Teoriden Eyleme: (Dijital) Dürtmelerin Çevre Yanlısı Davranışları Nasıl Etkilediğinin Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2024, , 1335 - 1365, 27.09.2024

Havva Serim Toro , Seda Aksümer

https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1464126

Abstract

İnsanların çeşitli ortamlardaki gündelik eylemleri çevresel sorunlara yol açabilmektedir. Otomatik olarak gerçekleştirilen bu eylemler, geleneksel iktisatta göz ardı edilmektedir. Bu nedenle, çevre yanlısı davranışları tespit etmek ve anlamak çok önemlidir. Öte yandan, davranışsal iktisat bu tür davranışları etkileyen bilişsel kısıtlamalara ilişkin içgörüler sunmakta ve insanların sınırlı rasyonelliğini dikkate alan dürtmeler geliştirmektedir. Bu nedenle çalışmada, davranışsal iktisattaki dürtmelerin sürdürülebilir bir dünya inşa etme ve çevre dostu davranışların temelini atma konusundaki önemi vurgulanmaktadır. Bu bağlamda dürtmelerin dijital ortamlarda ortaya çıkan önemi incelenerek bu alandaki uygulamaları analiz edilmiştir. Kapsamlı bir literatür taraması yapılan bu çalışmada, çevre yanlısı davranışlar enerji tasarrufu, atık azaltma, geri dönüşüm ve sürdürülebilir tüketim olarak kategorize edilmektedir. Sürdürülebilir tüketim ise market alışverişi, seyahat kararları, moda ve makyaj tercihleri olarak ayrılmaktadır. Araştırma, birçok çevre yanlısı davranışın otomatik doğasını kabul ederek ve yaygın tutum-davranış farkını ele alarak, davranışsal iktisatın önemini belirgin hale getirmektedir. Sonuç olarak, hem geleneksel hem de dijital dürtmelerin etkisini araştıran bu çalışma, çevre yanlısı davranışların teşvik edilmesine ilişkin ampirik kanıtlara pratik bir yanıt sunmaktadır.

Keywords

Çevre Yanlısı Davranışlar, (Dijital) Dürtmeler, Politika İncelemesi, Sürdürülebilirlik, Literatür Taraması

From Theory to Action: Evaluating How (Digital) Nudges Influence Pro-Environmental Behaviors

Abstract

Everyday actions of people across various settings can lead to environmental issues. These automatically performed actions are overlooked in the traditional economics. Therefore, it is crucial to identify and understand pro-environmental behaviors. On the other hand, behavioral economics offers insights into cognitive constraints affecting these kinds of behaviors and develops nudges that take human beings' limited rationality into account. Therefore the study underscores the significance of nudges as empirical tools in behavioral economics for building a sustainable world and laying the foundation for pro-environmental behaviors. In this context, it examines the emerging significance of nudges in digital settings, analyzing their applications in this domain. Conducting an extensive literature review, this study categorizes pro-environmental behaviors as energy conservation, waste reduction & recycling, and sustainable consumption. Sustainable consumption is divided into grocery shopping, travel decisions, fashion & makeup choices. The research makes the importance of behavioral economics apparent by acknowledging the automatic nature of many pro-environmental behaviors and addressing the pervasive attitude-behavior gap. Consequently, by investigating the impact of both physical and digital nudges, this article offers a practical response to empirical evidence on promoting pro-environmental behavior responsible actions.

Keywords

Pro-environmental behavior, (Digital) Nudges, Policy Review, Sustainability, Literature Review

References

• Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A Review of Intervention Studies Aimed at Household Energy Conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273-291.
• Allcott, H. (2011). Social Norms and Energy Conservation. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9-10), 1082-1095.
• Amatulli, C., De Angelis, M., Peluso, A. M., Soscia, I., & Guido, G. (2019). The Effect of Negative Message Framing on Green Consumption: An Investigation of The Role of Shame. Journal of Business Ethics, 157, 1111-1132.
