ABD-Çin Rekabeti Bağlamında Kuşak ve Yol İnisiyatifi ve Denizcilik Sektörü

Year 2025, Volume: 9 Issue: 4, 1944 - 1966, 27.11.2025

Bülent Hoca , Mehmet Ufuk Tutan

https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1673086

Abstract

Günümüzde dünya ekonomisi ve uluslararası entegrasyon biçimleri hızla değişmekte, buna bağlı olarak uluslararası ticarette de hızlı değişimler meydana gelmektedir. Küreselleşme döneminde Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti (Çin) ekonomik olarak çok hızlı yükselmiş ancak 2008 küresel krizinin şiddetli etkileri önemli kırılmalara yol açmıştır. 2008 sonrası Çin’in attığı ulusal ve uluslararası adımlar Batı’da, özellikle ABD’de, artan tepkiyle karşılanmıştır. Eski haliyle küreselleşme sona ermiş görünmekte ancak yerine neyin geçmekte olduğu belirsizliğini korumaktadır. Uluslararası ticarette yaşanan bu kritik değişimler, uluslararası ticaretin önemli bir bileşeni olan denizcilik sektöründe de önemli etkiler yaratmaktadır. Dolayısıyla bu çalışmada, giderek artan ABD-Çin rekabetinin getirdiği belirsizliklerin hem genelde hem de denizcilik sektörü özelinde anlaşılmasına katkı sağlanması amaçlanmaktadır. Ekonomik ve jeopolitik yönleri olan bu rekabet, eleştirel bir uluslararası ekonomi politik yaklaşımıyla ele alınmakta ve denizcilik sektörüne etkileri Kuşak ve Yol İnisiyatifi (KYİ) örnek olayıyla, geniş bir kaynak taraması ve ikincil veriler kullanılarak incelenmektedir. Çalışma, Asya’dan Avrupa’ya ve Güney Amerika’ya uzanan altyapı yatırımlarıyla KYİ‘nin, denizcilik sektörü açısından yaratabileceği risk ve fırsatları tartışarak sonuçlandırılmaktadır.

Keywords

ABD-Çin Rekabeti , Kuşak ve Yol İnisiyatifi , Denizcilik Sektörü , Eleştirel Uluslararası Ekonomi Politik

Supporting Institution

Piri Reis Üniversitesi

Project Number

BAP-2024-05

The Belt and Road Initiative and the Maritime Sector in the Context of US-China Rivalry

Abstract

Today, the global economy and forms of international integration are undergoing rapid transformation, leading to significant changes in international trade. During the era of globalization, the People’s Republic of China (China) experienced a remarkable economic rise, and the severe impact of the 2008 global financial crisis caused notable disruptions. In the aftermath of the crisis, China’s domestic and international initiatives have increasingly faced criticism, particularly from the West and the United States. While the previous phase of globalization appears to have come to an end, what will replace it remains uncertain. These critical shifts in international trade have also generated significant implications for the maritime industry, a vital component of global commerce. Accordingly, this study aims to contribute to the understanding of the uncertainties arising from the intensifying U.S.-China rivalry, both in general and specifically within the maritime sector. This study adopts a critical international political economy perspective to analyze economic and geopolitical competition, focusing on its effects on the maritime industry through the case study of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Utilizing an extensive literature review and secondary data, the study concludes by discussing the potential risks and opportunities that the BRI’s infrastructure investments—spanning from Asia to Europe and South America—may present for the maritime sector.

Keywords

US-China Rivalry , Belt and Road Initiative , Maritime Industry , Critical International Political Economy

