BİR NEO-LİBERAL DEVLET ELEŞTİRİSİ OLARAK “I, DANİEL BLAKE” FİLMİNİN SİYASAL YÖNETSEL ANALİZİ

Öz

Cinema, as a cultural domain, represents its own period because it is included in a certain network of social, economic and political factors. This positioning also affects the structure of the cinema, thus, the communication style of movies. They raise certain arguments and suggest a particular point of view through designed symbolic elements. Ken Loach, in his films, tackles the economic and political problems that reveal the inequality and social contradictions of the period that he lived. Especially in his recent films, he examines the process in which neoliberalism became influential, and its economic and social consequences. “I, Daniel Blake” released at the end of 2016 is an example of political filmmaking of Loach as a character based on individual solidarity within the new state administration created by this economic system. The film is considered as a record of social life and highlights the inequality created by the capitalist economic order, despair despite strong individual solidarity against bureaucracy and its intertwined relationships with private companies. In this study, the analysis of the political arguments of “I, Daniel Blake”, by Ken Loach, will be based on the assumption that it represents the problems specific to the post-industrial society as the Postmodern Condition. Accordingly, the problems between the state and citizens in the restructuring process will be discussed in a theoretical context. The government style of the state in the film will be evaluated within the scope of the “Reinventing Government” project, and the defense of Citizen Blake will be interpreted as the expression of the criticism of the neoliberal form of government. Loach’s idiosyncratic expression will be considered as an example of political filmmaking. This study reviews the literature including books, articles and Internet resources.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ken Loach
• Daniel Blake
• Neoliberalism

Kaynakça

1. Alden, J.; Thomas, H. (1998). “Social Exclusion in Europe: Contex and Policy”, International Planning Studies, Vol:3, No.1, 1998, ss. 7-13.
2. Alfredo, Saad-Filho. (2008). “Washington Uzlaşmasından Washington Sonrası Uzlaşmasına: İktisadi Kalkınmaya Dair Neoliberal Gündemler”, Neoliberalizm: Muhalif Bir Seçki, Çev. Ş. Başlı, T. Öncel, İstanbul: Yordam Kitap.
3. Althusser, L. (1984). Essays on Ideology, Londra:.Verso,
4. Bayramoğlu, S. (2005). Yönetişim Zihniyeti: Türkiye’de Üst Kurullar ve Siyasal İktidarın Dönüşümü, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
5. Bradshaw, P. (2016). “I, Daniel Blake Review: Ken Loach's Welfare State Polemic is Blunt, Dignified and Brutally Moving”, The Guardian, 12 May 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/may/12/i-daniel-blake-ken-loachs-welfare-state-polemic-is-blunt-dignified-and-brutally-moving Erişim tarihi 25.11.2020
6. Cardulio, B. (2015). “Toplumsal Bilinç Sineması, Benim Adım Kes”, Ken Loach Söyleşileri Der: Yalur T. İstanbul: Agora Yayınları
7. Cox, R. K. (1998). “Locality and Community: Some Conceptual Issues”, European Planning Studies, Vol.6, No.1, February 1998,ss. 17-30
8. Day, W.; Shepperd, D.; Shaw, R. (2019). “Beyond the script: on the inclusion of film within a discursive analysis and the immaculate construction of Daniel Blake”, https://publications.aston.ac.uk/id/eprint/39494/1/_2019_Day_Shepperd_Shaw_Beyond_the_script_pre_publication_.pdf (Erişim Tarihi:23.05.2020)