• Anagnostopoulou, E., Urbančič, J., Bothos, E., Magoutas, B., Bradesko, L., Schrammel, J., & Mentzas, G. (2020). From Mobility Patterns to Behavioural Change: Leveraging Travel Behaviour and Personality Profiles to Nudge for Sustainable Transportation. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 54, 157-178.
• Anderson, K., Song, K., Lee, S., Krupka, E., Lee, H., & Park, M. (2017). Longitudinal Analysis of Normative Energy Use Feedback on Dormitory Occupants. Applied Energy, 189, 623-639.
• Andor, M. A., & Fels, K. M. (2018). Behavioral Economics and Energy Conservation–A Systematic Review of Non-Price Interventions and their Causal Effects. Ecological Economics, 148, 178-210.
• Antonides, G., & Welvaarts, M. (2020). Effects of Default Option and Lateral Presentation on Consumer Choice of The Sustainable Option in an Online Choice Task. Sustainability, 12(13), 5484.
• Arbuthnot, J., Tedeschi, R., Wayner, M., Turner, J., Kressel, S., & Rush, R. (1976). The Induction of Sustained Recycling Behavior through The Foot-In-The-Door Technique. Journal of Environmental Systems, 6(4), 355- 383.
• Ata, O., & Erdoğan, M. (2020). Geri Bildirim ve Sosyal Normların Hanehalkı Elektrik Enerjisi Tasarrufuna Etkileri: Deneysel Bir Çalışma. Tüketici ve Tüketim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(1), 1-34.
• Barker, H., Shaw, P. J., Richards, B., Clegg, Z., & Smith, D. (2021). What Nudge Techniques Work for Food Waste Behaviour Change at The Consumer Level? A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 13(19), 11099.
• Bauer, J. M., Aarestrup, S. C., Hansen, P. G., & Reisch, L. A. (2022). Nudging More Sustainable Grocery Purchases: Behavioural Innovations in A Supermarket Setting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121605.
• Beermann, V., Rieder, A., & Uebernickel, F. (2022). Green Nudges: How to Induce Pro-Environmental Behavior Using Technology. ICIS 2022 Proceedings, Copenhagen Denmark, December.
• Bekker, M. J., Cumming, T. D., Osborne, N. K. P., Bruining, A. M., McClean, J. I., & Leland, L. S. (2010). Encouraging Electricity Savings in A University Residential Hall Through A Combination Of Feedback, Visual, Prompts, and Incentives. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(2), 327–331.
• Berger, M., Greinacher, E., & Wolf, L. (2022). Digital Nudging to Promote Energy Conservation Behavior-Framing and Default Rules in A Smart Home App. ECIS 2022 Research Papers. 92. Last accessed December 11, 2023. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2022_rp/92/.
• Berger, M., Lange, T., & Stahl, B. (2022). A Digital Push with Real Impact–Mapping Effective Digital Nudging Elements to Contexts to Promote Environmentally Sustainable Behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134716.
• Berger, M., Müller, C., & Nüske, N. (2020). Digital Nudging in Online Grocery Stores-Towards Ecologically Sustainable Nutrition. In The Forty-First International Conference on Information Systems, India.
• Bittle, R. G., Valesano, R. M., & Thaler, G. M. (1979). The Effects of Daily Feedback on Residential Electricity Usage As A Function of Usage Level and Type of Feedback Information. Journal of Environmental Systems, 9(3), 275-287.
• Blankenberg, A. K., & Alhusen, H. (2019). On the Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Literature Review and Guide for The Empirical Economist. Center for European, Governance, and Economic Development Research (CEGE), (350).
• Brandsma, J. S., and Blasch, J. E. 2019. One for All? The Impact of Different Types of Energy Feedback and Goal Setting on Individuals’ Motivation to Conserve Electricity. Energy Policy, (135), 110992.
