ARASI[NDA]LIĞIN APORETİĞİ: JORGE LUİS BORGES VE KARAR VERİLEMEZLİĞİN LABİRENTİ

Year 2014, Issue: 17, 117 - 130, 01.05.2014

Ruhtan Yalçıner

Abstract

1947 yılında yayınlanan ‘Asterion’un Hanesi’ isimli kısa hikayesinde, Arjantinli yazar Jorge Luis Borges, Theseus efsanesinin kahramanını Theseus’tan minotaura, yani Asterion’a çevirir. Burada Borges, gerçekliğin labirente benzer vasfını kaleme alır. Asterion’un hanesi; kapıları, mevcudiyet metafiziğinin tecrübe edilişine hanenin labirente benzer vasfının ‘dünya’nın tecrübesi ile mekânzamansal olarak özdeşleştirilmesine açılan/kapanan, psişik bir hafıza mekanı tuhaflığın, yasın, umutsuzluğunun, umudun ve melankolinin mnemoteknik alanı olarak karşımıza çıkar. Bu hikayede Borges; minotaurun, labirentin/dünyanın verdiği varoluşsal ıstıraptan cezalandırıcısı Theseus eliyle kurtuluşunu işler. Asterion için dünyanın tecrübesi, yalnızca, kesinlik işaretlerinden epokhal bir geri çekilmeyi değil; aynı zamanda, karar verilemezliğin açığa serilmesini de ifade eder. Bataille ve Derrida’dan hareketle, bu çalışma, arası nda lığın aporetik bağlamını, Borges mitopoetiğinin öne çıkan belirleyicileri itibariyle değerlendirmektedir

Keywords

Borges, Theseus, Asterion, mitopoetik, arası nda lık, aporetik, karar verilemezlik, labirent

APORETICS OF THE IN-BETWEEN: JORGE LUIS BORGES AND THE LABYRINTH OF UNDECIDABILITY

Abstract

In his short story ‘The House of Asterion’, originally published in 1947, Argentinean writer Jorge Luis Borges turns the protagonist of the Theseus myth from Theseus to the minotaur, Asterion. Borges, herein, proses labyrinthine design of reality. The house of Asterion denotes a psychic space of memory mnemotechnic sphere of ambiguity, mourning, despair, hope and melancholia the doors of which are being unlocked/locked to the experience of the metaphysics of presence spatiotemporal equation of the labyrinthine characteristic of the house with the ‘world’ . In this plot, Borges proses minotaur’s relief from the existential pain of the labyrinth/world by the succour of his ‘redeemer’ Theseus . The experience of the world, for Asterion, connotes not only an epochal re-treat from markers of exactitude, but also the unconcealment of undecidability. By going through Bataille and Derrida, this paper interprets the aporetic context of the in-between via central tenants of Borges’ mythopoetic

Keywords

Borges, Theseus, Asterion, mythopoetic, in-betweenness, aporetic, undecidability, labyrinth

