TEORİK BİR TARTIŞMA: İSTİHBARATIN GÖZETİMİ

Abstract

İstihbarat kendisine yüklenen görev ve sorumlulukları bakımından oldukça önemli, istisnai ve ayrıcalıklı bir konumdadır. Ulusal güvenlik ve dış politika konularında karar alıcıların desteklenmesinde istihbaratın imkân ve kabiliyetlerinden istifade edilmektedir. İstihbarat karar alıcıların zamanında, doğru ve kesin bilgiye olan ihtiyacının karşılanması hayati bir önem arz etmektedir. Söz konusu hayati önem, istihbarat bağlamında sahip olunan imkân ve kabiliyetlerin verimli, etkin ve olabildiğince hatasız kullanılması mecburiyetini beraberinde getirmektedir. Sonuç olarak, istihbaratın gözetimi hususu 1970’li yıllarda liberal demokrasiye sahip batılı ülkelerde gündeme gelmeye başlamıştır. İstihbarat çalışmaları alanında gözetimin önemi, kazanılan deneyimler sonucunda her geçen gün artmaya devam etmiştir. Söz konusu durum, 11 Eylül saldırıları sonucunda daha da belirginleşerek ilgili alan yazında başat çalışma konuları arasında yerini almaya başlamıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı kamusal bir hizmet olan istihbaratın hesap verebilirliğinin tesis edilmesinin en kapsamlı yöntemleri arasında yer alan gözetim kavramının teorik çerçevesinin tartışılarak incelenmesidir. Bu doğrultuda, çalışmada nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden faydalanılmış olup ilgili alan yazın taranmıştır.

Keywords

• İstihbarat
• Gözetim
• Hesap Verebilirlik
• İstihbaratın Gözetimi
• Verimlilik

A Theoretical Discussion: Oversight of Intelligence

Abstract

Intelligence is in essential, exceptional and privileged position in terms of its duties and responsibilities. Opportunities and capabilities of intelligence are used to support decision makers on national security and foreign policy issues. Meeting the need of decision makers for timely, accurate and precise information is of vital importance. This vital importance brings with it the obligation to use the opportunities and capabilities available in the context of intelligence efficiently, effectively and as accurately as possible. As a results, the issue of intelligence oversight began to come to the fore in western countries with liberal democracies in the 1970s. The importance of oversight in the field of intelligence studies has continued to increase day by day as a result of the experiences gained. This situation became more evident as a result of the September 11 attacks and began to take its place among the dominant research topics in the relevant literature. The aim of this study is to discuss and examine the theoretical framework of the concept of oversight among the most comprehensive methods of establishing the accountability of intelligence a public service. In this regard, qualitative research methods are used in the study and the relevant literature reviewed.

Keywords

• Intelligence
• Oversight
• Accountability
• Oversight of Intelligence
• Effectiveness

References

1. Baker, J. A. (Winter, 2008). Intelligence Oversight. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 45 (1), 199-208.
2. Baldino, D. (2010). Introduction: Watching the Watchman. in (ed) Baldino, D. “Democratic Oversight of Intelligence Services”. Leichhardt: The Federation Press. 1-33.
3. Bochel, H., Defty, A., Kirkpatrick, J. (2014). Watching the Watchers: Parliament and The Intelligence Services. NewYork: Palgrave Macmillan.
4. Born, H. (2004). Democratic And Parliamentary Oversight Of The Intelligence Services: Practices And Procedures. Philipp Fluri and Miroslav Hadžić (Ed.) içinde, Source Book On Security Sector Reform: Collection Of Papers. Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces Centre for Civil-Military Relations, Belgrade.
5. Born H. Ve Leigh I. (2005). Making Intelligence Accountable: Legal Standards and Best Practice for Oversight of Intelligence Agencies, Geneva Centre For The Democratic Control Of Armed Forces, Geneva.
6. Born, H. ve Johnson, L.K. (2005). Balancing Operational Efficiency and Democratic Legitimacy. Johnson, L., Born, H., ve Leigh, I. D (Ed.) içinde, Who's Watching The Spies? Establishing Intelligence Service Accountability (s. 225-239). Potomac Books.
7. Born, H. (2005). Acknkowledgements. Johnson, L., Born, H., and Leigh, I. D (Ed.) içinde, Who's Watching The Spies? Establishing Intelligence Service Accountability. Potomac Books. p. XI.
8. Born H. Ve Leigh I. (2007a). Democratic Accountability Of Intelligence Services, Geneva Centre For The Democratic Control Of Armed Forces, Policy Paper, No.19, Geneva.

