Outcomes and Management of Pregnancies Complicated by Absent End-Diastolic Flow in the Umbilical Artery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Year 2025, Volume: 35 Issue: 2, 249 - 254, 30.04.2025

Nazan Vanlı Tonyalı , Gizem Aktemur , Gülşan Karabay , Betül Tokgöz Çakır , Ali Çağlar

https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.1582495

Abstract

Abstract
Background/Aim: This study aimed to evaluate perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by absent end-diastolic flow (AEDV) in the umbilical artery.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Etlik City Hospital Perinatology Clinic from November 2022 to June 2024. Eighty-five pregnant women diagnosed with AEDF in the umbilical artery Doppler were included. Key outcomes, including fetal birth weight, gestational age at delivery, Apgar scores, NICU admissions, and perinatal morbidity and mortality, were assessed.
Results: The mean gestational age at diagnosis and delivery was 28.86 ± 4.00 and 29.74 ± 3.85 weeks, respectively, with a median interval from AEDV detection to delivery of 2 days. The mean birth weight was 1031.42 ± 485.94 grams. A high cesarean delivery rate (89.4%) was observed, primarily due to fetal distress (63.2%). Fetal growth restriction (FGR) and preeclampsia were present in 80% and 38.8% of cases, respectively. Perinatal loss was 32.9%, with significant associations between higher hCG MoM levels and lower birth weight (r = -0.597, p = 0.011). ROC analysis indicated gestational age at delivery as the strongest predictor of neonatal complications (AUC: 0.804). NICU admissions showed severe neonatal complications, including intracranial hemorrhage and respiratory distress syndrome, aligning with the risk of poor outcomes in AEDV cases.
Conclusions: AEDV in the umbilical artery is a significant predictor of adverse perinatal outcomes, including high perinatal mortality and neonatal complications. Early detection and careful monitoring, alongside timely delivery, are critical in managing these high-risk pregnancies to improve neonatal outcomes. Further research should focus on optimizing intervention timing to balance fetal maturity with the risks of prematurity.

Keywords

Absent End-Diastolic Flow, Perinatal Outcomes, Fetal Ultrasoound

References

• 1. Bligard KH, Xu E, Raghuraman N, Dicke J, Odibo AO, Frolova AI. Significance of intermittent absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery in predicting neonatal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(1):S184-5.
• 2. Kurkinen-Räty M, Kivelä A, Jouppila P. The clinical significance of an absent end-diastolic velocity in the umbilical artery detected before the 34th week of pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76(5):398-404.
• 3. Ertan AK, He JP, Tanriverdi HA, Hendrik J, Limbach HG, Schmidt W. Comparison of perinatal outcome in fetuses with reverse or absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery and/or fetal descending aorta. J Perinat Med. 2003;31(4). Available from: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/JPM.2003.043/html
• 4. Caradeux J, Martinez-Portilla RJ, Basuki TR, Kiserud T, Figueras F. Risk of fetal death in growth-restricted fetuses with umbilical and/or ductus venosus absent or reversed end-diastolic velocities before 34 weeks of gestation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2):S774-S782.e21.
• 5. Bilardo CM, Hecher K, Visser GH, Papageorghiou AT, Marlow N, Thilaganathan B, et al. Severe fetal growth restriction at 26–32 weeks: key messages from the TRUFFLE study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(3):285-90.
• 6. Adedo AA, Arogundade RA, Okunowo AA, Idowu BM, Oduola-Owoo LT. Comparative study of the umbilical artery Doppler indices of healthy and growth-restricted fetuses in Lagos. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2022;12(2):63-9.
• 7. Gairabekova D, Van Rosmalen J, Duvekot JJ. The outcome of early‐onset fetal growth restriction with or without abnormal umbilical artery Doppler flow. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100(8):1430-8.
• 8. Kinoshita M, Thuring A, Morsing E, Maršál K. Extent of absent end‐diastolic flow in the umbilical artery and outcome of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;58(3):369-76.
• 9. Müller T, Nanan R, Rehn M, Kristen P, Dietl J. Arterial and ductus venosus Doppler in fetuses with absent or reverse end‐diastolic flow in the umbilical artery: correlation with short‐term perinatal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81(9):860-6.
• 10. Serdaroğlu Ö, Aldemir EY, Kavuncuoğlu S, Erbaş İM, Gedikbaşı A. Neurodevelopmental and somatic growth outcomes of premature IUGR newborns with absent or reversed end-diastolic flow on umbilical artery Doppler. İKSST. 2017. Available from: http://cms.galenos.com.tr/Uploads/Article_48028/%C4%B0KSSTD-9-121-En.pdf
• 11. Deniz A, Ulker K. Perinatal outcomes of pregnancies with intrauterine growth restriction and/or preeclampsia associated with reverse flow or absence of end-diastolic flow velocity in umbilical artery Doppler flowmetry. Kafkas J Med Sci. 2012;2(3):99-104.
• 12. Wang KG, Chen CY, Chen YY. The effects of absent or reversed end-diastolic umbilical artery Doppler flow velocity. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;48(3):225-31.
• 13. Madazli R. Prognostic factors for survival of growth-restricted fetuses with absent end-diastolic velocity in the umbilical artery. J Perinatol. 2002;22(4):286-90.