Supporting Institution

Piri Reis University

Project Number

BAP-2024-05

References

• An, N., & Hong Z. (2018). Conceptual and theoretical debates in modern geopolitics and their implications for chinese geopolitics. Area Development and Policy, 3(3), 368–382.
• Aritua, B., Cheng, L., Farrell, S., & de Langen, P. (2022). Developing China’s ports: How the gateways to economic prosperity were revived. World Bank Press, New York.
• Balaam, D.N., & Veseth, M. (2005). Introduction to international political economy (3rd Edition). Pearson, New Jersey.
• Baldwin, R. (2024). China is the world’s sole manufacturing superpower: A line sketch of the rise. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/china-worlds-sole-manufacturing-superpower-line-sketch-rise (Erişim Tarihi: 9 Nisan 2025).
• Banach, C., & Gunter, J. (2023). How the BRI is shaping global trade and what to expect from the initiative in its second decade. MERICS China Global Competition Tracker, No. 4. https://merics.org/en/tracker/how-bri-shaping-global-trade-and-what-expect-initiative-its-second-decade, (Erişim Tarihi: 18 Haziran 2025).
• Blanchard, J. F. (2024). Sailing into Chinese overseas ports in Europe and the Americas: Clarifying Murky Waters. J. F. Blanchard (Ed.), Chinese overseas ports in Europe and the Americas: Understanding smooth and turbulent waters (1-26). Routledge Publishers, New York.
• Blanchard, J. F. (2017). Probing China’s twenty-first-century maritime silk road initiative (MSRI): An examination of MSRI narratives. Geopolitics, 22(2), 246–268.
• Blanchard, J. F., & Flint, C. (2017). The geopolitics of China’s maritime silk road initiative. Geopolitics, 22(2), 223–245.
• Blanchard, J. F., & Pasupala, C. (2025). Chinese overseas ports in Southeast and South Asia: Connecting the dots. J. F. Blanchard (Ed.), Chinese overseas ports in Southeast and South Asia (1-26). Routledge Publishers, New York.
• Cafruny, A. W. (1987). Ruling the waves: The political economy of international shipping. University of California Press, Berkeley CA.
• Cafruny, A. W., Martin, G. P., & Talani, L. S. (2016). Introduction. A. Cafruny, L. S. Talani & G. P. Martin (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of critical international political economy (1-6). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
• CFR (Council of Foreign Relations) (2023). Tracking China’s control of overseas ports. https://www.cfr.org/tracker/china-overseas-ports (Erişim tarihi 10.03.2025)
• CNBC (2025). Trump is targeting China-made containerships in new flank of global economic war on the oceans. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/11/trump-pursues-new-trade-war-on-seas-targeting-china-containerships.html (Erişim Tarihi: 9 Nisan 2025)
• Cohen, B. J. (2008). International political economy: An intellectual history. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
• Cohn, T.H. (2005). Global political economy: Theory and practice (3rd Edition). Pearson, New York.
• Cox, R. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126-154.
• CSIS (Center for Strategic International Studies) (2023). Italy withdraws from China’s Belt and Road Initiative. https://www.csis.org/analysis/italy-withdraws-chinas-belt-and-road-initiative, (Erişim tarihi 10.03.2025).
• Demarais, A. (2023). What does US-China ‘de-risking’ actually mean? https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/08/23/derisking-us-china-biden-decoupling-technology-supply-chains-semiconductors-chips-ira-trade/ (Erişim Tarihi: 9 Nisan 2025)
• Dicken, P. (2015). Global shift: Mapping the changing contours of the world economy (Seventh ed.). The Guilford Press, New York.
• The Economist (2019). Slowbalisation: The steam has gone out of globalization. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2019/01/24/the-steam-has-gone-out-of-globalisation (Erişim Tarihi: 9 Nisan 2025)
• Fangye, Z. (2022). Responsibilities of change as a major country and the Belt and Road. C. Fang & P. Nolan (Eds.) The routledge handbook of the belt and road (29-34). Routledge, New York.
• Financial Times (2025). Shipowners switch to smaller vessels as world trade reroutes from China. https://www.ft.com/content/6bf382ee-ee83-4310-b3bc-a487a14cebb7, (Erişim Tarihi: 9 Nisan 2025).
