Man’s Tongue, Woman’s Poison: Deadloch, A Feminist Crime Comedy in the Genre of Police Crime Drama

Abstract

We argue that Deadloch transforms the conventions of the police crime drama into a feminist dark comedy that employs queer humor and “soft” methods of violence to expose and critique patriarchal, colonial, and heteronormative power structures. This study aims to analyze Deadloch, a feminist dark comedy, through multiple concepts such as discourse, gender, identity, colonial criticism, and justice. Analysis becomes possible at the intersection of these concepts. In the story set on the island, attempts are made to solve the serial murders and find the killer. In choosing the “island” spatially, its function as a closed microcosm in which social norms and power relations are reproduced is also foregrounded as a metaphor. The victims whose tongues are cut out in the murders are men. In the series where the displacement and redirection of gender identities are realized with humor, the main issue is to overcome binary oppositions such as public/private, female/male, emotion/reason, rational/irrational, love/hate, and pleasure/pain. These binary oppositions are tried to be overcome in a place where emotions are queerized. Emotions blur the fixity of identities, the performativity of masculinities, and the spatial traces of the colonial past in the stories of the series' characters, opening to the past and present. The series uses the cross-genre transitivity and captures this through humor to realize the feminist fantasy of justice. The conflict experienced in the town between the locals and the newcomers also shows the cultural embeddedness of hegemonic masculinity practices. The study asks, first, how humor functions in the aestheticization of crime and violence. Secondly, it asks how narrative structures that disrupt gender stereotypes invite the audience into a new ethico-political space and how social positions such as race, class, culture, and colonial memory intersect in this narrative where crime is coded with femininity. In the study, the method of feminist close reading is used in accordance with the concept of intersectionality, and multiple concepts (gender, identity, class, culture, culture, colonial memory) are analyzed along with the crime comedy under scrutiny. The conflict between conservatives and lesbians begins when two female detectives, Dulcie and Redcliffe, take on the murder. As the murder remains unsolved and the serial killer remains elusive, the polarization and conflict between the locals and the newcomers become more and more apparent, and the issues around sexual identity, class, and hegemonic masculinity become more and more visible.

Keywords

• Feminist Film Noir
• Police Crime Drama
• Violence
• Humor
• Queer

Erkeğin Dili, Kadının Zehri: Deadloch, Polisiye Türünde Bir Feminist Suç Komedisi

Öz

Bu çalışma, bir feminist kara komedi olan Deadloch dizisini söylem, cinsiyet, kimlik, kolonyalizm eleştirisi, adalet gibi çoklu kavramlarla analiz etmeyi hedeflemektedir. Bu kavramların kesiştiği noktalarda analiz mümkün hale gelebilmektedir. Adada geçen hikâyede, işlenen seri cinayetler çözüme kavuşturulmaya, seri katil bulunmaya çalışılır. Cinayetlerde dilleri kesilerek öldürülen kurbanlar erkeklerdir. Cinsiyet kimliklerinin yer ve yön değiştirmelerinin mizahla gerçekleştiği bu dizide, kamusal/özel, kadın/erkek, duygu/akıl, rasyonel/irrasyonel, sevgi/nefret, haz/acı gibi ikilikleri aşmak temel meseledir. Bu ikilikler duyguların queerleştiği yerde aşılmaya çalışılmaktadır. Duygular, dizide karakterlerin geçmişe ve şimdiye açılan hikâyelerinde kimliklerin sabitliğini, erkekliklerin performatifliğini, kolonyal geçmişe ait mekânsal izleri bulanıklaştırmaktadır. Dizi, mizahla yakaladığı türsel geçişliliği, feminist adalet fantezisini gerçekleştirmek için kullanır. Çalışmada, ilk olarak, mizahın suçun ve şiddetin estetikleştirilmesinde nasıl bir işlev gördüğü sorusu sorulur. İkinci olaraksa, cinsiyet stereotiplerini bozan anlatı yapılarının izleyiciyi nasıl yeni bir etik-politik alana davet ettiği ve suçun kadınlıkla kodlandığı bu anlatıda, ırk, sınıf, kültür ve kolonyal hafıza gibi toplumsal konumların nasıl kesişmekte oldukları soruları sorulmaktadır. Cinayet çözülemedikçe, seri katil bulunamadıkça yerli halk ve yeni gelenler arasındaki kutuplaşma ve çatışma giderek kendini belli etmeye cinsel kimlik, sınıf ve hegemonik erkeklik kavramları etrafındaki sorunlar daha da görünür olmaya başlar.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Feminist Film Noir
• Suç Polisiyesi
• Şiddet
• Mizah
• Queer