• Buckley, P. (2020). Prices, Information and Nudges for Residential Electricity Conservation: A Meta-Analysis. Ecological Economics, 172, 106635.
• Byerly, H., Balmford, A., Ferraro, P. J., Hammond Wagner, C., Palchak, E., Polasky, S., & Fisher, B. (2018). Nudging Pro‐Environmental Behavior: Evidence and Opportunities. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(3), 159-168.
• Cardella, E., Ewing, B. T., & Williams, R. B. (2022). Green is Good—The Impact of Information Nudges on The Selection of Voluntary Green-Power Plans. The Energy Journal, 43(1). 1- 42.
• Chakravarty, S., & Mishra, R. (2019). Using Social Norms to Reduce Paper Waste: Results from A Field Experiment in The Indian Information Technology Sector. Ecological Economics, 164, 106356.
• Chatzigeorgiou, I. M., & Andreou, G. T. (2021). A Systematic Review on Feedback Research for Residential Energy Behavior Change through Mobile and Web Interfaces. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135, 110187.
• Chongwilaikasaem, S., & Ayaragarnchanakul, E. (2023). Electricity Saving Behavior in Student Dorms: What Message Framing Works? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 107, 102088. 1-9.
• Chu, E. W., & Karr, J. R. (2017). Environmental Impact: Concept, Consequences, Measurement. Reference Module in Life Sciences, 1-22.
• Chui, W. S., Wai, C. W., & Ahmad, R. (2015). Local and Global Messages for Prompting Energy Conservation Behaviour: An Experimental Study in University. J. Teknologi, 74, 87-92.
• Cialdini, R. B., Demaine, L. J., Sagarin, B. J., Barret, D. W., Rhoads, K. & Winter, P. L. (2006). Managing Social Norms for Persuasive Impact. Social Influence, 1(1), 3-15.
• Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus Theory of Normative Conduct: Recycling The Concept of Norms to Reduce Littering in Public Places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015-1026.
• Cialdini, Robert B. and Noah J. Goldstein (2004). Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–622.
• Constantino, S., Sparkman, G., Kraft-Todd, G., Bicchieri, C., Centola, D., ShellDuncan, B., Vogt, S., & Weber, E., (2022). Scaling up Change: A Critical Review and Practical Guide to Harnessing Social Norms for Climate Action. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 23, 50–97.
• Cosic, A., Cosic, H., & Ille, S. (2018). Can Nudges Affect Students’ Green Behaviour? A Field Experiment. Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, 2(1), 107-111.
• De Bauw, M., De La Revilla, L. S., Poppe, V., Matthys, C., & Vranken, L. (2022). Digital Nudges to Stimulate Healthy and Pro-Environmental Food Choices in E-Groceries. Appetite, 172, 105971.
• De Groot, J. I. & Steg, L. (2008). Value Orientations to Explain Beliefs Related to Environmental Significant Behavior: How to Measure Egoistic, Altruistic, and Biospheric Value Orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330-354.
• Degirmenci, K., & Recker, J. (2018). Creating Environmental Sensemaking Through Green is: An Experimental Study on Eco-Nudging Paper Printing Behavior. In Proceedings of the 24th Americas Conference on Information Systems (Pp. 1-10). Association for Information Systems (AIS).
• Delmas, M., & Lessem, N. (2014). Saving Power to Conserve Your Reputation? The Effectiveness of Private Versus Public Information. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 67(3), 353-370.
• Dupré, M., & Meineri, S. (2016). Increasing Recycling Through Displaying Feedback and Social Comparative Feedback. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 101-107.
• Edirneligil, A. (2021). Davranışsal İktisat Bağlamında Hanehalkı Elektrik Tüketiminin Belirleyicileri: Konya Örneği. Doktora Tezi. Selçuk Üniversitesi. 1-204.
• Egebark, J., & Ekström, M. (2016). Can Indifference Make The World Greener?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 76, 1-13.
