Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Koyunlarda intravajinal sünger uygulamasına bağlı vajinitis olgularından izole edilen aerobik bakteriler ve antibiyotik duyarlılıkları

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 1, 7 - 10, 01.06.2011

Öz

Bu çalışmada, intravajinal sünger uygulamaları sonrası vajinitis oluşan koyunlardan, aerobik bakterilerin izolasyonu, identifikasyonu ve izole edilen etkenlerin antibiyotik duyarlılıklarının saptanması amaçlandı. Çalışmada, bakteriyel vajinitis infeksiyonlarından, 18 (%42.85) Escherichia coli, 15 (%35.71) Bacillus spp., 2 (%4.76) Klebsiella pneumonia, 4 (%9.52) Corynebacterium spp., 1 (%2.38) Pseudomonas aureginosa ve 2 (%4.76) Staphylococcus aureus izole ve identifiye edildi. İzole edilen etkenlerin yapılan antibiyogramları sonucunda ampisilin, penisilin, eritromisin ve amoksisiline yüksek oranda dirençli ve gentamisin, trimetoprim-sulfametoksazol, sefuroksim, nalidiksik asit, norfloksasin, tetrasiklin ve streptomisine ise duyarlı oldukları belirlendi. Sonuç olarak, sünger uygulamalarından sonra yaygın olarak gelişen vajinitis infeksiyonlarından E.coli ve Bacillus spp. etkenlerinin yüksek oranda izole edildiği, izole edilen etkenlerin ampisilin, penisilin, eritromisin ve amoksisiline dirençli olduğu, kullanılan diğer antibiyotiklere karşı genel olarak duyarlı oldukları kanısına varıldı.

Kaynakça

  • Bauer AU, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Tack M, (1966). Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. J Clin Pathol. 45, 493-494.
  • Guerra, MMP, Mota RA, Mergulhao FCC, Lima RF, Souza AF, Melo EH, Silva KPC, Soares PC, (2002). Study of the microbial flora and evaluation of the effectiveness of Gentocin (R) 40mg in the prevention of vaginal infection in dairy goats submitted to estrous synchronization. A Hora Vet. 22, 13-17.
  • Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM, Schreckenberger PC, Winn WC, (1997). Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology, Fifth edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia. p: 211-765.
  • Manes J, Fiorentino MA, Kaiser G, Hozbor F, Alberio R, Sanchez E, Paolicchi F, (2010). Changes in the aerobic vaginal flora after treatment with different intravaginal devices in ewes. Small Rumin Res. 94, 201-204.
  • Martins G, Figueira L, Penna B, Brandao F, Varges R, Vasconcelos C, Lilenbaum W, (2009). Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility if vaginal bacteria from ewes treated with progestin-impregnated intravaginal sponges. Small Rumin Res. 81, 182-184.
  • Menchaca A, Rubianes E, (2004). New treatments associated with timed artificial insemination in small ruminants. Reprod Fert Develop. 16, 403-413.
  • Motlomelo KC, Greyling JPC, Schwalbach LMJ, (2002). Synchronisation of oestrus in goats: the use of different progestagen treatments. Small Rumin Res. 45, 45-49.
  • National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (2004). Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals; informational supplement.M31-S1 National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA.
  • Özyurtlu N, Yeşilmen S, Küçükaslan İ, (2008). The effectiveness of using antibiotic with intravaginal sponge and duration of sponge teratments on the vaginal fl ora and fertility in anestrous ewes. J Anim Vet Adv. 7(6), 723-727.
  • Quinn PJ, Carter ME, Markey B, Carter GR, (1999). Clinical Veterinary Microbiology. Wolfe Publication London, UK.
  • Sargison ND, Howie F, Mearns R, Penny CD, Foster G, (2007). Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli as a perennial cause of abortion in a closed flock of Suffolk ewes. Vet Rec. 160, 875-876.
  • Scudamore CL, (1988). Intravaginal sponge insertion technique. Vet Rec. 123, 554.
  • Suarez G, Zunino P, Carol H, Ungerfeld R, (2006). Changes in the aerobic vaginal bacterial mucous load and assessment of the susceptibility to antibiotics after treatment with intravaginal sponges in anestrus ewes. Small Rumin. Res. 63, 39-43.

