Effect of pressure wound dressing using elastic bandage following axillary dissection compared to standard wound dressing on postoperative seroma development and surgical complications

Year 2025, EARLY ONLINE, 1 - 10

Kadriye Acar , Yeliz Yılmaz Bozok

https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1693148

Abstract

Objectives: Postoperative seroma is a common complication following breast surgery and axillary dissection. This issue persists despite attempts to prevent seroma, including intraoperative fibrin isolation, application of thrombin spray, fascia treatment techniques, and shoulder immobilization. This study aims to evaluate the impact of pressure wound dressings on the development of postoperative seroma after axillary dissection.

Methods: This is a randomized, controlled prospective study involving 63 patients. Pressure wound dressings were applied to patients in the intervention group (n=32), while standard dressings were applied to those in the control group (n=31). Both groups were compared regarding the postoperative length of stay for the drain catheter, the amount of drainage, duration of hospital stay, postoperative pain levels on the 1st, 3rd, and 10th days, as well as rates of reoperation and rehospitalization.

Results: The study indicated that the daily and total fluid drainage was significantly lower in the pressure wound dressing group. Moreover, postoperative pain scores on the 1st, 3rd, and 10th days, as well as the duration of hospital stay for patients after surgery, were notably lower in this group.

Conclusions: The use of pressure wound dressings significantly reduces fluid drainage and postoperative pain in patients undergoing axillary dissection. This approach holds promise for decreasing postoperative complications.

Keywords

Axillary dissection , pressure dressing , seroma , mastectomy

Ethical Statement

The study was approved by the Izmir Katip Çelebi University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Decision no.: 0537 and date: 23.12.2021).

References

• 1. Sancho-Garnier H, Colonna M. [Breast cancer epidemiology]. Presse Med. 2019; 48(10): 1076-1084. doi:10.1016/j.lpm.2019.09.022. [Article in French]
• 2. Harbeck N, Penault-Llorca F, Cortes J, et al. Breast cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019; 5(1):66. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0111-2.
• 3. Harbeck N. Breast cancer is a systemic disease optimally treated by a multidisciplinary team. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6(1):30. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0167-z.
• 4. Moo TA, Sanford R, Dang C, Morrow M. Overview of Breast Cancer Therapy. PET Clin. 2018;13(3):339-354. doi:10.1016/j.cpet.2018.02.006.
• 5. Veronesi P, Corso G. Standard and controversies in sentinel node in breast cancer patients. Breast. 2019;48 Suppl 1:S53-56. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9776(19)31124-5.
• 6. Sevensma KE, Lewis CR. Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy. [Updated 2023 Jul 3]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553184/
• 7. Pogson CJ, Adwani A, Ebbs SR. Seroma following breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;29(9):711-717. doi:10.1016/s0748-7983(03)00096-9.
• 8. McCaul JA, Aslaam A, Spooner RJ, Louden I, Cavanagh T, Purushotham AD. Aetiology of seroma formation in patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer. Breast. 2000;9(3):144-148. doi: 10.1054/brst.1999.0126.
• 9. Chang YT, Shih SL, Loh EW, Tam KW. Effects of Fibrin Sealant on Seroma Reduction for Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Axillary Dissection: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(13):5286-5295. doi:10.1245/s10434-020-08747-5.
• 10. Cong Y, Cao J, Qiao G et al. Fascia Suture Technique Is a Simple Approach to Reduce Postmastectomy Seroma Formation. J Breast Cancer. 2020;23(5):533-541. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2020.23.e51.
• 11. Douay N, Akerman G, Clément D, Malartic C, Morel O, Barranger E. [Seroma after axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2008;36(2):130-135. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2007.07.040. [Article in French]
• 12. CDC, National Healthcare Safety Network. Surgical Site Infection Event (SSI). January 2021, available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf.
• 13. O'Hea BJ, Ho MN, Petrek JA. External compression dressing versus standard dressing after axillary lymphadenectomy. Am J Surg. 1999;177(6):450-453. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00089-6.
• 14. Kottayasamy Seenivasagam R, Gupta V, Singh G. Prevention of seroma formation after axillary dissection--a comparative randomized clinical trial of three methods. Breast J. 2013;19(5): 478-484. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12164.
• 15. Thomson DR, Sadideen H, Furniss D. Wound drainage after axillary dissection for carcinoma of the breast. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(10):CD006823. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006823.pub2.
• 16. Esen E, Saydam M, Guler S et al. Successful use of minimal invasive debridement plus negative pressure wound therapy under skin flap and axillary region for refractory postmastectomy seroma: A STROBE-compliant retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(43):e31634. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031634.