References

1. Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh University Press.
2. Allué, S. B. (2002). The aesthetics of serial killing: Working against ethics in ”The Silence of the Lambs” (1988) and” American Psycho” (1991). Atlantis, 7-24.
3. Aykut, E. (2010). Osmanlı’da zehir satışının denetimi ve kocasını zehirleyen kadınlar [The regulation of poison sales in the Ottoman Empire and women who poisoned their husbands]. Toplumsal Tarih, 194, 58-64.
4. Baki, B. (2012). Aşk politik midir? [Is love political?] https://bianet.org/yazi/ask-politik-midir-136097 (Date Accessed: 29 Nisan 2025).
5. Batur, E. (Haz.). (2005). Kara mizah antolojisi [An anthology of dark humor]. Sel Yayıncılık.
6. Berger, A. A. (1991). Media analysis techniques. Sage Publications.
7. Berger, J. (1972). Ways of Seeing. Penguin Books.
8. Bilger, A. (1995). Goblin laughter: Violent comedy and the condition of women in Frances Burney and Jane Austen. Women's Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 24(4), 323-340.

9. Brammer, R. (2025). Dark laughs: Australian comedy noir from the outback to tassie. M/C Journal, 28(1).
10. Buckmaster, L. (2023, June 1). Deadloch review – ripsnorting whodunnit pumps new blood into old tropes. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2023/jun/01/deadloch-review-ripsnorting-whodunnit-pumps-new-blood-into-old-tropes (Date Accessed: 3 March 2025).
11. Butler, J. (2014). Cinsiyet belası [Gender trouble]. B. Ertür (Çev.). İstanbul: Metis.
12. Butler, J. (2021). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. Routledge.
13. Butler, J. (2021). Şiddetsizliğin gücü: Etik-politik bir düğüm [The force of nonviolence: An ethico-political bind]. B. Ertür (Çev.). İstanbul: Metis.
14. Çalcı, S. (2019). Deleuze, Kant ve Ada [Deleuze, Kant and Island]. ViraVerita E-Dergi, (10), 268-286.
15. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Polity Press.
16. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & society, 19(6), 829-859.
17. Dufourmantelle, A. (2023). Yumuşaklığın gücü [Power of Gentleness]. S. Oruç & S. Yalçın (Çev.). Kolektif Kitap.
18. Feasey, R. (2008). Masculinity and popular television. Edinburgh University Press.
19. Freud, S. (2003). Espiriler ve bilinçdışı ile ilişkileri [Jokes and their relation to the unconscious] (4. Baskı). E. Kalkın (Çev.). İstanbul: Payel.
20. Freud, S. (2003). Günlük yaşamın psikopatolojisi [The psychopathology of everyday life]. Ş. Yeğin (Çev.). İstanbul: Payel.
21. Gates, P. (2009). The meritorious melodrama: Film noir with a female detective. Journal of Film and Video, 61(3), 24-39.
22. Gates, P. (2011). Detecting women: Gender and the Hollywood detective film. State University of New York Press.
23. Hammarén, N., & Johansson, T. (2014). Homosociality: In between power and intimacy. SAGE Open, 4(1), 1–11. doi:10.1177/2158244013518057.
24. Harvey, S. (2012). Woman’s place: The absent family of film noir. E. A. Kaplan (Ed.), Women in film noir (35-47). Bloomsbury Publishing.
25. Haywood, C., & Mac an Ghaill, M. (2003). Men and masculinities: Theory, research and social practice. Open University Press.
26. Hennefeld, M. (2022). Feminist film theory on the brink of laughter. K. Stevens (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of film theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. IMDb. (n.d.). Deadloch (TV series). IMDb. Retrieved April 19, 2025, from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt14671678/ (Date Accessed: 18 Mart 2025).
