Evaluation of the effect of fixed orthodontic treatment on periodontal health and oral malodor

Year 2014, , 121 - 6, 08.09.2014

Deniz Uzuner Emine Kaygısız , Levent Taner Sema Yüksel Yasemin Sezgin Rana Çulhaoğlu Can Ateş

https://doi.org/10.17214/aot.45740

Cited By: 2

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of fixed orthodontic treatment with wire-ligated conventional brackets on oral malodor and periodontal status.

MATERIALS AND METHOD: Thirty-five patients, aged 12-18 years, in permanent dentition, and requiring fixed orthodontic treatment participated in this study. The subjects treated with conventional bracket (CB; Group1, n=20) and untreated control group (Group 2, n=15) were evaluated. Oral malodor, plaque index, gingival index, pocket depth, bleeding on probing, tongue coating scores were recorded in each group. Measurements were taken from the treatment group just before bonding (T1), 1 week after maxillary and mandibular bonding (T2) and 4 weeks after bonding (T3). Measurements for the control group were done in the same periods. Volatile sulphur compounds which determine malodor were measured with Halimeter.

RESULTS: One week after bonding, compared with the control group, the plaque index, pocket depth and bleeding on probing increased significantly in the CB group, (T2-T1; p<0.05). No significant change was found in the gingival index and tongue coating scores for all groups. One month after bonding, compared with the control group, the plaque index, pocket depth and gingival index increased significantly in the CB group (T3-T1; p<0.05). Regarding oral malodor, a non-significant increase was found during the observation period in the control group. In the CB group, a non-significant increase after 1 week and a nonsignificant decrease after 4 weeks was detected.

CONCLUSION: CB with wire ligation had no significant effect on oral malodor in one month period. In the CB group, the plaque index and tongue coating index scores increased significantly compared with the control group.

Keywords

Halitosis, Orthodontic Brackets, Periodontal Diseases

Sabit ortodontik tedavinin periodontal sağlık ve ağız kokusu üzerine etkisi

Abstract

AMAÇ: Çalışmanın amacı, ligatür teli ile bağlanan geleneksel braket sisteminin kullanıldığı sabit ortodontik tedavilerin ağız kokusu ve periodontal dokular üzerindeki etkisinin değerlendirilmesidir.

GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Daimi dişlenme dönemindeki sabit ortodontik tedavi ihtiyacı olan, kronolojik yaşları 12-18 arasında değişen 35 birey çalışmaya dahil edildi. Geleneksel braket sistemi (GB; n=20) ile tedavi edilenler Grup 1’i, tedavi edilmeyen ve kontrol grubunu oluşturanlar ise Grup 2’yi oluşturdu (n=15). Hastaların gruplara dağılımları rastgele olarak yapıldı. Her grupta ağız kokusu ölçümü, plak indeks, cep derinliği, gingival indeks, sondlamada kanama indeksi ve dil üzeri eklenti skorları ölçümleri yapıldı. Tedavi grubunda ölçümler, braketleme yapılmadan hemen önce (T1), alt-üst çene braketleme yapılmasından bir hafta sonra (T2) ve braketlemeden dört hafta sonra (T3) yapıldı. Aynı dönemlerde kontrol grubunun ölçümleri de tekrarlandı. Ağız kokusunu belirleyen volatil sülfür komponentleri Halimeter cihazı yardımıyla ölçüldü.

BULGULAR: Braketlemeden bir hafta sonra (T2-T1), GB grubunda plak indeksi, cep derinliği ve sondlamada kanama indekslerindeki artış, kontrol grubuna göre önemli düzeyde farklı bulundu (p<0.05). Her iki grupta da gingival indeks ve dil üzeri eklenti skorlarında önemli farklılık bulunmadı. Braketlemeden bir ay sonra ise (T3-T1), GB grubunda plak indeksi, cep derinliği ve gingival indeksteki artışın kontrol grubuna göre farklı olduğu tespit edildi (p<0.05). Kontrol grubunda tüm değerlendirme zamanlarında ağız kokusunda önemli olmayan düzeyde artış olduğu saptandı. GB grubunda ise birinci haftada önemli olmayan düzeyde artış, bir ay sonra ise önemli olmayan düzeyde azalma bulundu.

SONUÇ: Tel ligatür ile bağlanan geleneksel braket sistemi ağız kokusu üzerinde bir aylık süreç içinde önemli bir farklılık oluşturmamıştır. Ancak GB grubunda plak indeksi ve dil üzeri eklenti miktarındaki artış, kontrol grubundaki artıştan daha fazladır.

