Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

STOIC ETHICS AND ITS EVALUATION BY HEGEL

Year 2018, Volume: 13 Issue: 26, 443 - 455, 29.12.2018

Abstract

The Stoic school of philosophy stands out mostly with its ethical doctrine. The most crucial theme in it is their distinction between ethically binding values and those to be considered neutral. What corresponds to this disjunction is a distribution of areas in which one should take responsibility and ought not to. In this paper, as well as presenting and discussing this basic theme of Stoic ethics with a critical gaze, I will problematise Hegel’s evaluation of it, as it is worked out in the Phenomenology of the Spirit. Then, I will question whether Hegel’s claim that Stoic ethics was unduly inward-looking is tenable given the Stoic insistence on the value of sociability.

References

  • Beiser, Frederick. Hegel. New York and London: Routledge, 2006.
  • Brennan, Tad. “Stoic Moral Psychology.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by Brad Inwood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • Chiereghin, Franco. “Freedom and Thought: Stoicism, Skepticism, and Unhappy Consciousness.” In The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, edited by Kennth R. Westphal. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009.
  • Foucault, Michel. The Care of the Self: Volume 3 of The History of Sexuality. New York: Pantheon Books, 1986.
  • Gill, Christopher. “The Schood in the Roman Imperial Period.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by Brad Inwood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
  • Houlgate, Stephen. An Introduction to Hegel: Freedom, Truth and History. New Jersey: SBlackwell, 2005.
  • Schofield, Malcolm. “Stoic Ethics.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by Brad Inwood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • Sedley, David. “The School, from Zeno to Arius Didymus.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by Brad Inwood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • Solomon, Robert C. In the Spirit of Hegel. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.
  • Stephens, William O. Stoic Ethics: Epictetus and Happiness as Freedom. London and New York: Continuum, 2007. Stern, Robert. Hegel and the Phenomenology of Spirit. London: Routledge, 2002.
  • Zeller, Eduard. Outlines of the History of Greek Philosophy. Translated by L. R. Palmer. New York: Dover Publications, 1980.

STOACI ETİK VE HEGEL TARAFINDAN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Year 2018, Volume: 13 Issue: 26, 443 - 455, 29.12.2018

Abstract

Stoacı felsefe okulu en çok etik öğretisi ile öne çıkmaktadır. Buradaki en
önemli tema etik olarak bağlayıcı olan ve nötr olarak görülen değerleri ayırmış
olmalarıdır. Bu ayrıma karşılık gelen şey ise kişinin sorumluluk alması ve
almaması gereken alanların dağıtılmış olmasıdır. Bu yazıda, Stoacı etiğin bu
temel temasını eleştirel bir gözle sunmanın ve tartışmanın yanı sıra, Tinin
Görüngübilimi’nde işlenildiği şekilde, Hegel’in bunu değerlendirmesini
sorunsallaştıracağım. Daha sonra, Hegel’in Stoacı etiğin gereğinden fazla içe
dönük olduğu iddiasının, Stoacıların sosyallik değerine vurguları dikkate
alındığında, tutarlı olup olmadığını sorgulayacağım.

References

  • Beiser, Frederick. Hegel. New York and London: Routledge, 2006.
  • Brennan, Tad. “Stoic Moral Psychology.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by Brad Inwood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • Chiereghin, Franco. “Freedom and Thought: Stoicism, Skepticism, and Unhappy Consciousness.” In The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, edited by Kennth R. Westphal. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009.
  • Foucault, Michel. The Care of the Self: Volume 3 of The History of Sexuality. New York: Pantheon Books, 1986.
  • Gill, Christopher. “The Schood in the Roman Imperial Period.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by Brad Inwood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
  • Houlgate, Stephen. An Introduction to Hegel: Freedom, Truth and History. New Jersey: SBlackwell, 2005.
  • Schofield, Malcolm. “Stoic Ethics.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by Brad Inwood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • Sedley, David. “The School, from Zeno to Arius Didymus.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by Brad Inwood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • Solomon, Robert C. In the Spirit of Hegel. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.
  • Stephens, William O. Stoic Ethics: Epictetus and Happiness as Freedom. London and New York: Continuum, 2007. Stern, Robert. Hegel and the Phenomenology of Spirit. London: Routledge, 2002.
  • Zeller, Eduard. Outlines of the History of Greek Philosophy. Translated by L. R. Palmer. New York: Dover Publications, 1980.
There are 13 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Philosophy
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Emre Karatekeli

Publication Date December 29, 2018
Submission Date December 31, 1899
Acceptance Date December 29, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 13 Issue: 26

Cite

Chicago Karatekeli, Emre. “STOACI ETİK VE HEGEL TARAFINDAN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”. FLSF Felsefe Ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 13, no. 26 (December 2018): 443-55.

Starting from 2024, our journal will be published in 3 issues as two regular and one special issues. These issues will be published In May (regular issue), September (special issue) and December (regular issue).

Acceptance of articles for our special issue and our regular issue in December will begin on March 15.

Only articles within the scope of the file will be included in our special issue. 

Thank you for your attention.