Traces of Feminist Economics in Turkish Akademia: An Analysis Through Graduate Thesis

Year 2021, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 418 - 453, 17.05.2021

Ebru Işık Ufuk Serdaroğlu

https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.919618

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The goal of this study is to trace feminist economics in Turkey for the period of 1990-2020 through the graduate thesis in academia. To explore the traces of feminist economics through the qualifications of feminist economics, two hundred M.A. and Ph.D. thesis in academia are examined in detail in the sense of thier form and content.

Keywords

Feminist Economics, Women, Gender, Feminism

Feminist İktisadın Türkiye’deki Seyr-ü Seferi ve Serencamı: Lisansüstü Tezler Üzerinden Bir Okuma

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, feminist iktisadın seyr-ü seferini ve serencamını 1990-2020 yılları için lisansüstü tezler üzerinden okumaktır. Bu doğrultuda, değerlendirmeye alınan iki yüz yüksek lisans ve doktora tezi, hangilerinin feminist iktisadın özelliklerini taşıdığını belirleyebilmek amacıyla, biçim ve içerik yönünden detaylı olarak irdelenmiştir.

Keywords

Feminist İktisat, Kadın, Toplumsal Cinsiyet, Feminizm

References

• Agenjo‐Calderón, A., & Gálvez‐Muñoz, L. (2019). Feminist economics: Theoretical and political dimensions. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 78(1), 137-166.
• Barker, D. K. (2013). Feminist economics as a theory and method. In Handbook of Research on Gender and Economic Life. Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Bartlett, R.L. (1996). Discovering Diversity in Introductory Economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(2), s.141-153.
• Benería, L., G. Berik ve M. Floro. (2016). Gender, Development and Globalization. New York: Routledge.
• Bergmann, B. R. (1990). "Feminism and Economics." Women's Studies Quarterly 18, no. 3: 68-74.
• Buğra, A. (2005). İktisatçılar ve İnsanlar, İstanbul, İletişim Yayınevi,2005.
• England, P. (1993). The Separative Self: Androcentric Bias in Neoclassical Assumptions. Beyond economic man: Feminist theory and economics (der. M.A. Ferber ve J.A.Nelson) içinde, University of Chicago Press.
• Ferber, M. A., & Nelson, J. A. (Eds.). (1993). Beyond economic man: Feminist theory and economics. University of Chicago Press.
• Folbre, N. (2011). Greed, Lust and Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Gardiner, J. (1997). Gender, Care, and Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Işık E. (2020). Kadın Emeği (Farklı Feminizm ve Feminist İktisat Anlayışları Temelinde Bilgi Kuramsal Bir İrdeleme), Yetkin Yayınevi.
• Jaggar, A. M. (2007). Feminist Politics and Human Nature. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers: New Jersey.
• Jennings, A.L. (1993). “Public or Private? Institutional Economics and Feminism.” In Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics. Eds. Marianne Ferber and Julie Nelson, pp. 111–130. Chicago: Universityof Chicago Press.
• Kuiper, E. Sap, J. (Eds.). (1995). Out of the margin: Feminist perspectives on economics. Psychology Press.
• MacDonald, M. (1995). Feminist economics: From theory to research. Canadian Journal of Economics, 159-176.
• Nelson, J.A: (1996). Feminism, objectivity and economics. Routledge.
• Nelson, J. A. (1995). Feminism and economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 131-148.
• Nelson, J. A. (1992). "Gender, Metaphor, and the Definition of Economics." Economics and Philosophy 8, no. 1: 103-125.
• Nelson, J.A. (1993). “The Study of Choice or the Study of Provisioning? Gender and the Definition of Economics.” In Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics. Eds. Marianne Ferber and Julie Nelson, pp. 23–36. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Power, M. (2013). “A Social Provisioning Approach to Gender and Economic Life.” In Handbook of Research on Gender an Economic Life. Eds. Deborah M. Figart and Tonia Warnecke, pp. 7–17. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
• Power, M. (2004). “Social Provisioning as a Starting Point for Feminist Economics.” Feminist Economics 10(3): 3–19.
• Pujol, Mi. A. (1992). Feminism and Anti-Feminism in Early Economic Thought. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
• Scott, J.W. (1986). Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis, The American Historical Review, 91(5), 1053-1075.
• Seiz, J. 1993. "Feminism and the history of economic thought." History of Political Economy 25, no. 1: 185-201.
• Serdaroğlu, U. (2010a). İktisat ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet, Efil Yayınevi: Ankara.
• Serdaroğlu, U.(2010b). Feminist İktisatın Bakışı Postmodernist mi?, Efil Yayınevi:Ankara.
• Schackelford, J. (1992). Feminist Pedagogy: A Means for Bringing Critical Thinking and Creativity to the Economics Classroom, American Economics Review, 82(2), s. 570-576.
• Stober, M. (1994) “Can Feminist Thought Improve Economics? Rethinking Economics Through a Feminist Lens”, American Economic Review,84(2):143-147.
• Strassmann, D. (1995). Creating a forum for feminist economic inquiry. Feminist Economics, 1(1), 1-5.
• Williams, R.M. (1993). Race, Deconstruction, and the Emergent Agenda of Feminist Economic Theory. Beyond economic man: Feminist theory and economics (der. M.A. Ferber ve J.A.Nelson) içinde, University of Chicago Press.
• Wooley, F.R. (1993). “The Feminist Challenge to Neoclassical Economics”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, December 1993, 17:4, s. 485-492.