BibTex RIS Cite

Hava Aracı Kokpit Arayüz Değerlendirmesi İçin Çok Kriterli Bir Yaklaşım

Year 2013, Volume: 28 Issue: 4, 0 - , 05.03.2014

Mehmet Şenol Metin Dağdeviren Mustafa Kurt

Abstract

Hava araçlarında uçuş emniyetini sağlayan en önemli faktör insan-makine etkileşimini sağlayan arayüzlerdir. Pilot-kokpit etkileşim kalitesi ile uçuş emniyeti ve arayüz kullanılabilirliği arasında yakın bir ilişki vardır. Kokpit arayüzleri ile etkileşimde mürettebat hataları yıkıcı sonuçlar ortaya çıkarabilmekte olup, kullanıcı-dostu arayüz tasarımı ile etkileşim kalitesi ve uçuş emniyeti iyileştirilebilmektedir. Literatürde arayüz tasarımı ve
kullanılabilirliği için farklı kullanılabilirlik değerlendirme teknikleri (KDT) kullanılmaktadır; bu tekniklerin çoğunun öznel değerlendirmelere bağlı olması sebebiyle hatalı sonuçların elde edilebilmesine sebep olmaktadır. Bu çalışmada kokpit arayüz kullanılabilirlik seviyelerinin değerlendirilmesi, geliştirilmesi ve kullanılabilirlik sıralaması için çok kriterli bir yaklaşım önerilmiştir. Çalışmada kullanılan alternatif arayüzler; nicel, nitel ve birleşik tasarım yaklaşımlarının sonucu olarak belirlenmiş ve birleşik tasarım ile daha tatminkar sonuçlar elde edildiği görülmüştür.

Keywords

İnsan-makina etkileşimi Arayüz değerlendirmesi Kokpit Tasarımı Çok kriterli analiz