References

• Apollodorus, The Library, Vol. I, Book I-III, London: William Hieneman, 1921a.
• Apollodorus, The Library, Vol. II, Book III-X, London: William Hieneman, 1921b.
• Auerbach, E. (2003), Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Ballard, E. G. (1957), Art and Analysis: An Essay toward a Theory in Aesthetics, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Barthes, R. (1972), ‘Kafka’s Answer’, Critical Essays, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 133-137.
• Bataille, G. (1973), Literature and Evil, New York: Urizen Books.
• Bataille, G. (1986a), ‘The Pineal Eye’, Visions of Excess: Selected Writings, 1927-1939, A. Stoekl (ed.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 79-90.
• Bataille, G. (1986b), ‘The Labyrinth’, Visions of Excess: Selected Writings, 1927-1939, A. Stoekl (ed.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 171-177.
• Bataille, G. (1988), The Inner Experience, New York: State University of New York Press.
• Bataille, G. (1989), The Tears of Eros, San Francisco: City Lights Books.
• Blanchot, M. (1981), ‘Two Version of the Imaginary’, The Gaze of Orpheus and Other Literary Essays, P. A. Sitney (ed.), New York: Station Hill Press, 79-89.
• Borges, J. L. (1999a), ‘The Perpetual Race of Achilles and the Tortoise’, Selected Non-Fictions, E. Weinberger (ed.), New York: Viking Penguin, 43-47.
• Borges, J. L. (1999b), ‘A History of Eternity’, Selected Non-Fictions, E. Weinberger (ed.), New York: Viking Penguin, 123-139.
• Borges, J. L. (2007), ‘The House of Asterion’, Labyrinths: Selected Stories and Other Writings, D. A. Yates, and J. E. Irby (eds.), New York: New Directions, 138-140.
• Bossart, W. H. (2003), Borges and Philosophy: Self, Time, and Metaphysics, New York: Peter Lang.
• Campbell, J. (2002), The Inner Reaches of Outer Space: Metaphor as Myth and as Religion, Novato: New World Library.
• Carotenuto, A. (1981), The Vertical Labyrinth: Individuation in Jungian Psychology Studies, Toronto: Inner City Books.
• Cixous, H. (1976), ‘Fiction and its Phantoms: A Reading of Freud’s Das Unheimliche (The “uncanny”)’, New Literary History 7(3), 525–548.
• Dembo, L. S. (1998), ‘Jorge Luis Borges’, Jorge Luis Borges: Conversations, R. Burgin (ed.), Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 84-91.
• Derrida, J. (1992), Acts of Literature, D. Attridge (ed.), New York: Routledge.
• Derrida, J. (1993), Aporias: Dying–Awaiting (One Another at) the ‘Limits of Turth’, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Derrida, J. (2006), Geneses, Genealogies, Genres and Genius: The Secrets of the Archive, New York: Columbia University Press.
• Freud, S. (1955), ‘The Uncanny’, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, XVII, J. Strachey (ed.), London: Hogarth Press, 218-252.
• Frish, M. (2004), You Might be Able to Get There from Here: Reconsiderin Borges and the Postmodern, Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
• Gasché, R. (2012), Georges Bataille: Phenomenology and Phantasmatology, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Gingerich, S. (2009), ‘Nothing and Everything: Theoretical and Practical Nihilism in Borges’, Thinking with Borges, W. Eggington and D. E. Johnson (eds.), Aurora: The Davies Group, 19-36.
• Gracia, J. J. E. (2012), Painting Borges: Philosophy Interpreting Art Interpreting Literature, Albany: State University of New York.
• Grimal, P. (1990), A Concise Dictionary of Classical Mythology, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
• Heidegger, M. (1962), Being and Time. New York: Harper & Row.
• Jenckes, K. (2007), Reading Borges after Benjamin: Allegory, Afterlife, and the Writing of History, Albany: State University of New York Press.
• Johnson, D. E. (2009), ‘Introduction: Borges and the Letter of Philosophy’, Thinking with Borges, W. Eggington and D. E. Johnson (eds.), Aurora: The Davies Group, 1-17.
• Jung, C. G. (1988), ‘Approaching the Unconscious’, Man and His Symbols, New York: Anchor Press, 18-103.
• Jung, C. G. (2004), Four Archetypes: Mother, Rebirth, Spirit, Trickster, London: Routledge.
• Kafka, F. (2009), The Trial, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Kierkegaard, S. (1994), Fear and Trembling and The Book on Adler, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
• Klossowski, P. (1997), Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle, Chicago: The Universtiy of Chicago Press.
• Kristeva, J. (1991), Strangers to Ourselves. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Lacan, J. (2006), ‘The Mirror Stage as Formative of the I Function as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience’, Ecrits, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 75-81.
• Latour, B. (2004), ‘“Do You Believe in Reality?” News from the Trenches of the Science Wars’, Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1-23.
• Latour, B. (2005), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Mulhall, S. (2007), Philosophical Myths of the Fall. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Nancy, J-L. (1993), The Birth to Presence, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Ovid, Metamorphoses, Vol. I, Book I-VIII, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
• Ovid, Metamorphoses, Vol. II, Book IX-XV, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1958.
• Ranciére, J. (2011), The Politics of Literature, Cambridge: Polity.
• Schelling, F. W. J. (2007), Historical-Critical Introduction to the Philosophy of Mythology, New York: State University of New York Press.
• Wilson, J. (2006), Jorge Luis Borges, London: Reaktion Books.
• Ziarek, K. (2009), ‘The “Fiction” of Possibility’, Thinking with Borges, W. Eggington and D. E. Johnson (eds.), Aurora: The Davies Group, 69-86.