Bir üretim tesisinin trafo bakım hizmetine yönelik bütünleşik bir yaklaşım

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 40 Sayı: 4, 2323 - 2334

Hande Belenköylü , Hacer Güner Gören

https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1667616

Öz

Yoğun rekabet ortamında işletmelerin üretim devamlılığının sağlanması, büyük oranda makine ve ekipmanlarının sürekliliğine bağlıdır. Bu sebeple, bakım faaliyetleri bir işletme için kritik faaliyetler kapsamında yer alır. Bakım faaliyetleri için alınacak hizmetin işletme ihtiyaçlarını karşılayabilecek nitelikte olan tedarikçilerden alınması ve bu bağlamda uygun olanlarının performanslarını değerlendirme ve uygun tedarikçiyi belirleme konusu büyük önem arz etmektedir. Tedarikçi seçimi, işletmelerin ihtiyaçları, çalışma koşulları, tecrübeleri ve faaliyet alanları göz önünde bulundurularak belirlenen kriterler ve alternatifler doğrultusunda en uygun alternatifin seçilmesi süreci olarak ifade edilebilir. Bu çalışmada, Denizli’de faaliyet gösteren bir işletmenin alacağı trafo bakım hizmeti problemi ele alınmış ve bütünleşik bir yöntem önerilmiştir. Önerilen yöntemde, kriter ağırlıklandırmada Bulanık FUCOM (Tam Tutarlılık Yöntemi) ve alternatiflerin değerlendirilmesinde Bulanık MAIRCA (Çok Nitelikli İdeal-Gerçek Karşılaştırmalı Analiz) yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Sonuçların tutarlılığı için duyarlılık analizi yapılmış ve elde edilen sonuçlar karşılaştırılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Trafo bakım hizmeti , Çok kriterli karar verme , Bulanık FUCOM , Bulanık MAIRCA , Tedarikçi Seçimi

