ÜRETKEN YAPAY ZEKADA SİBER GÜVENLİK VE ETİK: CHATGPT ÖRNEĞİ

Abstract

Teknolojinin durmaksızın gelişmesiyle üretken yapay zeka alanında akıl almaz yenilikler ortaya çıkmış ve bu teknolojinin önde gelen modellerinden biri ChatGPT modeli olmuştur. Bu modellerin kullanımı toplumsal ve bireysel olarak fırsatları ve riskleri beraberinde getirmektedir. Modeli kullanan bireylerin modelden faydalanmak ve modeli etik ilkelere uygun bir şekilde kullanma bilincinde olmaları oluşacak etik risklerin önlenmesinde büyük bir adım olacaktır. Bu çalışma, üretken yapay zekanın sunduğu fırsatlara ve etik sorunlara değinerek bu faktörlerin kullanıcı görüşlerini değerlendirmek için nicel teknikler aracılığıyla ele almayı amaçlamaktadır. Aynı zamanda bu çalışma, üretken yapay zeka modeli ChatGPT kullanıcılarının, modelin yetenekleri ve etik sorunlarının farkında olup olmadığını çevrimiçi bir anket çalışması ile değerlendirmektedir. Anket, 3’lü likert ölçeği ve 298 katılımcı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Anket sonuçları istatistiksel olarak analiz edildikten sonra katılımcıların ChatGPT’nin yeteneklerinden haberdar oldukları ve ChatGPT’yi olumlu karşıladıkları ancak etik sorunlarla ilgili endişe taşıdıkları anlaşılmaktadır. Gün geçtikçe kullanımının yaygınlaştığı ve yaygınlaşmaya da devam edeceği varsayılan üretken yapay zeka teknolojisi için yasal düzenlemeler ve kullanıcı farkındalığının sağlanması gerekliliği ortaya konmuştur. Bu çalışma ile ChatGPT ve benzeri modellerin faydaları yadsınamayacak kadar ilgi çekici olsa da etik ve siber sorunların önemine dikkat çekmektedir. Kişisel ve toplumsal güvenin sağlanması, bu risklerin farkında olarak üretken yapay zeka teknolojisini kullanmaktan geçmektedir.

Keywords

• Üretken Yapay Zekâ
• ChatGPT
• Üretken Yapay Zekâ ve Etik
• ChatGPT ve Etik
• Üretken Yapay Zekâ ve Siber Güvenlik
• ChatGPT ve Risk

CYBERSECURITY AND ETHICS IN GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: THE CASE OF CHATGPT

Abstract

With the continuous development of technology, unfathomable innovations have emerged in the field of generative artificial intelligence and one of the leading models of this technology has been the ChatGPT model. The use of these models brings both social and individual opportunities and risks. The awareness of the individuals using the model to benefit from the model and to use the model in accordance with ethical principles will be a big step in preventing ethical risks. This study aims to address the opportunities and ethical issues presented by generative artificial intelligence and to address these factors through quantitative techniques to evaluate user opinions. At the same time, this study evaluates whether the users of ChatGPT, a generative artificial intelligence model, are aware of the model's capabilities and ethical issues through an online survey. The survey was conducted with a 3-point Likert scale and 298 participants. After statistically analyzing the survey results, it is understood that the participants are aware of the capabilities of ChatGPT and hold a positive perception of the model, but they are concerned about ethical issues. It has been revealed that legal regulations and user awareness should be ensured for the productive artificial intelligence technology, which is assumed to be widely used and will continue to be widespread day by day. This study draws attention to the importance of ethical and cyber issues, although the benefits of ChatGPT and similar models are undeniably interesting. Ensuring personal and social trust depends on using productive artificial intelligence technology by being aware of these risks.