• Environmental Law. (1983). The Organizing Principle of The Publication: 5(22), 499.
• FHWA (2019). Applying Incentives to Shift Mode of Travel. In Expanding Traveler Choices Through The Use of Incentives: A Compendium of Examples (Chapter 4).
• Frederiks, E.R., Stenner, K. & Hobman, E.V. (2015). Household Energy Use: Applying Behavioural Economics to Understand Consumer Decision-Making and Behaviour. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 4, 1385–1394.
• Fredholm, S., & Karlsson, E. (2020). Are you Cheap or Climate Friendly? Applying Nudge Theory to Lower Meat Purchasing in Grocery Stores. Master Thesis. 1-53.
• Friis, R., Skov, L. R., Olsen, A., Appleton, K. M., Saulais, L., Dinnella, C., & Perez-Cueto, F. J. (2017). Comparison of Three Nudge Interventions (Priming, Default Option, and Perceived Variety) to Promote Vegetable Consumption in A Self-Service Buffet Setting. PloS One, 12(5), 1-16.
• Froehlich, J. (2009, February). Promoting Energy Efficient Behaviors in The Home Through Feedback: The Role of Human-Computer Interaction. In Proc. HCIC Workshop (Vol. 9, pp. 1-11).
• Fuerst, F. & Singh, R. (2018). How Present Bias Forestalls Energy Efficiency Upgrades: A Study of Household Appliance Purchases in India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186, 558–569.
• Gabrielli, S., & Maimone, R. (2013). Digital Interventions or Sustainable Urban Mobility: A Pilot Study. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct Publication (pp. 119-122).
• Garg, P. (2020). Introduction to Fast Fashion: Environmental Concerns and Sustainability Measurements. Environmental Concerns and Sustainable Development. Biodiversity, Soil and Waste Management, (2), 409-427.
• Geislar, S. (2017). The New Norms of Food Waste at The Curb: Evidence-Based Policy Tools to Address Benefits and Barriers. Waste Management, 68, 571-580.
• Ghesla, C., Grieder, M., & Schubert, R. (2020). Nudging The Poor and The Rich–A Field Study on The Distributional Effects of Green Electricity Defaults. Energy Economics, 86, 104616.1-15.
• Gillingham, K., & Tsvetanov, T. (2018). Nudging Energy Efficiency Audits: Evidence from A Field Experiment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 90, 303-316.
• Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A Room with A Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472-482.
• Gonzales, M. H., Aronson, E. & Costanzo, M. A. (1988). Using Social Cognition and Persuasion to Promote Energy Conservation: A Quasi‐Experiment 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18(12), 1049-1066.
• Gould, R. K., Ardoin, N. M., Biggar, M., Cravens, A. E., & Wojcik, D. (2016). Environmental Behavior’ S Dirty Secret: The Prevalence of Waste Management in Discussions of Environmental Concern and Action. Environmental Management, 58, 268-282.
• Grazzini, L., Rodrigo, P., Aiello, G., & Viglia, G. (2018). Loss or Gain? The Role of Message Framing in Hotel Guests’ Recycling Behaviour. J. Sustain. Tour., 26 (11), 1944–1966.
• Grebitus, C., Roscoe, R. D., Van Loo, E. J., & Kula, I. (2020). Sustainable Bottled Water: How Nudging and Internet Search Affect Consumers’ Choices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 267, 121930.
• Han, Q., Nieuwenhijsen, I., De Vries, B., Blokhuis, E., & Schaefer, W. (2013). Intervention Strategy to Stimulate Energy-Saving Behavior of Local Residents. Energy Policy, (52), 706-715.
• Hayes, S. C. & Cone, J. D. (1981). Reduction of Residential Consumption of Electricity Through Simple Monthly Feedback. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14(1), 81–88.
• Homar, A. R. & Cvelbar, L. K. (2021). The Effects of Framing on Environmental Decisions: A Systematic Literature Review. Ecological Economics, 183, (106950), 1-18.
