The Effect of Social Studies Preservice Teachers’ Value Preferences on Global Citizenship Levels

Year 2023, , 149 - 158, 19.01.2023

Hacı Bayram Kanar Birol Bulut

https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.1166431

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the relationship between social studies teacher candidates' value preferences and their level of global citizenship. This research, using the a relational survey model, was conducted on 322 pre-service teachers studying in the social studies teaching departments of the education faculties of three universities in Turkey. In this study, two scales were used as data collection tools. One of the data collection tools is the Global Citizenship Scale (GCS) developed by Morais and Ogden (2011), adapted to Turkish by Şahin and Çermik (2014) and its validity-reliability analyzes were made. The other data collection tool is the “Multidimensional Social Values Scale” developed by Bolat (2013). The data obtained in these scales were analyzed with the SPSS 21 program. As a result of the research, although the levels of global citizenship and multidimensional social values of female participants are higher than that of male participants, the difference is not statistically significant. A positive and significant relationship was found between the scores of the "Global Citizenship Scale" and the "Multidimensional Social Values Scale" as well as the sub-dimensions. In addition, it is seen that the scientific values sub-dimension of the multidimensional social values scale predicts the level of global citizenship at a statistically significant level.

Keywords

Social Studies, Values, Citizenship, Global Citizenship

SOSYAL BİLGİLER ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ DEĞER TERCİHLERİNİN KÜRESEL VATANDAŞLIK DÜZEYLERİNE ETKİSİ

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı, sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının değer tercihleri ile küresel vatandaşlık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesidir. İlişkisel tarama modeli kullanılan bu araştırma, Türkiye’de bulunan üç üniversitenin eğitim fakültesi sosyal bilgiler öğretmenliği bölümlerinde öğrenim gören 322 öğretmen adayı üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Bu araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak iki ölçek kullanılmıştır. Veri toplama araçlarından biri, Morais ve Ogden (2011) tarafından geliştirilen Küresel Vatandaşlık Ölçeği (KVÖ)’nin Şahin ve Çermik (2014) tarafından Türkçeye uyarlandığı ve geçerlik-güvenirlik analizlerini yapıldığı ölçektir. Diğer veri toplama aracı ise Bolat (2013) tarafından geliştirilen “Çok Boyutlu Sosyal Değerler Ölçeği” dir. Bu ölçeklerde elde edilen veriler SPSS 21 programı ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda kadın katılımcıların küresel vatandaşlık düzeyleri ile çok boyutlu sosyal değerler düzeyleri, erkek katılımcılara göre daha yüksek olmasına rağmen fark, istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildir. “Küresel Vatandaşlık Ölçeği” ve “Çok Boyutlu Sosyal Değerler Ölçeği” ve bunun yanında alt boyutlara ait alınan puanlar arasında pozitif yönde ve anlamlı düzeyde bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Ayrıca çok boyutlu sosyal değerler ölçeğinin bilimsel değerler alt boyutunun, küresel vatandaşlık düzeyini, istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde yordadığı görülmektedir.

