EN
TR
The Worth of Action in the Difference Between Legitimacy and Justice: Aristotle's, Hegel's and Butler's Interpretations on Antigone
Abstract
In this article, I focused on the Antigone myth, which is an important source of reference in the context of modern debates and feminist politics. For this purpose, I comparatively investigated Aristotle's, Hegel's and Butler's reviews on Antigone. Antigone emerges as an agency of the ethical perception that is presented as "honesty" and the myth rises when the written laws are incapable of determining what is just. So, in this article, I purpose to making investigation about the nature of the political action through Aristotle's, Hegel's and Butler's interpretations on Antigone.
Keywords
References
- Antigone, Sofokles, çev. Ayşe Selen, Mitos-Boyut Tiyatro Yayınları, İstanbul, 2011.
- Aristoteles, Nikomakhos’a Etik, çev. Saffet Babür, BilgeSu Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2007.
- Aristoteles, Eudemos’a Etik, çev. Saffet Babür, Dost Kitapevi, İstanbul, 1994.
- Aristoteles, Retorik, çev. Mehmet H. Doğan, YKY, İstanbul, 2001.
- Butler Judith , Antigone’nin İddiası, çev. Ahmet Ergenç, Kabalı Yayınları, İstanbul, 2007.
- Harrell Jean Gabbert , Profundity: A Universal Value, Pennsylvania University Press, University Park PA, 1992.
- Hegel, Tinin Görüngübilimi, çev. Aziz Yardımlı, İdea, İkinci Baskı, İstanbul,1994.
- Hegel, Philosophy of Right, Translated by S.W Dyde, Batoche Books, Kitchener; 2001.
Details
Primary Language
Turkish
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Authors
Sema Ülper Oktar
This is me
Publication Date
May 1, 2016
Submission Date
-
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Number: 21