9. Born, H. ve Leigh, I. (2007b). Intelligence And Accountability. Lock K. Johnson (Ed.) içinde, Intelligence And Accountability: Safeguards Against The Abuse Of Secret Power. Praeger Security International (s. 141-165). USA.
10. Born, H. ve Jensen, F. (2007). Intelligence Services: Strengthening Democratic Accountability. Born H. ve Caparini M. (Ed.) içinde, Democratic Control Of Intelligence Services: Containing Rogue Elephants, (s. 257-269) Endgland: Routledge Press, Ashgate.
11. Born H. ve Mesevage, G.G. (2012). Introducing Intelligence Oversight. Born H. ve Wills A. (Ed.) içinde, Overseeing Intelligence Services: A Toolkit, Geneva: DCAF.
12. Boer, M. (2012). Conducting Oversight. in (eds) Born H. ve Wills A. “Overseeing Intelligence Services: A Toolkit, Geneva: DCAF.
13. Brodeur, J.P. ve Dupeyron, N. (2016). Democracy And Secrecy: The French Intelligence Community. J.P. Brodeur, Gill, P., Töllborg, D. (Ed.) içinde, Democracy, Law And Security: Internal Security Services in Contemporary Europe (9-24). London: Routledge Press.
14. Caparini, M. (2007). Controlling and Overseeing Intelligence Servives In Democracy. Born H. ve Caparini M. (Ed.) içinde, Democratic Control Of Intelligence Services: Containing Rogue Elephants (s. 3-24). England: Routledge Press, Ashgate.
15. Chirazi, G. (2013). Strengthening Intelligence Oversight in Romania. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92, 164-168. Elsevier Inc.
16. DCAF (2003). Intelligence Practice And Democratic Oversight: A Practitioner's View. Intelligence Working Group, Geneva Centre For The Democratic Control Of Armed Forces, Occasional Paper. 3, Geneva.
17. DCAF (2017). Intelligence Oversight. Geneva Centre For The Democratic Control Of Armed Forces. SSR Backgrounder Series, Geneva.
18. Eryılmaz, B., Biricikoğlu, H. (2011). Kamu Yönetiminde Hesap Verebilirlik ve Etik, ş Ahlakı Dergisi Turkish Journal of Business Ethics, Mayıs May 2011, Cilt Volume 4, Sayı Issue 7, s.19-45.
19. Eskens, S., Daalen, O., Eijk, N. (2016). 10 Standards for Oversight and Transparency of National Intelligence Services. Journal of National Security Law & Policy. 8 (3), 553-594.
20. Gill, P. (2007). Democratic And Parlimentary Accountability Of Intelligence Services After 9/11. Born H. ve Caparini M. (Ed.) içinde. Democratic Control of Intelligence Services: Containing Rogue Elephants (s. 195-216). England: Routledge Press.
21. Gill, P. (2013). Obstacles To The Oversight Of The UK Intelligence Community, E-International Relations. 19 July. 1-4.
22. Gill, P. (2016). Security and Intelligence Services In The United Kingdom. P. Brodeur, Gill, P., Töllborg, D. in (Ed.) içinde, Democracy, Law And Security: Internal Security Services In Contemporary Europe (s. 265-293). London: Routledge Press.
23. Goldman, Z. K. ve Rascoff, S. J. (2016). Introduction: The New Intelligence Oversight. Goldman, Z. K., ve S. J. Rascoff (Ed.) içinde, Global Intelligence Oversight: Governing Security In The Twenty-First Century, New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Grossman, S. ve M. Simon. (2008). And Congress Shall Know the Truth: The Pressing Need for Restructuring Congressional Oversight of Intelligence. Harvard Law & Policy Review. Vol(2), 435-447.
25. Homburg, B. M. (2015). “Intelligence Overisight: Improvement Through Continual Evaluation”, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Johns Hopkins Universitesi. ABD.
26. Hutton, L. (2019). Intelligence And Gender. Gender and Security Toolkit, Geneva: DCAF, OSCE/ODIHR, UN Women.
27. Johnson, L. K. (2005a). Accountability and America’s Secret Foreign Policy: Keeping A Legislative Eye On The Central Intelligence Agency. Foreign Policy Analysis. 1 (1), 99-120.
28. Johnson, L. K. (2005b). Governing i n The Absence Of Angels: On the Practice of Intelligence Accountability in The United States. Johnson, L., Born, H., ve Leigh, I. D. (Ed.), Who's Watching The Spies? Establishing Intelligence Service Accountability. Potomac Books.
29. Lashmar, P. (2015) “Investigating The Empire Of Secrecy: Three Decades Of Reporting On The Secret State”, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Brunel University. England.
