BibTex RIS Cite

DESCARTES VE ÖZNE OLARAK BENLİK

Year 2003, Issue: 38, 107 - 118, 15.12.2003

Abstract

References

  • Augustine, St., The City of God Against t/ie Pagans, çev. R.W. Dyson, Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought içinde (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
  • Castaneda, H., "He: A Study in the Logic of Self-Consciousness," Ratio 8 (1966).
  • Descartes, R.. Philosophical Writings of Descartes (metinde PWD olarak kısaltılmıştır), çev. J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, ve D. Murdoch, 3 cilt, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
  • Hintikka, I, "Cogito ergo sum: Inference or Performance?", Philosophical Review, 71 (1962), 3-32.
  • Kant, I., Critique of Pure Reason, çev. N. K. Smith (New York: St Martin's Press, 1965).
  • Russell, B., A History of Western Philosophy (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1945), Ryle, G., The Concept of Mind (New York: Barnes and Noble, 1949).
  • Shoemaker, S., Self-Knowledge and Self-Identity (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1963).
  • Williams, B., 'Rene Descartes', The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, P. Edwards (ed.), (New York: Routledge, 1962).

Descartes and Self as Subject

Year 2003, Issue: 38, 107 - 118, 15.12.2003

Abstract

In this paper, Descartes' theory of self and self-knowledge is being examined. Descartes claims that self-knowledge has a special status, and is more certain that sensory knowledge, because while it is acquired directly through an intellectual intuition, sensory knowledge is mediated. The aim of Descartes' cogito argument is to show that self-knowledge is the most certain of all kinds of knowledge and, that because of this it is absolutely indubitable. However, as I try to show in this paper, Descartes makes unjustified deductions from the cogito argument such as that the thinking self is a simple, immortal substance. I argue that while the cogito argument proves that 'I as a subject' must exist, it does not give us any insight into the nature of this T. That is to say, the cogito argument does not show that this T is a simple, immortal, and thinking substance.

References

  • Augustine, St., The City of God Against t/ie Pagans, çev. R.W. Dyson, Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought içinde (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
  • Castaneda, H., "He: A Study in the Logic of Self-Consciousness," Ratio 8 (1966).
  • Descartes, R.. Philosophical Writings of Descartes (metinde PWD olarak kısaltılmıştır), çev. J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, ve D. Murdoch, 3 cilt, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
  • Hintikka, I, "Cogito ergo sum: Inference or Performance?", Philosophical Review, 71 (1962), 3-32.
  • Kant, I., Critique of Pure Reason, çev. N. K. Smith (New York: St Martin's Press, 1965).
  • Russell, B., A History of Western Philosophy (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1945), Ryle, G., The Concept of Mind (New York: Barnes and Noble, 1949).
  • Shoemaker, S., Self-Knowledge and Self-Identity (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1963).
  • Williams, B., 'Rene Descartes', The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, P. Edwards (ed.), (New York: Routledge, 1962).
There are 8 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Sahabettin Yalçın This is me

Publication Date December 15, 2003
Published in Issue Year 2003 Issue: 38

Cite

APA Yalçın, S. (2003). DESCARTES VE ÖZNE OLARAK BENLİK. Felsefe Dünyası(38), 107-118.