Learning and teaching styles in learning and teaching foreign languages are two
interrelated areas. A study in one of these fields sheds light on the other. Therefore,
interest in how people learn and how they prefer learning has increased over the years
due to an extensive amount of literature available pertaining to both learning styles and
teaching styles. Thus, this research is grounded in clarifying the relationship between
ENG 101 1 students’ preferred perceptual learning styles and their success in a reading
test. In this regard, this paper is concerned with identifying the preferred perceptual
learning styles of university students (N= 154) considering their age, gender and
countries to determine if relationships exist between students’ success in an IELTS
reading test and preferred perceptual learning style. This study is significant as the
number of studies based on examining the relationships between success in reading
skills and perceptual learning styles is limited. Data were gathered from Reid’s PLSPQ
to determine the focused participants’ preferred perceptual learning styles and an IELTS
reading test to investigate the relationship between individuals’ preferred perceptual
learning styles and their success in the reading test. In the analysis of the data, a t-test
and ANOVA were applied. Thus, this survey is both qualitative and quantitative. The results show there was a statistical difference between students’ success in the IELTS
reading test and preferred perceptual learning style as kinaesthetic learners significantly
outperformed other learner groups.
Learning and teaching styles in learning and teaching foreign languages are two
interrelated areas. A study in one of these fields sheds light on the other. Therefore,
interest in how people learn and how they prefer learning has increased over the years
due to an extensive amount of literature available pertaining to both learning styles and
teaching styles. Thus, this research is grounded in clarifying the relationship between
ENG 101 1 students’ preferred perceptual learning styles and their success in a reading
test. In this regard, this paper is concerned with identifying the preferred perceptual
learning styles of university students (N= 154) considering their age, gender and
countries to determine if relationships exist between students’ success in an IELTS
reading test and preferred perceptual learning style. This study is significant as the
number of studies based on examining the relationships between success in reading
skills and perceptual learning styles is limited. Data were gathered from Reid’s PLSPQ
to determine the focused participants’ preferred perceptual learning styles and an IELTS
reading test to investigate the relationship between individuals’ preferred perceptual
learning styles and their success in the reading test. In the analysis of the data, a t-test
and ANOVA were applied. Thus, this survey is both qualitative and quantitative. The results show there was a statistical difference between students’ success in the IELTS
reading test and preferred perceptual learning style as kinaesthetic learners significantly
outperformed other learner groups.
Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
---|---|
Konular | İletişim ve Medya Çalışmaları |
Bölüm | Derleme Makaleleri -Compilation Articles |
Yazarlar | |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | 6 Kasım 2018 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2018 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 96 |
Derginin yayım dili Türkçe ve İngilizce’dir, ayrıca Türkçe de olsa tüm basılan makalelerin başlık, öz ve anahtar sözcükleri İngilizce olarak da makalede bulunur. Hakemlerden onay almış Türkçe makaleler için 750-1000 sözcükten oluşan genişletilmiş özet (extended summary) gereklidir. Elektronik çeviriler kabul edilmez.
Dergi TR-Dizin, Web of Science (ESCI), DOAJ ile diğer pek çok dizin tarafından taranmaktadır. Scimagoe quartile değeri: Q2 'dir:
TR DIZIN 2020 Etik Kriterleri kapsamında, dergimize 2020 yılından itibaren etik kurul izni gerektiren çalışmalar için makalenin yöntem bölümünde ilgili Etik Kurul Onayı ile ilgili bilgilere (kurul-tarih-sayı) yer verilmesi gerekecektir. Bu nedenle dergimize makale gönderecek olan yazarlarımızın ilgili kriteri göz önünde bulundurarak makalelerini düzenlemeleri önemle rica olunur.
Alan Editörleri/ Field Editörs
Halkbilimi/Folklore
Prof.Dr. Hande Birkalan-Gedik (JohannWolfgang-Goethe İniversitet-birkalan-gedik@m.uni-frankfurt.de)
Prof.Dr. Ali Yakıcı (Gazi Üniversitesi-yakici@gazi.edu.tr)
Prof.Dr. Aynur Koçak (Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi-nurkocak@yildiz.edu.tr)
Prof.Dr. Işıl Altun ( (Regensburg Üniversitesi/Kocaeli Üniversitesi-İsil.Altun@zsk.uni-regensburg.de)
Edebiyat/Literature
Prof.Dr. Abdullah Uçman (Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi -emekli-29 MayısÜniversitesi-abdullahucman@29mayis.edu.tr
Prof. Dr. Ramazan Korkmaz (Ardahan Üniversitesi-emekli-Kafkasya Üniversiteler Birliği -KÜNİB-r_korkmaz@hotmail.com)
Prof.Dr. Emel Kefeli (Marmara Üniversitesi-emekli-İstanbul 29 Mayıs Üniversitesi-ayseemelkefeli @gmail.com)
Prof.Dr. Zekiye Antakyalıoğlu ( İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi-zekabe@hotmail.com)
Antropoloji/Anthropology
Prof.Dr. Hanife Aliefendioğlu (Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi-hanife.aliefendioglu@emu.edu.tr)
Prof. Dr. Şebnem Pala Güzel (Başkent Üniversitesi-sebnempa@baskent.edu.tr)
Prof.Dr. Derya Atamtürk Duyar (İstanbul Üniversitesi-datamturk@istanbul.edu.tr)
Prof.Dr. Meryem Bulut (Ankara Üniversitesi-meryem.bulut@gmail.com)
Dil-Dilbilim/Language-Linguistics
Prof.Dr. Nurettin Demir (Hacettepe Üniversitesi-demir@hacettepe.edu.tr)
Prof. Dr. Aysu Erden (Maltepe Üniversitesi-aysuerden777@gmail.com)
Prof.Dr. Sema Aslan Demir (Hacettepe Üniversitesi-semaaslan@hacettepe.edu.tr)