30. Leftwich, A. (1993). Governance democracy and development in the third world. Third World Quarterly. Volume 14, Sayı 3, 605-624.
31. Leigh, I. (2005). More Closely Watching The Spies: Three Decades Of Experiences. Johnson, L., Born, H., and Leigh, I. D in (Ed.) içinde, Who's Watching The Spies? Establishing Intelligence Service Accountability (s. 3-12). Potomac Books.
32. Lester, G.A. (2012). “When Should Secrets Stay Secret? Accountability, Democratic Governance, And Intelligence” Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, University of California, Berkeley. U.S.A.
33. Leigh, I. (2005). More Closely Watching The Spies: Three Decades Of Experiences. Johnson, L., Born, H., and Leigh, I. D in (Ed.) içinde, Who's Watching The Spies? Establishing Intelligence Service Accountability (s. 3-12). Potomac Books.
34. Lowenthal, M. (2012). Intelligence From Secrets To Policy. 5 th. Ed. Washington DC: CQ Press.
35. MacDonald, J. A., ve McGrath, R. J. (2013). Retrospective Congressional Oversight And The Dynamics Of Legislative Influence Over The Bureaucracy. In Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
36. McCubbins, M. D. ve Schwartz, T. (1984). Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols Versus Fire Alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 28(1), 165–179.
37. Nathan, L. (2012). Intelligence Transparency, Secrecy, and Oversight in a Democracy. Born H. and Wills A (Ed) içinde, Overseeing Intelligence Services: A Toolkit. Geneva: DCAF.
38. Ogul, M. S. (1976). Congress Oversees The Bureaucracy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
39. Ogul, M. S., ve Rockman, B. A. (1990). Overseeing Oversight: New Departures and Old Problems. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 15(1), 5–24.
40. Phillips O.H., Jackson, P. ve Leopold, P. (2001). Constitutional And Administrative Law. London: 8 th ed. Sweet & Maxwell.
41. Puyvelde D.V. (2013) “Challenging Accountability: US Intelligence, The Private Sector And The Global War On Terrorism”, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Aberystwyth University, England.
42. Robertson, K. G. (1987). Intelligence, Terrorism and Civil Liberties. Conflict Quarterly, 7 (2), 43-62.
43. Scheinin, M. (2010). Compilation of Good Practices on Legal and Institutional Frameworks and Measures That Ensure Respect for Human Rights by Intelligence Agencies While Countering Terrorism, Including On Their Oversight. United Nations Human Rights Council Report. Session 14 /46, Agenda Item 3.
44. Silver, Daniel B. (1988). The Uses And Misuses Of Intelligence Oversight. Houston Journal of International Law, 11 (1), 7-20.
45. Taylor, N. R. (1990). In Defence of The Realm? The Case for Accountable Security Services. London: Civil Liberties Trust Press.
46. Weller, R.G. (2000). Political Scrutiny and Control of Scandinavia's Security and Intelligence Services. International Journal of Intelligence and Counter Intelligence, 13 (2), 171-192.
47. Whitaker, R. (1999). Designing a Balance between Freedom and Security. Joseph Fletcher (Ed.) içinde, Ideas In Action: Essay On Politics And Law In Honour Of Peter Russell (s. 39-41). Toronto: University Of Toronto Press.
48. Wolfers, A. (1962). Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
49. Wille, B.M. (2006). Improving The Democratic Accountability of EU Intelligence. Intelligence and National Security. 21 (1), February, 100-128
50. Wills, A. (2010). Understanding Intelligence Oversight. Geneva Centre for Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF). Geneva.
51. Wills, A., Vermeulen M., Born H., Scheinin M. ve Wiebusch M. (2011). Parliamentary oversight of security and intelligence agencies in the European Union. Study requested by the European Parliaments Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, under the auspice of the Directorate-General for internal policies. Policy department citizens rights and constitutional affairs https://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/ 201109/20110927ATT27674/20110927ATT27674EN.pdf
52. Yüksel, Ü. (2019), “Ulusal Güvenlik Hizmetlerinde Hesap Verilebilirlik ve Mali Denetim”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara.