Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2019, , 990 - 995, 04.11.2019
https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.425740

Abstract

References

  • [1] Errico D, Scrimieri F, Riccardi R, Fedeli R, Iarossi G. Trabeculectomy with double low dose of mitomycin C - two years of follow-up. Clin Ophthalmol 2011;5:1679-86.
  • [2] Azuara-Blanco A, Katz LJ. Dysfunctional filtering blebs. Surv Ophthalmol 1998;43:93-126.
  • [3] Yarangümeli A, Köz OG, Kural G. Encapsulated blebs following primary standard trabeculectomy: course and treatment. J Glaucoma 2004;13:251-5.
  • [4] Schwartz AL, Van Veldhuisen PC, Gaasterland DE, Ederer F, Sullivan EK, Cyrlin MN. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 5. Encapsulated bleb after initial trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;127:8-19.
  • [5] Van Buskirk EM. Cysts of Tenon’s capsule following filtration surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1982;94:522-7.
  • [6] Mandal AK. Results of medical management and mitomycin C-augmented excisional bleb revision for encapsulated filtering blebs. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1999;30:276-84.
  • [7] Ferrer H. Conjunctival dialysis in the treatment of glaucoma recurrent after sclerectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 1941;24:788-90.
  • [8] Addicks EM, Quigley HA, Green WR, Robin AL. Histologic characteristics of filtreing blebs in glaucomatous eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1983;101:795-8.
  • [9] Skuta GL, Parrish RK: II. Wound healing in glaucoma filtration surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 1987;32:149-70.
  • [10] Ophir A. Encapsulated filtering bleb. A selective review-new deductions. Eye 1992;6:348-52.
  • [11] Kapasi MS, Birt CM. The efficacy of 5-fluorouracil bleb needling performed 1 year or more posttrabeculectomy: a retrospective study. J Glaucoma 2009;18:144-8.
  • [12] Paris G, Zhao M, Sponsel WE. Operative revision of non-functioning filtering blebs with 5-fluorouracil to regain intraocular pressure control. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2004;32:378-82.
  • [13] Broadway DC, Bloom PA, Bunce C, Thiagarajan M, Khaw PT. Needle revision of failing and failed trabeculectomy blebs with adjunctive 5-fluorouracil: survival analysis. Ophthalmology 2004;111:665-73.
  • [14] Suzuki R, Susanna R Jr. Early transconjunctival needling revision with 5-fluorouracil versus medical treatment in encapsulated blebs: a 12-month prospective study. Clinics (sao Paulo) 2013;68:1376-9.
  • [15] Panarelli JF, Vinod K, Huang G, Sidoti PA. Transconjunctival revision with mitomycin-C following failed trabeculectomy. J Glaucoma 2016;25:618-22.
  • [16] Mardelli PG, Lederer CM Jr, Murray PL, Pastor SA, Hassanein KM. Slit-lamp needle revision of failed filtering blebs using mitomycin C. Ophthalmology 1996;103:1946-55.
  • [17] Palejwala N, Ichhpujani P, Fakhraie G, Myers JS, Moster MR, Katz LJ. Single needle revision of failing filtration blebs: a retrospective comparative case series with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C. Eur J Ophthalmol 2010;20:1026-34.
  • [18] Anand N, Khan AJ. Glaucoma. Long-term outcomes of needle revision of trabeculectomy blebs with mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil: a comparative safety and efficacy report. J Glaucoma 2009;18:513-20.
  • [19] Iwach AG, Delgado MF, Novack GD, Nguyen N, Wong PC. Transconjunctival mitomycin-C in needle revisions of filtering blebs. Ophthalmology 2003;110:734-42.
  • [20] Gutierrez-Ortiz C, Cabarga C, Teus MA. Prospective evaluation of preoperative factors associated with successful mitomycin C needling of failed filtration blebs. J Glaucoma 2006;15:98-102.
  • [21] Shetty RK, Wartluft L, Moster MR. Slit-lamp needle revision of failed fi ltering blebs using high-dose mitomycin C. J Glaucoma 2005;14:52-6.
  • [22] Shin DH, Kim YY, Ginde SY, Kim PH, Eliassi-Rad B, Khatana AK, et al. Risk factors for failure of 5-fluorouracil needling revision for failed conjunctival filtration blebs. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;132:875-80.
  • [23] Rashad MA. Efficacy of repeated 5-fluorouracil needling for failing and failed filtering surgeries based on simple gonioscopic examination. Clin Ophthalmol 2013;7:15-22.

The efficacy of bleb needling revision with 5-fluorouracil in encapsulated bleb after unsuccessful trabeculectomy

Year 2019, , 990 - 995, 04.11.2019
https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.425740

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy of the bleb needling
revision (BNR) procedure with the adjunctive use of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) in
encapsulated bleb after unsuccessful trabeculectomy.

Methods: We reviewed 16 eyes of 15 subjects who underwent BNR
procedure
due to encapsulated
bleb after unsuccessful trabeculectomy. Demographic data, type of glaucoma,
intraocular pressure (IOP) values of pre-BNR, IOP values of post-BNR at first
day, first week and first month, follow up time and complications were recorded
from patients’ files,
retrospectively.

Results: The mean follow up time was
53.1 ± 26.4 weeks.
The average
time between previous unsuccessful trabeculectomy and BNR
was 11.12 ± 8.79 weeks. The mean IOP
of pre-BNR was 26.0 
± 4.4 mmHg and
significantly decreased to 12.4 ± 5.0 mmHg post-BNR at the first day (
p <
0.001). The mean IOP values of post-BNR at the first week was 13.3 ± 4.9 mmHg
and at the first month was 14.8 ± 4.8 mmHg. According to the
mean IOP of
pre-BNR,
the mean IOP values of
post-BNR at the first week and at the first month were significantly lower (p <
0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Seven (44%) eyes were achieved success and
eight (50%) eyes were achieved
qualified success. One (6%) eye was
classified as the failure.







