Research Article
Niğde İlinde Güneş Enerjisi Santrallerinin Yaygınlaştırılması ve Sera Gazı Emisyonlarının Azaltılmasının Potansiyeli
Abstract
Günümüzde modern toplumların elektrik enerjisi ihtiyacını karşılamak için kullanılan fosil türevli yakıtlardan hızla doğa dostu olan yenilebilir enerji kaynaklarına geçilmektedir. Fosil türevli yakıtların kullanılması sonucunda biriken sera gazları nedeniyle küresel iklim değişikliği ortaya çıkmıştır. Bunu yanında hava kalitesi de bozulmaya başlamıştır. Güneş enerjisi ekonomik ve teknik uygulanabilirlik açısından en yaygın olarak tercih edilen yenilebilir enerji kaynağı olarak günümüzde kabul görmektedir. Yapılan bu çalışmada Niğde ili için güneş enerjisinin elektrik enerji üretimli potansiyeli, ekonomik ve çevresel olarak uygulanabilirlik açısından incelenmiştir. İldeki mevcut arazi kullanım haritaları, tarım arazileri ve güneş radyasyon potansiyeli haritaları bir arada değerlendirilmiştir. İldeki tarım arazisi ve orman vasfını yitirmiş alanın sadece %3,4 güneş enerjisi üretimi için kullanıldığında gerekli olan elektrik enerjisi ihtiyacı karşılanabileceği hesaplanmıştır. Bu enerji yılda 435924 ton CO2 emisyonun atmosfere verilmeyeceği anlamına gelmektedir.
References
- [1] Košir, M., Iglič, N., Kunič, R.: Optimisation of heating, cooling and lighting energy performance of modular buildings in respect to location’s climatic specifics. Renew Energy 2018; 129: 527–539.[2] Abo-Elyousr, F.K., Elnozahy, A.: Bi-objective economic feasibility of hybrid micro-grid systems with multiple fuel options for islanded areas in Egypt. Renew Energy 2018; 128: 37–56.[3] Gu, Q., Wei, J., Luo, S., Ma, M., Tang, X.: Potential and environmental control of carbon sequestration in major ecosystems across arid and semi-arid regions in China. Sci Total Environ 2018; 645: 796–805.[4] Nabielek, P., Dumke, H., Weninger, K.: Balanced renewable energy scenarios: a method for making spatial decisions despite insufficient data, illustrated by a case study of the Vorderland-Feldkirch Region, Vorarlberg, Austria. Energy Sustain Soc.8, 2018.[5] Üçtuğ, F.G., Azapagic, A.: Environmental impacts of small-scale hybrid energy systems: Coupling solar photovoltaics and lithium-ion batteries. Sci Total Environ 2018; 643: 1579–1589.[6] Leng, G.: Keeping global warming within 1.5 °C reduces future risk of yield loss in the United States: A probabilistic modeling approach. Sci Total Environ 2018; 644: 52–59.[7] Talbot, D., Boiral, O.: GHG reporting and impression management: An assessment of sustainability reports from the energy sector. J Bus Ethics 2018; 147: 367–383.[8] Karunathilake, H., Hewage, K., Mérida, W., Sadiq, R.: Renewable energy selection for net-zero energy communities: Life cycle based decision making under uncertainty. Renew Energy 2019; 130: 558–573.[9] Ediger, V.Ş., Kirkil, G., Çelebi, E., Ucal, M., Kentmen-Çin, Ç.: Turkish public preferences for energy. Energy Policy 2018; 120: 492–502.[10] Liobikienė, G., Butkus, M.: The challenges and opportunities of climate change policy under different stages of economic development. Sci Total Environ 2018; 642: 999–1007.[11] Kılıç, E., Puig, R., Zengin, G., Zengin, C.A., Fullana-i-Palmer, P.: Corporate carbon footprint for country Climate Change mitigation: A case study of a tannery in Turkey. Sci Total Environ 2018; 635: 60–69.[12] Ozdemir, S., Sahin, G.: Multi-criteria decision-making in the location selection for a solar PV power plant using AHP. Meas J Int Meas Confed 2018; 129: 218–226.[13] Pasaoglu, G., Garcia, N.P., Zubi, G.: A multi-criteria and multi-expert decision aid approach to evaluate the future Turkish power plant portfolio. Energy Policy 2018; 119: 654–665.[14] Sak, T.: Rüzgâr ve güneş enerjisi teknolojilerinin irdelenmesi ve Niğde iline uygulanabilirliklerinin değerlendirilmesi, Yüksek lisans, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi, Niğde, Turkiye, 2015.[15] Koval, S., Krahenbuhl, G., Warren, K., O’Brien, G.: Optical microscopy as a new approach for characterising dust particulates in urban environment. J Environ Manage 2018; 223: 196–202.[16] Yang, H.-H., Arafath, S.M., Lee, K.-T., Hsieh, Y.-S., Han, Y.-T.: Chemical characteristics of filterable and condensable PM2.5 emissions from industrial boilers with five different fuels. Fuel 2018; 232. 415–422.[17] Gonzalez, A., Riba, J.-R., Esteban, B., Rius, A.: Environmental and cost optimal design of a biomass–Wind–PV electricity generation system. Renew Energy 2018; 126: 420–430.[18] Souliotis, M., Arnaoutakis, N., Panaras, G., Kavga, A., Papaefthimiou, S.: Experimental study and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Hybrid Photovoltaic/Thermal (PV/T) solar systems for domestic applications. Renew Energy 2018; 126: 708–723.[19] Ramphull, M., Surroop, D.: Greenhouse gas emission factor for the energy sector in Mauritius. J Environ Chem Eng 2017; 5: 5994–6000.[20] WNA: Comparison of Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Various Electricity Generation Sources, 2011.