References

  • Strauch, B., "Automation and Decision Making—
  • Lessons from the Cali Accident", Proc. Hum.
  • Factors and Ergonomics Soc. 41st Annu. Meet.
  • Albuquerque, NM: Hum. Factors and Ergon. Soc.,
  • –199, 1997.
  • Funk, K. Suroteguh, C. Wilson, J. and Lyall, B.,
  • "Flight deck automation and task management",
  • Proc. of 1998 IEEE Int. Conf. on Syst. Man and
  • Cybern. San Diego, Cilt 1, 863–868, 1998.
  • Sarter, N. Woods, D., Billings, C., "Automation
  • surprises", Salvendy, G. (Eds.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. 2nd Ed. New
  • York: Wiley, 1926–1943, 1997.
  • Singer, G., "Filling the gaps in the human factors
  • certification net", Dekker, S., Hollnagel, E. (Eds.),
  • Coping with Computers in the Cockpit.
  • Brookfield, VT: Ashgate, 87–107, 1999.
  • Billings, C.E., Aviation automation: The search
  • for a human-centered approach. Mahwah, NJ:
  • Lawrence Erlbaum Assfociates, Inc, 1997.
  • Smith, C., "Design of the Eurofighter human
  • machine interface", Air and space Europe.
  • Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, Cilt 1, No 3, 54–59,
  • -
  • Previc, F.H., Ercoline, W.R., "The outside-in
  • attitude display concept revisited", Int. J. Aviat.
  • Psycholo., 377-401, 2000.
  • Tlauka, M., Stanton, D. and Kenna, F.P. Dual
  • Displays., Dept. of Psycholo. Univ. of Leicester,
  • -
  • Torenvliet, G.L., Jamieson, G.A., Vicente, K.J.,
  • "Making the most of ecological interface design:
  • the role of individual differences", Appl. Ergon.,
  • , 395-408, 2000.
  • Kima, G.J., Hanb, S.H., Yangb, H., Choa, C.,
  • "Body-based interfaces", Appl. Ergon., Cilt 35,
  • -274, 2004.
  • Jones, G.R., Hooper, R.H., "The effect of singleor
  • multiple-layered garments on interface pressure
  • measured at the backpack-shoulder interface",
  • Appl. Ergon., Cilt 36, 79-83, 2005.
  • Wellings, T., Williams, M., Tennant, C.,
  • "Understanding customers’ holistic perception of
  • switches in automotive human–machine
  • interfaces", Appl. Ergon., Cilt 41, 8-17, 2010.
  • Rubens, E.M., Trotter, M.J., Lenné, M.G.,
  • "Effects on driving performance of interacting
  • with an in-vehicle music player: A comparison of
  • three interface layout concepts for information
  • presentation", Appl. Ergon., Cilt 42, 583-591,
  • -
  • Rydström, A., Broström, R., Bengtsson, K.J., "A
  • comparison of two contemporary types of in-car
  • multifunctional interfaces", Appl. Ergon., Cilt 43,
  • -514, 2012.
  • Lee, K.W., Lee, Y.C., "Design and validation of
  • an improved graphical user interface with the
  • ‘Tool ball’", Appl. Ergon., Cilt 43, 57-68, 2012.
  • Virzi, R.A., "Usability inspection methods",
  • Helander, M., Landauer, T., Prabhu, P. (Eds.),
  • Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction.,
  • New York: Elsevier, 705–715, 1997.
  • Dağdeviren, M, Eren, T., "Analytic hierarchy
  • process and use of 0-1 goal programming methods
  • in selecting supplier firm", J. Fac. Eng. Archit.,
  • Gazi Univ. Cilt 16, 41-52, 2001.
  • Bozdağ, C.E., Kahraman, C., Ruan, D., "Fuzzy
  • group decision making for selection among
  • computer integrated manufacturing systems",
  • Comp. Ind., Cilt 5, 13-29, 2003.
  • Büyüközkan, G., Ertay, T., Kahraman, C., Ruan,
  • D., "Determining the importance weights for the
  • design requirements in the house of quality using
  • the fuzzy analytic network approach", Int. J.
  • Intel. Syst., Cilt 19, 443-461, 2004.
  • Xiaohua, W., Zhenmin, F., "Sustainable
  • development of rural energy and its appraising
  • system in Chine", Renew. Sustain. Energ., Cilt
  • , 395-404, 2002.
  • Yedla, S., Shresta, R.M., "Multi-criteria approach
  • for the selection of alternative options for
  • environmentally sustainable transport system in
  • Delhi", Transp. Res., Cilt 37, 717-729, 2003.
  • Aras, H., Erdogmus, S., Koc, E., "Multi-criteria
  • selection for a wind observation station location
  • using analytic hierarchy process", Renew. Energ.,
  • Cilt 29, 1383-1392, 2004.
  • Tolga, E, Demircan, M.L., Kahraman, C.,
  • "Operating system selection using fuzzy
