Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2018, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 172 - 194, 31.01.2018
https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2018.02.010

Abstract

References

  • Çöloğlu, H., 1987. İktisadi Sistemler Sistem- Doktrin- Eleştiri. Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Yayınları.
  • Ersoy, A., 2008. İktisadi Teoriler ve Düşünceler Tarihi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Hamitoğulları, B., 1978. Çağdaş İktisadi Sistemler Strüktürel ve Doktrinal Bir Yaklaşım. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayınları.
  • Savaş, V. F., 1998. İktisatın Tarihi. İstanbul: Avcıol Basım Yayın.
  • Serdaroğlu, U., 2008. Feminist İktisat Bilim’i Sorguluyor. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 19 (66), 1-28.
  • Serdaroğlu, U., 2010. Feminist İktisat’ın Bakışı Postmodernist mi?. Ankara: Efil Yayınevi.

Speaking Economists are Debating Turkey's Problems

Year 2018, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 172 - 194, 31.01.2018
https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2018.02.010

Abstract

The reason for writing this article I realize that the students of economics have difficulty in giving an answer to elementary economic issues and indeed complicate it. However, it would be helpful for them to form an understanding of the economic ideas in terms of which school of thought they are belong to. The main problem that creates complexity at this point seems to be that they do not know (or ignore) that the information they gather reflects different economic views or that the analysis tools they use together belong to different schools of economics. This situation, which makes it difficult to make economic inferences, can be facilitated by listening the economists when explaining their own ideas. Therefore, the aim of this study is not to discuss the economic problems of Turkey, but rather to try to reflect the views of certain fundamental aspects of the economic thinkers as clear and compact as possible. The selected thinkers are prefered according to their recognition as representative for their school of economic thought. Althougt, the method of this study is hermeneutic, language analysis is not its main purpose. In this study, it will be tried to interpret and adhere only economic theories or economic discourse, even if the language analysis and the meanings behind it are also common features of hermeneutic method.

References

  • Çöloğlu, H., 1987. İktisadi Sistemler Sistem- Doktrin- Eleştiri. Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Yayınları.
  • Ersoy, A., 2008. İktisadi Teoriler ve Düşünceler Tarihi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Hamitoğulları, B., 1978. Çağdaş İktisadi Sistemler Strüktürel ve Doktrinal Bir Yaklaşım. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayınları.
  • Savaş, V. F., 1998. İktisatın Tarihi. İstanbul: Avcıol Basım Yayın.
  • Serdaroğlu, U., 2008. Feminist İktisat Bilim’i Sorguluyor. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 19 (66), 1-28.
  • Serdaroğlu, U., 2010. Feminist İktisat’ın Bakışı Postmodernist mi?. Ankara: Efil Yayınevi.
There are 6 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Hale Kırmızıoğlu 0000-0001-8869-9933

Publication Date January 31, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 2 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Kırmızıoğlu, H. (2018). Speaking Economists are Debating Turkey’s Problems. Fiscaoeconomia, 2(2), 172-194. https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2018.02.010

Creative Commons Lisansı
 Fiscaoeconomia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.