Klinik Anatomi Eğitimi Verilen Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı Araştırma Görevlilerinin Eğitim Hakkındaki Görüşlerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Bir Üniversite Örneği

Year 2024, , 114 - 118, 29.02.2024

Emine Aslanlar , İnci Kara , Nadire Ünver Doğan , Zeliha Fazlıoğulları , Mustafa Büyükcavlak

https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.1389840

Abstract

Özet
Giriş: Anatomi, tıp müfredatının temel taşlarından biridir. Anatominin derinlemesine anlaşılması, özellikle cerrahi disiplininde güvenli klinik uygulama için esastır. Bu çalışmada klinik anatomi eğitimi verilen anesteziyoloji ve reanimasyon anabilim dalı araştırma görevlilerinin eğitim hakkındaki geri bildirimlerinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.
Gereç ve yöntemler: Anesteziyoloji ve reanimasyon anabilim dalındaki farklı kıdemdeki tüm araştırma görevlilerine haftada 2 saat klinik anatomi eğitimi verilerek eğitim 1 ay içinde tamamlanmıştır. Araştırma görevlilerine eğitim hakkındaki görüşlerini bildiren 18 sorudan oluşan 5’li Likert tipi anket uygulanmıştır. Katılımcıların anketteki sorulara 1’den 5’e kadar puan vermeleri istenmiştir. Aynı zamanda yaş, cinsiyet, uyruk, klinikteki deneyim süresi, nöroaksiyel veya periferik sinir bloğu deneyimi ve rejyonel anestezi kursuna katılım gibi veriler kaydedilmiştir.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil molan 40 katılımcının 15’i (%37,5) erkek, 25’i (%62,5) kız ve yaş ortalamaları 29,67±3,94 yıldı. Çalışmamızda katılımcıların tamamına yakını klinikle entegre anatomi eğitiminin gerekli olduğunu bildirmişlerdir. Büyük çoğunluğu anatomi eğitiminin hava yolu yönetiminde ve rejyonel anestezi uygulamalarında kendilerine katkı sağlayacağını belirtmiştir. Katılımcılar arasında eğitim öncesinde rejyonel anestezi kursuna katılım oranı %17,5’tir. Rejyonel anestezi kursuna katılanlar ve katılmayanlar arasında anket puan ortalaması açısından fark bulunmamıştır.
Sonuç: Anesteziyoloji ve reanimasyon uzmanlık eğitimi sürecinde, klinik anatomi eğitimlerine yer verilmesiyle uzmanlık eğitimi kalitesinin buna bağlı olaraka klinik uygulamalardaki güvenlik ve etkinliğin artacağı kanaatindeyiz.

Keywords

klinik anatomi, rejyonel anestezi, uzmanlık eğitimi

Assessment of the Opinions of Anesthesiology and Reanimation Research Assistants Regarding Clinical Anatomy Education: A University Example

Abstract

Introduction: Anatomy is considered one of the cornerstones of medical education. In-depth understanding of anatomy is essential, especially for safe clinical practice in surgical disciplines. This study aimed to evaluate the feedback of research assistants in the department of anesthesiology and reanimation, who received clinical anatomy education.
Methods: Clinical anatomy education was provided for research assistants at different levels in the department of anesthesiology and reanimation, with two hours per week, and the education was completed within one month. The 5-point Likert scale questionnaire consisting of 18 questions was administered to research assistants to gather their opinions about education. Participants were asked to rate the questions on a scale from 1 to 5. Additionally, data such as age, gender, duration of clinical experience, experience with neuroaxial or peripheral nerve blocks, and participation in regional anesthesia courses were recorded.
Results: A total of 40 participants, including 15 (37.5%) males and 25 (62.5%) females, with an average age of 29.67 ± 3.94 years, were included in the study. Nearly all participants in our study reported that integrated clinical anatomy education is necessary. The majority mentioned that anatomy education would contribute to airway management and regional anesthesia applications. The participation rate in regional anesthesia courses before education was 17.5%. There was no significant difference in average questionnaire scores between those who participated in regional anesthesia courses and those who did not (p=0.06).
Conclusion: In the process of anesthesiology and reanimation specialization training, we believe that incorporating clinical anatomy education would enhance the quality of specialization education, thereby improving safety and effectiveness in clinical applications.

