The Queer Perspective in Social Work: Towards a Gender-Neutral Approach

Year 2023, , 925 - 937, 26.05.2023

Yunus Kara , Ayşe Serpen

https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.1201775

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to reveal the lack of associating social work and queer theory in Turkey and reflecting it to professional practices. In this framework, first, it is aimed to understand how the social work discipline has historically handled queer theory and how this approach has changed (or not) and how critical social work, radical social work and anti-oppression social work approaches look at the subject, then the queer theory's approach to the issue. It is envisaged to present a gender-neutral approach on how it can be applied in social work intervention processes. An approach independent of gender roles embodies the idea that the roles, facts, and situations assigned to women and men through the binary gender system are socially constructed, changed, and differentiated from society to society, from culture to culture, rather than biologically determined. Along with all these discussions, it is aimed to make a critical analysis of the transformations social work has undergone in the context of queer theory and to reveal the perspective of queer theory from this point of view, and to reveal the possibilities that social work can provide to social work by providing the queer perspective.

Keywords

Queer Theory, Queer Social Work, Queer, Gender

SOSYAL HİZMETTE QUEER BAKIŞ AÇISI: TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET ROLLERİNDEN BAĞIMSIZ BİR YAKLAŞIMA DOĞRU

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’deki sosyal hizmet alanı ve queer teorinin ilişkilendirilmesi ve mesleki uygulamalara yansıtılması konusundaki eksikliğin ortaya konması amaçlanmaktadır. Bu çerçevede, öncelikle tarihsel olarak, sosyal hizmet disiplininin queer teoriyi nasıl ele aldığını ve bu ele alışın nasıl değişip dönüştüğünü (veya dönüşmediğini) ve bunun karşısında eleştirel sosyal hizmet, radikal sosyal hizmet ve baskı karşıtı sosyal hizmet yaklaşımlarının konuya nasıl baktığının anlaşılması, ardından queer teorinin sosyal hizmet müdahale süreçlerinde nasıl uygulanabileceğine dair toplumsal cinsiyet rollerinden bağımsız bir yaklaşımın sunulması öngörülmektedir. Toplumsal cinsiyet rollerinden bağımsız bir yaklaşım, ikili cinsiyet sistemi üzerinden kadınlara ve erkeklere atanan rollerin, olguların ve durumların, biyolojik olarak belirlenmelerinden ziyade toplumsal olarak inşa edildiğini, değişebildiğini ve toplumdan topluma, kültürden kültüre farklılaştığı fikrini bünyesinde barındırmaktadır. Tüm bu tartışmalarla birlikte sosyal hizmetin queer teori bağlamında geçirdiği dönüşümlerin eleştirel bir analizinin yapılması ve buradan hareketle queer teorinin bakış açısının ortaya konulması sağlanarak, sosyal hizmetin queer perspektifle ilişkilenme biçiminin, sosyal hizmete sağlayabileceği imkânların ortaya konulması amaçlanmaktadır.

