Diş hekimliğinde kullanılan kompozit rezinlerin güçlendirilmesi

Year 2014, Volume: 31 Issue: 3, 160 - 6, 08.09.2014

Nihal Pehlivan Özgül Karacaer

https://doi.org/10.17214/aot.66166

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Diş hekimliğinin birçok alanında yaygın olarak kullanılan kompozit rezinlerin sahip oldukları pek çok avantaja karşın mekanik özelliklerinin yeterli olmaması önemli bir dezavantajdır. Bu nedenle günümüzde mekanik özelliklerin geliştirilmesine yönelik çalışmalara ilgi giderek artmaktadır. Bu derlemede kompozit rezinlerin içeriğindeki organik matriks, inorganik doldurucular ve silanların modifiye edilerek güçlendirilmesine yönelik yapılan çalışmalar ele alınmıştır.

Keywords

İnorganik Doldurucu, Kompozit Rezin, Nanodoldurucu; Nanofiber, Nanopartiküller, Organik Matriks, Prostodonti, Restoratif Diş Hekimliği

Reinforcement of dental composite resins

Abstract

Composite resins are commonly used as dental restorative materials in dentistry and have many advantages, whereas their insufficient mechanical properties are among the main disadvantages. Therefore, efforts to improve the mechanical properties are now becoming increasingly popular. In this review article, studies on strengthening the composite resin by modifying the organic matrix, inorganic fillers and silans are discussed.

Keywords

Composite Resin, Inorganic Filler, Organic Matrix, Nanofiber, Nanofiller, Nanoparticles, Prosthodontics, Restorative Dentistry