Conclusion: The bleb needling revision procedure with the
adjunctive use of 5-FU in encapsulated bleb after unsuccessful trabeculectomy
is a simple, useful and repeatable method to restore the dysfunctional bleb. 

References

  • [1] Errico D, Scrimieri F, Riccardi R, Fedeli R, Iarossi G. Trabeculectomy with double low dose of mitomycin C - two years of follow-up. Clin Ophthalmol 2011;5:1679-86.
  • [2] Azuara-Blanco A, Katz LJ. Dysfunctional filtering blebs. Surv Ophthalmol 1998;43:93-126.
  • [3] Yarangümeli A, Köz OG, Kural G. Encapsulated blebs following primary standard trabeculectomy: course and treatment. J Glaucoma 2004;13:251-5.
  • [4] Schwartz AL, Van Veldhuisen PC, Gaasterland DE, Ederer F, Sullivan EK, Cyrlin MN. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 5. Encapsulated bleb after initial trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;127:8-19.
  • [5] Van Buskirk EM. Cysts of Tenon’s capsule following filtration surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1982;94:522-7.
  • [6] Mandal AK. Results of medical management and mitomycin C-augmented excisional bleb revision for encapsulated filtering blebs. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1999;30:276-84.
  • [7] Ferrer H. Conjunctival dialysis in the treatment of glaucoma recurrent after sclerectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 1941;24:788-90.
  • [8] Addicks EM, Quigley HA, Green WR, Robin AL. Histologic characteristics of filtreing blebs in glaucomatous eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1983;101:795-8.
  • [9] Skuta GL, Parrish RK: II. Wound healing in glaucoma filtration surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 1987;32:149-70.
  • [10] Ophir A. Encapsulated filtering bleb. A selective review-new deductions. Eye 1992;6:348-52.
  • [11] Kapasi MS, Birt CM. The efficacy of 5-fluorouracil bleb needling performed 1 year or more posttrabeculectomy: a retrospective study. J Glaucoma 2009;18:144-8.
  • [12] Paris G, Zhao M, Sponsel WE. Operative revision of non-functioning filtering blebs with 5-fluorouracil to regain intraocular pressure control. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2004;32:378-82.
  • [13] Broadway DC, Bloom PA, Bunce C, Thiagarajan M, Khaw PT. Needle revision of failing and failed trabeculectomy blebs with adjunctive 5-fluorouracil: survival analysis. Ophthalmology 2004;111:665-73.
  • [14] Suzuki R, Susanna R Jr. Early transconjunctival needling revision with 5-fluorouracil versus medical treatment in encapsulated blebs: a 12-month prospective study. Clinics (sao Paulo) 2013;68:1376-9.
  • [15] Panarelli JF, Vinod K, Huang G, Sidoti PA. Transconjunctival revision with mitomycin-C following failed trabeculectomy. J Glaucoma 2016;25:618-22.
  • [16] Mardelli PG, Lederer CM Jr, Murray PL, Pastor SA, Hassanein KM. Slit-lamp needle revision of failed filtering blebs using mitomycin C. Ophthalmology 1996;103:1946-55.
  • [17] Palejwala N, Ichhpujani P, Fakhraie G, Myers JS, Moster MR, Katz LJ. Single needle revision of failing filtration blebs: a retrospective comparative case series with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C. Eur J Ophthalmol 2010;20:1026-34.
  • [18] Anand N, Khan AJ. Glaucoma. Long-term outcomes of needle revision of trabeculectomy blebs with mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil: a comparative safety and efficacy report. J Glaucoma 2009;18:513-20.
  • [19] Iwach AG, Delgado MF, Novack GD, Nguyen N, Wong PC. Transconjunctival mitomycin-C in needle revisions of filtering blebs. Ophthalmology 2003;110:734-42.
  • [20] Gutierrez-Ortiz C, Cabarga C, Teus MA. Prospective evaluation of preoperative factors associated with successful mitomycin C needling of failed filtration blebs. J Glaucoma 2006;15:98-102.
  • [21] Shetty RK, Wartluft L, Moster MR. Slit-lamp needle revision of failed fi ltering blebs using high-dose mitomycin C. J Glaucoma 2005;14:52-6.
  • [22] Shin DH, Kim YY, Ginde SY, Kim PH, Eliassi-Rad B, Khatana AK, et al. Risk factors for failure of 5-fluorouracil needling revision for failed conjunctival filtration blebs. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;132:875-80.
  • [23] Rashad MA. Efficacy of repeated 5-fluorouracil needling for failing and failed filtering surgeries based on simple gonioscopic examination. Clin Ophthalmol 2013;7:15-22.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Ophthalmology
Journal Section Original Articles
Authors

Mehmet Okka 0000-0002-3908-1042

Enver Mirza 0000-0002-8847-5726

Refik Oltulu 0000-0003-2447-6524

Selman Belviranlı This is me 0000-0002-4177-6046

Mehmet Kemal Gündüz This is me 0000-0001-9105-6429

Publication Date November 4, 2019
Submission Date May 21, 2018
Acceptance Date January 22, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019

Cite

AMA Okka M, Mirza E, Oltulu R, Belviranlı S, Gündüz MK. The efficacy of bleb needling revision with 5-fluorouracil in encapsulated bleb after unsuccessful trabeculectomy. Eur Res J. November 2019;5(6):990-995. doi:10.18621/eurj.425740

e-ISSN: 2149-3189 


The European Research Journal, hosted by Turkish JournalPark ACADEMIC, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

by-nc-nd.png

2025