Keywords

Queer, Queer Teori, Queer Sosyal Hizmet, Toplumsal Cinsiyet

References

• Akbaş, E. (2014). Sosyal çalışmada çağdaş eleştirel perspektifler. Ankara: SABEV.
• Bailey, R., Brake, M. (1975). Radical social work. London: Edward Arnold.
• Baines, D. (2011). An overview of anti-oppressive social work practice: Neoliberalism, inequality, and change. In D. Baines (Ed.), Doing anti-oppressive practice (pp. 1-24). Fernwood Publishing.
• Berghan, S. (2011). Transfeminizm. Cogito, 65-66, 140-148.
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Brown, H. C. (2008). Social work and sexuality, working with lesbians and gay men: What remains the same and what is different? Practice: Social Work in Action, 20(4), 265-75.
• Burdge, B. J. (2007). Bending gender, ending gender: Theoretical foundations for social work practice with the transgender community. Social Work, 52(3), 243-250.
• Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519–531.
• Butler, J. (1997). Against proper objects. In Feminism meets queer theory (Eds. Weed, E. & Schor, N.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• Butler, J. (2014). Cinsiyet belası: Feminizm ve kimliğin altüst edilmesi (Başak Ertür, Çev.). İstanbul: Metis.
• Clare, E. (2015). Exile and pride: Disability, queerness, and liberation. Duke University Press.
• Clarke, V., Braun, V. (2012). Toplumsal cinsiyet. Eleştirel psikoloji, D. Fox, I. Prilleltensky ve S. Austin (Ed.), kitabı içinde. İstanbul: Ayrıntı.
• Cocker, C., Hafford-Letchfield, T. (2010). Out and proud? Social work's relationship with lesbian and gay equality. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1996-2008.
• Cornell, R. W. (2016). Toplumsal cinsiyet ve iktidar. İstanbul: İletişim.
• Dalrymple, J., Burke, B. (2006). Anti-oppressive social work practice: Social care and the law (2nd Edition). Open University Press.
• Dentato, M. P., Craig, S. L., Lloyd, M. R., Kelly, B. L., Wright, C., Austin, A. (2016). Homophobia within schools of social work: the critical need for affirming classroom settings and effective preparation for service with the LGBTQ community. Social Work Education, 35 (6), 672-692. doi:10.1080/02615479.2016.1150452.
• Demez, G. (2005). Kabadayıdan sanal delikanlıya değişen erkek imgesi. İstanbul: Babil.
• Dökmen, Z. Y. (2014). Toplumsal cinsiyet: Sosyal psikolojik açıklamalar (5. Baskı). İstanbul: Remzi.
• Edwards, T. (1998). Queer Fears: Against the cultural turn. Sexualities, 1, 471-484.
• Eng, D. L., Halberstam, J., Munoz, J. E. (2005). What’s queer about queer studies now? Social Text, 23(3/4), 1–17.
• Eriksen, T. H. (2004). Etnisite ve milliyetçilik: Antropolojik bir bakış. İstanbul: Avesta.
• Featherstone, B., Green, L. (2013). Judith Butler. In Social work theories and methods (Eds. Gray, M. & Webb, S. A.). London: Sage.
• Ferguson, I. (2008). Reclaiming social work: Challenging neo-liberalism and promoting social justice. London: Sage.
• Ferguson, I. (2009). Another world is possiple!: Reclaiming the radical tradition. In V. Leskošek (Ed.), Theories and methods of social work, exploring different perspectives (pp. 81-98). Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana.
• Fredriksen-Goldsen, K. I., Lindhorst, T., Kemp, S. P., Walters, K. L. (2009). ‘‘My Ever Dear’’: Social Work’s ‘‘Lesbian’’ Foremothers - A Call for Scholarship. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 24 (3), 325-336.
• Fook, J. (2002). Social work – Critical theory and practice. London: Sage Publications.
• Foucault, M. (2014). Cinselliğin tarihi (Çev. Hülya Uğur Tanrıöver). İstanbul: Ayrıntı.
• Foucault, M. (2016). Entelektüelin siyasi işlevi (Seçme yazılar 1). İstanbul: Ayrıntı.
• Gerrig, R. J., Zimbardo, P. G. (2012). Psikoloji ve yaşam: Psikolojiye giriş. İstanbul: Nobel.
• Green, A. I. (2002). Gay but not queer: Toward a post-queer study of sexuality. Theory and Society, 31, 521-545.
• Green, L., Featherstone, B. (2014). Judith Butler, power and social work. In Rethinking anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive theories for social work practice (Eds. Cocker, C. & Hafford-Letchfield, T.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Güldalı, O. (2018). Baskı karşıtı sosyal hizmet: Modern dünya-sistemi açısından eleştirel bir değerlendirme. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 29 (1), 228-244.
• Haig, D. (2004). The inexorable rise of gender and the decline of sex: Social change in academic titles; 1945–2001. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 33 (2), 87-96.
