Does the Happiness of Volunteers Change According to Their Income? An Empirical Application across the World

Year 2024, , 1279 - 1313, 27.09.2024

Keziban Altun Erdoğdu

https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1404070

Abstract

Enabling a volunteer to undertake a task altruistically within the social structure they live in directly or indirectly improves their happiness. However, the donation of valuable resources such as time, skills, and effort by the volunteer, as well as the resulting happiness, may vary based on income and the way of volunteering. From this point of view, in this study, the happiness of volunteers from different income groups was investigated according to the forms of volunteering. For this purpose, data from the World Values Survey (WVS) covering the first (1981-1984), third (1995-1998), fifth (2005-2009), sixth (2010-2014), and seventh (2017-2022) waves are analyzed globally using the ordered logistic method. The analysis revealed that the happiness of low-income volunteers increased when the number of voluntary organizations they actively participated in increased, while high-income volunteers were happier when they regularly participated in such organizations' activities. In various analyses involving different volunteer organizations, it was found that high-income volunteers achieved more happiness by actively providing voluntary services in associations or foundations aimed at increasing social awareness. On the other hand, low-income volunteers achieved more happiness by actively participating in volunteer work in groups formed for mutual assistance. Additionally, it was found that active volunteering in religious associations, foundations, or groups did not significantly contribute to the happiness of high-income volunteers but increased the happiness of volunteers in the low and middle-income groups. The study, unlike the literature, has shown that when considering the form of voluntarism, even high-income individuals benefit from volunteering behavior.

Keywords

Income, Volunteering, Happiness, Voluntary Organizations

Gönüllülerin Gelirine Göre Mutluluğu Değişir Mi? Dünya Genelinde Ampirik Bir Uygulama

Abstract

Gönüllünün sosyal yapı içinde karşılıksız olarak bir işi yapmayı üstlenmesi, durumunu doğrudan veya dolaylı olarak iyileştirerek mutlu olmasını sağlar. Ancak gönüllünün zaman, beceri, emek gibi değerli kaynaklarını bağışlaması ve süreç sonunda mutlu olması gelirine ve gönüllülüğü gerçekleştirme biçimine göre farklılık gösterebilir. Buradan hareketle çalışmada, farklı gelir grubunda yer alan gönüllülerin mutluluğu gönüllülüğü gerçekleştirme biçimlerine göre araştırılmıştır. Bu amaç için Dünya Değerler Araştırması’nın birinci (1981-1984), üçüncü (1995-1998), beşinci (2005-2009), altıncı (2010-2014) ve yedinci (2017-2022) dalgası sıralı lojistik yöntemi kullanılarak dünya genelinde analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda, düşük gelirli gönüllülerin aktif olarak üye olduğu gönüllü kuruluş sayısı arttığında mutluluğunun da arttığı; yüksek gelirli gönüllülerin ise bu tür kuruluşların faaliyetlerine düzenli olarak katıldığında mutlu olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Çeşitli gönüllü kuruluşları içeren analizlerde, yüksek gelir grubundaki gönüllülerin sosyal farkındalığı artırmaya yönelik kurulan dernek veya vakıflarda aktif olarak gönüllü hizmet sağlayarak yüksek mutluluğa ulaştığı; düşük gelir grubundaki gönüllülerin ise yardımlaşmak amacıyla oluşturulan gruplarda aktif bir şekilde gönüllü çalışmalar yaparak yüksek mutluluğa ulaştığı sonucuna varılmıştır. Ayrıca dini derneklerde, vakıflarda veya gruplarda gerçekleştirilen aktif gönüllülüğün, yüksek gelir grubundaki gönüllülerin mutluluğu için anlamlı olmadığı; düşük gelir ve orta gelir grubundaki gönüllülerin mutluluğunu ise arttırdığı bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Çalışma, literatürden farklı olarak, gönüllülüğün gerçekleştirme biçimi dikkate alındığında yüksek gelirli kişilerin de gönüllülük davranışından fayda elde edileceğini ortaya koymuştur.

