Research Article

Physiognomy and Geosophy of Pergamon according to Aelius Aristeides

Volume: 26 November 12, 2023
TR EN

Physiognomy and Geosophy of Pergamon according to Aelius Aristeides

Abstract

Geographical depictions in ancient texts are often personal, biased, subjective, and sometimes imaginative. Therefore, the concept of geosophy coined by J. Kirtland Wright is important in terms of examining the geographical narratives and expressions in historical texts. According to him, geosophy is the study of geographical information in all respects and covers both true and false geographical ideas of all manner of people. Hence, Wright emphasizes that intuitive, imaginative and subjective thoughts are also valuable in geographical perception and should be taken into consideration. Examining all kinds of information related to the geographical perception in the texts from past to present brings the concept of geosophy closer to history as a discipline. In this study, physiognomic and geographical definitions of Aelius Aristeides, an orator and sophist of the 2nd century CE, about Pergamon, which is the most important ancient settlement of Kaikos Valley, and its surroundings are examined in terms of geosophical subjectivity and imagining categories. Thus, it is revealed that the examination of the narratives of ancient texts on terrestrial space from the geosophical point of view can offer new perspectives in studies on ancient history and historical geography.

Keywords

References

  1. H. L. Ansbacher – R. R. Ansbacher (edd.), The Individual Psychology of Alfred Adler: A Systematic Presentation in Selections from His Writings, New York 1956.
  2. C. A. Behr, Aelius Aristides and the Sacred Tales, Amsterdam 1968.
  3. C. A. Behr, P. Aelius Aristides, the Complete Works: Vol. 2, Orations XVII-LIII, Leiden 1981.
  4. C. A. Behr, P. Aelius Aristides. The Complete Works. Vol. 1, Orations I-XVI with an Appendix Containing the Fragments and Inscriptions, Leiden 1986.
  5. B. Burrell, Neokoroi: Greek Cities and Roman Emperors, Leiden 2004.
  6. E. J. Edelstein – L. Edelstein, Asclepius: Collection and Interpretation of the Testimonies, 2 vols, Baltimore 1945.
  7. V. A. Foertmeyer, Tourism in Graeco-Roman Egypt, Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, New Jersey 1989.
  8. S. Freud, A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis, transl. by G. Stanley Hall, New York 1920.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Latin and Classical Greek Languages , Latin and Classical Greek Literature , Greek and Roman Period Archeology , Old Anatolian History

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Murat Tozan
Türkiye

Publication Date

November 12, 2023

Submission Date

May 22, 2023

Acceptance Date

August 25, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 26

APA
Tozan, M. (2023). Physiognomy and Geosophy of Pergamon according to Aelius Aristeides. Gephyra, 26, 39-54. https://doi.org/10.37095/gephyra.1300441
AMA
1.Tozan M. Physiognomy and Geosophy of Pergamon according to Aelius Aristeides. GEPHYRA. 2023;26:39-54. doi:10.37095/gephyra.1300441
Chicago
Tozan, Murat. 2023. “Physiognomy and Geosophy of Pergamon According to Aelius Aristeides”. Gephyra 26 (November): 39-54. https://doi.org/10.37095/gephyra.1300441.
EndNote
Tozan M (November 1, 2023) Physiognomy and Geosophy of Pergamon according to Aelius Aristeides. Gephyra 26 39–54.
IEEE
[1]M. Tozan, “Physiognomy and Geosophy of Pergamon according to Aelius Aristeides”, GEPHYRA, vol. 26, pp. 39–54, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.37095/gephyra.1300441.
ISNAD
Tozan, Murat. “Physiognomy and Geosophy of Pergamon According to Aelius Aristeides”. Gephyra 26 (November 1, 2023): 39-54. https://doi.org/10.37095/gephyra.1300441.
JAMA
1.Tozan M. Physiognomy and Geosophy of Pergamon according to Aelius Aristeides. GEPHYRA. 2023;26:39–54.
MLA
Tozan, Murat. “Physiognomy and Geosophy of Pergamon According to Aelius Aristeides”. Gephyra, vol. 26, Nov. 2023, pp. 39-54, doi:10.37095/gephyra.1300441.
Vancouver
1.Murat Tozan. Physiognomy and Geosophy of Pergamon according to Aelius Aristeides. GEPHYRA. 2023 Nov. 1;26:39-54. doi:10.37095/gephyra.1300441