Yıkıcı Yönetimin İşyeri Nezaketsizliği ve Bilgi Saklama Üzerindeki Etkisi: Psikolojik Sözleşme İhlali Algısının Aracılık Rolü

Öz

Bu çalışma yıkıcı yönetimin işyeri nezaketsizliği ve bilgi saklama davranışı üzerindeki etkisini incelemek ve psikolojik sözleşme ihlali algısının bu ilişkilerdeki rolünü araştırmak amacıyla tasarlanmıştır. İstanbul’da faaliyet gösteren lojistik firmalarında görev yapan 222 çalışandan anket aracılığı ile veri toplanmış ve toplanan veriler istatiksel analizlere tabi tutulmuştur. Analiz sonuçları yıkıcı yönetimin çalışanların göstermiş olduğu işyeri nezaketsizliği üzerinde anlamlı ve pozitif bir yönde etkisi olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Benzer şekilde analiz sonuçları, yıkıcı yönetim ile bilgi saklama davranışı arasında pozitif bir ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir. Yine analiz sonuçlarına göre yıkıcı yönetim çalışanlarda psikolojik sözleşmenin ihlal edildiği algısına neden olmaktadır. Ancak önceki araştırmalarda işyeri nezaketsizliğinin, bilgi saklama davranışına yol açabileceği öne sürülse de mevcut çalışmada bu ilişki desteklenmemiştir. Araştırmada ayrıca psikolojik sözleşme ihlali algısının aracı bir rol oynayıp oynamadığı da incelenmiştir. Belirlenen hipotezlerin aksine psikolojik sözleşme ihlali algısının yıkıcı yönetimin işyeri nezaketsizliği ve bilgi saklama davranışı ile ilişkisinde herhangi bir aracılık etkisine sahip olmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Araştırmanın önemli bulgularından biri de işyeri nezaketsizliğinin bilgi saklama davranışı üzerindeki etkisinde psikolojik sözleşme ihlali algısının aracılık rolünün tespit edilmesidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• yıkıcı yönetim
• işyeri nezaketsizliği
• bilgi saklama
• psikolojik sözleşme ihlali

The Effect of Abusive Supervision on Workplace Incivility and Knowledge-Hiding: The Mediating Role of Psychological Contract Breach

Abstract

This study was designed to examine the impact of abusive supervision on workplace incivility and knowledge-hiding behavior and to investigate the role of perceived psychological contract breaches in these relationships. Data was collected through a survey from 222 employees working in logistics companies operating in Istanbul, and the collected data were subjected to statistical analyses. The analysis results reveal that abusive supervision has a significant and positive effect on employees' workplace incivility. Similarly, the results indicate a positive relationship between abusive supervision and knowledge-hiding behavior. Additionally, the findings show that abusive supervision leads to the perception of psychological contract breaches among employees. However, although previous research has suggested that workplace incivility may lead to knowledge-hiding behavior, this relationship was not supported in the present study. The study also examined whether the perception of psychological contract breach plays a mediating role. Contrary to the hypotheses, it was concluded that the perception of psychological contract breach does not have any mediating effect on the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace incivility and knowledge-hiding behavior. One of the significant findings of the research is the identification of the mediating role of the perception of psychological contract breach in the effect of workplace incivility on knowledge-hiding behavior.

Keywords

• abusive supervision
• workplace incivilty
• knowledge hiding
• psychological contract breach

References

1. Aasland, M. S., Skogstad, A., Notelaers, G., Nielsen, M. B. & Einarsen, S. (2010). The prevalence of destructive leadership behaviour. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 438-452.
2. Abubakar, A. M., Yazdian, T. F. & Behravesh, E. (2018). A riposte to ostracism and tolerance to workplace incivility: A generational perspective. Personnel Review, 47, 441–457.
3. Agarwal, S., Pandey, R., Kumar, S., Lim, W. M., Agarwal, P. K. & Malik, A. (2023). Workplace incivility: A retrospective review and future research agenda. Safety Science, 158, 105990.
4. Agarwal, U. A., Avey, J. & Wu, K. (2022). How and when abusive supervision influences knowledge hiding behavior: Evidence from India. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(1), 209-231.
5. AL-Abrrow, H., Alnoor, A., Ismail, E., Eneizan, B., Makhamreh, H. Z. & Ratajczak-Mrozek, M. (2019). Psychological Contract and Organizational Misbehavior: Exploring the moderating and mediating effects of organizational health and psychological contract breach in Iraqi oil tanks company. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1683123. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 23311975.2019.1683123
6. Ali, S., Hussain, I., Shahzad, F. & Afaq, A. (2022). A multidimensional model of abusive supervision and work incivility. Sustainability, 14(11), 2-14.
7. Ampofo, E. T. (2021). Do job satisfaction and work engagement mediate the effects of psychological contract breach and abusive supervision on hotel employees’ life satisfaction?. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 30(3), 282-304.
8. Anand, A. & Walsh, I. (2020). The four stages of the knowledge sharing process in SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 24(6), 465-481.

