Spor sahaları drenajına genel bakış: Deneysel çalışma sistematiğinin oluşturulması

Year 2023, Volume: 38 Issue: 4, 2495 - 2504, 12.04.2023

Erdal Kesgin Kadir Gezici Hayrullah Ağaçcıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1120796

Abstract

Sızma ve drenaj konularında toprak-su ilişkilerinin hidrolojik olarak değerlendirilmesi karmaşık bir süreçtir. Bu çalışmada, spor sahalarının tasarımı aşamasında gerçekleştirilmesi gereken yöntemlerin, özellikle deneysel çalışma sistematiğinin önemi üzerinde durulmuştur. Spor sahaları drenajının literatürde belirli bir standardının olmaması ve tasarımların çoğunlukla deneyime dayalı olarak gerçekleştirilmesi nedeniyle standart bir yöntem geliştirilmeye çalışılmıştır. Deneysel çalışmaların başarısı için gerekli koşullar sunularak, hazırlanan örnek drenaj kesitleri karşılaştırılmıştır. Yapılan deneysel çalışmalar sonucunda, sisteme uygulanan hiyetograf deseninin ve drenaj kesiti tabaka kalınlıklarının, çıkış debisi hidrografının parametreleri üzerinde oldukça etkin olduğu anlaşılmıştır. Bu çalışma, spor sahalarının drenajı hakkında literatürde yeterli sayıda çalışma olmaması ve araştırma tekniklerinin net olarak ortaya konulmaması dikkate alınarak yeni bir bakış açısı kazandırılması ve bir araştırma yöntemi önerilmesi sebebiyle önem arz etmektedir.

Keywords

Spor sahası, drenaj, yağmur simülatörü

Supporting Institution

TÜBİTAK

Project Number

214M616

Thanks

Bu çalışma TÜBİTAK 1001 projeleri kapsamında 214M616 no’lu proje olarak 2015-2018 yılları arasında desteklenmiştir.

An overview of sports field drainage: Development of experimental investigation methodology

Abstract

Hydrological evaluation of soil-water relationships for infiltration and drainage is a complex issue. Within the scope of this study, the significance of the experimental studies for the drainage design of sports fields is emphasized. In addition, a standard technique was tried to develop due to the lack of absence of certain specifications and inaccurate designs mostly based on the traditional experience regarding sports field drainage. The essential circumstances for the success of the experimental studies were presented and a sample drainage section was compared. As a result of the experimental studies, it was understood that the pattern of the hyetograph applied to the system and the layer thicknesses of the drainage section were highly effective on the parameters of the output flow hydrograph. Due to the lack of studies for sports field drainage that their mechanisms were not clearly revealed, the presented study is significant in term of developing a new perspective and procedure to the relevant field.

