The Effect of Education on Oral Feeding Supporting Practices in Preterm Babies on Health Professionals in NICU: A quasi-experimental study
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effect education on oral feeding supporting practices in preterm infants on healthcare professionals.
Material and Methods: The study was a single group with pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design conducted at a medical faculty hospital in Turkey. A sample of 44 NICU healthcare professionals (nurse and physician) participated in an education programme. Data were collected using the Demographic Characteristics and Preterm Infant Feeding Qestionnaire Form. Participants were split into groups of 8 to 10 person and the education course was completed in average 45 minutes per day for five days. Prior to the education program, participants completed the pretest. The posttest was completed two weeks after completion of the education course. Data were analyzed using McNemar test and paired t test.
Results: The average age of the participants is 26.14±4.81. Of the 44 participants, 86.4% were nurse, 13.6% physicians and 88.6% were female. While 63.6% of the healthcare professionals had NRP certification, 70.5% of them did not have the neonatal intensive care nursing certificate. It was determined that 40.9% of the participants were not educated about preterm infant feeding, while those who participated in the training were found to receive breast milk training in the context of in-service training. The mean rate of correct pretest answers was 58.69%, whereas the mean rate of correct posttest answers was 78% (p<0.001)
Conclusion: It has been determined that the education given on oral feeding supporting practices in preterm infants improves knowledge the healthcare professionals’.
Keywords
: Education, evidence-based interventions, NICU, oral feeding, preterm infants;
References
- 1. Standley JM, Cassidy J, Grant R, et al. The effect of music reinforcement for non-nutritive sucking on nipple feeding of premature infants. Pediatr Nurs 2010;36(3):138.
- 2. Girgin BA, Gözen D. Turkish neonatal nurses' knowledge and practices regarding the transition to oral feeding in preterm infants: A descriptive, cross-sectional study. J Pediatr Nurs 2020;53:e179-e85.
- 3. Shaker C. Feed me only when I'm cueing: Moving away from a volume-driven culture in the NICU. Neonatal Intensive Care 2012;25(3):27-32.
- 4. Cormier DME. Impact of cue-based feeding protocol on premature infants' outcomes and hospital length of stay. Doctoral Project. California State University, 2014.
- 5. Crosson DD, Pickler RH. An integrated review of the literature on demand feedings for preterm infants. Adv Neonatal Care 2004;4(4):216-25.
- 6. Başbakkal Z. Yenidoğan yoğun bakım ünitesindeki bebeklerin beslenme yönetimi. In: Tüfekci FG, Alemdar DK, Özdemir FK, eds. Yenidoğan yoğun bakım hemşireliği. Second ed. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, 2016;279-96.
- 7. Watson J, McGuire W. Responsive versus scheduled feeding for preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;8:CD005255.
- 8. Dalgleish SR, Kostecky LL, Blachly N. Eating in "SINC": Safe individualized nipple-feeding competence, a quality improvement project to explore infant-driven oral feeding for very premature infants requiring noninvasive respiratory support. Neonatal Netw 2016;35(4):217-27.
- 9. Girgin BA, Gözen D, Karatekin G. Effects of two different feeding positions on physiological characteristics and feeding performance of preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 2018;23(2):e12214.
- 10. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007;39(2):175-91.