9. Diken, B. ; Laustsen, B. C. (2014). Filmlerle Sosyoloji, Çev.: Sona Ertekin, İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
10. Fukuyama, F. (2005). Devlet İnşası, Çev.:Devrim Çetinkasap, İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
11. Fuller, G. (1998). Loach on Loach. Faber and Faber, UK.
12. Gibbons, A. (2017). “I, Daniel Blake”, Film Review, SAGE Publications, Urbanisation 2(2) ss.173–176 . http://journals.sagepub.com/home/urb (Erişim tarihi: 01.12.2020.)
13. Giles, G., (2017). “You Do Not Exist to Be Used‘: Dismantling Ideas of Productivity in Life” https://thebodyisnotanapology.com/magazine/you-are-more-than-what-you-do-dismantling-ideas-of-productivity-in-life-purpose/ (Erişim Tarihi 01.12.2020)
14. Gül, M. E.; Han T. Ş. (2020). “Ben Daniel Blake Filminin Bireyin Yaşlılık Dönemi Çatışmaları Bağlamında İncelenmesi”, İmgelem Dergisi, C:4, S:6, Temmuz 2020, ss. 157-176. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/imgelem/issue/55950/676536 (Erişim Tarihi 10.12.2020)
15. Gümüş M.; Öztürk M. (2019). “Politik Sinemada İşçi Sınıfı Temalarının İşlenişi: Ken Loach Sineması”, İş ve Hayat Dergisi, C: 5, S: 10, ss. 34-57. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/944085 (Erişim Tarihi: 26.05.2020)
16. Güzelsarı, S. (2002). “Dünya Ticaretinde Çok Taraflı Anlaşmalar Süreci”, Hizmet Ticaretinde Küreselleşme GATS Anlaşması, Ankara: Genel İş Matbaası. Harvey, D. (2015). Neoliberalizmin Kısa Tarihi, Çev. Aylin Onocak, İstanbul: Sel Yayıncılık.
17. Heywood, A. (2011). Siyaset Teorisine Giriş, Çev.: Hızır Murat Köse, İstanbul: Küre Yayınları.
18. Hornaday, A. (2017). “I, Daniel Blake: A Radiant Portrait of Resilience Amid Economic Despair”, The Washington Post, June 1st, 2017. https://www.washingtonpost.com/goingoutguide/movies/i-daniel-blake-a-radiant-portrait-of-resilience-amid-economic-despair/2017/06/01/2cf18916-455f-11e7-a196-a1bb629f64cb_story.html?utm_term=.4dc8cf329722 Erişim Tarihi:01.12.2020
19. Jessop, B. (2000). “The Changing Governance of Welfare: Recent Trends in its Primary Functions, Scale and Modes of Coordination”, New Risks, New Welfare: Signposts for Social Policy (Edt.Nick Manning, Ian Shaw), Massachusetts: Blackwell Publisher, ss. 12-24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317929284_The_changing_governance_of_welfare_Recent_trends_in_its_primary_functions_scale_and_modes_of_coordination/link/5951b7ab0f7e9b329234d5d9/download (Erişim Tarihi: 25.05.2020)
20. Kaplan, F. N. (2017). “Kültürel Hegemonyanın Kıskacında Yeni İnsan: Bir Kültür Eleştirisi Olarak Ken Loach Sineması”, Journal of Current Researches on SocialSciences (JoCReSS), Cilt:7, Sayı:1, 2017, ss.365-378. http://www.jocress.com/Makaleler/498550056_7-1-21_kaplan.pdf (Erişim tarihi (4.12.2020)
21. Kiely, R. (2005). The Clash of Globalisations Neo-Liberalism, The Third Way and Anti Globalisation, Boston: Brill Leiden.
22. Kozanoğlu, H.; Gür, N.; Özden, B. A. (2008). Neoliberalizmin Gerçek 100’ü, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
23. Medovoi, L. (2010). A Contribution to the Critique of Political Ecology: Sustainability as Disavowal‖, New Formations, 69: pp. 129–143. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233513945 (Erişim Tarihi: 25.11.2020)
24. Monaco, J. (2014). Bir Film Nasıl Okunur?, Çev.: Ertan Yılmaz, İstanbul: Oğlak Yayıncılık.
25. Morin, E. (2005). The Cinema or the Imaginary Man, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
26. Munck, R. (2008). “Neoliberalizm ve Siyaseti, Neoliberalizmin Siyaseti”, Neoliberalizm: Muhalif Bir Seçki, (Çev. Ş. Başlı, T. Öncel), İstanbul:Yordam Kitap.
27. Murray, J. (2017). “I, Daniel Blake”, Cineaste, Spring 2017, ss.49-51.
28. Nowell-Smith, G. (2008). Dünya Sinema Tarihi, Çev.: Ahmet Fethi İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınları.
29. O’Brien, N. (2018). “Administrative Justice in the Wake of I, Daniel Blake”, The Political Quarterly, Vol. 89, No. 1, January–March 2018, ss. 82-91.
30. Okyay, S. (1997). Proletaryanın Şairi: Ken(neth) Loach, Avrupalı Yönetmenler, Ankara: Kitle Yayınları.
31. Onaran, A. Ş. (1986). Sinemaya Giriş, İstanbul: Filiz Kitabevi,
32. Orhangazi, N. O. (2012). Politik Sinema Kavramı Üzerine Bir İnceleme: Demiryolculardan Postacılara Ken Loach Sineması, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İletişim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı.
33. Osborbe, D.; Gaebler T. (1992). Reinventing Government, USA: A William Patrick Book;,
34. Özman, A.; Bağır, İ. T. (2015). “İtalyan Yeni Gerçekçiliği ve Francesko Rosi’nin Politik Sineması”, Doğu Batı Dergisi, S: 73, Yıl: 18, Mayıs-Haziran-Temmuz 2015, ss. 109-139, Ankara: Doğu Batı Yayınları.
35. Petković, D. (2018). “The Neoliberal State And The Citizen in I, Daniel Blake” Facta Universitatis Linguistics and Literature, Vol. 16, No 2, pp. 167-180. https://doi.org/10.22190/FULL1802167P (Erişim tarihi: 23.05.2020)
36. Ryan, F. (2017). “I, Daniel Blake is a realistic depiction of life on benefits. Isn‘t it?”, The Guardian, 16 February 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/16/daniel-blake-realistic-life-benefits , (Erişim Tarihi:01.12.2020)
37. Ryan, M.; Kellner, D. (2010).Politik Kamera, Çev.: Elif Özsayar, İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
38. Savaşkan, O. (2009). “Neoliberalizm ve Yeni Sosyal Politika Ortamı: Türkiye’de Çalıştırma Programları ve Emek Piyasaları”, Türkiye’de Neoliberalizm: Demokrasi ve Ulus Devlet, 10. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Kongresi Metinleri, İstanbul: Yordam Kitap.
39. Taylor, M. (2015). “Vast social cleansing’ pushes tens of thousands of families out of London.” The Guardian, (2015, August 28)
40. The Trussel Trust. (2017). Early Warnings Universal Credit and Foodbanks, https://www.trusselltrust.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/04/Early-Warnings-Universal-Credit-and-Foodbanks.pdf (Erişim Tarihi 26.05.2020)
41. Wise, L. R.; Szücs, S. (1996). “The Public/Private Cleavage in a Welfare State: Attitudes Toward Public Management Reform”, Govarnance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, Vol:9, No. 1, January 1996, ss. 43-70.