Endogenous Money Supply: Turkish Economy (2011-2018)

Year 2021, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 595 - 610, 17.05.2021

Leyla Baştav

https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.891839

Cited By: 2

Abstract

There are basicly two views answering the question of how money is created: according to the exogenous money hypothesis of economic theory central banks have full control over the money stock in the markets and other policy instruments; whereas endogenous money theory postulates money is created by credit demand of economic actors . Demand for credits in turn arises from the production process, triggered by changes in production costs, basicly from a rise in nominal wages. This paper aims to analyze whether money supply creation is endogenous in the Turkish money markets during the period 2011-2018 by use of monthly data, for which cointegration between money supply (money base, M1, M2) and credits is tested by Johansen method and VECM is estimated for specifying direction of causality between the variables. Further, Toda Yamamoto test is applied to check robustness of the results obtained from VECM long and short run causality. Results point at relation from credits to money supply; i.e. money is endogenous and demand determined, also that credits extended by banks form basis of the money supply.


İktisadi teoride paranın nasıl yaratıldığı sorusuna iki farklı cevap bulunmaktadır: dışsal para hipotezine göre merkez bankalarının para stoku ve diğer para politikası araçları üzerinde tam kontrolü bulunmaktayken; içsel para teorisine göre para ekonomik aktörlerin kredi talebi üzerine yaratılmaktadır. İçsel para teorisine göre para talebi firma üretim süreçlerinden ortaya çıkmakta, üretim maliyetlerindeki artış ve daha çok da nominal ücretlerdeki artıştan kaynaklanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada aylık veri kullanılarak 2011-2018 arasındaki dönemde para arzının içselliği araştırılmakta; para arzı M1, M2 ile krediler arasında Johansen koentegrasyon ilişkisi olup olmadığı sınanarak, VECM analizi ile değişkenler arasındaki nedensellik sorgulanmaktadır. Buna ilave olarak VECM kısa ve uzun dönem nedensellik testi sonuçlarının güçlü olup olmadığı Toda Yamamoto testiyle sınanmaktadır. Elde edilen sonuçlara gore nedensellik kredilerden para arzına doğrudur; para arzı içsel olup talep tarafından belirlenmekte, banka kredileri para arzının temelini oluşturmaktadır.

Keywords

Post Keynesian economics, endogenous Money, Johansen cointegration, VECM, Toda Yamamoto