• Hammack, P. L., Mayers, L., Windell, E. P. (2013). Narrative, psychology and the politics of sexual identity in the united states: From sickness to species to subject. Psychology & Sexuality, 4 (3), 219-243.
• Haritaworn, J. (2015). Queer lovers and hateful others: Regenerating violent times and places. London: Pluto Press.
• Hicks, S., Watson, K. (2003). Desire lines: 'Queering' health and social welfare. Sociological Research Online, 8, 1-10.
• Hicks, S. (2005). Sexuality: Social Work Theories and Practice. In R. Adams, L. Dominelli & M. Payne (Eds.). Social work futures - Crossing boundaries, transforming practice (pp.141-153). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Hicks S. (2015). Social work and gender: An argument for practical accounts. Qualitative Social work: Research and Practice, 14(4), 471–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325014558665
• Hicks, S., Jeyasingham, D. (2016). Social work, queer theory and after: A Genealogy of sexuality theory in neo-liberal times. The British Journal of Social Work, 46(8), 2357–2373. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw103
• Hillock, S. and Mule, N. J. (2016). Queering Social Work Education. Canada: UBC Press.
• Hughes, M. (2004, October). Queer ageing and social work. Paper presented at the Global Social Work Conference, Adelaide, SA.
• Jackson, S. (2006). Gender, sexuality and heterosexuality: The complexity (and limits) of heteronormativity. Feminist Theory, 7(1), 105–121.
• Jagose, A. (2009). Feminism’s queer theory. Feminism & Psychology, 19(2), 157–174.
• Ife, J. (1999). Rethinking social work: Towards critical practice. South Melbourne: Longman.
• İlter, N. (2014). Toplumsal cinsiyet gerilimleri üzerinden feminizmi tartışmak (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Mardin Artuklu Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Mardin.
• Kara, Y. (2018). Sosyal hizmet öğrencilerinin homofobik tutumlarının belirlenmesi. Sosyal Çalışma Dergisi, 2 (1), 16-27.
• Kara, Y. (2020). Is queer social work possible? International Social Sciences Studies Journal, (e-ISSN:2587-1587), 6(61), 1718-1723. http://dx.doi.org/10.26449/sssj.2278
• Kara, Y., Duyan, V. (2022). The effects of emotion-based group work on psychosocial functions of LGBT people. Social Work with Groups. DOI: 10.1080/01609513.2022.2027851
• Kara, Y., Serpen, A. S. (2022). Online group work with social workers to enhance skills for working with LGBTQIA+ people. Social Work with Groups. DOI: 10.1080/01609513.2022.2053030
• Kara, Y., Karataş, M., Duyan, V. (2022). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on LGBTQ+’s sexual behaviors in Turkey: “Everything about sex had become a black box”. Journal of Homosexuality. DOI: 10.1080/00918369.2022.2072255
• Kara, Y. (2022a). Kadınlara yönelik şiddetin karşılaştırmalı bir analizi: Cadı avlarından Türkiye’deki kadın cinayetlerine. International Journal of Social Inquiry, 15(1), 69-84. DOI: 10.37093/ijsi.937007
• Kara, Y. (2022b). Nitel bir araştırmanın gösterdikleri: Türkiye’de LGBTQ+ olmak. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (52), 399-415. DOI: 10.30794/pausbed.1056348
• Kincheloe, J. L., McLaren, P. L. (2003). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In Y.S. Denzin, & N.K. Lincoln (Eds.). The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
• Lavalette, M., Penketh, L. (2014). Race, racism and social work. In Race, racism and social work: Contemporary issues and debates (Eds. Lavalette, M. & Penketh, L.). Bristol: Policy Press.
• MacKinnon, K. V. R. (2011). Thinking about queer theory in social work education: A pedagogical (in)query. Canadian Social Work Review, 28(1), 139–144.
• Martinez, P., Barsky, A., Singleton, S. (2011). Exploring queer consciousness among social workers. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 23(2), 296–315.
• McPhail, B. A. (2004). Questioning gender and sexuality binaries: What queer theorists, transgendered individuals, and sex researchers can teach social work. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services, 17, 3-21.
• Miles, R. (2000). Irkçılık. İstanbul: Sarmal.
• Miles, R., Brown, M. (2003). Racism (2nd Edition). Routledge.
• Miles, L. (2011). LGBT oppression, sexualities and radical social work today. In Radical social work today: Social work at the crossroads (Ed. Lavalette, M.). Bristol: Policy Press.
• Miller, J. L., Donner, S., Fraser, E. (2004). Talking when talking is tough: Taking on conversations about race, sexual orientation, gender, class and other aspects of social identity. Smith College Studies in Social Work 74 (2), 377-392.