Keywords

Ağız Kokusu, Ortodontik Braketler, Periodontal Hastalıklar

References

• 1. Newman MG, Van Winkelhof AJ. Antibiotic and antimicrobial use in dental practice, 2nd ed. London: Quintessence; 2000.
• 2. Lee PP, Mak WY, Newsome P. The aetiology and treatment of oral halitosis: an update. Hong Kong Med J 2004;10:414-8.
• 3. Nalçaci R, Sönmez IS. Evaluation of oral malodor in children. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:384-8.
• 4. Messadi DV, Younai FS. Halitosis. Dermatol Clin 2003;21:147-55, viii. 5. Quirynen M. Management of oral malodour. J Clin Periodontol 2003;30 Suppl 5:17-8.
• 6. Quirynen M, Zhao H, van Steenberghe D. Review of the treatment strategies for oral malodour. Clin Oral Investig 2002;6:1-10.
• 7. Öztürk H,Taner İL, Güryıl Z. Gizli kalmış aproksimal bölge çürüklerinin tespitinde ısırtma radyografisiyle çeşitli klinik bulguların teşhis yö- nünden karşılaştırılması. GÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg 1987;4:111-9.
• 8. Balenseifen JW, Madonia JV. Study of dental plaque in orthodontic patients. J Dent Res 1970;49:320-4.
• 9. Lara-Carrillo E, Montiel-Bastida NM, Sánchez-Pérez L, Alanís-Tavira J. Effect of orthodontic treatment on saliva, plaque and the levels of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15:e924-9.
• 10. Forsberg CM, Brattström V, Malmberg E, Nord CE. Ligature wires and elastomeric rings: two methods of ligation, and their association with microbial colonization of Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli. Eur J Orthod 1991;13:416-20.
• 11. Pellegrini P, Sauerwein R, Finlayson T, McLeod J, Covell DA Jr, Maier T, et al. Plaque retention by self-ligating vs elastomeric orthodontic brackets: quantitative comparison of oral bacteria and detection with adenosine triphosphate-driven bioluminescence. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:426.e1-9; discussion 426-7.
• 12. Scheie AA, Arneberg P, Krogstad O. Effect of orthodontic treatment on prevalence of Streptococcus mutans in plaque and saliva. Scand J Dent Res 1984;92:211-7.
• 13. Mitchell L. Decalcification during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances--an overview. Br J Orthod 1992;19:199-205. 14. Clark JR. Oral hygiene in the orthodontic practice: Motivation, responsibilities, and concepts. Am J Orthod 1976;69:72-82.
• 15. Türkkahraman H, Sayin MO, Bozkurt FY, Yetkin Z, Kaya S, Onal S. Archwire ligation techniques, microbial colonization, and periodontal status in orthodontically treated patients. Angle Orthod 2005;75:231-6.
• 16. Tonzetich J. Production and origin of oral malodor: a review of mechanisms and methods of analysis. J Periodontol 1977;48:13-20.
• 17. Babacan H, Sokucu O, Marakoglu I, Ozdemir H, Nalcaci R. Effect of fixed appliances on oral malodor. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:351-5.
• 18. Pandis N, Vlachopoulos K, Polychronopoulou A, Madianos P, Eliades T. Periodontal condition of the mandibular anterior dentition in patients with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Orthod Craniofac Res 2008;11:211-5.
• 19. Zachrisson S, Zachrisson BU. Gingival condition associated with orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1972;42:26-34.
• 20. Silness J, Loe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 1964;22:121-35.
• 21. Loe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand 1963;21:533-51.
• 22. Mühlemann HR, Son S. Gingival sulcus bleeding--a leading symptom in initial gingivitis. Helv Odontol Acta 1971;15:107-13.
• 23. Vandekerckhove B, Van den Velde S, De Smit M, Dadamio J, Teughels W, Van Tornout M, et al. Clinical reliability of non-organoleptic oral malodour measurements. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36:964-9.
• 24. Kleinberg I, Wolff MS, Codipilly DM. Role of saliva in oral dryness, oral feel and oral malodour. Int Dent J 2002;52 Suppl 3:236-40.
• 25. Salako NO, Philip L. Comparison of the use of the Halimeter and the Oral Chroma™ in the assessment of the ability of common cultivable oral anaerobic bacteria to produce malodorous volatile sulfur compounds from cysteine and methionine. Med Princ Pract 2011;20:75-9.
• 26. Yoneda M, Masuo Y, Suzuki N, Iwamoto T, Hirofuji T. Relationship between the β-galactosidase activity in saliva and parameters associated with oral malodor. J Breath Res 2010;4:017108.
• 27. Quirynen M, Dadamio J, Van den Velde S, De Smit M, Dekeyser C, Van Tornout M, et al. Characteristics of 2000 patients who visited a halitosis clinic. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36:970-5.
• 28. Doty RL, Green PA, Ram C, Yankell SL. Communication of gender from human breath odors: relationship to perceived intensity and pleasantness. Horm Behav 1982;16:13-22.
• 29. Rosenberg M, Kulkarni GV, Bosy A, McCulloch CA. Reproducibility and sensitivity of oral malodor measurements with a portable sulphide monitor. J Dent Res 1991;70:1436-40.
• 30. Murata T, Yamaga T, Iida T, Miyazaki H, Yaegaki K. Classification and examination of halitosis. Int Dent J 2002;52 Suppl 3:181-6.
• 31. Loesche WJ, Kazor C. Microbiology and treatment of halitosis. Periodontol 2000 2002;28:256-79.
• 32. Kozlovsky A, Gordon D, Gelernter I, Loesche WJ, Rosenberg M. Correlation between the BANA test and oral malodor parameters. J Dent Res 1994;73:1036-42.
• 33. Stamou E, Kozlovsky A, Rosenberg M. Association between oral malodour and periodontal disease-related parameters in a population of 71 Israelis. Oral Dis 2005;11 Suppl 1:72-4.
• 34. Bosy A, Kulkarni GV, Rosenberg M, McCulloch CA. Relationship of oral malodor to periodontitis: evidence of independence in discrete subpopulations. J Periodontol 1994;65:37-46.