Research Article

Gypsyness as a Building Process: A Theoretical Analysis

Volume: 27 Number: 2 July 15, 2017
EN TR

Gypsyness as a Building Process: A Theoretical Analysis

Abstract

This study focuses on in the context of Gypsyness and in the reproduction of public space; stereotyping, stigmatization, prejudice, othering, exclusion, myths about gypsies, myths and myths. The study focuses on two groups of factors which are generally influential in the construction of the gypsy. In the first place there are proverbs, idioms, literary works and media, and myths and negative litanies that prepare various exclusion practices and Gypsies exclusive grounds in the construction of the Gypsy. Gypsyness is generally constructed within the framework of various exegesis practices, myths and negative myths. The Gypsies also play a role in the internalization of the prejudices towards the Gypsy by the Gypsies and in the reconstruction and reproduction of the Gypsy.

Keywords

References

  1. Adaman, F. ve Keyder, Ç. (2006), “Türkiye’de Büyük Kentlerde Gecekondu ve Çöküntü Mahallelerinde Yaşanan Yoksulluk ve Sosyal Dışlanma”, European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/social_inclusion/docs/2006/study_turkey_tr.pdf (E.T: 20.12.2013).
  2. Aksu, Mustafa (2003), Türkiye’de Çingene Olmak, İstanbul: Ozan Yayıncılık,.
  3. Andrews, Peter Alford (1992), Türkiye’de Etnik Gruplar, Çev. Mustafa Küpüşoğlu, İstanbul: Ant Yayınları.
  4. Asseo, Henriette (2007), Çingeneler: Bir Avrupa Yazgısı, Çev. Orçun Türkay, Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  5. Aşkın, Umur (2012), “Çingeneler ve Sosyal Politika-1, Sosyo-Kültürel Alt Yapı”, Çalışma Ortamı Dergisi, Ocak - Şubat-ss.10-12, http://calismaortami.fisek.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/calisma_ ortami120.pdf. (E.T: 20.05.2014).
  6. Aydın, Mustafa (2002), Siyasetin Sosyolojisi, İstanbul: Açılım Kitap.
  7. Bayraktar, Özlem (2011), “Çingeneler Başka Dünyanın İnsanları”, Global Media Journal Turkish Edition Sayı:1(2) s.118-132.
  8. Beynon, Erdmann Doane (1936), “The Gypsy in a Non-Gypsy Economy”, The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 42, No. 3, Novp. 358-370.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

July 15, 2017

Submission Date

May 26, 2017

Acceptance Date

July 3, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 27 Number: 2

APA
İlhan, S., & Fırat, M. (2017). Gypsyness as a Building Process: A Theoretical Analysis. Firat University Journal of Social Sciences, 27(2), 265-276. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.346534
AMA
1.İlhan S, Fırat M. Gypsyness as a Building Process: A Theoretical Analysis. Firat University Journal of Social Sciences. 2017;27(2):265-276. doi:10.18069/firatsbed.346534
Chicago
İlhan, Süleyman, and Muhammet Fırat. 2017. “Gypsyness As a Building Process: A Theoretical Analysis”. Firat University Journal of Social Sciences 27 (2): 265-76. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.346534.
EndNote
İlhan S, Fırat M (July 1, 2017) Gypsyness as a Building Process: A Theoretical Analysis. Firat University Journal of Social Sciences 27 2 265–276.
IEEE
[1]S. İlhan and M. Fırat, “Gypsyness as a Building Process: A Theoretical Analysis”, Firat University Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 265–276, July 2017, doi: 10.18069/firatsbed.346534.
ISNAD
İlhan, Süleyman - Fırat, Muhammet. “Gypsyness As a Building Process: A Theoretical Analysis”. Firat University Journal of Social Sciences 27/2 (July 1, 2017): 265-276. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.346534.
JAMA
1.İlhan S, Fırat M. Gypsyness as a Building Process: A Theoretical Analysis. Firat University Journal of Social Sciences. 2017;27:265–276.
MLA
İlhan, Süleyman, and Muhammet Fırat. “Gypsyness As a Building Process: A Theoretical Analysis”. Firat University Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 27, no. 2, July 2017, pp. 265-76, doi:10.18069/firatsbed.346534.
Vancouver
1.Süleyman İlhan, Muhammet Fırat. Gypsyness as a Building Process: A Theoretical Analysis. Firat University Journal of Social Sciences. 2017 Jul. 1;27(2):265-76. doi:10.18069/firatsbed.346534

Cited By