9. Anand, A., Agarwal, U. A. & Offergelt, F. (2023). Why should i let them know? Effects of workplace incivility and cynicism on employee knowledge hiding behavior under the control of ethical leadership. International Journal of Manpower, 44(2), 247-266.
10. Anand, A., Centobelli, P. & Cerchione, R. (2020). Why should i share knowledge with others? A review-based framework on events leading to knowledge hiding. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(2), 379-399.
11. Andersson, L. M. & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452-471.
12. Arasli, H., Hejraty, B. & Abubakar, A. M. (2018). Workplace incivility as a moderator of the relationships between polychronicity and job outcomes. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30, 1245-1272. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2016-0655
13. Arshad, R. & Ismail, I. R. (2018). Workplace incivility and knowledge hiding behavior: Does personality matter? Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 5(3), 278-288.
14. Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y. & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 191-201.
15. Aryee, S., Sun, L. Y., Chen, Z. X. G. & Debrah, Y. A. (2008). Abusive supervision and contextual performance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure. Management and Organization Review, 4(3), 393-411.
16. Ashforth, B. E. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47, 755-778.
17. Ay, F. A. (2022). İstismarcı yönetim, örgütsel mutluluk ve iş performansı arasındaki ilişki. İşletme Bilimi Dergisi, 10(2), 215-245.
18. Babcock, P. (2004). Shedding light on knowledge management. HR Magazine, 49(5), 46-50.
19. Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
20. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley, New York, NY, USA
21. Bryman, A. & Cramer, D. (2001). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS Release 10 for Windows. USA: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
22. Cerne, M., Nerstad, C. G. L., Dysvik, A. & Skerlavaj, M. (2014). What goes around comes around: Knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 172-192.
23. Connelly, C. E. & Zweig, D. (2015). How perpetrators and targets construe knowledge hiding in organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(3), 479-489.
24. Connelly, C. E., Cerne, M., Dysvik, A. & Skerlavaj, M. (2019). Understanding knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(7), 779-782.
25. Connelly, C. E., Zweig, D., Webster, J. & Trougakos, J. P. (2012). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(1), 64-88.
26. Conway, N. & Briner, R. B. (2002). A daily diary study of affective responses to psychological contract breach and exceeded promises. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 287-302.
27. Cortina, L. M. & Magley, V. J. (2009). Patterns and profiles of response to incivility in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 272-288
28. Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H. & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(1), 64-80.
29. Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M., Pereira Costa, S., Doden, W. & Chang, C. (2019). Psychological contracts: Past, present, and future. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6(1), 145-169.
30. Cropanzano, R. & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
31. Çelik, S. & Gül, H. (2022). Yöneticilerin liderlik tarzının işyeri nezaketsizliğine etkisinde örgüt kültürünün aracılık rolü üzerine bir araştırma. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 24(43), 586-613.
32. Dadi, V. (2012). Promises, expectations, and obligations-which terms best constitute the psychological contract. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(19), 88-100.
33. Einarsen, S., Aasland, M. S. & Skogstad, A. (2007). Destructive leadership behavior: A definition and conceptual model. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 207-216.
34. Farooq, R. & Sultana, A. (2021). Abusive supervision and its relationship with knowledge hiding: The Mediating role of distrust. International Journal of Innovation Science, 13(5), 709-731.
35. Feng, J. & Wang, C. (2019). Does abusive supervision always promote employees to hide knowledge? From both reactance and COR perspectives. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(7), 1455-1474.
36. Ferris, D. L., Chen, M. & Lim, S. (2017). Comparing and contrasting workplace ostracism and incivility. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 315-338.
37. Garg, N., Kumar, C. & Ganguly, A. (2022). Knowledge hiding in organization: A comprehensive literature review and future research agenda. Knowledge and Process Management, 29(1), 31-52.
38. George, D. & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (10a Ed.). Boston: Pearson.
39. Gerçek, M. & Elmas-Atay, S. (2021). Algılanan yönetici desteğinin psikolojik sözleşmenin içeriği ve yerine getirilmesi üzerindeki etkileri. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2), 268-281.
40. Ghani, U., Teo, T., Li, Y., Usman, M., Islam, Z. U., Gul, H., Naeem, R. M., Bahadar, H., Yuan, J. & Zhai, X. (2020). Tit for tat: Abusive supervision and knowledge hiding-the role of psychological contract breach and psychological ownership. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4),1-16.
