Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Türkiye’de Heteropatriyarkal Ailenin İnşası ve Muhalif Cinsellikler

Year 2011, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 55 - 64, 01.01.2011
https://doi.org/10.1501/Fe0001_0000000044

Abstract

Bu metnin temel amacı ulus-devletlerin tabiyetleri altındaki vatandaşların bedenleri üzerinden, cinsiyeti ve cinselliği kullanarak hem kendi nüfuslarını idame ettiklerini hem de küresel anlamda sınır belilerdiklerini örnekler üzerinden tartışarak, Türkiyenin hetropatriyarkal rejimi içerisinde eşcinsellere ebeveynlik yolunun nasıl ve neden kapalı tuttulduğunu irdelemek. Cinsel yönelim konusunun sadece heteroseksüel normdan sapma gösteren küçük bir azınlığı ilgilendirdiği savı üzerinden heteroseksüelliğin doğallaştırılmasını tartışmaya açıyor. Ulus devletin temellerinden biri olarak heteropatriarkal aileyi, milliyetçilik bağlamında annelik kurumunu ve ebeveynliğe giden yollların hangi sebepler ve yöntemlerle cinsel muhaliflere kapatıldığını anlatıyor

References

  • Acara, Eda. A Case Study on the Discourse of Women’s Conscientious Objection in Turkey unpublished MA thesis. Saint Mary’sUniversity, Halifax, 2010.
  • Bayraktar, Sevi. Makbul Anneler Müstakbel Vatandaşlar: Neoliberal Beden Politikalarında Annelik. (Ankara: Ayizi Kitap, 2011).
  • Bereket, Tarik and Barry Adams. “The Emergence of Gay Identities in Contemporary Turkey.” Sexualities, 9:31 (2006). Retrieved 3 October, 2009.
  • Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York: Routledge, 1990).
  • Butler, Judith. Frames of War: When is Life Grievable. (London: Verso, 2010).
  • Butler, Judith. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. (London: Verso, 2004).
  • Delice, Serkan. ‘Osmanlı’yı Bugün Nasıl Tefsir Ediyoruz? Tarih ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Üzerine Düşünceler’ (How do we conceptualize the Ottoman today? Thoughts on History and Gender), Cinsiyet Halleri: Türkiye’de Toplumsal Cinsiyet’in Kesişim Sınırları, (ed.) Nil Mutluer (Istanbul: Varlık, 2008): 72-87.
  • Eng, David L., Judith Halberstam, José Esteban Muñoz “What is Queer about Queer Studies Now?” A Special Issue of Social Text. Number 84-85 (2005). http://www.dukeupress.edu/Catalog/ViewProduct.php?productid=15316
  • Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies (HUIP), Turkey Demographic and Health Survey 2008, (Ankara
  • Hacettepe University Press. 2009)
  • Hürriyet Sunday Supplement, “Homosexuality is a Disease’ says Turkish Minister,” (March 7, 2010). http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=8216homosexuality-is-a-disease8217-says-minister-2010-03-07
  • Ilkkaracan, Pınar. “Turkey: How Adultery Almost Derailed Turkey's Aspiration to Join the European Union” in Sexpolitics Richard Parker (ed.). Sexuality Polity Watch (2007): 247-275
  • Jacobsen, Janet R. “Queer is? Queer Does? Normativity and the Problem of Resistance”. GLQ 4:4. Duke University Press. (1998): 511-536.
  • Kurtoğlu, Ayça. “Sex Reassignment, Biological Reproduction and Sexual Citizenship in Turkey,” Fe Dergi 1/2 (2009): 88.
  • Manalansan, Martin. “Race, Violence and Neoliberal Spatial Politics in the Global City” Social Text 84-85, Vol 23, Nos 3-4, Fall-Winter (2005).
  • Massad, Joseph. “Re-Orienting Gay Desire: the Gay International and the Arab World.” Public Culture, 14-2, pp. 361- (2002) http://muse.jhu.edu.proxy.queensu.ca/journals/public_culture/v014/14.2massad.pdf
  • Mohanty, Chandra T. Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory Practising Solidarity. (New Delhi: Raj Press, ). Oktem, Kerem. “Another Struggle: Sexual Identity Politics in Unsettled Turkey.” (2008). http://www.zcommunications.org/another-struggle-sexual-identity-politics-in-unsettled-turkey-by-kerem-ktem
  • Öz, Yasemin. “Görünmezlik Kıskacında Lezbiyenler.” İn Cinsiyet halleri: Türkiye’de Toplumsal Cinsiyetin Kesişim Sınırları Nil Mutluer (ed.) (Istanbul: Varlık Yayınları, 2008).
  • Puar, Jaspir. “Introduction: Homonationalism and Biopolitics.” Pp.1-37 in Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. (USA: Duke University Press, 2007).
  • Rich, Adrienne. “Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence” Signs, Vol 5, No 4. (1980). http://www.jstor.org/stable/3173834
  • Rich, Adrienne. Of Women Born: Motherhood as an Experience and as Institution. (New York: Norton& Company, Said, Edward. Introduction in Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient (London: Penguin, 1995 Revisited edition).
  • Sancar, Serpil. “Otoriter Türk Modernleşmesinin Cinsiyet Rejimi” (The Sexual Regime of the Turkish Authoritarian Modernization), Doğu Batı, Özel Sayı: İdeolojiler II, no.29. (2004).
  • Sedgwick, Eve K. Epistemology of the Closet. (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1990).
  • Seidman, Steven. Difference Troubles: Queering Social Theory and Sexual Politics (UK: Cambridge University Press, ). Selek, Pınar. Sürüne Sürüne Erkek Olmak (Crawling to be a Man) (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2008).
  • Selek, Pınar. Maskeler, Süvariler, Gacılar (Istanbul: Aykırı Yayıncılık, 2001).
  • Serifsoy, Selda. “Aile ve Kemalist Modernizasyon Projesi, 1928-1950” in (ed.)Ayse Gul Altınay Vatan Millet
  • Kadınlar (Istanbul: İletisim yayıncılık, 2000): 167-201
  • Smith, Andrea. “Heteropatriarchy and the Three Pillars of White Supremacy” in Color of Violence: INCITE Women of Color against Violence. (2006).
  • Tekeli, Sirin. ed. Women in Modern Turkish Society (London and New Jersey: Zed Books, 1995).
  • Warner, Michael. Fear of a Queer Planet: Queer Politics and Social Theory (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993)
  • Wittig, Monique. “The Category of Sex”, in The Straight Mind and Other Essays (Boston: Beacon Press, 1992).
  • Ze'vi, Dror. Producing Desire: Changing Sexual Discourse in the Ottoman Middle East, 1500-1900 (London, England
  • University of California Press, 2006).
  • Zürcher, E. J. Turkey: A Modern History. (New York: I.B.Taurus, 2004).