Kaynakça

• 1. Demir H., H., İmalat sektöründe bulanık TOPSIS yöntemiyle tedarikçi seçimi, Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 2010.
• 2. Dağdeviren M., Erarslan E., Supplier selection using promethee sequencing method, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 23 (1), 69-75, 2008.
• 3. Dağdeviren M., Eraslan E., Koç M., Dizdar, N. E., Tedarikçi Seçim Problemine Analitik Ağ Süreci ile Alternatif Bir Yaklaşım, Teknoloji, 8 (2), 115-122, 2005.
• 4. Khan M. Ahfaz, Sharma A. K., Transformer Condition Ranking Using Fuzzy AHP, International Journal of Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering, 7 (1), 35-41, 2018.
• 5. Dioka K., Transformer and Reactor Supplier Selection, Transformer and Reactor Procurement, Editör: Bastos G.M., Breckenridge T., Lamb M., MacArthur TL., Ryder S., CIGRE Green Books. Springer, İsviçre, 179-204, 2022.
• 6. Mungroo S., Implementing a World-Class Sourcing Process at Eskom with Specific Reference to the Supplier selection process for large transformers, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, KwaZulu-Natal Üniversitesi, Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Ticaret Yüksek Lisansı, Gauteng, Güney Afrika, 2005.
• 7. Bhutta K.S., Huq F., Supplier selection problem: a comparison of total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process approaches, Supply Chain Management, 7 (3), 126-135, 2002.
• 8. Junyi C., Ngai Eric W. T., Decision-making techniques in supplier selection: Recent accomplishments and what lies ahead, Expert Syst. Appl., 140, 2020.
• 9. Vanessa B. S., Luciana P. Barros C., Fernando S., Approaches for supporting sustainable supplier selection - A literature review, J. Cleaner Prod, 273, 2020.
• 10. Pamucar D., Ecer F., Prioritizing the weights of the evaluation criteria under fuzziness: The fuzzy full consistency method–FUCOM-F, Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 18 (3), 419-437, 2020.
• 11. Taşkent M. C., Kılıç Delice E., Bulanık FUCOM Metodu ile Tedarikçi Değerlendirme Kriterlerinin Ağırlıklarının Belirlenmesi, European Journal of Science and Technology, 28, 863–868, 2021.
• 12. Pamučar D., Deveci M., Canıtez,F., Božanić D., A fuzzy Full Consistency Method-Dombi-Bonferroni model for prioritizing transportation demand management measures, Appl. Soft Comput. 87, 2020.
• 13. Xu D., Ren J., Dong L., Yang, Y., Portfolio selection of renewable energy-powered desalination systems with sustainability perspective: A novel MADM-based framework under data uncertainties, J. Cleaner Prod, 275, 124114, 2020.
• 14. Simi´c J. M., Stevi´c Ž., Zavadskas E. K., Bogdanovi´c V., Suboti´c M., Mardani A., A Novel CRITIC-Fuzzy FUCOM-DEA-Fuzzy MARCOS Model for Safety Evaluation of Road Sections Based on Geometric Parameters of Road, Symmetry, 12 (12), 2020. 15. Vukasović D., Gligović D., Terzić S., Stević Ž., Macura P., A Novel Fuzzy MCDM Model for Inventory Management in order to Increase Business Efficiency, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27 (2), 386–401, 2021.
• 16. Pamucar D., Ecer F., Deveci M., Assessment of Alternative Fuel Vehicles for Sustainable Road Transportation of United States Using Integrated Fuzzy FUCOM and Neutrosophic Fuzzy MARCOS Methodology, Sci. Total Environ., 788, 2021.
• 17. Atçı S. H., Atalay K. D., Web sitesi tasarım aşamasındaki kriterlerin önem derecelerinin GB-FUCOM ile belirlenmesi, Journal of Turkish Operations Management (JTOM), 6 (1), 1010-1027, 2022.
• 18. Demir G., Damjanović M., Matović B., Vujadinović R., Toward Sustainable Urban Mobility by Using Fuzzy-FUCOM and Fuzzy-CoCoSo Methods: The Case of the SUMP Podgorica. Sustainability, 14 (9), 1–27, 2022.
• 19. Saha A., Mishra A. R., Rani, P., Hezam I. M., Cavallaro F., A q-rung orthopair fuzzy FUCOM double normalization-based multi-aggregation method for healthcare waste treatment method selection, Sustainability, 14 (7), 4171, 2022.
• 20. Khosravi M., Haqbin A., Zare Z., Shojaei P., Selecting the most suitable organizational structure for hospitals: an integrated fuzzy FUCOM-MARCOS method, Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 20 (1), 1-16, 2022.
• 21. Boral S., Howard I., Chaturvedi S. K., McKee K., Naikan V. N. A., An integrated approach for fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MAIRCA, Eng. Fail. Anal., 108, 2020.
• 22. Pamučar D. S., Ćirović G., Božanić D., Application of interval valued fuzzy-rough numbers in multi-criteria decision making: The IVFRN-MAIRCA model, Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 29 (2), 221-247, 2019.
• 23. Adar T., Delice E. K., New integrated approaches based on MC-HFLTS for healthcare waste treatment technology selection, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32 (4), 688-711, 2019.
• 24. Gul M., Ak M. F., Assessment of occupational risks from human health and environmental perspectives: a new integrated approach and its application using fuzzy BWM and fuzzy MAIRCA, Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 34 (8), 1231-1262, 2020.
• 25. Gul M., Mete S., Serin F., Celik E., Gul M., Mete S., Celik E., Fine–Kinney-based occupational risk assessment using fuzzy best and worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy MAIRCA. Studies in Fuzznies and Soft Computing, 13-30, 2021.
• 26. Boral S., Howard I., Chaturvedi S. K., McKee K., Naikan V.N.A., A novel hybrid multi-criteria group decision making approach for failure mode and effect analysis: An essential requirement for sustainable manufacturing, Sustainable Prod. Consumption, 21, 14-32, 2020.