  • replacement analysis and analytic hierarchy
  • process", Int. J. Prod. Econ., Cilt 97, 89-117,
  • -
  • Kim, P.P, Lee K.J, Lee B.W., "Selection of an
  • optimal nuclear fuel cycle scenario by goal
  • programming & analytic hierarchy process", Ann.
  • of Nucl. Energy, Cilt 26, 449-460, 1999.
  • Wolfslehner, B., Vacik, H., Lexer, M.J.,
  • "Application of the analytic network process in
  • multi-criteria analysis of sustainable forest
  • management", For. Ecol. Manag., Cilt 207, 157-
  • , 2005.
  • Saaty, T.L., Takizawa, M., "Dependence and
  • independence: from linear hierarchies to nonlinear
  • Networks", Eur. J. Oper. Res. 26, 229-237, 1986.
  • Saaty, T.L., Decision Making with Dependence
  • and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process,
  • RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 1996.
  • Yüksel, İ., Dağdeviren, M., "Using the analytic
  • network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis-A
  • case study for a textile firm", Inf. Sci., Cilt 177,
  • -3382, 2007.
  • Ayağ, Z., Özdemir, R.G., "A hybrid approach to
  • concept selection through fuzzy analytic network
  • process", Comp. Ind. Eng., 56, 368-379, 2009.
  • Lee, H., Lee, S., Park, Y., "Selection of
  • technology acquisition mode using the analytic
  • network process", Math. Comp. Model., Cilt 49,
  • -1282, 2009.
  • Boran, S., Göztepe, K., "Development of a fuzzy
  • decision support system for commodity
  • acquisition using fuzzy analytic network process",
  • Expert Syst. Appl., Cilt 37, 1939-1945, 2010.
  • Vinodh, S., Ramiya, R.A., Gautham, S.G.,
  • "Application of fuzzy analytic network process for supplier selection in a manufacturing
  • organisation", Expert Syst. Appl., Cilt 38, 272-
  • , 2011.
  • Shyur, H.J. "COTS evaluation using modified
  • TOPSIS and ANP", Appl. Math. Comp., Cilt
  • , 251-259, 2006.
  • Le Téno, J., F., Mareschal, B., "An interval
  • version of PROMETHEE for the comparison of
  • building products’ design with ill-defined data on
  • environmental quality", Eur. J. Oper. Res., Cilt
  • , 522–529, 1988.
  • Goumas, M., Lygerou, V., "An extension of the
  • PROMETHEE method for decision making in
  • fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy
  • exploitation projects", Eur. J. Oper. Res., Cilt
  • , 606-613, 2000.
  • Geldermann J., Spengler, T., Rentz, O., "Fuzzy
  • outranking for environmental assessment, case
  • study: Iron and steel making industry", Fuzzy Set
  • Syst., Cilt 115, 45– 65, 2000.
  • Bilsel, R., U., Büyüközkan, G., Ruan, D., "A
  • fuzzy prefernce-ranking model for a quality
  • evaluation of hospital websites", Int. J. Intel.,
  • Syst. Cilt 21, 1181-1197, 2006.
  • Liu P., Guan Z., "Evaluation research on the
  • quality of the railway passenger service based on
  • the linguistic variables and the improved
  • PROMETHEE-II method", J. Comp., Cilt 4, 265-
  • , 2009.
  • Yılmaz, B., Dağdeviren, M., "Comparative
  • analysis of PROMETHEE and fuzzy
  • PROMETHEE methods in equipment selection
  • problem", J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ., Cilt
  • , No 4, 811-826, 2010.
  • Arıkan, F., Küçükçe, Y.S, "Satın alma faaliyeti
  • için bir tedarikçi seçimi-değerlendirme problemi
  • ve çözümü", J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ., Cilt
  • , No 2, 255-264, 2012.
  • Aydoğan, E.K., Soylu, M.Y., Gencer, C., Çetin,
  • S., Soysal, M., Bektaş, O., Yüce, E., Öztürk, Y.,
  • Gökırmak, Y., Sağıroğlu, Ş., " IPv4’den IPv6’ya
  • geçiş için AHP modeli", J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi
  • Univ., Cilt 26, No 3, 701-709, 2011.
  • DuBois D., Prade H., "Operations on fuzzy
  • numbers", Int. J. Syst Sci., Cilt 9, 613– 626,
  • -
  • Şenol, M.B. Dağdeviren, M. Kurt, M. and
  • Çilingir, C., "Display panel design of a general
  • utility helicopter by applying quantitative and
  • qualitative approaches", Hum. Factors and
  • Ergon. in Manuf., Cilt 20, No 1, 73-86, 2010.
  • Yager, R. R., "A prodecure for ordering fuzzy
  • subsets of the unit interval", Inf. Sci., Cilt 24,
  • -700, 1981.