Keywords

clinical anatomy, regional anesthesia, specialist training

References

• Kumar R, Singh R. Model pedagogy of human anatomy in medical education. Surg Radiol Anat 2020;42:355-365.
• Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Ann Anat 2016;208:151-157.
• Orebaugh SL. A Regional Anesthesia Cadaver Dissection Laboratory. J Educ Perioper Med 2006;8:E040.
• Fuzier R, Cuvillon P, Delcourt J, Lupescu R, Bonnemaison J, Bloc S et al. ALR périphérique en orthopédie: évaluation multicentrique des pratiques et impact sur l'activité de la SSPI [Peripheral nerve block in orthopaedic surgery: multicentric evaluation of practicing professionals and impact on the activity of the recovery room]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2007;26:761-768.
• Custers EJFM. Long-term retention of basic science knowledge: a review study. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2010;15:109-128.
• Doomernik DE, van Goor H, Kooloos JGM, Ten Broek RP. Longitudinal retention of anatomical knowledge in second-year medical students. Anat Sci Educ 2017;10:242-248.
• Selcuk İ, Tatar I, Huri E. Cadaveric anatomy and dissection in surgical training. Turk J Obstet Gynecol 2019;16:72-75.
• Özcan S, Huri E, Tatar İ, Sargon M, Karakan T, Yağlı ÖF et al. Impact of cadaveric surgical anatomy training on urology residents knowledge: a preliminary study. Turk J Urol 2015;41:83-87.
• Feigl GC, Litz RJ, Marhofer P. Anatomy of the brachial plexus and its implications for daily clinical practice: regional anesthesia is applied anatomy. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2020;45:620-627.
• Cale AS, Hendrickse A, Lyman M, Royer DF. Integrating a cadaver review session into the existing regional anesthesia training for anesthesiology residents: an initial experience. Medical Science Educator 2020;30:695-703.
• Demars N, Compère V, Duparc F, Fourdrinier V, Dureuil B. Contribution of the anatomy laboratory to the practical training of residents in regional anesthesia. Surgical and radiologic anatomy 2010;32:69-73.
• AKKOÇ RF, AKSU F, KAVAKLI A, ÖGETÜRK M. Klinisyenlerin Gözüyle Anatomi Eğitimi: Anket Çalışması. Firat Tip Dergisi. 2021;26:4.
• Kandemir YB, Sindel M, Şenol Y. Tıpta Farklı Uzmanlık Alanlarında Eğitim Süresince Anatomi Dersi Gereksinimi. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2018;17:50-55.
• Kerby J, Shukur ZN, Shalhoub J. The relationships between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by medical students. Clinical Anatomy 2011;24:489-497.
• Schulz C. The value of clinical practice in cadaveric dissection: lessons learned from a course in eye and orbital anatomy. Journal of Surgical Education. 2017;74:333-40.
• Singh M, Sharma M, Nair AG, Mehta A, Kaur M, Gupta R, et al. Cadaver dissection for oculoplastic procedures: A beginner’s guide. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 2022;70:3239.
• Ripart J, de la Sfar CD. Quel apprentissage de l'anesthésie locorégionale?. InAnnales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation 2006;25:89-95.
• Rizzolo LJ, Rando WC, O'Brien MK, Haims AH, Abrahams JJ, Stewart WB. Design, implementation, and evaluation of an innovative anatomy course. Anatomical sciences education 2010;3:109-120.
• Biasutto SN, Caussa LI, del Río LE. Teaching anatomy: cadavers vs. computers?. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger 2006;188:187-190.