• Jahn, M., Jentsch, M., Prause, C. R., Pramudianto, F., Al-Akkad, A., & Reiners, R. (2010). The Energy Aware Smart Home. In 2010 5th International Conference on Future Information Technology, (pp. 1-8).
• Johnsen, S. Å. K. (2016). Inertia Processes and Status Quo Bias in Promoting Green Change. Human Affairs, 26(4), 400-409.
• Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.
• Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L. & Thaler, R.H (1991). Anomalies the Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206.
• Kallbekken, S., & Sælen, H. (2013). “Nudging” Hotel Guests to Reduce Food Waste as A Win–Win Environmental Measure. Economics Letters, 119(3), 325–327.
• Kennedy, E. H., Beckley, T. M., McFarlane, B. L. & Nadeau, S. (2009). Why We Don't" Walk The Talk": Understanding The Environmental Values/ Behaviour Gap in Canada. Human Ecology Review, 151-160.
• Kim, S. B., & Kim, D. Y. (2014). The Effects of Message Framing and Source Credibility on Green Messages in Hotels. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly. 55 (1), 64–75.
• Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are The Barriers to Pro-Environmental Behavior?. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 199-260.
• Kremer, M., Rao, G., & Schilbach, F. (2019). Behavioral Development Economics. In Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations, 1(2), 345-458.
• Lee, E. J., Choi, H., Han, J., Kim, D. H., Ko, E., & Kim, K. H. (2020). How to “Nudge” Your Consumers Toward Sustainable Fashion Consumption: An Fmri Investigation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 642-651.
• Lehner, M., Mont, O., & Heiskanen, E. (2016). Nudging–A Promising Tool for Sustainable Consumption Behaviour?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 166-177.
• Levy, J. S. (1996). Loss Aversion, Framing, and Bargaining: The Implications of Prospect Theory for International Conflict. International Political Science Review, 17(2), 179–195.
• Li, D., Zhao, L., Ma, S., Shao, S. & Zhang, L. (2019). What Influences an Individual’s Pro-Environmental Behavior? A Literature Review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, (146), 28–34.
• Linder, N., Lindahl, T., & Borgström, S. (2018). Using Behavioural Insights to Promote Food Waste Recycling in Urban Households—Evidence from A Longitudinal Field Experiment. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(352), 1-13.
• Ling, M., Xu, L., & Yang, H. (2023). Direct and Spillover Effects of Social Norm Nudges for Household Recycling: A Longitudinal Field Experiment. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 42, 423-433.
• Liu, Y., Veríssimo, D., & Farhidi, F. (2016). Using Social Norm to Promote Energy Conservation in A Public Building. Energy and Buildings, 133, 32-36.
• Loock, C.-M., Staake, T., & Thiesse, F. (2013). Motivating Energy-Efficient Behavior with Green is: An Investigation of Goal Setting and The Role of Defaults. MIS Quarterly. 1313-1332.
• Lord, K.R. (1994). Motivating Recycling Behavior: A Quasi Experimental Investigation of Message and Source Strategies. Psychol. Mark., 11 (4), 341–358.
• Lotti, L., Barile, L., & Manfredi, G. (2023). Improving Recycling Sorting Behaviour with Human Eye Nudges. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 10127.
• McGrath, G. M. (2023). Using Social Norm Nudges in Supermarket Shopping Trolleys to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Purchases. Nutrition Bulletin, 48(1), 115-123.
• Meske, C., & Amojo, I. (2019). Status Quo, Critical Reflection and Road Ahead of Digital Nudging in Information Systems Research--A Discussion with Markus Weinmann and Alexey Voinov. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.08202. pp. 402 – 420.
• Meske, C., Amojo, I., & Müller, C. (2022). Online Flight Booking: Digital Nudging to Decrease Aviation-Related Carbon Emissions. Information Technology & People. Vol. Ahead-Of-Print No. Ahead-Of-Print. Https://Doi.Org/10.1108/ITP-03-2021-0172
• Meybeck, A., & Gitz, V. (2017). Sustainable Diets Within Sustainable Food Systems. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 76(1), 1-11.