Aerobic bacteria and their antibiotic susceptibility of sheep with vaginitis due to intravaginal sponges application

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 1, 7 - 10, 01.06.2011

Öz

The aim of this study, was to isolate, identificate aerobic bacteria and determine antibiotic susceptibility of isolated agents in sheep with vaginitis due to intravaginal sponges application. In the study, 18 (42.85%) Escherichia coli, 15 (35.71%) Bacillus spp., 2 (4.76%) Klebsiella pneumoniae, 4 (9.52%) Corynebacterium spp., 1 (2.38%) Pseudomonas aureginosa and 2 (4.76%) Staphylococcus aureus were isolated and identified from bacterial vaginitis infections. As a result of antibiotic susceptibility; the agents are highly resistant against ampicillin, penicillin, erythromycin, amoxicillin, and sensitive to gentamicin, trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole, cefuroxime, nalidixic acid, norfloxacin, tetracycline and streptomycine. As a result, E.coli and Bacillus spp. were highly isolated from vaginitis infections due to intravaginal sponges applications. It has been concluded that isolated agents were resistant to ampicillin, penicillin, erythromycin and amoxicillin and in general, sensitive to other antibiotics.

Kaynakça

  • Bauer AU, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Tack M, (1966). Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. J Clin Pathol. 45, 493-494.
  • Guerra, MMP, Mota RA, Mergulhao FCC, Lima RF, Souza AF, Melo EH, Silva KPC, Soares PC, (2002). Study of the microbial flora and evaluation of the effectiveness of Gentocin (R) 40mg in the prevention of vaginal infection in dairy goats submitted to estrous synchronization. A Hora Vet. 22, 13-17.
  • Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM, Schreckenberger PC, Winn WC, (1997). Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology, Fifth edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia. p: 211-765.
  • Manes J, Fiorentino MA, Kaiser G, Hozbor F, Alberio R, Sanchez E, Paolicchi F, (2010). Changes in the aerobic vaginal flora after treatment with different intravaginal devices in ewes. Small Rumin Res. 94, 201-204.
  • Martins G, Figueira L, Penna B, Brandao F, Varges R, Vasconcelos C, Lilenbaum W, (2009). Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility if vaginal bacteria from ewes treated with progestin-impregnated intravaginal sponges. Small Rumin Res. 81, 182-184.
  • Menchaca A, Rubianes E, (2004). New treatments associated with timed artificial insemination in small ruminants. Reprod Fert Develop. 16, 403-413.
  • Motlomelo KC, Greyling JPC, Schwalbach LMJ, (2002). Synchronisation of oestrus in goats: the use of different progestagen treatments. Small Rumin Res. 45, 45-49.
  • National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (2004). Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals; informational supplement.M31-S1 National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA.
  • Özyurtlu N, Yeşilmen S, Küçükaslan İ, (2008). The effectiveness of using antibiotic with intravaginal sponge and duration of sponge teratments on the vaginal fl ora and fertility in anestrous ewes. J Anim Vet Adv. 7(6), 723-727.
  • Quinn PJ, Carter ME, Markey B, Carter GR, (1999). Clinical Veterinary Microbiology. Wolfe Publication London, UK.
  • Sargison ND, Howie F, Mearns R, Penny CD, Foster G, (2007). Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli as a perennial cause of abortion in a closed flock of Suffolk ewes. Vet Rec. 160, 875-876.
  • Scudamore CL, (1988). Intravaginal sponge insertion technique. Vet Rec. 123, 554.
  • Suarez G, Zunino P, Carol H, Ungerfeld R, (2006). Changes in the aerobic vaginal bacterial mucous load and assessment of the susceptibility to antibiotics after treatment with intravaginal sponges in anestrus ewes. Small Rumin. Res. 63, 39-43.
Toplam 13 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Veteriner Cerrahi
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Osman Yaşar Tel Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2011
Gönderilme Tarihi 1 Aralık 2011
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2011 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Tel, O. Y. (2011). Koyunlarda intravajinal sünger uygulamasına bağlı vajinitis olgularından izole edilen aerobik bakteriler ve antibiyotik duyarlılıkları. Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi, 22(1), 7-10.


15430