Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

PARÇA-BÜTÜN BAĞLAMINDA ZAMANDA ÖZDEŞLİK SORUNU

Year 2018, Volume: 13 Issue: 26, 47 - 60, 29.12.2018

Abstract

Çağdaş zaman metafiziklerinde,
özellikle zamanın doğası ve özdeşlik ile ilgili tartışmalarda, şeylerin
değişiyor olmalarına karşın zaman boyunca kendine özdeşliklerini nasıl
koruduğuyla ilgili tartışmalar vardır. Bu çalışmada, çağdaş metafizik
tartışmalarında karşılaştığımız zamanda özdeşlik sorununu parça-bütün
karşıtlığı bağlamında inceleyeceğiz. Burada temelde iki karşıt argüman vardır.
İlki açısından, değişim varsa herhangi bir şeyin değişimden önce ya da sonra
aynı ve böylece kendine özdeş kalması olanaklı değildir. İkincisine göre ise,
değişimin olanaklı olması için zaten değişimden önce ve sonra aynı kalan bir
şeyin varlığını varsaymak gerekir, diğer türlü değişim olmaz. Bununla birlikte
bu iki karşıtlığa rağmen özdeşliğin sağlanamadığı ve şeylerin hem bütün olarak
hem de parça bakımından zaman-dışı yönlerinin olduğu görülmektedir.

References

  • Balashov, Y. (2000). Persistence and Space-Time: Philosophical Lessons of the Pole and Barn. The Monist, 83(3), 321-340.
  • Carter, W. R., & Hestevold, H. (1994). On Passage and Persistence. American Philosophical Quarterly, 31(4), 269-283.
  • Denkel, A. (1996). Object and Property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Frassen, B. C., & Pesghard, I. (2008). Identity over Time: Objectively, Subjectivly. The Philosophical Quarterly, 58(230), 15-35.
  • Locke, J. (1961). Essay Concerning Human Understanding.
  • Merricks, T. (1994). Endurance and Indiscernibility. The Journal of Philosophy, 91(4), 165-184.
  • Merricks, T. (1998). There Are No Criteria of Identity Over Time. Noûs, 32(1), 106-124.
  • Noonan, E. J., & Lowe, E. (1988). Substance, Identity and Time. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 62, 61-100.
  • Noonan, H. W. (1980). Objects and Identity: An Examination of the Relative Identity Thesis and Its Consequences. London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Oaklander, L. (1995). Personal identity. Q. S. Oaklander içinde, Time, change and freedom: An introduction to metaphysics (s. 91-108). London: Routledge.
  • Oaklander, L. (1995). Personal identity and time. Q. S. Oaklander içinde, Time, change and freedom: An introduction to metaphysics (s. 109-119). London: Routledge.
  • Sider, T. (2001). Four-Dimensionalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

PROBLEM OF IDENTITY IN TIME IN THE CONTEX OF PART AND WHOLE

Year 2018, Volume: 13 Issue: 26, 47 - 60, 29.12.2018

Abstract

In contemporary metaphysics of time, especially in the debates about the
nature of time and identity over time, there are debates about how things have
preserved their identities over time, even if they have changed. In this work, we
will examine the question of identity in the context of part-whole opposition
when we encounter it in contemporary metaphysical discussions. There are
basically two opposing arguments here. In terms of province, if there is change,
it is not possible for anything to be the same before and after the change and
thus to remain identical to itself. According to the second, in order for change
to be possible, it is necessary to assume the existence of something that has
already remained the same before and after the change. Despite these two
contrasts, however, it seems that identities of things over time cannot be
achieved and they are both timeless in terms of parts and whole

References

  • Balashov, Y. (2000). Persistence and Space-Time: Philosophical Lessons of the Pole and Barn. The Monist, 83(3), 321-340.
  • Carter, W. R., & Hestevold, H. (1994). On Passage and Persistence. American Philosophical Quarterly, 31(4), 269-283.
  • Denkel, A. (1996). Object and Property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Frassen, B. C., & Pesghard, I. (2008). Identity over Time: Objectively, Subjectivly. The Philosophical Quarterly, 58(230), 15-35.
  • Locke, J. (1961). Essay Concerning Human Understanding.
  • Merricks, T. (1994). Endurance and Indiscernibility. The Journal of Philosophy, 91(4), 165-184.
  • Merricks, T. (1998). There Are No Criteria of Identity Over Time. Noûs, 32(1), 106-124.
  • Noonan, E. J., & Lowe, E. (1988). Substance, Identity and Time. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 62, 61-100.
  • Noonan, H. W. (1980). Objects and Identity: An Examination of the Relative Identity Thesis and Its Consequences. London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Oaklander, L. (1995). Personal identity. Q. S. Oaklander içinde, Time, change and freedom: An introduction to metaphysics (s. 91-108). London: Routledge.
  • Oaklander, L. (1995). Personal identity and time. Q. S. Oaklander içinde, Time, change and freedom: An introduction to metaphysics (s. 109-119). London: Routledge.
  • Sider, T. (2001). Four-Dimensionalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
There are 12 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Philosophy
Journal Section Articles
Authors

A. Suat Gözcü

Publication Date December 29, 2018
Submission Date September 20, 2018
Acceptance Date December 29, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 13 Issue: 26

Cite

Chicago Gözcü, A. Suat. “PARÇA-BÜTÜN BAĞLAMINDA ZAMANDA ÖZDEŞLİK SORUNU”. FLSF Felsefe Ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 13, no. 26 (December 2018): 47-60.

Starting from 2024, our journal will be published in 3 issues as two regular and one special issues. These issues will be published In May (regular issue), September (special issue) and December (regular issue).

Acceptance of articles for our special issue and our regular issue in December will begin on March 15.

Only articles within the scope of the file will be included in our special issue. 

Thank you for your attention.