• Milford, A. B., Øvrum, A., & Helgesen, H. (2015). Nudges to Increase Recycling and Reduce Waste. Norwegian Agricultural Economics Research Institute. 1- 27.
• Mirbabaie, M., Marx, J., & Germies, J. (2021). Conscious Commerce--Digital Nudging and Sustainable E-Commerce Purchase Decisions. Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney, (pp.1-11).
• Mont, O., & Plepys, A. (2008). Sustainable Consumption Progress: Should We be Proud or Alarmed?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(4), 531-537.
• Mullainathan, S., R.H. Thaler (2001), "Behavioral Economics", Smelser N., P. Bates (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Social, Pergamon Press, 1094-1100.
• Nelson, K. M., Bauer, M. K., & Partelow, S. (2021). Informational Nudges to Encourage Pro-Environmental Behavior: Examining Differences in Message Framing and Human Interaction. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 610186, 1-15.
• Newell, R. G., & Siikamäki, J. (2014). Nudging Energy Efficiency Behavior: The Role of Information Labels. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 1(4), 555-598.
• Niculescu, M., Payne, C. R., & Just, D. (2016). Using Mirrors and Social Norms to Improve Fruit and Vegetable Purchases in Grocery Stores. In The Proceedings of the International Conference" Marketing-from Information to Decision" (p. 69). Babes Bolyai University.
• Nilsson, A., Bergstad, C. J., Thuvander, L., Andersson, D., Andersson, K., & Meiling, P. (2014). Effects of Continuous Feedback on Households’ Electricity Consumption: Potentials and Barriers. Applied Energy, 122, 17-23.
• Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 913-923.
• O'donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (1999). Doing it now or later. American Economic Review, 89(1), 103-124.
• Ölander, F., & Thøgersen, J. (2014). Informing versus nudging in environmental policy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37, 341-356.
• Ong, D., Chiu, S., Andrews, E., & Nadarajan, G. (2023). One Needs to be Reminded and Motivated: Mediating Role of Digital Nudging for Food Waste Reduction. Journal of Social Marketing, 13(3), 449-471.
• Osbaldiston, R., & Schott, J. P. (2012). Environmental Sustainability and Behavioral Science: Meta-Analysis of Pro environmental Behavior Experiments. Environment and Behavior, 44(2), 257-299.
• Petersen, J. E., Shunturov, V., Janda, K., Platt, G., & Weinberger, K. (2007). Dormitory Residents Reduce Electricity Consumption When Exposed to Real-Time Visual Feedback and Incentives. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(1), 16–33.
• Pichert, D., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2008). Green Defaults: Information Presentation and Pro-Environmental Behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), 63-73.
• Poortinga, W., & Whitaker, L. (2018). Promoting The Use of Reusable Coffee Cups Through Environmental Messaging, The Provision of Alternatives and Financial Incentives. Sustainability, 10(3), 873, 1-10.
• Qi, D., Li, R., Penn, J., Houghtaling, B., Prinyawiwatkul, W., & Roe, B. E. (2022). Nudging Greater Vegetable Intake and Less Food Waste: A Field Experiment. Food Policy, 112, 102369.
• Rabin, M. (2002). A Perspective on Psychology and Economics. European Economic Review. 46(4–5),657–85.
• Ramus, C.A. & Killmer, A.B.C. (2007). Corporate Greening Through Prosocial Extra Role Behaviours- A Conceptual Framework for Employee Motivation. Business Strategy and the Environment, (16), 554-570.
• Riggs, W., & Kuo, J. (2015). The Impact of Targeted Outreach for Parking Mitigation on The Uc Berkeley Campus. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 3(2), 151–158.