41. Gök, S., Karatuna, I. & Başol, O. (2019). İşyeri nezaketsizliği ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 22(44), 105-116.
42. Gul, R. F., Dunnan, L., Jamil, K., Awan, F. H., Ali, B., Qaiser, A. & Aobin, Q. (2021). Abusive supervision and its impact on knowledge hiding behavior among sales force. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 800778, 1-13.
43. Gulzar, S., Ayub, N. & Abbas, Z. (2021). Examining the mediating-moderating role of psychological contract breach and abusive supervision on employee well-being in banking sector. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1959007. 1-19.
44. Guo, L., Zhao, H., Cheng, K. & Luo, J. (2020). The relationship between abusive supervision and unethical pro-organizational behavior: Linear or curvilinear? Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 41(3), 369-381.
45. Güğerçin, S. & Çavuş, M. F. (2021). Yıkıcı yönetim, sanal kaytarma ve işteki üretkenlik: Banka çalışanları üzerine bir araştırma. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 9(1), 164-185.
46. Güğerçin, U. & Aksay, B. (2017). Dean’in yabancılaşma ölçeğinin Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik analizi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 13(1), 137-154.
47. Gültekin, S. (2014). Psikolojik sözleşme ihlali ile örgüte karşı sinik tutum arasındaki ilişkide lider-üye etkileşiminin aracılık etkisi. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara
48. Gürbüz, S. (2021). AMOS ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
49. Hao, Q., Wei, K. & Zhang, B. (2022). How to attenuate the effects of abusive supervision on knowledge hiding: The neutralizing roles of coworker support and individual characteristics. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(7), 1807-1825.
50. Hernaus, T., Cerne, M., Connelly, C., Poloski Vokic, N. & Škerlavaj, M. (2019). Evasive knowledge hiding in academia: When competitive individuals are asked to collaborate. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(4), 597-618.
51. Hershcovis M. S. & Reich T. C. (2013). Integrating Workplace Aggression Research: Relational, contextual, and method considerations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 26-42.
52. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524.
53. Irum, A., Ghosh, K. & Pandey, A. (2020). Workplace incivility and knowledge hiding: A research agenda. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(3), 958-980.
54. Islam, T., Asif, A., Jamil, S. & Ali, H. F. (2022). How abusive supervision affect knowledge hiding? The mediating role of employee silence and moderating role of psychological ownership. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems.
55. Kara, A. U. & Köksal, K. (2023). İstismarcı yönetimin çalışan özgeciliğine etkisi: Psikolojik sözleşme ihlalinin düzenleyici etkisi. Aurum Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 5-29.
56. Kaynak, İ. (2021). The role of the organizational climate in the effect of workplace incivility on revenge intention. Business, Economics and Management Research Journal, 4(2) 103-117
57. Khalid, M., Bashir, S., Khan, A. K. & Abbas, N. (2018). When and how abusive supervision leads to knowledge hiding behaviors: An islamic work ethics perspective. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(6), 794-806.
58. Kılıç, S. (2016). Cronbach'ın alfa güvenirlik katsayısı. Journal of Mood Disorders, 6(1), 47-48.
59. Kodden, S. F. G. P. & Roelofs, J. (2019). Psychological contract as a mediator of the leadership turn over intentions relationship. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 19(2), 93-102.
60. Kürü, S. A. & Beğenirbaş, M. (2022). Örgütlerde bilgi saklama davranışı ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlama çalışması. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 10(1), 25-39.
61. Li, J. J., Wong, I. A. & Kim, W. G. (2016). Effects of psychological contract breach on attitudes and performance: The moderating role of competitive climate. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 55, 1-10.
62. Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Brees, J. R. & Mackey, J. (2013). A review of abusive supervision research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(S1), 120-137.
63. Men, C., Fong, P. S., Huo, W., Zhong, J., Jia, R. & Luo, J. (2020). Ethical leadership and knowledge hiding: A moderated mediation model of psychological safety and mastery climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 166, 461-472.
64. Mishra, M. & Pandey, A. (2019). The impact of leadership styles on knowledge-sharing behavior: A review of literature. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 33(1), 16-19.
65. Morsch, J., van Dijk, D. & Kodden, B. (2020). The impact of perceived psychological contract breach, abusive supervision, and silence on employee well-being. Journal of Applied Business & Economics, 22(2).37-53
66. Onaran, S. O. & Göncü-Köse, A. (2023). Mediating processes in the relationships of abusive supervision with instigated incivility, CWBs, OCBs, and multidimensional work motivation. Current Psychology, 42(23), 19881-19893.
67. Pearson, C. M. & Porath, C. L. (2008). The cost of bad behavior: How incivility damages your business. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 5, 239-273.