• Fulton, J. (2021). The Gulf Coperation Council’s Vision of Maritime Silk and Road Initiative Coperation. J. F. Blanchard (Ed.) China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative, Africa and the Middle East: Feats, freezes and failures (227-254). Palgrave Macmillan Publishers, New York.
• Gaillard, N., Gotoh, F., & Michalek, R. (Eds.). (2023). The future of multilateralism and globalization in the age of the U.S.–China rivalry (1st ed.). Routledge, Oxon. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003340430
• Gavris, M. (2021). Revisiting the fallacies in hegemonic stability theory in light of the 2007–2008 crisis: the theory’s hollow conceptualization of hegemony. Review of Political Economy, 28(3), 739–760.
• Gilpin, R. (2017). Uluslararası İlişkilerin Ekonomi Politiği (5. Baskı). Kripto Basım Yayım, Ankara.
• Global Trade Alert (2025). Granular evidence on trade and industrial policy changes worldwide. https://www.globaltradealert.org, (Erişim Tarihi: 9 Nisan 2025).
• Grieger, G. (2024). International trade dispute settlement: World Trade Organisation Appellate Body crisis and the multi-party interim appeal arbitration arrangement. European Parliamentary Research Service, Briefing. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2024)762342, (Erişim Tarihi: 9 Nisan 2025).
• Haralambides, H., & Gujar, G. (2023). The ‘new normal’, global uncertainty and key challenges in building reliable and resilient supply chains. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 25, 623-638.
• Haralambides, H., & Merk, O. (2020). The Belt and Road Initiative. OECD Discussion Paper No 178. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/the-belt-and-road-initiative_2281f06f-en.html, (Erişim tarihi 10.03.2025).
• Iftikhar, M., & Zhan, J. V. (2020). The geopolitics of China’s overseas port investments: A comparative analysis of Greece and Pakistan. Geopolitics, 27(3), 826–851.
• Ikenberry, G. J. (2011). Liberal Leviathan: The origins, crisis, and transformation of the American world order. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
• IMF (2023). Geoeconomic fragmentation and the future of multilateralism. IMF Staff Discussion Note, 23/001, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Staff-Discussion-Notes/Issues/2023/01/11/Geo-Economic-Fragmentation-and-the-Future-of-Multilateralism-527266, (Erişim Tarihi: 9 Nisan 2025).
• Jingye, L. (2022). Six coridors, six means of communication, multiple countries, multiple ports. C. Fang & P. Nolan (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of the Belt and Road (393-396). Routledge, New York.
• Jisi, W., & Ran, H. (2019). From cooperative partnership to strategic competition: a review of China–U.S. relations 2009–2019. China Int Strategy Rev., 1, 1–10.
• Kaldor, N. (1961). Capital accumulation and economic growth. D.C. Hague (Ed.), The theory of capital. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
• Krpata, M. (2023). Can Europe do without a geologistical strategy to face China? Paris: The French Institute of International Relations Publications. https://www.ifri.org/en/studies/can-europe-do-without-geologistical-strategy-face-china (Erişim Tarihi: 10.03.2025).
• Lew, J. J., Roughead, G., Hillman, J., & Sacks, D. (2021). China’s Belt and Road: Implications for the United States. Independent Task Force Report No. 79. New York: The Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/report/chinas-belt-and-road-implications-for-the-united-states/, (Erişim tarihi 10.03.2025).
• McKinsey Global Instıtute (2024). Geopolitics and geometry of global trade. https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/our-research/geopolitics-and-the-geometry-of-global-trade, (Erişim tarihi 10.03.2025).
• Notteboom, T., Pallis, A., & Rodrigue, J-P. (2022). Port economics, management and policy. Routledge, London ve New York.
• Office of the US Trade (2025). Section 301 Investigation Report on China’s Targeting Maritime, Logistic, and Shipbuilding Sectors for Dominance. https://ustr.gov/issue-areas/enforcement/section-301-investigations/section-301-china-targeting-maritime-logistics-and-shipbuilding-sectors-dominance, (Erişim tarihi 10.03.2025).
