Evaluation of the long-term results of facemask

Year 2014, , 127 - 33, 08.09.2014

Emine Kaygısız , Sema Yüksel

https://doi.org/10.17214/aot.06861

Cited By: 1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term results of face mask when growth potential of the patients were close to cease or ceased.

MATERIALS AND METHOD: The material consisted of pre-treatment (T1), post treatment (T2), and long-term (T3) lateral cephalograms and hand-wrist radiographs of 17 patients (9 female, 8 male; mean age: 11.1 years) with skeletal Class III malocclusion characterized by maxillary deficiency or maxillary deficiency and mandibular prognatism with anterior crossbite or tet-a-tet incisor and/or Class III molar relationship and treated with Delaire type face mask. Subjects whose growth potentials were close to cease or ceased at the T3 period were selected for the study. The mean follow-up period (T3-T2) was 4.7 years.

RESULTS: Significant increases in SNA angle and A┴VertT distance were observed during face mask therapy (T2-T1) and at overall period (T3-T1; p<0.001, p<0.01, respectively). SNB angle and B┴Vert T distance increased only during the follow-up period (T3-T2; p<0.001, p<0.01, respectively). For the ANB angle, significant increases were found during face mask therapy and at overall period (p<0.001, p<0.01, respectively); however, a significant decrease was found during the follow-up period (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION: After face mask therapy, relapse may occur during follow-up due to re-occurrence of the original growth pattern. These findings suggest the necessity of follow-up after treatment in patients with Yassıla III malocclusion
during growth and development.

Keywords

Long-Term Effects, Malocclusion, Angle Class III, Orthodontics

Yüz maskesi uygulamasının uzun dönem sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

AMAÇ: Çalışmanın amacı, yüz maskesi uygulamasının uzun dönem etkilerini, büyüme ve gelişim potansiyeli az kalmış ya da hiç kalmamış olan bireylerde değerlendirmektir.

GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Bu araştırmanın materyalleri, üst çene yetersizliği ya da üst çene yetersizliği ve alt çene ileriliği kaynaklı iskeletsel Sınıf III malokluzyon ile birlikte ön çapraz kapanış veya baş başa keser ilişkisi ve/veya Sınıf III büyük azı ilişkisine sahip, Delaire tipi yüz maskesi ile tedavi edilmiş 17 bireyin (9 kız, 8 erkek; ortalama yaş 11.1 yıl) uygulama öncesi (T1), uygulama sonrası (T2) ve uzun dönem takip sonu (T3) lateral sefalometrik ve el-bilek filmlerinden oluşturuldu. T3 döneminde, büyüme ve gelişim potansiyeli azalmış ya da hiç kalmamış bireyler çalışmaya alındı. Ortalama takip süresi (T3-T2) 4.7 yıldı.

BULGULAR: SNA açısının ve A┴Vert T mesafesinin uygulama döneminde (T2-T1) ve toplam sürede (T3-T1) önemli düzeyde arttığı bulundu (sırasıyla, p<0.001, p<0.01). SNB açısı ve B┴Vert T mesafesinin sadece takip döneminde (T3-T2) önemli düzeyde arttığı bulundu (sırasıyla p<0.001, p<0.01). ANB açısının uygulama döneminde ve toplam sürede önemli düzeyde arttığı (sırasıyla, p<0.001 ve p<0.01) takip döneminde önemli düzeyde azaldığı belirlendi (p<0.01).

SONUÇ: Yüz maskesi uygulamasından sonraki takip döneminde bireye özgün büyüme ve gelişim yönünün tekrar ortaya çıkması sonucunda nüks görülebilmektedir. Bu da Sınıf III malokluzyona sahip bireylerin tedaviden sonra takibinin gerekliliğini ortaya çıkarmaktadır.