References

• Arestis, P. (1987/88). “The Credit Segment of a UK Post Keynesian Model” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, V. 10, N. 2, 250-69.
• Arestis, P., Mariscal, I.B.F. (1995). “The Endogenous Money Stock: Empirical Observations from the United Kingdom”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, V. 17, N. 4, 545-559.
• Aybar, S., Harris, L. (1988). “Credibility Models of Central Bank Independence and the Case of Turkey”, METU Studies in Development, V. 25, N. 4, 535-558.
• Badarudin Z.E. et al. (2013). “Post-Keynesian Money Endogeneity Evidence in G-7 Economies”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 33, 146-162.
• Cifter, A., Özün A. (2007). “The Monetary Transmission Mechanism in the New Economy: Evidence from Turkey (1997-2006)”, South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 2, 15-24.
• Çavuşoğlu, A. T. (2003). “The Endogenous Money Growth: An Outcome Of High Budget Deficits in Turkey”, HÜ İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1), 111-127.
• Dışyatat, P. (2008). “Monetary Policy Implementation: Misconceptions and Their Consequences”, BIS Working Papers, No.269.
• Fontana, G. (2003). “Post Keynesian Approaches to Endogenous Money: A Time Framework Explanation”, Review of Political Economy, 291-314.
• Güney, İ. E., Çepni, O. (2016). “Endogeneity of Money Supply: Evidence from Turkey”, TCMB Reseach Notes in Economics, Nbr 2016-19, 1-12.
• Howells, P. (2006). “The Endogeneity of Money: Empirical Evidence”, in P. Arestis and M. Sawyer (Eds.). A Handbook of Alternative Monetary Economics (pp. 52-68). Cheltenham:Edward Elgar
• --------------- (1999). “The Source of Endogenous Money”, Economic Issues, V. 4, N 1, 101-112.
• --------------- (1995), “The Demand for Endogenous Money”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 18(1), Fall 1995, 89-106
• Howells, P., Hussein, K. (1998). “The Endogeneity of Money: Evidence from G7” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, V. 45, N. 3, 329-40.
• Howells, P., Mariscal, I.B.F. (1992). “An Explanation for the Recent Behavior of Income and Transaction Velocities in the United Kingdom”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, V. 14, N. 3, 367-88.
• Işık, S. (2000). Para Arzının Endojenliği Tartışması: Türkiye Örneği. Doktora Tezi, Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Işık, S., Kahyaoğlu H. (2011). “The Endogenous Money Hypothesis: Some Evidence from Turkey (1987-2007)”, Journal of Money, Investment and Banking, 19, 61-71.
• Işık, S., Alkın, H., Uluğ, M. (2018). “Avrupa Birliği Üyesi 13 Ülkede Post-Keynesyen Para Arzının İçselliği Hipotezinin Test Edilmesi”, Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(17), 1-20.
• İncekara, A., Amanov, A. (2017). “Optimal Instrument Selection in Monetary Policy: Endogeneity of Money Supply”, Journal of Business Economics and Finance, Vol (6), Iss 2, 61-69.
• Kaldor, N. (1989). “Origins of the New Monetarism”, In F. Targetti, F. Thirwal and A. P. (Eds.), Futher Essays on Economic Theory and Policy (pp. 160-177). New York: Holmes-Meier,
• ------------ (1985). The Source of Monetarism. 2nd edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• ------------- (1987). “The Role of Commodity Prices in Economic Recovery”, World Development, Vol 15, Iss 5, May 1987, 551-558
• Karabulut, G. (2005). “Paranın Endojenliği ve Türkiye Örneği”, Yönetim/İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Dergisi, V. 16, N. 51, 25-31.
• Lavoie, M. (2005). “Monetary Base Endogeneity and the New Procedures Of The Asset-Based Canadian And American Monetary Systems”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27(4), 689-708.
• -------------- (1992). Foundations of Post-Keynesian Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
• Minsky, H.P. (1982). Can ‘It’ Happen Again? Essays on Instability and Finance. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
• Moore, B. J. (1989). “The Endogeneity of Credit Money”, Review of Political Economy, 1(1), 65-93.
• ----------------- (1983). “Unpacking the Post Keynesian Black Box: Bank Lending and the Money Supply”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, V. 5, N. 4., 537-556.
• ----------------- (1979). “The Endogenous Money Stock”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, V. 2, N. 1, 49-70.
• Moore, B. J., Threadgold, A. R. (1985). “Corporate Bank Borrowing in the UK, 1965-1981”, Economica, V. 52, N. Feb, 65-78.
• Nayan, S., Kadir, N., Abdullah M.S. and Ahmad, M. (2013). “Post Keynesian Endogeneity of Money Supply: Panel Evidence”, Procedia Economics and Finance, 7, 48-54.
• Özgür, G. (2011). “Türkiye Ekonomisinde Para Arzının İçsel Süreci”, Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 22(78), 67-90.
• Palacıo-Vera, A. (2001). “The Endogenous Money Hypothesis: Some Evidence from Spain (1987–98)”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, V.23, N. 3, 509–526.
• Palley, T. (1991). “The Endeogenous Money Supply: Consensus and Disagreement”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 13(3), 397-403.
• Panagopoulos, Y., Spiliotis, A. (1998). “The Determinants of Commercial Banks' Lending Behavior: Some Evidence for Greece”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 20(4), 649-672.
• Pollin, R. (1991). “Two Theories of Money Supply Endogeneity: Some Empirical Evidence”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, V. 13, N. 3, 366-96.
• Rogers, C. (1989). “Money, Interest and Capital: A Study in the Foundations of Monetary Theory”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Tayyar, A. E. (2017). “Political Exchange Rate Fluctuations Specific to Fixed Exchange Rate Regimes: A Case Study on Turkey”, Annals of the Constantin Brancusi University of Targu Jiu, Economy Series, Issue 2, 4-14.
• Tobin, J. (1971). Essays in Economics: Macroeconomics. Chicago: Markham.
• Toda, H.Y., Yamamoto, T. (1995). “Statistical Inference in Vector Autoregressions with Possibly Integrated Processes”, Journal of Econometrics. 66, pp.225-250.
• Vera, A. P. (2001). “The Endogenous Money Hypothesis: Some Evidence from Spain (1987–1998)”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 23(3), 509-526.
• Wray, L. R. (1992). “Alternative Theories of the Rate of Interest”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 16, Issue 1, 69-89.
• ---------------- (1990). Money and Credit in Capitalist Economies: the Endogenous Money Approach”,” Aldershot, Edward Elgar
• Yurtkur, A.K. (2019). Para Arzının İçselliği Hipotezi: Türkiye için Ampirik Bir Analiz (2006-2018), International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies, (24).