A Review on Freedom and Authority in Theories of John Locke and Thomas Hobbes

Year 2020, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 132 - 158, 31.01.2020

Aslıhan Çoban Balcı

https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2020.01.007

Abstract

This article tackles with the questions of freedom and authority in the thoughts of J. Locke and T. Hobbes. J. Locke is mostly known as the father of classical liberal thought whereas T. Hobbes is known with his famous work Leviathan within which he questions the source of sovereignty and made a focus on a strong sovereign. Both thinkers are social contract thinkers. However, their descriptions on state of nature are completely different. In this work, not only the mere concepts of freedom and authority but also legitimate power, law, despotism and consent will be discussed in their thought as such they are very related to the freedom and authority. To that end, first the relationship between state and individual will be addressed. Second the relationship between law and liberty will be mentioned. Then the concepts of political power and authority will be overviewed. Lastly the main questions associated with freedom and authority will be evaluated. At the end, it is supposed to delineate a general assessment about these two thinkers on their critical concepts, freedom and authority.

Keywords

J. Locke, Freedom, Authority, T. Hobbes

References

• Ağaoğulları, M. A.(2005), “Thomas Hobbes: Ölümlü Tanrı” in Ağaoğulları, M. ve Köker, L. (ed.) Kral-Devletten Ulus-Devlete, İmge Yayınları, Ankara
• Barry, N. (1995), An Introduction to Modern Political Theory, Macmillan, London
• Canavan, F. (1979), John Locke and the Theory of Sovereignty: Mixed Monarchy and the Right of Resistance in Franklin J., 1978; Hobbes and Locke: Power and Consent by Ramon M. Lemos, Book Review, The Journal of Politics, Vol, 41, pp. 970-973.
• Godwin, K. and Wahlke, J. (1997), Introduction to Political Science: Reason, Reflection and Analysis, Harcourt Brace College Publisher, America
• Hampsher-Monk, I. (1992), A History of Modern Political Thought: Major Political Thinkers from Hobbes to Marx, Blackwell, USA
• Held, D (1989) Political Theory and the Modern State Essays on State, Power and Democracy, Standford University Press, California
• Levine, A. (2002), Engaging Political Philosophy from Hobbes to Rawls, Blackwell, UK
• McNeilly (1968), The Anatomy of Leviathan, Macmillan, New York Pennock, J.R. (1960), “Hobbes’ Confusing Clarity: The Case of Liberty” American Political Science Review, vol. 54, pp 428-36.
• Rapaczynski, A. (1987), Nature and Politics: Liberalism in the Philosophies of Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau, Cornell University Press, USA
• Rapheal, D.D. (1990) Problems of Political Philosophy, Second Edition, revised and enlarged, Macmillan Press, London, Hong Kong
• Russel, B. (1996), Batı Felsefesi Tarihi, Say yayınları, İstanbul
• Saraçoğlu, A. M. (2002), “Evrensel Özgürlük Alanının İnşaasini Yeniden Düşünmek”, Türkiye Günlüğü, Ankara, no. 68, s: 87-96.
• Seliger, M. (1969), The Liberal Politics of John Locke, Frederick A. Praeger Publishers, New York
• Schochet, J. (1990) “Intending (Political) Obligation: Hobbes and the Voluntary Basis of Society” in Dietz, M. G. (ed.) Thomas Hobbes and Political Theory, University Press of Kansas, USA
• Simmons, J. (1992) The Lockean Theory of Rights, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
• Sommerville, J. (1992), Thomas Hobbes: Political Ideas in Historical Context, Macmillan, London
• Tully, J. (1993), An approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
• Zabcı, F. (2004), “John Locke: Liberalizmin Düşüncedeki Öncüsü” in Ağaoğulları, M. A.at all (ed.) Kral-Devletten Ulus-Devlete, İmge Yayınları, Ankara
• Wolin, S. (1990), “Hobbes and the Culture of Despotism” in Dietz, M. G. (ed.) Thomas Hobbes and Political Theory, University Press of Kansas, USA