Year 2019,
Volume: 31 Issue: 2, 327 - 335, 27.09.2019
Abstract
References
- [1] Košir, M., Iglič, N., Kunič, R.: Optimisation of heating, cooling and lighting energy performance of modular buildings in respect to location’s climatic specifics. Renew Energy 2018; 129: 527–539.[2] Abo-Elyousr, F.K., Elnozahy, A.: Bi-objective economic feasibility of hybrid micro-grid systems with multiple fuel options for islanded areas in Egypt. Renew Energy 2018; 128: 37–56.[3] Gu, Q., Wei, J., Luo, S., Ma, M., Tang, X.: Potential and environmental control of carbon sequestration in major ecosystems across arid and semi-arid regions in China. Sci Total Environ 2018; 645: 796–805.[4] Nabielek, P., Dumke, H., Weninger, K.: Balanced renewable energy scenarios: a method for making spatial decisions despite insufficient data, illustrated by a case study of the Vorderland-Feldkirch Region, Vorarlberg, Austria. Energy Sustain Soc.8, 2018.[5] Üçtuğ, F.G., Azapagic, A.: Environmental impacts of small-scale hybrid energy systems: Coupling solar photovoltaics and lithium-ion batteries. Sci Total Environ 2018; 643: 1579–1589.[6] Leng, G.: Keeping global warming within 1.5 °C reduces future risk of yield loss in the United States: A probabilistic modeling approach. Sci Total Environ 2018; 644: 52–59.[7] Talbot, D., Boiral, O.: GHG reporting and impression management: An assessment of sustainability reports from the energy sector. J Bus Ethics 2018; 147: 367–383.[8] Karunathilake, H., Hewage, K., Mérida, W., Sadiq, R.: Renewable energy selection for net-zero energy communities: Life cycle based decision making under uncertainty. Renew Energy 2019; 130: 558–573.[9] Ediger, V.Ş., Kirkil, G., Çelebi, E., Ucal, M., Kentmen-Çin, Ç.: Turkish public preferences for energy. Energy Policy 2018; 120: 492–502.[10] Liobikienė, G., Butkus, M.: The challenges and opportunities of climate change policy under different stages of economic development. Sci Total Environ 2018; 642: 999–1007.[11] Kılıç, E., Puig, R., Zengin, G., Zengin, C.A., Fullana-i-Palmer, P.: Corporate carbon footprint for country Climate Change mitigation: A case study of a tannery in Turkey. Sci Total Environ 2018; 635: 60–69.[12] Ozdemir, S., Sahin, G.: Multi-criteria decision-making in the location selection for a solar PV power plant using AHP. Meas J Int Meas Confed 2018; 129: 218–226.[13] Pasaoglu, G., Garcia, N.P., Zubi, G.: A multi-criteria and multi-expert decision aid approach to evaluate the future Turkish power plant portfolio. Energy Policy 2018; 119: 654–665.[14] Sak, T.: Rüzgâr ve güneş enerjisi teknolojilerinin irdelenmesi ve Niğde iline uygulanabilirliklerinin değerlendirilmesi, Yüksek lisans, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi, Niğde, Turkiye, 2015.[15] Koval, S., Krahenbuhl, G., Warren, K., O’Brien, G.: Optical microscopy as a new approach for characterising dust particulates in urban environment. J Environ Manage 2018; 223: 196–202.[16] Yang, H.-H., Arafath, S.M., Lee, K.-T., Hsieh, Y.-S., Han, Y.-T.: Chemical characteristics of filterable and condensable PM2.5 emissions from industrial boilers with five different fuels. Fuel 2018; 232. 415–422.[17] Gonzalez, A., Riba, J.-R., Esteban, B., Rius, A.: Environmental and cost optimal design of a biomass–Wind–PV electricity generation system. Renew Energy 2018; 126: 420–430.[18] Souliotis, M., Arnaoutakis, N., Panaras, G., Kavga, A., Papaefthimiou, S.: Experimental study and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Hybrid Photovoltaic/Thermal (PV/T) solar systems for domestic applications. Renew Energy 2018; 126: 708–723.[19] Ramphull, M., Surroop, D.: Greenhouse gas emission factor for the energy sector in Mauritius. J Environ Chem Eng 2017; 5: 5994–6000.[20] WNA: Comparison of Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Various Electricity Generation Sources, 2011.
There are 1 citations in total.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Engineering |
| Journal Section | MBD |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | September 27, 2019 |
| Submission Date | October 24, 2018 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2019 Volume: 31 Issue: 2 |