The Construction of Heteropatriarchal Family and Dissident Sexualities in Turkey

Year 2011, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 55 - 64, 01.01.2011
https://doi.org/10.1501/Fe0001_0000000044

Abstract

Nation states create their sexual regimes not only to discipline and manage the populations within the state but also to establish their differences from other states and set their borders through the bodies of the citizens under their mandate. The article contends that heterosexuality is naturalised through the argument that sexual orientation is an issue which concerns only a small minority of the population that deviates from the norm. In Turkey, the depiction of a homosexual category, that is hyper-sexualized and devoid of parenting abilities works in the construction of the heteropatriarchal family, which constitutes one of the main pillars of the nation state. The article scrutinizes the institution of motherhood in relation to the nationalist ideology, why parenting is reserved only for heterosexual people and how sexual dissidents are excluded from the practices of parenting a child

References

  • Acara, Eda. A Case Study on the Discourse of Women’s Conscientious Objection in Turkey unpublished MA thesis. Saint Mary’sUniversity, Halifax, 2010.
  • Bayraktar, Sevi. Makbul Anneler Müstakbel Vatandaşlar: Neoliberal Beden Politikalarında Annelik. (Ankara: Ayizi Kitap, 2011).
  • Bereket, Tarik and Barry Adams. “The Emergence of Gay Identities in Contemporary Turkey.” Sexualities, 9:31 (2006). Retrieved 3 October, 2009.
  • Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York: Routledge, 1990).
  • Butler, Judith. Frames of War: When is Life Grievable. (London: Verso, 2010).
  • Butler, Judith. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. (London: Verso, 2004).
  • Delice, Serkan. ‘Osmanlı’yı Bugün Nasıl Tefsir Ediyoruz? Tarih ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Üzerine Düşünceler’ (How do we conceptualize the Ottoman today? Thoughts on History and Gender), Cinsiyet Halleri: Türkiye’de Toplumsal Cinsiyet’in Kesişim Sınırları, (ed.) Nil Mutluer (Istanbul: Varlık, 2008): 72-87.
  • Eng, David L., Judith Halberstam, José Esteban Muñoz “What is Queer about Queer Studies Now?” A Special Issue of Social Text. Number 84-85 (2005). http://www.dukeupress.edu/Catalog/ViewProduct.php?productid=15316
  • Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies (HUIP), Turkey Demographic and Health Survey 2008, (Ankara
  • Hacettepe University Press. 2009)
  • Hürriyet Sunday Supplement, “Homosexuality is a Disease’ says Turkish Minister,” (March 7, 2010). http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=8216homosexuality-is-a-disease8217-says-minister-2010-03-07
  • Ilkkaracan, Pınar. “Turkey: How Adultery Almost Derailed Turkey's Aspiration to Join the European Union” in Sexpolitics Richard Parker (ed.). Sexuality Polity Watch (2007): 247-275
  • Jacobsen, Janet R. “Queer is? Queer Does? Normativity and the Problem of Resistance”. GLQ 4:4. Duke University Press. (1998): 511-536.
  • Kurtoğlu, Ayça. “Sex Reassignment, Biological Reproduction and Sexual Citizenship in Turkey,” Fe Dergi 1/2 (2009): 88.
  • Manalansan, Martin. “Race, Violence and Neoliberal Spatial Politics in the Global City” Social Text 84-85, Vol 23, Nos 3-4, Fall-Winter (2005).