• Petersson, N.P., Tenold, S., & White, N.J. (ed.) (2019). Shipping and globalization in the post-war era: Contexts, companies, connections. Palgrave, Cham.
• Reboredo, R., & Gambino, E. (2023). Connectivity and competition: The emerging geographies of Africa’s ports race. Area Development and Policy, 8(2), 142-161.
• Robinson, W. I. (2011). Giovanni Arrighi: Systemic cycles of accumulation, hegemonic transitions, and the rise of China. New Political Economy, 16(2), 267–280.
• Rodrik, D. (2011). The globalization paradox. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Schindler, S., Alami, I., DiCarlo, J., Jepson, N., Rolf, S., Bayırbağ, M. K., Cyuzuzo, L., DeBoom, M., Farahani, A. F., Liu, I. T., McNicol, H. Miao, J.T., Nock, P., Teri, G., Seoane, M.F.V., Ward, K., Zajontz, T., & Zhao, Y. (2024) The second cold war: US-China competition for centrality in infrastructure, digital, production, and finance networks. Geopolitics, 29(4), 1083-1120.
• Slater, A. (2024). China decoupling -how far, how fast?. Oxford Economics. https://www.oxfordeconomics.com/resource/china-decoupling-how-far-how-fast/ (Erişim Tarihi: 9 Nisan 2025)
• Spigarelli, F., & Lepore, D. (2024). China’s Italian Ports in the spotlight: Economic, social and geopolitical aspects. J. F. Blanchard (Ed.), Chinese overseas ports in Europe and the Americas: Understanding smooth and turbulent waters (93-109). Routledge Publishers, New York.
• Stopford, M. (2009). Maritime economics (3rd Edition). Routledge, London ve New York.
• Tarapore, A. (2020). Building strategic leverage in the Indian Ocean Region. The Washington Quarterly, 43(4), 207–237.
• ITC (2025). Trade Map: Trade statistics for international business development. www.trademap.org, (Erişim Tarihi: 9 Nisan 2025).
• Tudoroiu, T. (2024). The geopolitics of China’s Road and Belt Initiative. Routledge, New York.
• Tutan, M. U. (2019). Küresel güç sistemlerinin politik-ekonomik biçimlenişi: 18. yüzyıldan günümüze. Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi Dergisi (BRIQ), 1(1), 32-44.
• UNCTAD (2025a). Review of Maritime Transport. United Nations Publications, New York. https://unctad.org/publication/review-maritime-transport-2024, (Erişim tarihi 10.03.2025).
• UNCTAD (2025b). UNCTADstat Data Centre. https://unctadstat.unctad.org/datacentre/ (Erişim Tarihi: 9 Nisan 2025)
• UNCTAD (2024). Review of Maritime Transport. United Nations Publications, New York. https://unctad.org/publication/review-maritime-transport-2023 (Erişim Tarihi: 10.03.2025)
• UNCTAD (2022). Review of Maritime Transport. UN Publications, New York. https://unctad.org/rmt2022 (Erişim Tarihi: 9 Nisan 2025)
• Vangeli, A. (2018). The normative foundations of the Belt and Road Initiative. W. Shan, K. Nuotio & K. Zhang (Eds.), Normative readings of the Belt and Road Initiative: Road to new paradigms (59–83). Springer, Cham.
• Wilmsmeier, G., & Monios, J. (2020). The geography of maritime trade: Globalisation and beyond. G. Wilmsmeier & J. Monios (Eds.), Geographies of maritime transport (1-15). Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK.
• World Bank (2025). World development indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators, (Erişim tarihi 10.03.2025).
• WTO (World Trade Organization) (2024). Global Trade Outlook and Statistics. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/trade_outlook24_e.htm (Erişim Tarihi: 10.03.2025)
• Wu, X., & Ji, Y. (2020). The military drivers of China’s Belt and Road endeavor: Expanding the global reach from land mess to the maritime domains. China Review, 20(4), 223–244.
• Xinhuanet (2018). Xi gives new impetus to Belt and Road Initiative. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-08/28/c_137423414.htm, (Erişim tarihi 10.03.2025).
• Yılmaz, M. L. (2024). 3. Dünya Savaşı Ne Zamandan Beri Devam Ediyor? Z Raporu, Ağustos 2024, Sayı: 63, s. 42-44.
• Zajontz, T. (2023). The political economy of China’s infrastructure development in Africa: Capital, state agency, debt. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
• Zhang, X. (2017). Chinese capitalism and the Maritime Silk Road: A world-systems perspective. Geopolitics, 22(2), 310-331.