Keywords

Gelir, Gönüllülük, Mutluluk, Gönüllü Kuruluşlar

References

• Arslan, M. L. (2021). Gönüllülük Felsefesi. B. Çankır (Der.), Liderlik: Gönüllülük ve Gönüllü Liderliği (59-76). İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A.Ş.
• Beatton, T. & Torgler, B. (2018). Volunteering and Life or Financial Shocks: Does Income and Wealth Matter?. Applied Economics, 50(19), 2190-2209.
• Becker, G. S. (1992). Fertility and the Economy. Journal of Population Economics, 5(3), 185-201.
• Benenson, J. & Stagg, A. (2016). An Asset-Based Approach to Volunteering: Exploring Benefits for Low-Income Volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1), 131-149.
• Binder, M. & Freytag, A. (2013). Volunteering, Subjective Well-Being and Public Policy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 97-119.
• Borgonovi, F. (2008). Doing Well by Doing Good: The Relationship Between Formal Volunteering and Self-Reported Health and Happiness. Social Science & Medicine, 66(11), 2321-2334.
• Bruni, L. & Stanca, L. (2008). Watching Alone: Relational Goods, Television and Happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65(3-4), 506-528.
• Chambre, S. M. (1984). Is Volunteering a Substitute for Role Loss in Old Age? An Empirical Test of Activity Theory. The Gerontologist, 24(3), 292-298.
• Chen, C. M., Yeh, C. Y. & Chang, C. H. (2014). Volunteering and Life Satisfaction: An İnvestigation of Endogeneity. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 55(1), 21-32.
• Day, K. M. & Devlin, R. A. (1996). Volunteerism and Crowding Out: Canadian Econometric Evidence. Canadian Journal of Economics, 29(1), 37-53.
• Dumludağ, D. (2014). Fayda, Mutluluk ve Refah. A. F. Aysan & D. Dumludağ (Der.), Kalkınmada Yeni Yaklaşımlar (365-386). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları.
• Enders, L. E. & Fanslow, A. M. (1981). Volunteer Service of Professional Home Economists. Home Economics Research Journal, 10(2), 120-126.
• Enjolras, B. (2021). Explaining the Varieties of Volunteering in Europe: A Capability Approach. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32(6), 1187-1212.
• Fiorillo, D. (2011). Volunteer Work and Domain Satisfactions: Evidence From Italy. International Journal of Social Economics, 39(1/2), 97-124.
• Frey, B. S. & Gallus, J. (2018). Volunteer Organizations: Motivating with Awards. R. Ranyard (Ed.), Economic Psychology (275-286). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
• Gil-Lacruz, M., Saz-Gil, M. I. & Gil-Lacruz, A. I. (2019). Benefits of Older Volunteering on Wellbeing: An International Comparison. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2647.
• Lawton, R. N., Gramatki, I., Watt, W. & Fujiwara, D. (2021). Does Volunteering Make Us Happier, or are Happier People More Likely to Volunteer? Addressing the Problem of Reverse Causality When Estimating the Wellbeing Impacts of Volunteering. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(2), 599-624.
• Lee, M. A. (2019). Volunteering and Happiness: Examining the Differential Effects of Volunteering Types According to Household Income. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(3), 795-814.
• Meier, S. & Stutzer, A. (2004). Is Volunteering Rewarding in İtself? Evidence from a Natural Experiment (No. 2004-12). CREMA Working Paper.
• Meier, S. & Stutzer, A. (2008). Is Volunteering Rewarding in Itself?. Economica, 75(297), 39-59.
• Meier, S. (2006). The Economics of Non-Selfish Behaviour: Decisions to Contribute Money to Public Goods. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Menchik, P. L. & Weisbrod, B. A. (1987). Volunteer Labor Supply. Journal of Public Economics, 32(2), 159-183.
• Morrow-Howell, N., Hinterlong, J., Rozario, P. A. & Tang, F. (2003). Effects of Volunteering on the Well-Being of Older Adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(3), 137-145.
• Morrow-Howell, N., Hong, S. I. & Tang, F. (2009). Who Benefits from Volunteering? Variations in Perceived Benefits. The Gerontologist, 49(1), 91-102.
• Musick, M. A. & Wilson, J. (2003). Volunteering and Depression: The Role of Psychological and Social Resources in Different Age Groups. Social Science & Medicine, 56(2), 259-269.
• Rojas, M. (2019). The Relevance of Richard A. Easterlin’s Groundbreaking Work. A Historical Perspective. Rojas, M. (Ed.), The Economics of Happiness How the Easterlin Paradox Transformed Our Understanding of Well-Being and Progress (3-24). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
• Ruben, R. & Dumludağ, D. (2018). İktisat ve Psikoloji. D. Dumludağ, Ö. Gökdemir, L. Neyse & E. Ruben (Der.), İktisatta Davranışsal Yaklaşımlar (33-52). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları.
• Sánchez-García, J., Gil-Lacruz, A. I. & Gil-Lacruz, M. (2022). The Influence of Gender Equality on Volunteering among European Senior Citizens. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 33(4), 820-832.
• Shi, Z. (2016). Does the Number of Children Matter to the Happiness of their Parents?. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 3(1), 1-24.
• Steinberg, K. S., Rooney, P. M. & Chin, W. (2002). Measurement of Volunteering: A Methodological Study Using Indiana as a Test Case. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(4), 484-501.
• Sundeen, R. A. (1992). Differences in Personal Goals and Attitudes among Volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21(3), 271-291.
• Tanskanen, A. O. & Danielsbacka, M. (2016). Do Volunteering and Charity Pay off? Well-Being Benefits of Participating in Voluntary Work and Charity for Older and Younger Adults in Finland. Research on Ageing and Social Policy, 4(2), 2-28.
• Tiltay, M. A. (2021). Gönüllü Yönetimi. B. Çankır (Der.), Liderlik: Gönüllülük ve Gönüllü Liderliği (41-57). İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A.Ş.
• Veenhoven, R. & Dumludağ, D. (2018). İktisat ve Mutluluk: Bugün Daha Mutlu muyuz?. D. Dumludağ, Ö. Gökdemir, L. Neyse & E. Ruben (Der.), İktisatta Davranışsal Yaklaşımlar (223-251). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları.
• Wallrodt, S. & Thieme, L. (2023). The Opportunity Costs of Volunteering: Evidence from Germany. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(5), 1169-1190.
• Wilson, J. & Musick, M. (1997). Who Cares? Toward an Integrated Theory of Volunteer Work. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 694-713.
• Wilson, J. & Musick, M. (1998). The Contribution of Social Resources to Volunteering. Social Science Quarterly, 79(4), 799-814.
• Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 215-240.
• Wilson, J., Mantovan, N. & Sauer, R. M. (2020). The Economic Benefits of Volunteering and Social Class. Social Science Research, 85, 102368.
• Yemişcigil, A. & Dolan, P. (2018). “Mutluluk” Nedir, Nasıl Ölçülür?. Kalkınma Literatüründe Kavramsal ve Metodolojik Yaklaşımlar. D. Dumludağ, Ö. Gökdemir, L. Neyse & E. Ruben (Der.), İktisatta Davranışsal Yaklaşımlar (187-198). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları.
• Ziemek, S. (2006). Economic Analysis of Volunteers’ Motivations—A Cross-Country Study. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(3), 532-555.