Keywords

Sports field, drainage, rainfall simulator

Project Number

214M616

References

• 1. Collignon H., Sultan N., Santander C., The sports market: In Major trends and challenges in an industry full of passion, Chicago, AT Kearney, 2011.
• 2. Sport England., Natural turf for sport: Design guidance note, London: English Sports Council, 2011.
• 3. Adams W.A., Practical aspects of sports field drainage, Soil Use Manage, 2 (2), 51–54, 1986.
• 4. Taylor D.H., Nelson S.D., Williams C.F., Sub-root zone layering effects on water retention in sports turf soil profiles, Agronomy Journal, 85 (3), 626–630, 1993.
• 5. Taylor D.H., Blake G.R., Sand content of sand-soil-peat mixtures for turfgrass, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 43 (2), 394–398, 1979.
• 6. Baker S.W., Soil physical conditions of the root zone layer and the performance of winter games’ pitches, Soil Use Manage, 5 (3), 116–122, 1989.
• 7. Kesgin E., Investigation of Effective Drainage Methods in Sports Field Under Various Rainfall Conditions, Doctoral dissertation, Yıldız Technical University, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Istanbul, 2021.
• 8. Gezici K., Spor Sahalarında Kullanılan Drenaj Sistemlerinin İncelenmesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 2021.
• 9. Simpson M.R., Fleming P.R., Frost M.W., Briefing: Sustainable drainage for sports pitch developments, In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Municipal Engineer, 166 (4), 211-215, 2013.
• 10. Kowalik T., Rajda W., Physical properties, permeability and retentiveness of silt loam and its composites with sand for constructing carrying layer of a football field, Journal of Ecological Engineering, 15 (4), 37–45, 2014.
• 11. Ward C.J., Sports turf drainage: A review, Journal of the Sports Turf Research Institute, 59, 9-28, 1983.
• 12. Gezici K., Kesgin E., Agaccioglu H., Hydrological Assessment of Experimental Behaviors for Different Drainage Methods in Sports Fields, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 147 (9), 04021034, 2021.
• 13. Dixon S., Fleming P., James I., Carre M., The science and engineering of sport surfaces, Routledge, London, U.K., 2015.
• 14. Fleming P.R., Frost M.W., Simpson M.R., Drainage Behavior of Sports Pitches- Findings from a Research Study, Loughborough, Loughborough University, pp. 25. 2016.
• 15. Kesgin E., Agaccioglu H., Dogan A., Experimental and numerical investigation of drainage mechanisms at sports fields under simulated rainfall. Journal of Hydrology. 580, 124251, 2020.
• 16. Young C., Fleming P.R., A review of mechanical impact testing devices for sport surfaces, In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference of Science, Technology and Research into Sports Surfaces (STARSS), Loughborough University, UK, 2007.
• 17. Mooney S.J., Baker S.W., The effects of grass cutting height and pre-match rolling and watering on football pitch ground cover and playing quality, Journal of Turfgrass Science, 76, 70–77, 2000.
• 18. Pessarakli M., Handbook of turfgrass management and physiology, CRC press, Florida, USA., 2007.
• 19. Puhalla J., Krans J., Goatley M., Sports fields: A manual for design, construction and maintenance, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, USA, 1999.
• 20. Dogan A., Agaccioglu H., Basayigit L., Investigation of techniques to provide rapid and effective drainage of sports fields under various hydrologic conditions. (Report Number: 214M616), TUBITAK, Ankara, 2018.
• 21. Kesgin E., Gezici K., Ağaçcıoğlu H., Hydrological evaluation of sports field drainage, ISPEP 9th International Conferance on Engineering & Natural Sciences, Ankara-Turkey, 182-191, 13 - 15 November, 2020.
• 22. USGA Green Section Staff., USGA Recommendations for a Method of Putting Green Construction, 1993.
• 23. Henderson J.J., Crum J.R., Wolff T.F., Rogers III, J.N., Athletic field root zone mixes: what is the best mix for your field?, In Proceedings of the 71th Annual Michigan Turfgrass Conference, Michigan-USA, 2001.
• 24. Magni S., Volterrani M., Miele S., Soccer pitches performances as affected by construction method, sand type and turfgrass mixture, 1th International Conference on Turfgrass Management and Science for Sports Fields, Leuven-Belgium, 2003.
• 25. Miller D.E., Water retention and flow in layered soil profiles, Field Soil Water Regime, 5, 107–117, 1973.
• 26. Kesgin E., Dogan A., Agaccioglu H., Rainfall simulator for investigating sports field drainage processes, Measurement, 125, 360–370, 2018.
• 27. Canaway P.M., Maximising the performance of sports turf. Doctoral dissertation, Univ. of Liverpool, Department of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Liverpool, 1994.
• 28. McCarty L.B., Hubbard L.R., Quisenberry V.L., Applied soil physical properties, drainage, and irrigation strategies, Springer International Publishing, New York, USA, 2016.
• 29. SAPCA (Sports and Play Construction Association)., The SAPCA code of practice for the design, construction and improvement of natural sports turf, Kenilworth, UK, 2010.
• 30. Simpson M.R., Sustainable drainage of sports pitches. Doctoral dissertation, Loughborough University, Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Leicestershire, 2016.
• 31. Alway F.J., McDole G.R., Relation of the water-retaining capacity of a soil to its hygroscopic coefficient, Journal of Agricultural Research, 9 (2), 27–71, 1917.
• 32. Shelton D., Advances in Sportsturf Drainage, In 9th International Drainage Symposium held jointly with CIGR and CSBE/SCGAB Proceedings, Quebec City-Canada, 13-16 June, 2010.
• 33. James I.T., Blackburn D.W.K., Godwin R.J., Mole drainage as an alternative to sand slitting in natural turf sports surfaces on clays, Soil Use and Management, 23 (1), 28-35, 2007.
• 34. Moore I.D., Hirschi M.C., Barfield B.J., Kentucky rainfall simulator, Transactions of ASAE, 26 (4), 1085–1089, 1983.
• 35. Bubenzer G.D., 1979. Inventory of rainfall simulators, Proc. rainfall Simulator Workshop, Tucson, Az. USDA-SEA ARM-W-10, 120–131, 1979.
• 36. Laws J.O., Parson D.A., The relationship of raindrop size to intensity, Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 24 (2), 452–460, 1943.
• 37. Cerdà A., Rainfall drop size distribution in the Western Mediterranean basin, València Spain, Catena, 30 (2-3), 169-182, 1997.
• 38. Moazed H., Bavi A., Boroomand-Nasab S., Naseri A., Albaji M., Effects of climatic and hydraulic parameters on water uniformity coefficient in solid set systems, Journal of Applied Sciences(Faisalabad), 10 (16), 1792-1796, 2010.
• 39. Luk S.H., Abrahams A.D., Parsons A.J., Sediment sources and sediment transport by rill flow and interrill flow on a semi-arid piedmont slope, southern Arizona, Catena, 20 (1-2), 93-111, 1993.
• 40. Christiansen J.E., The uniformity of application of water by sprinkler systems, Agricultural Engineering, 22 (3), 89-92, 1941.
• 41. Aksoy H., Unal N.E., Cokgor S., Gedikli A., Yoon J., Koca K., Boran S.I., Eris E., Pak G., A rainfall simulator for laboratory scale assessment of rainfall-sediment tervasport processes over a two dimensional flume, Catena, 98, 63-72, 2012.
• 42. Gilley J.E., Finkner S.C., Estimating Soil Detachment Caused by Raindrop Impact, Trans. ASAE, 28 (1), 140-146, 1985.
• 43. Van Dijk, A I.J.M., Bruijnzeel, L.A., Rosewell, C.J., Rainfall intensity–kinetic energy relationships: A critical literature appraisal, Journal of Hydrology, 261 (1), 1–23, 2002.