Retraction: Attachment alternatives in implant-supported overdentures

Year 2023, Volume: 40 Issue: 2, 61 - 67, 02.05.2023

Güliz Aktaş , Şenay Canay

This is a retraction to: İmplant üstü overdenture protezlerde tutucu alternatifleri https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gaziaot/issue/6609/87815

Retraction Note

Abstract

Severe resorption of the alveolar ridges often makes it very difficult for patients to wear conventional dentures due to the lack of retention and stability of the dentures. Implant-supported overdentures offer edentulous patients a better retained and more stable prosthesis resulting in improved chewing ability and patient satisfaction compared against conventional complete dentures. There exist various attachment systems to be used with overdenture prostheses and are available in the market. However, the efficiency of implant-supported overdentures and effects of these attachment types on patient satisfaction and quality of life is still investigated by researchers. Implant-supported overdenture has become the standard option for the care of edentulous patients. However the number of implants to be placed and the type of retention mechanism for overdenture fixation to be used remains as a matter of controversy. The aim of this article was to evaluate the use of different types of attachments and their effects on marginal bone loss and patient satisfaction and to review the technical complications associated with their use.

Keywords

Dental implant, implant-supported denture, jaw, edentulous

Retraction: İmplant üstü overdenture protezlerde tutucu alternatifleri

This is a retraction to: İmplant üstü overdenture protezlerde tutucu alternatifleri https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gaziaot/issue/6609/87815

Retraction Note

Makaledeki fotograflardan bazılarının sehven izinsiz kullanılmış olması nedeniyle yazarların isteği doğrultusunda makale geri çekilmiştir

Abstract

Tam protezlerin kullanımı, zaman içerisinde alveolar kemikteki ciddi rezorpsiyona bağlı olarak tutuculuk ve stabilitenin azalması nedeniyle zorlaşmaktadır. Bu nedenle implant destekli overdenture protezler tam dişsiz hastaların tedavisinde standart bir tedavi seçeneği haline gelmiştir. Özellikle implant üstü overdenture protezler konvansiyonel tam protezler ile karşılaştırıldığında daha iyi retansiyon ve stabiliteyi sağlamasıyla, hasta memnuniyetinde ve çiğneme etkinliğinde artışı beraberinde getirmektedir. Overdenture protezlerde kullanılabilecek çok çeşitli firmalar tarafından üretilen tutucu sistemleri mevcuttur. Ancak bu tutucu sistemlerinin hasta memnuniyeti ve hayat kalitesi üzerine olan etkisi devam eden çalışmalarda araştırılmaktadır. Overdenture protezler için implant sayısı ve kullanılacak tutucu mekanizması ile ilgili halen kesinleşmiş veriler bulunmamaktadır. Bu derlemenin amacı tam dişsizlik durumunda implant üstü overdenture protezlerde kullanılan farklı tutucu tiplerinin tanımlanması ve bu tutucu tiplerinin marjinal kemik kaybı, hasta memnuniyeti ve teknik komplikasyon üzerine olan etkisinin değerlendirilmesidir.