  • Massad, Joseph. “Re-Orienting Gay Desire: the Gay International and the Arab World.” Public Culture, 14-2, pp. 361- (2002) http://muse.jhu.edu.proxy.queensu.ca/journals/public_culture/v014/14.2massad.pdf
  • Mohanty, Chandra T. Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory Practising Solidarity. (New Delhi: Raj Press, ). Oktem, Kerem. “Another Struggle: Sexual Identity Politics in Unsettled Turkey.” (2008). http://www.zcommunications.org/another-struggle-sexual-identity-politics-in-unsettled-turkey-by-kerem-ktem
  • Öz, Yasemin. “Görünmezlik Kıskacında Lezbiyenler.” İn Cinsiyet halleri: Türkiye’de Toplumsal Cinsiyetin Kesişim Sınırları Nil Mutluer (ed.) (Istanbul: Varlık Yayınları, 2008).
  • Puar, Jaspir. “Introduction: Homonationalism and Biopolitics.” Pp.1-37 in Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. (USA: Duke University Press, 2007).
  • Rich, Adrienne. “Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence” Signs, Vol 5, No 4. (1980). http://www.jstor.org/stable/3173834
  • Rich, Adrienne. Of Women Born: Motherhood as an Experience and as Institution. (New York: Norton& Company, Said, Edward. Introduction in Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient (London: Penguin, 1995 Revisited edition).
  • Sancar, Serpil. “Otoriter Türk Modernleşmesinin Cinsiyet Rejimi” (The Sexual Regime of the Turkish Authoritarian Modernization), Doğu Batı, Özel Sayı: İdeolojiler II, no.29. (2004).
  • Sedgwick, Eve K. Epistemology of the Closet. (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1990).
  • Seidman, Steven. Difference Troubles: Queering Social Theory and Sexual Politics (UK: Cambridge University Press, ). Selek, Pınar. Sürüne Sürüne Erkek Olmak (Crawling to be a Man) (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2008).
  • Selek, Pınar. Maskeler, Süvariler, Gacılar (Istanbul: Aykırı Yayıncılık, 2001).
  • Serifsoy, Selda. “Aile ve Kemalist Modernizasyon Projesi, 1928-1950” in (ed.)Ayse Gul Altınay Vatan Millet
  • Kadınlar (Istanbul: İletisim yayıncılık, 2000): 167-201
  • Smith, Andrea. “Heteropatriarchy and the Three Pillars of White Supremacy” in Color of Violence: INCITE Women of Color against Violence. (2006).
  • Tekeli, Sirin. ed. Women in Modern Turkish Society (London and New Jersey: Zed Books, 1995).
  • Warner, Michael. Fear of a Queer Planet: Queer Politics and Social Theory (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993)
  • Wittig, Monique. “The Category of Sex”, in The Straight Mind and Other Essays (Boston: Beacon Press, 1992).
  • Ze'vi, Dror. Producing Desire: Changing Sexual Discourse in the Ottoman Middle East, 1500-1900 (London, England
  • University of California Press, 2006).
  • Zürcher, E. J. Turkey: A Modern History. (New York: I.B.Taurus, 2004).
There are 34 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Women's Studies
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

H Burcu Baba This is me

Publication Date January 1, 2011
Published in Issue Year 2011 Volume: 3 Issue: 1

Cite

Chicago Baba, H Burcu. “Türkiye’de Heteropatriyarkal Ailenin İnşası Ve Muhalif Cinsellikler”. Fe Dergi 3, no. 1 (January 2011): 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1501/Fe0001_0000000044.