Year 2013, Volume: 28 Issue: 4, 0 - , 05.03.2014

Mehmet Şenol Metin Dağdeviren Mustafa Kurt

Abstract

References

  • Strauch, B., "Automation and Decision Making—
  • Lessons from the Cali Accident", Proc. Hum.
  • Factors and Ergonomics Soc. 41st Annu. Meet.
  • Albuquerque, NM: Hum. Factors and Ergon. Soc.,
  • –199, 1997.
  • Funk, K. Suroteguh, C. Wilson, J. and Lyall, B.,
  • "Flight deck automation and task management",
  • Proc. of 1998 IEEE Int. Conf. on Syst. Man and
  • Cybern. San Diego, Cilt 1, 863–868, 1998.
  • Sarter, N. Woods, D., Billings, C., "Automation
  • surprises", Salvendy, G. (Eds.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. 2nd Ed. New
  • York: Wiley, 1926–1943, 1997.
  • Singer, G., "Filling the gaps in the human factors
  • certification net", Dekker, S., Hollnagel, E. (Eds.),
  • Coping with Computers in the Cockpit.
  • Brookfield, VT: Ashgate, 87–107, 1999.
  • Billings, C.E., Aviation automation: The search
  • for a human-centered approach. Mahwah, NJ:
  • Lawrence Erlbaum Assfociates, Inc, 1997.
  • Smith, C., "Design of the Eurofighter human
  • machine interface", Air and space Europe.
  • Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, Cilt 1, No 3, 54–59,
  • -
  • Previc, F.H., Ercoline, W.R., "The outside-in
  • attitude display concept revisited", Int. J. Aviat.
  • Psycholo., 377-401, 2000.
  • Tlauka, M., Stanton, D. and Kenna, F.P. Dual
  • Displays., Dept. of Psycholo. Univ. of Leicester,
  • -
  • Torenvliet, G.L., Jamieson, G.A., Vicente, K.J.,
  • "Making the most of ecological interface design:
  • the role of individual differences", Appl. Ergon.,
  • , 395-408, 2000.
  • Kima, G.J., Hanb, S.H., Yangb, H., Choa, C.,
  • "Body-based interfaces", Appl. Ergon., Cilt 35,
  • -274, 2004.
  • Jones, G.R., Hooper, R.H., "The effect of singleor
  • multiple-layered garments on interface pressure
  • measured at the backpack-shoulder interface",
  • Appl. Ergon., Cilt 36, 79-83, 2005.
  • Wellings, T., Williams, M., Tennant, C.,
  • "Understanding customers’ holistic perception of
  • switches in automotive human–machine
  • interfaces", Appl. Ergon., Cilt 41, 8-17, 2010.
  • Rubens, E.M., Trotter, M.J., Lenné, M.G.,
  • "Effects on driving performance of interacting
  • with an in-vehicle music player: A comparison of
  • three interface layout concepts for information
  • presentation", Appl. Ergon., Cilt 42, 583-591,
  • -
  • Rydström, A., Broström, R., Bengtsson, K.J., "A
  • comparison of two contemporary types of in-car
  • multifunctional interfaces", Appl. Ergon., Cilt 43,
  • -514, 2012.
  • Lee, K.W., Lee, Y.C., "Design and validation of
  • an improved graphical user interface with the
  • ‘Tool ball’", Appl. Ergon., Cilt 43, 57-68, 2012.
  • Virzi, R.A., "Usability inspection methods",
  • Helander, M., Landauer, T., Prabhu, P. (Eds.),
  • Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction.,
  • New York: Elsevier, 705–715, 1997.
  • Dağdeviren, M, Eren, T., "Analytic hierarchy
  • process and use of 0-1 goal programming methods
  • in selecting supplier firm", J. Fac. Eng. Archit.,
  • Gazi Univ. Cilt 16, 41-52, 2001.
  • Bozdağ, C.E., Kahraman, C., Ruan, D., "Fuzzy
  • group decision making for selection among
  • computer integrated manufacturing systems",
  • Comp. Ind., Cilt 5, 13-29, 2003.
  • Büyüközkan, G., Ertay, T., Kahraman, C., Ruan,
  • D., "Determining the importance weights for the
  • design requirements in the house of quality using
  • the fuzzy analytic network approach", Int. J.
  • Intel. Syst., Cilt 19, 443-461, 2004.
  • Xiaohua, W., Zhenmin, F., "Sustainable
  • development of rural energy and its appraising
  • system in Chine", Renew. Sustain. Energ., Cilt
  • , 395-404, 2002.
  • Yedla, S., Shresta, R.M., "Multi-criteria approach
  • for the selection of alternative options for
  • environmentally sustainable transport system in
  • Delhi", Transp. Res., Cilt 37, 717-729, 2003.
  • Aras, H., Erdogmus, S., Koc, E., "Multi-criteria
  • selection for a wind observation station location
  • using analytic hierarchy process", Renew. Energ.,
  • Cilt 29, 1383-1392, 2004.
  • Tolga, E, Demircan, M.L., Kahraman, C.,
  • "Operating system selection using fuzzy