68. Porath, C. L. & Pearson, C. M. (2012). Emotional and behavioral responses to workplace incivility and the impact of hierarchical status. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 326-357.
69. Pradhan, S. & Jena, L. K. (2018). Abusive supervision and job outcomes: A moderated mediation study. Evidence-based HRM, 6(2), 137-152.
70. Pradhan, S., Srivastava, A. & Jena, L. K. (2020). Abusive supervision and intention to quit: Exploring multi-mediational approaches. Personnel Review, 49(6), 1269-1286.
71. Pradhan, S., Srivastava, A. & Mishra, D. K. (2019). Abusive supervision and knowledge hiding: The mediating role of psychological contract violation and supervisor directed aggression. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(2), 216-234.
72. Rahman, M. M. (2023). The interplay of abusive supervision and coworker incivility on the turnover intention of front liners: A mediation effect of work stress. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 1757-4323.
73. Robinson, S. L. & Morrison, E. W. (2000). The development of psychological contract breach and violation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1(21), 525-546.
74. Schat, A. C. H., Desmarais, S. & Kelloway, E. K. (2006). Exposure to workplace aggression from multiple sources: Validation of a measure and test of a model. Unpublished manuscript, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada, 331-351.
75. Schilpzand, P., de Pater, I. & Erez, A. (2016). Workplace incivility: A review of the literature and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 57-88.
76. Seçkin, Ş. N. (2021). İstismarcı yönetim ve intikam niyeti: Mağduriyet algısının aracı, sürekli öfkenin düzenleyici rolü. İnönü Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(1), 135-151.
77. Sezici, E. (2016). İzleyicilerin yıkıcı liderlik algısı ve sonuçları. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (47), 106-121.
78. Shen, C., Zhang, Y., Yang, J. & Liu, S. (2020). Abusive supervision and employee creativity: A moderated mediation model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(2), 193-207.
79. Shin, Y., Hur, W. M. & Kang, S. (2021). Mistreatment from multiple sources: Interaction effects of abusive supervision, coworker incivility, and customer incivility on work outcomes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10), 5377.
80. Singh, S. K. (2019). Territoriality, task performance, and workplace deviance: Empirical evidence on role of knowledge hiding. Journal of Business Research, 97, 10-19.
81. Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th Ed.). Boston: Pearson.
82. Taştan, S. B. (2014). İşyeri nezaketsizliğini öngören örgütsel ve durumsal önceller ile çalışanların davranışsal sonuçları arasındaki ilişkinin ve sosyo-psikolojik kaynakların rolünün incelenmesi: Sağlık kurumlarında yapılan bir araştırma. Isguc The Journal Of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 16(3), 60-75.
83. Tavşancıl, E. (2010). Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi (4. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
84. Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178-190.
85. Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261-289.
86. Tepper, B. J., Carr, J. C., Breaux, D. M., Geider, S., Hu, C. & Hua, W. (2009). Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees’ workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 156-167.
87. Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Henle, C. A. & Lambert, L. S. (2006). Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 59(1), 101-123.
88. UND: Uluslararası Nakliyeciler Derneği. http://www.und.org.tr/ (Erişim Tarihi: 25/12/2023)
89. Ülbeği, İ. D., Özgen, H. M. & Özgen, H. (2014). Türkiye’de istismarcı yönetim ölçeğinin uyarlaması: Güvenirlik ve geçerlik analizi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(1), 1-12.
90. Vogelgesang, G. R., Crossley, C., Simons, T. & Avolio, B. J. (2021). Behavioral integrity: Examining the effects of trust velocity and psychological contract breach. Journal of Business Ethics, 172, 175-190.
91. Walsh, B. M., Lee, J., Jensen, J. M., McGonagle, A. K. & Samnani, A. (2018). Positive leader behaviors and workplace incivility: The mediating role of perceived norms for respect. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33, 495-508.
92. Wu, W. L. & Lee, Y. C. (2016). Do employees share knowledge when encountering abusive supervision?. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31, 154-168.
93. Wu, X., Lin, L. & Wang, J. (2021). When does breach not lead to violation? A dual perspective of psychological contract in hotels in times of crisis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 95, 1-11.
94. Xu, A. J., Loi, R. & Lam, L. W. (2015). The bad boss takes it all: How abusive supervision and leader-member exchange interact to influence employee silence. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 763-774.
95. Xue, Y., Bradley, J. & Liang, H. (2011). Team climate, empowering leadership, and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(2), 299-312.
96. Zhao, H. A. O., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C. & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work‐related outcomes: A meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 647-680.
97. Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G. & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206