• Mills, S. (2004). Discourse. London: Routledge.
• Money, J., Hampson, J. G., Hampson, J. L. (1955). An examination of some basic sexual concepts: The evidence of human hermaphroditism. Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital 97, 301-319.
• Mulé, N. J. (2015). The politicized queer, the informed social worker: Dis/re-ordering the social order. In LGBTQ people and social work: Intersectional perspectives (Eds. O’Neill, B. J., Swan, T. A, Mulé, N. J.). Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
• Ökten, Ş. (2009). Toplumsal cinsiyet ve iktidar: Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nin toplumsal cinsiyet düzeni. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2 (8), 302-312.
• Papadaki, V., Plotnikof, K., Papadaki, E. (2013). Social work students’ attitudes towards lesbians and gay men: The case of the social work Department in Crete, Greece. Social Work Education, 32, 453–467.
• Pearson, G. (1989). Women and men without work: The political economy is personal. In: C. Rojek, G.Peacock, S. Collins (Eds.), The haunt of misery: Critical essays in social work and helping. London: Routledge.
• Pelts, M. D. (2014). A look back at the defense of marriage act: Why same-sex marriage is still relevant for social work. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 29 (2), 237–247. doi:10.1177/0886109913519793.
• Penney, J. (2014). After queer theory: The limits of sexual politics. London: Pluto Press.
• Poon, M. K. (2011). Writing the racialized queer bodies: Race and sexuality in social work. Canadian Social Work Review, 28(1), 145–150.
• Poynter, K. J., Tubbs, N. J. (2008). Safe zones: Creating LGBT safe space ally programs. Journal of LGBT Youth, 5(1), 121-132.
• Riggs, D. W. (2017). Queer theory. In The palgrave handbook of critical social psychology (Ed. Brendan Gough). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Rubin, G. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality (Ed. Vance, C. S.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Scherrer, K. (2013). Culturally competent practice with bisexual individuals. Clinical Social Work Journal, 41, 238-248.
• Serpen, A. S., Demirbilek, M., Duyan, V., Megahead, H. A. (2018). Using movies to change homophobic attitudes of social work students: Turkish example. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(7), 876–881.
• Singh, G. (2014). Rethinking anti-racist social work in a neoliberal age. In Race, racism and social work: Contemporary issues and debates (Eds. Lavalette, M. & Penketh, L.). Bristol: Policy Press.
• Stone, A. (2015). Feminist felsefeye giriş (Çev. Y. Cingöz ve B. Tanrısever). İstanbul: Otonom.
• Sullivan, N. (2007). A critical introduction to queer theory. Melbourne: Circa Books.
• Sumara, D., Davis, B. (1999). Interrupting heteronormativity: Toward a queer curriculum theory. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(2), 191-208.
• Şah, U. (2016). Psikolojinin Çeşitli Alanlarında Çalışan Psikologların Cinsiyete, Toplumsal Cinsiyete ve Queer Kuramına İlişkin Söylemleri (Doktora Tezi). İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Thompson, N. (2006). Anti-Discriminatory practice (Fourth edition). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Thompson, N. (2016). Anti-discriminatory practice: Equality, diversity and social justice (6th edition). London: Palgrave.
• Trotter, J. (2000). Lesbian and gay issues in social work with young people: Resilience and success through confronting, conforming and escaping. British Journal of Social Work, 30, 115-123.
• Van Den Bergh, N., Crisp, C. (2004). Defining culturally competent practice with sexual minorities: Implications for social work education and practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 221-238.
• Van Voorhis, R., Wagner, M. (2001). Coverage of gay and lesbian subject matter in social work journals. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 147-159.
• Weeks, J. (2003). Necessary fictions: Sexual identities and the politics of diversity. In J. Weeks, J. Holland & M. Waites (Eds.). Sexualities and society: A Reader. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
• Wiegman, R. Wilson, E. A. (2015). Introduction: Antinormativity’s queer conventions. Differences, 26(1), 1–25.
• Willis, P. (2007). “Queer eye” for social work: Rethinking pedagogy and practice with samesex attracted young people. Australian Social Work, 60(2), 181–196.
• Wright, E. O. (2014). Sınıf analizine yaklaşımlar. İstanbul: NotaBene.
• Yardımcı, S., Güçlü, Ö. (2013). Queer tahayyül. İstanbul: Sel.