Keywords

Diş implantı, çene, dişsiz, implant-destekli protez

References

• Mau J, Behneke A, Behneke N, Fritzemeier CU, Gomez-Roman G, d’Hoedt B, et al. Randomized multicenter comparison of 2 IMZ and 4 TPS screw implants supporting bar-retained overdentures in 425 eden- tulous mandibles. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:835-47.
• Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Montreal, Quebec, May 24-25, 2002. Int J Oral Maxillofac Im- plants 2002;17:601-2.
• Redford M, Drury TF, Kingman A, Brown LJ. Denture use and the technical anality of dental prostheses among persons 18-74 years of age: United States, 1988-1991. J Dent Res 1996;75:714-25.
• Awad MA, Lund JP, Shapiro SH, Locker D, Klemetti E, Chehade A, et al. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular im- plant overdentures and conventional dentures: A randomized clinical trial in a senior population. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:390-6.
• Fontijn-Tekamp FA, Slagter AP, van’t Hof MA, Geertman ME, Kalk W. Bite forces with mandibular implant-retained overdentures. J Dent Res 1998;77:1832-9.
• van der Bilt A, van Kampen FMC, Cune MS. Masticatory function with mandibular implant-supported overdentures fitted with different attach- ment types. Eur J Oral Sci 2006;114:191-6.
• Emami E, Heydecke G, Rompre PH, de Grandmont P, Feine JS. Im- pact of implant support for mandibular dentures on satisfaction, oral and general health-related quality of life: a meta-analysis of randomized-con- trolled trials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:533-44.
• Thomason JM. The use of mandibular implant-retained overdentu- res improve patient satisfaction and quality of life. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2012;12:182-4.
• Thomason JM, Lund JP, Chehade A, Feine JS. Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:467-73.
• Klemetti E. Is there a certain number of implants needed to retain an overdenture? J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:80-4.
• Roccuzzo M, Bonino F, Gaudioso L, Zwahlen M, Meijer HJA. What is the optimal number of implants for removable reconstructions? A systematic review on implant-supported overdentures. Clin Oral Im- plants Res 2012;23:229-37.
• Gotfredsen K, Wiskott A; Working Group 4. Consensus report - re- constructions on implants. The Third EAO Consensus Conference 2012. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:238-41.
• Shafie H. Principles of attachment selection. Clinical and Labora- tory Manual of Implant Overdentures. 1st edn. Oxford: Blackwell; 2007. p.31-6.
• Misch CE. Mandibular implant overdentures design and fabrication. Dental Implant Prosthetics. St. Louis: Mosby; 2005. p.228-51.
• Misch C. Partial and complete edentulous maxilla implant treatment plans: fixed and overdenture prostheses. Dental Implant Prosthetics. St. Louis: Mosby; 2005. p. 281-308.
• Trakas T, Michalakis K, Kang K, Hirayama H. Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review. Implant Dent 2006;15:24-34.
• Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The edentulous predicament. 1: A prospective study of the effectiveness of implant-supported fixed prostheses. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:59-65.
• Payne AG, Solomons YF, Tawse-Smith A, Lownie JF. Inter-abut- ment and peri-abutment mucosal enlargement with mandibular implant overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:179-87.
• Bidez MW, Chen Y, McLoughlin SW, English CE. Finite element analysis of four- abutment Hader bar designs. Implant Dent 1993;2:171- 6.
• Yang TC, Maeda Y, Gonda T, Kotecha S. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and la- teral forces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:1315-9.
• Heckmann SM, Schrott A, Graef F, Wichmann MG, Weber HP. Man- dibular two-implant telescopic overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:560-9.
• Preiskel HW, Tsolka P. Telescopic prostheses for implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:352-7.
• Romanos GE, May S, May D. Treatment concept of the edentulous mandible with prefabricated telescopic abutments and immediate func- tional loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:593-7.
• Geckili O, Bilhan H, Bilgin T. Locator attachments as an alternative to ball attachments in 2-implant retained mandibular overdentures. J Can Dent Assoc 2007;73:691-4.
• Mizutani H. Preparations of abutments for magnetically retained overdentures. Ai M, Shiau YY, ed. New Magnetic Applications in Clini- cal Dentistry. 1st edn. Chicago: Quintessence Pub Co Inc; 2004. p.70- 4.
• Watanabe I, Tanaka Y, Ohkubo C, Miller AW. Application of cast magnetic attachments to sectional complete dentures for a patient with microstomia: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:573-7.
• Angelini E, Pezzoli M, Zucchi F. Corrosion under static and dynamic conditions of alloys used for magnetic retention in dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:848-53.
• Riley MA, Williams AJ, Speight JD, Walmsley AD, Harris IR. Inves- tigations into the failure of dental magnets. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:249-54.
• Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, van Steenberghe D. A 5-year ran- domized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral im- plants in the mandibular overdenture therapy-Part I: peri-implant outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:170-7.
• Gotfredsen K, Holm B. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: a randomized prospective 5-year study. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:125-30.
• Bilhan H, Mumcu E, Arat S. The comparison of marginal bone loss around mandibular overdenture-supporting implants with two different attachment types in a loading period of 36 months. Gerodontology 2011;28:49-57.
• Cehreli MC, Uysal S, Akca K. Marginal bone level changes and prosthetic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 2 im- plants: a 5-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12:114-21.
• Akca K, Cehreli MC, Uysal S. Marginal bone loss and prosthetic ma- intenance of bar-retained implant-supported overdentures: a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:137-45.
• Cehreli MC, Karasoy D, Kokat AM, Akca K, Eckert S. A systematic review of marginal bone loss around implants retaining or supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:266-77.
• Närhi TO, Hevinga M, Voorsmit RA, Kalk W. Maxillary overdentures retained by splinted and unsplinted implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:259-66.
• Cune M, Burgers M, van Kampen F, de Putter C, van der Bilt A. Mandibular overdentures retained by two implants: 10-year results from a crossover clinical trial comparing ball-socket and bar-clip attachments. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:310-7.
• Ucankale M, Akoglu B, Ozkan Y, Ozkan YK. The effect of different attachment systems with implant-retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG. Gerodontology 2012;29:24-9.
• Ellis JS, Burawi G, Walls A, Thomason JM. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attach- ment and magnets. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1293-8.
• Krennmair G, Seemann R, Fazekas A, Ewers R, Piehslinger E. Pa- tient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments: a crossover cli- nical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:1560-8.
• Krennmair G, Suto D, Seemann R, Piehslinger E. Removable four implant-supported mandibular overdentures rigidly retained with teles- copic crowns or milled bars: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Im- plants Res 2012;23:481-8.
• Kleis WK, Kammerer PW, Hartmann S, Al-Nawas B, Wagner W. A comparison of three different attachment systems for mandibular two-im- plant overdentures: one-year report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12:209-18.
• Mackie A, Lyons K, Thomson WM, Payne AG. Mandibular two-im- plant overdentures: three-year prosthodontic maintenance using the lo- cator attachment system. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:328-31.
• Krennmair G, Krainhofner M, Piehslinger E. Implant-supported man- dibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:987-94.
• Krennmair G, Seemann R, Weinländer M, Piehslinger E. Compari- son of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained man- dibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:598-606.
• Cakarer S, Can T, Yaltirik M, Keskin C. Complications associated with the ball, bar and Locator attachments for implant-supported over- dentures. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16:e953-9.
• Zou DH, Wu YQ, Huang W, Wang F, Wang S, Zhang Z, et al. A 3- year prospective clinical study of telescopic crown, bar, and locator at- tachments for removable four implant-supported maxillary overdentures. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:566-73.
• Bressan E, Tomasi C, Stellini E, Sivolella S, Favero G, Berglundh T. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:814-9.
• Akça K, Çavuşoğlu Y, Sağirkaya E, Çehreli MC. Early-loaded onestage implants retaining mandibular overdentures by two different mechanisms: 5-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:824-30.
• Cristache CM, Muntianu LA, Burlibasa M, Didilescu AC. Five-year clinical trial using three attachment systems for implant overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:e171-8.