• Roozen, I., Raedts, M., & Meijburg, L. (2021). Do Verbal and Visual Nudges Influence Consumers’ Choice for Sustainable Fashion?. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 12(4), 327-342.
• Schlich, E., & Fleissner, U. (2005). The Ecology Of Scale: Assessment of Regional Energy Turnover and Comparison with Global Food (5 Pp). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 10, 219-223.
• Schneider, C., Weinmann, M., & Vom. Brocke, J. (2018). Digital Nudging: Guiding Online User Choices Through Interface Design. Communications Of The ACM, 61(7), 67-73.
• Schultz, P. W. (1999). Changing Behavior with Normative Feedback Interventions: A Field Experiment on Curbside Recycling. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 25-36.
• Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms. Psychological Science, 18(5), 429-434.
• Schürmann, C. L., Helinski, C., Koch, J., Westmattelmann, D., & Schewe, G. (2023). Digital Nudging to Promote Sustainable Consumer Behavior? An Experimental Analysis in Online Fashion Retail. European Conference on Information Systems, Norway.
• Schweizer, D., Zehnder, M., Wache, H., Witschel, H. F., Zanatta, D., & Rodriguez, M. (2015). Using Consumer Behavior Data to Reduce Energy Consumption in Smart Homes: Applying Machine Learning to Save Energy Without Lowering Comfort of Inhabitants. In 2015 IEEE 14th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) (pp.1123-1129).
• Shearer, L., Gatersleben, B., Morse, S., Smyth, M., & Hunt, S. (2017). A Problem Unstuck? Evaluating The Effectiveness of Sticker Prompts for Encouraging Household Food Waste Recycling Behavior. Waste Management, 60, 164-172.
• Sherif, M. (1937). An Experimental Approach to The Study of Attitudes. Sociometry, 1(1/2), 90-98.
• Spaccarelli, S., Zolik, E., & Jason, L. A. (1989). Effects of Verbal Prompting and Block Characteristics on Participation in Curbside Newspaper Recycling. Journal of Environmental Systems, 19(1), 45-57.
• Spence, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2010). Framing and Communicating Climate Change: The Effects of Distance and Outcome Frame Manipulations. Global Environ. Change, 20(4), 656-667.
• Stanovich, K.E., & West. R.F. (2000). Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for The Rationality Debate?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645-665.
• Steg, L. & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging Pro-Environmental Behaviour: An Integrative Review And Research Agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309-317.
• Stern, P. (2000). Toward A Coherent Theory of Environmentally-Significant Behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.
• Sunstein, C. R., & Reisch, L. A. (2019). Trusting Nudges: Toward A Bill of Rights for Nudging. Routledge, 1-145.
• Sunstein, C. R., & Reisch, L. A. (2020). “Climate-Friendly Default Rules”. Sustainable Consumption and Production, Volume Ii: Circular Economy And Beyond. Swain, R. B., & Sweet, S. (Eds.). Springer Nature, 1-447.
• Sussman, R., Greeno, M., Gifford, R., & Scannell, L. (2013). The Effectiveness of Models and Prompts on Waste Diversion: A Field Experiment on Composting by Cafeteria Patrons. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(1), 24-34.
• Templeton, E. M., Stanton, M. V., & Zaki, J. (2016). Social Norms Shift Preferences For Healthy And Unhealthy Foods. Plos One, 11(11), e0166286.
• Terlau, W., & Hirsch, D. (2015). Sustainable Consumption and The Attitude-Behaviour-Gap Phenomenon-Causes and Measurements Towards A Sustainable Development. Proceedings in Food System Dynamics, 199-214.
• Thaler, R. H. (2016). Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, and Future. American Economic Review, 106(7),1577-1600.
• Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein C.R (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, And Happiness. USA: Yale University Press.
• Tian, H., & Liu, X. (2022). Pro-environmental Behavior Research: Theoretical Progress and Future Directions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11), 6721.