  • replacement analysis and analytic hierarchy
  • process", Int. J. Prod. Econ., Cilt 97, 89-117,
  • -
  • Kim, P.P, Lee K.J, Lee B.W., "Selection of an
  • optimal nuclear fuel cycle scenario by goal
  • programming & analytic hierarchy process", Ann.
  • of Nucl. Energy, Cilt 26, 449-460, 1999.
  • Wolfslehner, B., Vacik, H., Lexer, M.J.,
  • "Application of the analytic network process in
  • multi-criteria analysis of sustainable forest
  • management", For. Ecol. Manag., Cilt 207, 157-
  • , 2005.
  • Saaty, T.L., Takizawa, M., "Dependence and
  • independence: from linear hierarchies to nonlinear
  • Networks", Eur. J. Oper. Res. 26, 229-237, 1986.
  • Saaty, T.L., Decision Making with Dependence
  • and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process,
  • RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 1996.
  • Yüksel, İ., Dağdeviren, M., "Using the analytic
  • network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis-A
  • case study for a textile firm", Inf. Sci., Cilt 177,
  • -3382, 2007.
  • Ayağ, Z., Özdemir, R.G., "A hybrid approach to
  • concept selection through fuzzy analytic network
  • process", Comp. Ind. Eng., 56, 368-379, 2009.
  • Lee, H., Lee, S., Park, Y., "Selection of
  • technology acquisition mode using the analytic
  • network process", Math. Comp. Model., Cilt 49,
  • -1282, 2009.
  • Boran, S., Göztepe, K., "Development of a fuzzy
  • decision support system for commodity
  • acquisition using fuzzy analytic network process",
  • Expert Syst. Appl., Cilt 37, 1939-1945, 2010.
  • Vinodh, S., Ramiya, R.A., Gautham, S.G.,
  • "Application of fuzzy analytic network process for supplier selection in a manufacturing
  • organisation", Expert Syst. Appl., Cilt 38, 272-
  • , 2011.
  • Shyur, H.J. "COTS evaluation using modified
  • TOPSIS and ANP", Appl. Math. Comp., Cilt
  • , 251-259, 2006.
  • Le Téno, J., F., Mareschal, B., "An interval
  • version of PROMETHEE for the comparison of
  • building products’ design with ill-defined data on
  • environmental quality", Eur. J. Oper. Res., Cilt
  • , 522–529, 1988.
  • Goumas, M., Lygerou, V., "An extension of the
  • PROMETHEE method for decision making in
  • fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy
  • exploitation projects", Eur. J. Oper. Res., Cilt
  • , 606-613, 2000.
  • Geldermann J., Spengler, T., Rentz, O., "Fuzzy
  • outranking for environmental assessment, case
  • study: Iron and steel making industry", Fuzzy Set
  • Syst., Cilt 115, 45– 65, 2000.
  • Bilsel, R., U., Büyüközkan, G., Ruan, D., "A
  • fuzzy prefernce-ranking model for a quality
  • evaluation of hospital websites", Int. J. Intel.,
  • Syst. Cilt 21, 1181-1197, 2006.
  • Liu P., Guan Z., "Evaluation research on the
  • quality of the railway passenger service based on
  • the linguistic variables and the improved
  • PROMETHEE-II method", J. Comp., Cilt 4, 265-
  • , 2009.
  • Yılmaz, B., Dağdeviren, M., "Comparative
  • analysis of PROMETHEE and fuzzy
  • PROMETHEE methods in equipment selection
  • problem", J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ., Cilt
  • , No 4, 811-826, 2010.
  • Arıkan, F., Küçükçe, Y.S, "Satın alma faaliyeti
  • için bir tedarikçi seçimi-değerlendirme problemi
  • ve çözümü", J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ., Cilt
  • , No 2, 255-264, 2012.
  • Aydoğan, E.K., Soylu, M.Y., Gencer, C., Çetin,
  • S., Soysal, M., Bektaş, O., Yüce, E., Öztürk, Y.,
  • Gökırmak, Y., Sağıroğlu, Ş., " IPv4’den IPv6’ya
  • geçiş için AHP modeli", J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi
  • Univ., Cilt 26, No 3, 701-709, 2011.
  • DuBois D., Prade H., "Operations on fuzzy
  • numbers", Int. J. Syst Sci., Cilt 9, 613– 626,
  • -
  • Şenol, M.B. Dağdeviren, M. Kurt, M. and
  • Çilingir, C., "Display panel design of a general
  • utility helicopter by applying quantitative and
  • qualitative approaches", Hum. Factors and
  • Ergon. in Manuf., Cilt 20, No 1, 73-86, 2010.
  • Yager, R. R., "A prodecure for ordering fuzzy
  • subsets of the unit interval", Inf. Sci., Cilt 24,
  • -700, 1981.
There are 176 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Mehmet Şenol This is me

