Self-Attribution Bias in Financial Decision Could Be Decreased with Resilience? A Study on Resilience Centered Training
Abstract
Topic
This is the first study to focus on the self-attribution bias in financial decision and resilience relation. Resilience is one of the empowering factor to alleviate the negative effects of stressors and adversities, to comply with the new situations and to think in realistic way. When considered this point of view, self-attribution bias in financial decision and resilience relation could be an important subject.
Background
There is no any scientific work about the subject of the self-attribution bias in financial decision and resilience relation. In this study it is aslo analyzed the effect of resilience trainings on self attribution bias and resilience.
Purpose/Aim
One of the aims of this work is to invesitegate the self-attribution bias in financial decision and resilience correlation. The other aim is to find an evidence of how the self-attribution bias in financial decision and resilience changes with resilience centered trainings.
Scope/Method
For this reason individual self-attribution bias and resilience scores are measured. In order to measure the self attribution bias, specific statemens about the bias are conducted. To evaluate the resilience scores, The Turkish version of the Resilience Scale for Adults is used.
Results
The results show firstly, there is a negative relation between the self attribution bias and the resilience. Secondly it is seen that, the self attribution bias scores are decreased and the resilience scores are increased after the resilience centered trainings.
Conclusions
Importantly, our results provide the evidence about the relation of self attribution bias and resilience and the effect of resilience centered trainings on these factors. On the other hand, it is needed more research studies to validate and understand these findings.
Keywords
References
- Baruth, K. E., & Carroll, J. J. (2002). A formal assessment of resilience: The Baruth Protective Factors Inventory. Journal of Individual Psychology, 58, 235−244.
- Basım, H. N., & Çetin, F. (2011). Yetişkinler için psikolojik dayanıklılık ölçeğinin güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik çalışması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 22(2), 104-114.
- Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor‐Davidson resilience scale (CD‐RISC). Depression and anxiety, 18(2), 76-82.
- Doukas, J. A., & Petmezas, D. (2007). Acquisitions, overconfident managers and self‐attribution bias. European Financial Management, 13(3), 531-577.
- Friborg, O., Hjemdal, O., Rosenvinge, J. H., & Martinussen, M. (2003). A new rating scale for adult resilience: what are the central protective resources behind healthy adjustment? International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 12(2), 65-76.
- Friborg, O. (2005). Validation of a scale to measure resilience in adults. Department of Psychology, Faculty og social Sciences, University of Tromsø.
- Friborg, O., Barlaug, D., Martinussen, M., Rosenvinge, J. H., & Hjemdal, O. (2005). Resilience in relation to personality and intelligence. International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 14(1), 29-42.
- Hamurcu, Ç., & Hamurcu, H. D. Y. (2017). How Depression And Social Media Preferences Affect Financial Investment&Gambling Risk Taking Behaviours. Journal of Life Economics, 4(4), 143-156.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Business Administration
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Çağrı Hamurcu
*
0000-0002-3248-6733
Türkiye
Publication Date
May 31, 2019
Submission Date
March 19, 2019
Acceptance Date
May 15, 2019
Published in Issue
Year 2019 Volume: 3 Number: 2