• Torma, G., Aschemann‐Witzel, J., & Thøgersen, J. (2018). I Nudge Myself: Exploring ‘Self‐Nudging’strategies to Drive Sustainable Consumption Behaviour. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(1), 141-154.
• Trudel, R. (2019). Sustainable Consumer Behavior. Consumer Psychology Review, 2(1), 85-96.
• Valenčič, E., Beckett, E., Collins, C. E., Seljak, B. K., & Bucher, T. (2022). Digital Nudging in Online Grocery Stores: A Scoping Review on Current Practices and Gaps. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 131, 151-163.
• van Valkengoed, A. M., Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2022). To Select Effective Interventions for Pro-Environmental Behaviour Change, We Need to Consider Determinants of Behaviour. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(11), 1482-1492.
• Varotto, A., & Spagnolli, A. (2017). Psychological Strategies to Promote Household Recycling. A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Validated Field Interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 168-188.
• Von Kameke, C., & Fischer, D. (2018). Preventing Household Food Waste Via Nudging: An Exploration of Consumer Perceptions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 32-40.
• Wansink, B., & Hanks, A. S. (2013). Slim by Design: Serving Healthy Foods First in Buffet Lines Improves Overall Meal Selection. PLoS One, 8(10), 1-5.
• Wansink, B., Painter, J., & Ittersum, K. V. (2001). Descriptive Menu Labels’ Effect on Sales. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 42(6), 68-72.
• Wansink, B., Soman, D. & Herbst, K.C. (2017) Larger Partitions Lead to Larger Sales: Divided Grocery Carts Alter Purchase Norms and Increase Sales. Journal of Business Research, 75(C), 202–209.
• WCED, S. W. S. (1987). World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future, 17(1), 1-91.
• Wee, S. C., Choong, W. W., & Low, S. T. (2021). Can “Nudging” Play A Role to Promote Pro-Environmental Behaviour?, Environmental Challenges, 5, 100364.
• Weinmann, M., Schneider, C., & Brocke, J. V. (2016). Digital Nudging. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 58, 433-436.
• Wensing, J., Caputo, V., Carraresi, L., & Bröring, S. (2020). The Effects of Green Nudges on Consumer Valuation of Bio-Based Plastic Packaging. Ecological Economics, 178, 106783.
• White, K., MacDonnell, R., & Dahl, D. W. (2011). It's the Mind-Set That Matters: The Role of Construal Level and Message Framing in Influencing Consumer Efficacy and Conservation Behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 472-485.
• Wintschnig, B. A. (2021). The Attitude-Behavior Gap–Drivers and Barriers of Sustainable Consumption. Junior Management Science, 6(2), 324-346.
• Yildirim, S. (2022). The Consumer Role for Sustainable Development: How Consumers Contribute Sustainable Development Goals. In Research Anthology on Measuring and Achieving Sustainable Development Goals (pp. 872-888). IGI Global.
• Zawieska, J., Obracht-Prondzyńska, H., Duda, E., Uryga, D., & Romanowska, M. (2022). In Search of the Innovative Digital Solutions Enhancing Social Pro-Environmental Engagement. Energies, 15(14), 5191.
• Zhang, Z., & Wang, X. (2020). Nudging to Promote Household Waste Source Separation: Mechanisms and Spillover Effects. Resources, Conservation And Recycling, 162, 105054, 1-10.
• Zheng, H., Chen, K., & Ma, Z. (2023). Interactive Effects of Social Norms and Information Framing on Consumers' Willingness of Food Waste Reduction Behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75, 103525.
• Zimmermann, S., Hein, A., Schulz, T., Gewald, H., & Krcmar, H. (2021). Digital Nudging Toward Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Literature Review. PACIS, 226.
• Zimmermann, S., Schulz, T., Hein, A., Gewald, H., & Krcmar, H. (2023). Motivating Change in Commuters’ Mobility Behaviour: Digital Nudging for Public Transportation Use. Journal Of Decision Systems, 1-27.