Keywords

Sosyal Bilgiler, Değerler, Vatandaşlık, Küresel Vatandaşlık

References

• Alazmi, H. S. (2022). Leveraging international experts’ perspectives to reframe citizenship in Social Studies Curriculum during the globalisation era: shifting to a global citizenship education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 20:3, pages 291-309.
• Altıkulaç, A. (2016). Patriotism and global citizenship as values: A research on social studies teacher candidates. Journal of Education and Practice, 7 (36), 26-33.
• Aslan, F. (2021). 2010 ve 2018 ortaöğretim din kültürü ve ahlak bilgisi öğretim programlarında yer alan değerler eğitimi anlayışlarının karşılaştırılması. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Kayseri.
• Bulut, B. (2019). Correlation between global citizenship and sustainable development awareness levels of pre-service teachers. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 11 (3), 279-293
• Carmona, M., Guerra, R. & Hofhuis, J. (2022). What does ıt mean to be a “citizen of the world”: A prototype approach. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221221088332
• Clifford, V., & Montgomery, C. (2017). Designing an internationationalised curriculum for higher education: embracing the local and the global citizen. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(6), 1138-1151. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1296413
• Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S. W., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re‐conceptualization of Scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670-697.
• Çakmak, Z. , Bulut, B. & Taşkiran, C. (2015). A study on the relationship between global citizenship perceptions and ınternet use of social studies pre-service teachers. Adıyaman University Journal of Educational Sciences, 5 (1), 99-112. DOI: 10.17984/adyuebd.34905
• Davies, L. (2006). Global citizenship abstraction or framework for action. Educational Review, 58(1), 5-25.
• Dower N (2003). Introduction to global citizenship. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh.
• Dutt, S. (2009). Striving to promote shared values: UNESCO in the troubled world of the twenty-first century. India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, 65 (1), 83–95.
• Ersoy, A. F. (2013). Global citizenship education in social studies: Experiences of Turkish teachers and students in international conflict and war. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 1(1), 7-30. [Online]:www.enadonline.com, http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148- 2624.
• Estellés, Marta and Gustavo E. Fischman (2020). Imagining a Post-COVID-19 Global Citizenship Education. Praxis Educativa, 15: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5212/PraxEduc.v.15.15566.051.
• Gaudelli, W. (2016). Global Citizenship Education: Everyday Transcendence. 10.4324/9781315683492.
• Gibson, K. L, Rimmington G. M. & Landwehr-Brown, M. (2008). Developing global awareness and responsible world citizenship with global learning. Roeper Review, 30(1), 11-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02783190701836270.
• Goren, H. & Yemini, M. (2017). Global citizenship education redefined – A systematic review of empirical studies on global citizenship education. International Journal of Educational Research, 82(1), 170-183.
• Hatley, J. (2019). Universal values as a barrier to the effectiveness of global citizenship education: A multimodal critical discourse analysis. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 11 (1): 87–102. DOI https://doi.org/10.18546/IJDEGL.11.1.06
• Hatley, J. (2018). The values of global citizenship education and implications for social justice. [Doctoral Thesis]. Lancaster University. https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/35
• Kayışoğlu, N. B. (2016). Investigation of Global Citizenship Levels of Pre-Service Physical Education Teachers. Educational Research and Reviews, 11 (6): 299–306. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2661.
• Koçoğlu, E. and Bahadır K. (2020). Analyzing the Relation between the Sense of Citizenship and Global Citizenship in the Context of Students of Higher Education Institution. African Educational Research Journal, 8 (3): 627–39. https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.83.20.140.
• Lee, W. O. & Leung, S. W. (2006). Global citizenship education in Hong Kong and Shanghai secondary schools: ideals, realities and expectations. Citizenship Teaching and Learning, 2 (2), 68-84.
• Marino, M.T., Hayes, M.T. (2012). Promoting inclusive education, civic scientific literacy, and global citizenship with videogames. Cult Stud of Sci Educ, 7, 945–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9429-8
• Moon, BJ, Koo, JW (2011). Global citizenship and human rights: a longitudinal analysis of social studies and ethics in Republic of Korea. Comparative Education Review, 55(4): 574–599.
• Myers, J. P. (2006) Rethinking the social studies curriculum in the context of globalization: education for global citizenship in the U.S. Theory & Research in Social Education, 34:3, 370-394, DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2006.10473313
• Myers, J. P. (2016). Charting a democratic course for global citizenship education: Research directions and current challenges. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24, 55. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2174
• Ortloff D. H. (2011) Moving the borders: multiculturalism and global citizenship in the German social studies classroom. Educational Research, 53:2, 137-149, DOI: 10.1080/00131881.2011.572362
• Parekh, B. (2003). Cosmopolitanism and global citizenship. Review of International Studies, 29(1), 3–17. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097831
• Pashby, K. Costa, M., Stein, S. & Andreotti, V. (2020). A Meta-review of typologies of global citizenship education. Comparative Education, 56:2, 144-164, https://doi:10.1080/03050068.2020.1723352.
• Plante, C. N., Roberts, S. E., Reysen, S., & Gerbasi, K. C. (2014). “One of us”: Engagement with fandoms and global citizenship identification. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000008
• Temel, C. (2020). A study of global citizenship levels of Turkish university students according to different variables (youth camp leaders sample). Educational Research and Reviews, 11 (17): 1689–95. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2972.
• Torres, C. A. and Basio, E. (2020). Riflessioni critiche sul concetto di educazione alla cittadinanza globale. Dialogo con Carlos Alberto Torres sulla formazione universitaria negli Stati Uniti. Encyclopaideia, Vol. 24 (56): 107–17. https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.1825-8670/10742.
• Torres, C. A. (2015). Global citizenship education and global peace opportunities in achieving peace through GCED. Paper presented to the 2nd UNESCO Forum on Global Citizenship Education: Building Peaceful and Sustainable Societies–Preparing for post-2015, UNESCO Headquarters in Paris, France, 28–30 January 2015.
• Tully, J. (2014). On Global Citizenship: James Tully in dialogue. London: Bloomsbury Academic
• Salter, P. & Halbert, K. (2017). Constructing the [parochial] global citizen, Globalisation, Societies and Education, 15(5), 694−705, doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2016.1264290
• Shiveley, J. M. (2014). Teaching for democratic citizenship: Arriving at a guiding question for pedagogical practice. Social Studies Research and Practice. 9 (3): 81 – 87. DOI:10.1108/ssrp-03-2014-b0006
• Waddock, S. A. and Smith N. (2000). Relationships The Real Challenge of Corporate Global Citizenship. Business and Society Review. doi:10.1111/0045-3609.00064.
• Xiong, Y. & Li, M. (2017). Citizenship education as NGO intervention: turning migrant children in Shanghai into ‘new citizens’. Citizenship Studies, 21:7, 792-808, DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2017.1353741