References

• Aktürk H. Kompozit rezinin yüzey sertlik değerleri üzerine farklı ışık cihazlarının etkisi [tez]. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi; 2007.
• Chen L, Yu Q, Wang Y, Li H. BisGMA/TEGDMA dental composite containing high aspect-ratio hydroxyapatite nanofibers. Dent Mater 2011;27:1187-95.
• Sun W, Cai Q, Li P, Deng X, Wei Y, Xu M, et al. Post-draw PANPMMA nanofiber reinforced and toughened Bis-GMA dental restorative composite. Dent Mater 2010;26:873-80.
• Tian M, Gao Y, Liu Y, Liao Y, Hedin NE, Fong H. Fabrication and evaluation of Bis-GMA/TEGDMA dental resins/composites containing nano fibrillar silicate. Dent Mater 2008;24:235-43.
• Tian M, Gao Y, Liu Y, Liao Y, Xu R, Hedin NE, et al. BisGMA/TEGDMA Dental Composites Reinforced with Electrospun Nylon 6 Nanocomposite Nanofibers Containing Highly Aligned Fibrillar Silicate Single Crystals. Polymer 2007;48:2720-8.
• Altun C. Kompozit dolgu materyallerinde son gelişmeler. Gülhane Tıp Derg 2005;47:77-82.
• Önal B. Restoratif diş hekimliğinde maddeler ve uygulamaları, 1. Baskı. İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Yayınları; 2004.
• Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative dental materials, 11th ed. St Louis: CV Mosby; 2002.
• Chen MH. Update on dental nanocomposites. J Dent Res 2010;89:549-60.
• Şahin D, Kapdan A, Ünal M, Hürmüzlü F. Farklı yapıdaki kompozit rezin materyallerinin su emilimi ve suda çözünürlük değerlerinin karşılaştırılması. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2009;12:22-8.
• Çelik Ç, Yonca Ö. Rezin restoratif materyallerin polimerizasyonunda kullanılan ışık kaynakları. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi 2008;2:109-15.
• Karabela MM, Sideridou ID. Synthesis and study of physical properties of dental light-cured nanocomposites using different amounts of a urethane dimethacrylate trialkoxysilane coupling agent. Dent Mater 2011;27:1144-52.
• Dayangaç B. Kompozit rezin restorasyonlar, 1. Baskı. Ankara: Güneş Kitabevi; 2000.
• Philips RW. Skinner’s science of dental materials, 8th ed. London: WB Saunders Company; 1982.
• Khaled SM, Miron RJ, Hamilton DW, Charpentier PA, Rizkalla AS. Reinforcement of resin based cement with titania nanotubes. Dent Mater 2010;26:169-78.
• Schneider LF, Cavalcante LM, Silikas N, Watts DC. Degradation resistance of silorane, experimental ormocer and dimethacrylate resin based dental composites. J Oral Sci 2011;53:413-9.
• Xu HH, Schumacher GE, Eichmiller FC, Peterson RC, Antonucci JM, Mueller HJ. Continuous-fiber preform reinforcement of dental resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 2003;19:523-30.
• Rastelli AN, Jacomassi DP, Faloni AP, Queiroz TP, Rojas SS, Bernardi MI, et al. The filler content of the dental composite resins and their influence on different properties. Microsc Res Tech 2012;75:758-65.
• Landel RF, Nielsen LE. Mechanical properties of polymer and composites, 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1993.
• Freilich MA, Meiers JC, Duncan JP, Goldberg AJ. Fiber reinforced composites in clinical dentistry, 1st ed. London: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc; 2000.
• Tunçdemir AR, Aykent F. Fiberle güçlendirilmiş ve güçlendirilmemiş ışıkla sertleşen kompozitlerin translusenslerinin incelenmesi. SÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2009;18:13-9.
• Candan Ü, Eronat N. Fiberle güçlendirilmiş rezin kompozitler. EÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2008;29:1-12.
• Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Depth of cure and surface microhardness of experimental short fiber-reinforced composite. Acta Odontol Scand 2008;66:38-42.
• Schlichting LH, de Andrada MA, Vieira LC, de Oliveira Barra GM, Magne P. Composite resin reinforced with pre-tensioned glass fibers. Influence of prestressing on flexural properties. Dent Mater 2010;26:118-25.
• Güner ÇA, Karacaer Ö. Polietilen fiber ile güçlendirilmiş rezin tutuculu köprü restorasyonu: Olgu sunumları. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2007;10:26-30.
• Andreopoulos AG, Papaspyrides CD, Tsilibounidis S. Surface treated polyethylene fibres as reinforcement for acrylic resins. Biomaterials 1991;12:83-7.
• Braden M, Davy KW, Parker S, Ladizesky NH, Ward IM. Denture base poly(methyl methacrylate) reinforced with ultra-thin modulus polyethylene fibers. Br Dent J 1988;164:109-13.
• Ertem G, Şimşek E, Karacaer Ö. İki farklı polimerizasyon yönteminin polietilen fiberle güçlendirilmiş akrilik rezinlerin artık monomer miktarına etkisi. GÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg 2011;28:9-16.
• Samadzadeh A, Kugel G, Hurley E, Aboushala A. Fracture strengths of provisional restorations reinforced with plasma-treated woven polyethylene fiber. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:447-50.
• Solnit GS. The effect of methyl methacrylate reinforcement with silane-treated and untreated glass fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:310-4.
• Karacaer O, Polat TN, Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. The effect of length and concentration of glass fibers on the mechanical properties of an injection- and a compression-molded denture base polymer. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:385-93.
• Xu HH. Dental composite resins containing silica-fused ceramic single-crystalline whiskers with various filler levels. J Dent Res 1999;78:1304-11.
• Goldberg AJ, Freilich MA. An innovative pre-impregnated glass fiber for reinforcing composites. Dent Clin North Am 1999;43:127-33, vi-vii.
• Xu HH, Martin TA, Antonucci JM, Eichmiller FC. Ceramic whisker reinforcement of dental resin composites. J Dent Res 1999;78:706-12.
• Xu HH, Quinn JB, Giuseppetti AA, Eichmiller FC, Parry EE, Schumacher GE. Three-body wear of dental resin composites reinforced with silica-fused whiskers. Dent Mater 2004;20:220-7.
• Xu X, Guo G, Fan Y. Fabrication and characterization of dense zirconia and zirconia-silica ceramic nanofibers. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2010;10:5672-9.
• Fujita K, Ikemi T, Nishiyama N. Effects of particle size of silica filler on polymerization conversion in a light-curing resin composite. Dent Mater 2011;27:1079-85.
• Sun J, Forster AM, Johnson PM, Eidelman N, Quinn G, Schumacher G, et al. Improving performance of dental resins by adding titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Dent Mater 2011;27:972-82.
• Fong H. Electrospun nylon 6 nanofiber reinforced BisGMA/TEGDMA dental restorative composite resins. Polymer 2004;45:2427-32.
• Samuel SP, Li S, Mukherjee I, Guo Y, Patel AC, Baran G, et al. Mechanical properties of experimental dental composites containing a combination of mesoporous and nonporous spherical silica as fillers. Dent Mater 2009;25:296-301.
• Zandinejad AA, Atai M, Pahlevan A. The effect of ceramic and porous fillers on the mechanical properties of experimental dental composites. Dent Mater 2006;22:382-7.
• Ilie N, Hickel R. Macro-, micro- and nano-mechanical investigations on silorane and methacrylate-based composites. Dent Mater 2009;25:810-9.
• Chen MH, Chen CR, Hsu SH, Sun SP, Su WF. Low shrinkage light curable nanocomposite for dental restorative material. Dent Mater 2006;22:138-45.
• Soh MS, Yap AU, Sellinger A. Physicomechanical evaluation of low shrinkage dental nanocomposites based on silsesquioxane cores. Eur J Oral Sci 2007;115:230-8.
• Tilbrook DA, Clarke RL, Howle NE, Braden M. Photocurable epoxypolyol matrices for use in dental composites I. Biomaterials 2000;21:1743-53.
• Antonucci JM, McDonough WJ, Schutte CL, Moon CK. Shear strength measurements of dental polymer/glass fiber interface via the microbond test. Polymer Prepr 1995;36:821-2.
• Karabela MM, Sideridou ID. Effect of the structure of silane coupling agent on sorption characteristics of solvents by dental resin-nanocomposites. Dent Mater 2008;24:1631-9.
• McDonough WG, Antonucci JM, Dunkers JP. A study of dental adhesion by means of the microbond test. Polymer Prepr 1997;36:112-3.
• McDonough WG, Antonucci JM, Dunkers JP. Interfacial shear strengths of dental resin-glass fibers by the microbond test. Dent Mater 2001;17:492-8.
• Sideridou ID, Karabela MM. Effect of the structure of silane-coupling agent on dynamic mechanical properties of dental resin-nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 2008;110:507-16.
• Venz S, Antonucci JM. Silanization and modification of fillers for dental composites. J Dent Res 1986;65:191. [Abstr. No. 191].
• Wilson KS, Zhang K, Antonucci JM. Systematic variation of interfacial phase reactivity in dental nanocomposites. Biomaterials 2005;26:5095-103.