Keywords

Malokluzyon, Angle Sınıf III, Uzun Dönem Etkiler, Ortodonti

References

• Takada K, Petdachai S, Sakuda M. Changes in dentofacial morphology in skeletal Class III children treated by a modified maxillary protraction headgear and a chin cup: a longitudinal cephalometric appraisal. Eur J Orthod 1993;15:211-21.
• Kilic N, Celikoglu M, Oktay H. Effects of the functional regulator III on profile changes in subjects with maxillary deficiency. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:729-34.
• Cozzani G. Extraoral traction and class III treatment. Am J Orthod 1981;80:638-50.
• Mermigos J, Full CA, Andreasen G. Protraction of the maxillofacial complex. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:47-55.
• Kapust AJ, Sinclair PM, Turley PK. Cephalometric effects of face mask/expansion therapy in Class III children: a comparison of three age groups. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:204-12.
• Ravi MS, Shetty NK, Prasad RB. Orthodontics-surgical combination therapy for Class III skeletal malocclusion. Contemp Clin Dent 2012;3:78-82.
• He S, Gao J, Wamalwa P, Wang Y, Zou S, Chen S. Camouflage treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion with multiloop edgewise arch wire and modified Class III elastics by maxillary mini-implant anchorage. Angle Orthod 2013;83:630-40.
• Guyer EC, Ellis EE 3rd, McNamara JA Jr, Behrents RG. Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod 1986;56:7-30.
• Ellis E 3rd, McNamara JA Jr. Components of adult Class III malocclusion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984;42:295-305.
• Jacobson A, Evans WG, Preston CB, Sadowsky PL. Mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod 1974;66:140-71.
• Hägg U, Tse A, Bendeus M, Rabie AB. Long-term follow-up of early treatment with reverse headgear. Eur J Orthod 2003;25:95-102.
• Ngan PW, Hagg U, Yiu C, Wei SH. Treatment response and longterm dentofacial adaptations to maxillary expansion and protraction. Semin Orthod 1997;3:255-64.
• Chong YH, Ive JC, Artun J. Changes following the use of protraction headgear for early correction of Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1996;66:351-62.
• Nanda R, Burstone CJ. Retention and stability in orthodontics, 1st ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1993.
• Sugawara J, Mitani H. Facial growth of skeletal Class III malocclusion and the effects, limitations, and long-term dentofacial adaptations to chincap therapy. Semin Orthod 1997;3:244-54.
• Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment and posttreatment craniofacial changes after rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:404-13.
• Arman A, Ufuk Toygar T, Abuhijleh E. Evaluation of maxillary protraction and fixed appliance therapy in Class III patients. Eur J Orthod 2006;28:383-92.
• Ghiz MA, Ngan P, Gunel E. Cephalometric variables to predict future success of early orthopedic Class III treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:301-6.
• Saadia M, Torres E. Sagittal changes after maxillary protraction with expansion in class III patients in the primary, mixed, and late mixed dentitions: a longitudinal retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:669-80.
• Tortop T, Keykubat A, Yuksel S. Facemask therapy with and without expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:467-74.
• Yüksel S, Uçem TT, Keykubat A. Early and late facemask therapy. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:559-68.
• Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA. Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:555-68.
• Cha KS. Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction in patients exhibiting skeletal class III malocclusion: a comparison of three skeletal maturation groups. Angle Orthod 2003;73:26-35.
• Suda N, Ishii-Suzuki M, Hirose K, Hiyama S, Suzuki S, Kuroda T. Effective treatment plan for maxillary protraction: is the bone age useful to determine the treatment plan? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:55-62.
• Kiliçoglu H, Kirliç Y. Profile changes in patients with class III malocclusions after Delaire mask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:453-62.
• Sugawara J, Asano T, Endo N, Mitani H. Long-term effects of chincap therapy on skeletal profile in mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:127-33.
• Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. Growth in the Untreated Class III Subject. Semin Orthod 2007;13:130-42.
• Mitani H, Sato K, Sugawara J. Growth of mandibular prognathism after pubertal growth peak. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:330-6.
• Deguchi T, Kanomi R, Ashizawa Y, Rosenstein SW. Very early face mask therapy in Class III children. Angle Orthod 1999;69:349-55.
• Hägg U, Taranger J. Maturation indicators and the pubertal growth spurt. Am J Orthod 1982;82:299-309.
• Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. 2nd ed. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press; 1959.
• Westwood PV, McNamara JA Jr, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Sarver DM. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:306-20.
• Ishii H, Morita S, Takeuchi Y, Nakamura S. Treatment effect of combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in severe skeletal Class III cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:304-12.
• Gallagher RW, Miranda F, Buschang PH. Maxillary protraction: treatment and posttreatment effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:612-9.
• Shanker S, Ngan P, Wade D, Beck M, Yiu C, Hägg U, et al. Cephalometric a point changes during and after maxillary protraction and expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:423-30.
• Macdonald KE, Kapust AJ, Turley PK. Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:13-24.
• Ngan P, Hägg U, Yiu C, Merwin D, Wei SH. Treatment response to maxillary expansion and protraction. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:151-68.