Metin Dağdeviren This is me

Mustafa Kurt This is me

Publication Date March 5, 2014
Submission Date March 5, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 28 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Şenol, M., Dağdeviren, M., & Kurt, M. (2014). Hava Aracı Kokpit Arayüz Değerlendirmesi İçin Çok Kriterli Bir Yaklaşım. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(4).
AMA Şenol M, Dağdeviren M, Kurt M. Hava Aracı Kokpit Arayüz Değerlendirmesi İçin Çok Kriterli Bir Yaklaşım. GUMMFD. March 2014;28(4).
Chicago Şenol, Mehmet, Metin Dağdeviren, and Mustafa Kurt. “Hava Aracı Kokpit Arayüz Değerlendirmesi İçin Çok Kriterli Bir Yaklaşım”. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 28, no. 4 (March 2014).
EndNote Şenol M, Dağdeviren M, Kurt M (March 1, 2014) Hava Aracı Kokpit Arayüz Değerlendirmesi İçin Çok Kriterli Bir Yaklaşım. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 28 4
IEEE M. Şenol, M. Dağdeviren, and M. Kurt, “Hava Aracı Kokpit Arayüz Değerlendirmesi İçin Çok Kriterli Bir Yaklaşım”, GUMMFD, vol. 28, no. 4, 2014.
ISNAD Şenol, Mehmet et al. “Hava Aracı Kokpit Arayüz Değerlendirmesi İçin Çok Kriterli Bir Yaklaşım”. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 28/4 (March 2014).
JAMA Şenol M, Dağdeviren M, Kurt M. Hava Aracı Kokpit Arayüz Değerlendirmesi İçin Çok Kriterli Bir Yaklaşım. GUMMFD. 2014;28.
MLA Şenol, Mehmet et al. “Hava Aracı Kokpit Arayüz Değerlendirmesi İçin Çok Kriterli Bir Yaklaşım”. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 28, no. 4, 2014.
Vancouver Şenol M, Dağdeviren M, Kurt M. Hava Aracı Kokpit Arayüz Değerlendirmesi İçin Çok Kriterli Bir Yaklaşım. GUMMFD. 2014;28(4).