• 27. Ayadi H., Hamani N., Kermad L., Benaissa M., Novel fuzzy composite indicators for locating a logistics platform under sustainability perspectives, Sustainability, 13 (7), 2021.
• 28. Mestanza J.G., Bakhat R., A Fuzzy AHP-MAIRCA Model for Overtourism Assessment: The Case of Malaga Province, Sustainability, 13 (11), 2021.
• 29. Zhu G. N., Ma J., Hu J., Evaluating biological inspiration for biologically inspired design: An integrated DEMATEL‐MAIRCA based on fuzzy rough numbers, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 36 (10), 6032-6065, 2021.
• 30. Ecer F., Böyükaslan A., Zolfani S. H., Evaluation of cryptocurrencies for investment decisions in the era of Industry 4.0: A borda count-based intuitionistic fuzzy set extensions EDAS-MAIRCA-MARCOS multi-criteria methodology, Axioms, 11 (8), 2022.
• 31. Ecer F., An extended MAIRCA method using intuitionistic fuzzy sets for coronavirus vaccine selection in the age of COVID-19, Neural Comput. Appl., 34 (7), 5603-5623, 2022.
• 32. Božanić D., Tešić D., Puška A., Štilić A., Muhsen Y.R., Ranking Challenges, Risks and Threats Using Fuzzy Inference System, Decision Making:Applications in Management and Engineering, 6 (2), 933-947, 2023.
• 33. Narayanamoorthy S., Brainy J. V., Shalwala R. A., Alsenani T. R., Ahmadian A., Kang D., An enhanced fuzzy decision making approach for the assessment of sustainable energy storage systems, Sustainable Energy, Grids Networks, 33, 2023.
• 34. Ecer F., Sürdürülebilir tedarikçi seçimi: FUCOM sübjektif ağırlıklandırma yöntemi temelli Mairca yaklaşımı. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 8 (1), 26-48, 2021.
• 35. Więckowski J., Kizielewicz B., Shekhovtsov A., Sałabun W., How do the criteria affect sustainable supplier evaluation: A case study using multi-criteria decision analysis methods in a fuzzy environment, Journal of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, 2 (1), 37-52, 2023.
• 36. Peker B.N., Görener A., Tesis Yeri Seçiminde Kriterlerin Önem Ağırlıklarının Bulanık FUCOM Yöntemiyle, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21 (45), 1512-1536, 2022.
• 37. Supçiller A.A., Öktem T., Bir kablo firması için bulanık CRITIC ve bulanık MAIRCA ile ekstrüder hattı seçimi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 29 (8), 833-841, 2023. 38. Pamucar D., Željko S., Siniša S., A New Model for DeterminingWeight Coefficients of Criteria in MCDM Models: Full Consistency Method (FUCOM), Symmetry, 10, 393, 2018.
• 39. Tešić D., Delibašić B., Božanić D., Lojić R., Pamučar D., Balassa B. E., Application of the FUCOM-FUZZY MAIRCA Model in Human Resource Management, Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 20 (3), 2023.
• 40. Şahin Y., Karagül K., FUCOM ve COPRAS Yöntemleriyle ERP Yazılımı Seçimi, 4th International Conference on Applied Engineering and Natural Sciences, Konya, Türkiye, 785-791, 10-13 Kasım 2022.
• 41. Gökler S. H., Optimal site selection for electric vehicle charging stations: Analysis with hybrid FUCOM and geographic information systems, Energy, (30), 2024.
• 42. Tang C., Xu D., Chen N. Sustainability prioritization of sewage sludge to energy scenarios with hybrid-data consideration: a fuzzy decision-making framework based on full consistency method and fusion ranking model, Environ Sci and Pollut Res, 28, 5548-5565, 2021.
• 43. Gölcük İ., Durmaz Duygu E., Şahin R., Prioritizing occupational safety risks with fuzzy FUCOM and fuzzy graph theory-matrix approach, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 38 (1), 57-69, 2023.
• 44. Guo S., Zhao H., Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications, Knowledge-Based Syst, 121, 23–31, 2017.
• 45. Gigović L., Pamučar, Bajić D., Milićević M.,The combination of expert judgment and GIS-MAIRCA analysis for the selection of sites for ammunition depots, Sustainability, 8 (4), 1-30, 2016.
• 46. Pamucar D., Gigovic L., Bajic Z., Janosevic M., Location selection for wind farms using GIS multi-criteria hybrid model: an approach based on fuzzy and rough numbers, Sustainability, 9 (8), 1315, 2017.
• 47. Badi I., Ballem M., Supplier selection using the rough BWM-MAIRCA model: A case study in pharmaceutical supplying in Libya, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 1 (2), 16-33, 2018.
• 48. Gül M., Ak M. F., Assessment of occupational risks from human health and environmental perspectives: a new integrated approach and its application using fuzzy BWM and fuzzy MAIRCA, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 34, 1231-1262, 2020.
• 49. Hadiana S., Tabarestania E. S., Pham Q. B., Multi attributive ideal-real comparative analysis (MAIRCA) method for evaluating flood susceptibility in a temperate Mediterranean climate, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 67 (3), 401-418, 2022.
• 50. Tešić D., Božanić D., Stojković D., Puška A., Stojanović I., DIBR–DOMBI–FUZZY MAIRCA Model for Strategy Selection in the System of Defense, Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4961972.
• 51. Boral, S., Howard, I., Chaturvedi, S. K., McKee, K., Naikan, V. N. A., An Integrated Approach for Fuzzy Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy MAIRCA. Engineering Failure Analysis, 108, 2020.
• 52. Chen C.T., Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Sets and Syst., 114 (1), 1–9, 2000.
• 53. Lee H. C., Chang C., Comparative Analysis of MCDM Methods for Ranking Renewable Energy Sources in Taiwan, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Rev, 883–896, 2018.