Keywords

• Generative AI
• ChatGPT
• Generative AI and Ethics
• ChatGPT and Ethics
• Generative AI and Cybersecurity
• ChatGPT and Risk

References

1. KAYNAKÇA Addington, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Cyber Security Threats and Countermeasures. Available at SSRN 4425678. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4425678
2. Alawida, M., Abu Shawar, B., Abiodun, O. I., Mehmood, A., Omolara, A. E., ve Al Hwaitat, A. K. (2024). Unveiling the dark side of chatgpt: Exploring cyberattacks and enhancing user awareness. Information, 15(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15010027
3. Albayati, H. (2024). Investigating undergraduate students' perceptions and awareness of using ChatGPT as a regular assistance tool: A user acceptance perspective study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100203
4. Alkamli, S., ve Alabduljabbar, R. (2024). Understanding privacy concerns in ChatGPT: A data-driven approach with LDA topic modeling. Heliyon, 10(20). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39087
5. Ansari, A. N., Ahmad, S., ve Bhutta, S. M. (2024). Mapping the global evidence around the use of ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic scoping review. Education and Information Technologies, 29(9), 11281-11321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-024-09694-w
6. Banh, L., ve Strobel, G. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence. Electronic Markets, 33(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00680-1
7. Borji, A. (2023). A categorical archive of chatgpt failures. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03494. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.03494
8. Bozkurt, A. (2023). ChatGPT, üretken yapay zekâ ve algoritmik paradigma değişikliği. Alanyazın, 4(1), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.59320/alanyazin.1283282

9. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Demirel, F., Karadeniz, Ş., ve Çakmak, E. K. (2018). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri.
10. Dahmen, J., Kayaalp, M. E., Ollivier, M., Pareek, A., Hirschmann, M. T., Karlsson, J., ve Winkler, P. W. (2023). Artificial intelligence bot ChatGPT in medical research: the potential game changer as a double-edged sword. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 31(4), 1187-1189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07355-6
11. Derner, E., ve Batistič, K. (2023). Beyond the Safeguards: Exploring the Security Risks of ChatGPT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.08005. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.08005
12. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., . . . Ahuja, M. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
13. Else, H. (2023). BY CHATGPT FOOL SCIENTISTS. Nature, 613, 423. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7
14. Elsevier. Generative AI policies for journals. Erişim Tarihi: 24 Aralık 2024, https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/generative-ai-policies-for-journals
15. Ferrara, E. (2024). GenAI against humanity: Nefarious applications of generative artificial intelligence and large language models. Journal of Computational Social Science, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-024-00250-1
16. Feuerriegel, S., Hartmann, J., Janiesch, C., ve Zschech, P. (2024). Generative ai. Business ve Information Systems Engineering, 66(1), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00834-7
17. Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Patros, P., Wu, H., Kaur, R., Kaur, K., . . . Parlikad, A. K. (2024). Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: Emerging Era of AI Chatbots. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 4, 19-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.06.002
18. Golda, A., Mekonen, K., Pandey, A., Singh, A., Hassija, V., Chamola, V., ve Sikdar, B. (2024). Privacy and Security Concerns in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3381611
19. Gupta, M., Akiri, C., Aryal, K., Parker, E., ve Praharaj, L. (2023). From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of generative AI in cybersecurity and privacy. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3300381
20. Hu, K. (2023). ChatGPT sets record for fastest-growing user base - analyst note. Erişim Tarihi: 30 Ocak2025, https://www.reuters.com/technology/chatgpt-sets-record-fastest-growing-user-base-analyst-note-2023-02-01/
21. Jiang, Y., Li, X., Luo, H., Yin, S., ve Kaynak, O. (2022). Quo vadis artificial intelligence? Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00022-8
22. Kuraku, D. S., ve Kalla, D. (2023). Advantages, disadvantages and risks associated with chatgpt and ai on cybersecurity. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.jetir.JETIR2310612
23. Lee, S., Chung, M., Kim, N., ve Jones-Jang, S. M. (2024). Public perceptions of ChatGPT: Exploring how nonexperts evaluate its risks and benefits.
24. Liebrenz, M., Schleifer, R., Buadze, A., Bhugra, D., ve Smith, A. (2023). Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing. The lancet digital health, 5(3), e105-e106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00019-5
25. Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., ve Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The international journal of management education, 21(2), 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790
26. Mohammed, S. P., ve Hossain, G. (2024). Chatgpt in education, healthcare, and cybersecurity: Opportunities and challenges. Paper presented at the 2024 IEEE 14th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC). https://doi.org/10.1109/CCWC60891.2024.10427923
27. Niloy, A. C., Bari, M. A., Sultana, J., Chowdhury, R., Raisa, F. M., Islam, A., . . . Akter, S. (2024). Why do students use ChatGPT? Answering through a triangulation approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100208
28. Niloy, A. C., Hafiz, R., Hossain, B. M. T., Gulmeher, F., Sultana, N., Islam, K. F., . . . Rahman, M. A. (2024). AI chatbots: A disguised enemy for academic integrity? International Journal of Educational Research Open, 7, 100396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100396
29. OpenAI. (2022). Introducing ChatGPT. Erişim Tarihi: 22 Aralık 2024, https://openai.com/index/chatgpt/
30. OpenAI. (2023). March 20 ChatGPT outage: Here’s what happened. Erişim Tarihi: 22 Aralık 2024, https://openai.com/index/march-20-chatgpt-outage/
31. Rahman, M. M., ve Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5783. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783
32. Ray, P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 121-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003
33. Schlagwein, D., ve Willcocks, L. (2023). ‘ChatGPT et al.’: The ethics of using (generative) artificial intelligence in research and science. In (Vol. 38, pp. 232-238): SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962231200411
34. Sebastian, G. (2023). Do ChatGPT and other AI chatbots pose a cybersecurity risk?: An exploratory study. International Journal of Security and Privacy in Pervasive Computing (IJSPPC), 15(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSPPC.320225
35. Sengar, S. S., Hasan, A. B., Kumar, S., ve Carroll, F. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence: a systematic review and applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-20016-1
36. Shibli, A. M., Pritom, M. M. A., ve Gupta, M. (2024). AbuseGPT: Abuse of Generative AI ChatBots to Create Smishing Campaigns. Paper presented at the 2024 12th International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS).
37. Similarweb. (2024). Erişim Tarihi: 02 Ocak 2025, https://pro.similarweb.com/#/digitalsuite/websiteanalysis/overview/website-performance/*/999/1m?webSource=Totalvekey=chatgpt.com
38. Sison, A. J. G., Daza, M. T., Gozalo-Brizuela, R., ve Garrido-Merchán, E. C. (2023). ChatGPT: More than a weapon of mass deception, ethical challenges and responses from the human-Centered artificial intelligence (HCAI) perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.11215. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2225931
39. Spitale, G., Biller-Andorno, N., ve Germani, F. (2023). AI model GPT-3 (dis) informs us better than humans. Science Advances, 9(26), eadh1850. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh1850
40. Stokel-Walker, C., ve Van Noorden, R. (2023). What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science. Nature, 614(7947), 214-216. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00340-6
41. Teo, Z. L., Ning, C. Q. W., Wong, J. L. Y., ve Ting, D. (2024). Cybersecurity in the generative artificial intelligence era. Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology, 100091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjo.2024.100091
42. Van Dis, E. A., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., Van Rooij, R., ve Bockting, C. L. (2023). ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature, 614(7947), 224-226. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7
43. Wach, K., Duong, C. D., Ejdys, J., Kazlauskaitė, R., Korzynski, P., Mazurek, G., . . . Ziemba, E. (2023). The dark side of generative artificial intelligence: A critical analysis of controversies and risks of ChatGPT. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(2), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110201
44. Xu, X., Su, Y., Zhang, Y., Wu, Y., ve Xu, X. (2024). Understanding learners’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A thematic analysis of peer interviews among undergraduates and postgraduates in China. Heliyon, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26239
45. Ye, X., Yan, Y., Li, J., ve Jiang, B. (2024). Privacy and personal data risk governance for generative artificial intelligence: A Chinese perspective. Telecommunications Policy, 48(10), 102851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102851
46. YÖK. (2024). Yükseköğretim Kurumları Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Faaliyetlerinde Üretken Yapay Zeka Kullanımına Dair Etik Rehber. Ankara: YÖK. Erişim Tarihi: 26 Aralık 2024, https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/2024/yapay-zeka-kullanimina-dair-etik-rehber.pdf
47. Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. Available at SSRN 4312418. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418
48. Zhou, W., Zhu, X., Han, Q.-L., Li, L., Chen, X., Wen, S., ve Xiang, Y. (2024). The security of using large language models: A survey with emphasis on ChatGPT. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2024.124983
49. Zohny, H., McMillan, J., ve King, M. (2023). Ethics of generative AI. Journal of medical ethics, 49(2), 79-80. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-108909