Hpv-Specific Risk Management in Cervical Pathology Screening and Comparison of Pathological Results
Abstract
Background: In the process of detecting cervical cancer, cytology and HPV genotype screening both play a significant part. More researches are required to determine whether or not multiple HPV genotyping can accurately predict cytological abnormalities.
Methods: A total of 696 female individuals were subjected to analysis for cytology and HPV genotype testing. HPV-DNA, smear and final pathology results of these patients and the relationship between them were investigated using statistical methods.
Results: Cytological data indicating abnormalities were seen in a total of 110 subjects. HPV-16 was determined to be the most prevalent variety among the patients, and HPV-16-positive females were found to have an elevated risk of cervical lesions. HPV 16 infection rates were substantially increased in patients with HSIL and higher lesions.
Conclusion: An infection caused by HPV-16 is a major risk factor for cervical lesions. A test that examines many HPV genotypes may be able to predict cytological problems.
Keywords
HPV, Smear, Cervical Screening, Cervical Preinvasive Lesions, Cervical Cancer
References
- Arbyn M, Xu L. Efficacy and safety of prophylactic HPV vaccines. A Cochrane review of randomized trials. Expert review of vaccines. 2018;17(12):1085-91.
- Bouvard V, Wentzensen N, Mackie A, Berkhof J, Brotherton J, Giorgi-Rossi P, et al. The IARC Perspective on Cervical Cancer Screening. The New England journal of medicine. 2021;385(20):1908-18.
- Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, de Sanjosé S, Saraiya M, Ferlay J, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. The Lancet Global health. 2020;8(2):e191-e203.
- WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. WHO guideline for screening and treatment of cervical pre-cancer lesions for cervical cancer prevention. Geneva: World Health Organization© World Health Organization 2021.; 2021.
- Bruni L, Serrano B, Roura E, Alemany L, Cowan M, Herrero R, et al. Cervical cancer screening programmes and age-specific coverage estimates for 202 countries and territories worldwide: a review and synthetic analysis. The Lancet Global health. 2022;10(8):e1115-e27.
- Perkins RB, Guido RS, Castle PE, Chelmow D, Einstein MH, Garcia F, et al. 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020;24(2):102-31.
- Arbyn M, Simon M, de Sanjosé S, Clarke MA, Poljak M, Rezhake R, et al. Accuracy and effectiveness of HPV mRNA testing in cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Oncology. 2022;23(7):950-60.
- Salehi-Vaziri M, Sadeghi F, Hashemi FS, Haeri H, Bokharaei-Salim F, Monavari SH, et al. Distribution of Human Papillomavirus Genotypes in Iranian Women According to the Severity of the Cervical Lesion. Iranian Red Crescent medical journal. 2016;18(4):e24458.
- Arslan HN, Oruc MA. Results from a cervical cancer screening program in Samsun, Turkey. BMC women's health. 2022;22(1):331.
- Benoy IH, Vanden Broeck D, Ruymbeke MJ, Sahebali S, Arbyn M, Bogers JJ, et al. Prior knowledge of HPV status improves detection of CIN2+ by cytology screening. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2011;205(6):569.e1-7.