28. James, S. (2010). Cinsiyet, ırk, sınıf: Kadınlardan yeni bir bakış açısı [Sex, race and class]. S. Gündoğan (Der.). BGST Yayınları.
29. Kier-Byfield, S. (2024). Critical feminist method and pedagogical process. J. Cooke & L. Nyhagen (Eds.), Intersectional feminist research methodologies: Applications in the social sciences and humanities (176-189). London&New York: Routledge.
30. Kimmel, M. S., & Aronson, A. B. (2003). Men & masculinities: A social, cultural, and historical encyclopedia [2 volumes]. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
31. Kimmel, M. S., & Messner, M. A. (1992). Men's lives. Macmillan Publishing.
32. Kristeva, J. (2004). Korkunun güçleri: İğrençlik üzerine deneme [Powers of horror: An essay on abjection]. N. Tutal (Çev.). Ayrıntı Yayınları.
33. Le Breton, D. (2015). Acının antropolojisi [Anthropology of pain] (3. Baskı). İ. Yerguz (Çev.). Sel Yayıncılık.
34. Lemle, R., & Mishkind, M. E. (1989). Alcohol and masculinity. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 6(4), 213-222.
35. Lentricchia, F., & McAuliffe, J. (2004). Katiller, sanatçılar ve teröristler [Crimes of art and terror]. B. Yıldırım (Çev.). Ayrıntı Yayınları.
36. Lukić, J., & Espinosa, A. S. (2011). Feminist perspectives on close reading. R. Buikema, G. Griffin & N. Lykke (Eds.), Theories and methodologies in postgraduate feminist research (105-119). London&New York: Routledge.
37. MacKinnon, K. (2003). Representing men: Maleness and masculinity in the media. Arnold.
38. Mizejewski, L. (2004). Hardboiled and high heeled: The woman detective in popular culture. Routledge.
39. Modleski, T. (1998). Haz terörü: Çağdaş korku filmi ve postmodern kuram [The terror of pleasure: The contemporary horror film and postmodern theory]. T. Modleski (Ed.), Eğlence incelemeleri (N. Gürbilek (Çev.), 197-210). İstanbul: Metis.
40. Nanda, P. (2023, July 10). Margaret Carruthers in 'Deadloch,' explained: Did she kill William? Is Margaret dead too? Film Fugitives. https://fugitives.com/deadloch-season-1-character-margaret-carruthers-explained-2023-series/ (Date Accessed: 20 Mart 2025).
41. Place, J. (2012). Women in film noir. E. A. Kaplan (Ed.), Women in film noir (47-69). Bloomsbury Publishing.
42. Press, J. (2023, July 6). Deadloch is the feminist crime parody you didn’t know you needed. Vanity Fair. https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2023/07/deadloch-tv-review (Date Accessed: 21 Mart 2025).
43. Halberstam, J. (2011). The queer art of failure. Duke University Press.
44. Sanders, B. (2001). Kahkahanın zaferi [Sudden glory: Laughter as subversive history]. K. Atakay (Çev.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
45. Schrock, D., & Schwalbe, M. (2009). Men, masculinity, and manhood acts. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 277–295. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115933.
46. Shepherd, K. (2023). The Darkly Hilarious Series Deadloch Is an Antidote to Crime Drama Fatigue. https://slate.com/culture/2023/07/deadloch-amazon-prime-video-crime-drama-murder-mystery-finale.html (Date Accessed: 15 March 2025).
47. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books.
48. Smith, T. W. (2023). Duygular sözlüğü: Acımadan zevklenmeye [The book of human emotions: An encyclopedia of feeling, from anger to wanderlust] (8. Baskı). H. Şirin (Çev.). İstanbul: Kolektif Kitap.
49. Žižek, S. (2008). Violence: Six sideways reflections. Picador.
50. Zupančič, A. (2011). Komedi: Sonsuzun fiziği [The odd one in: On comedy]. T. Birkan (Çev.). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.