ENZİM UYGULAMASININ GIDA ENDÜSTRİSİNDE GOFRETLERİN YAPISI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Abstract

Çalışmanın amacı proteaz, amilaz, hemiselülaz ve ksilanazdan oluşan 13 farklı enzimin gofret hamur ve plakasına olan etkisinin incelenmesi ve etkili olan enzim kombinasyonunun belirlenmesidir. Bu amaçla üreticinin talimatlarına göre belirlenen dozlarda denenen ticari proteaz, amilaz, hemiselülaz ve ksilanaz enzimleri gofret hamuruna uygulanmış ve akış davranışları incelenmiştir. Daha sonrasında pişirilerek gofret plakası haline getirilen hamurların su aktivitesi, nem (%), ağırlık kaybı (%), renk parametreleri (L*, a*, b*), sertlik (g) ve duyusal analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Gofret hamurlarının akış davranışları ve karakterizasyon parametreleri değerlendirildiğinde Proteaz 4, Hemiselülaz 2, Ksilanaz 2 enzimleri kombinasyon olarak denenmek üzere seçilmiştir. Denenen kombinasyonlar arasından 80 ppm Ksilanaz 2 + 300 ppm Proteaz 4 enzim grubu içeren gofret hamuru akış davranışı, gofret plakası ise gevrekliği ve kahverengi- karamel rengi dolayısıyla endüstride kullanılmak üzere potansiyel göstermektedir.

Keywords

• Gofret yaprağı
• enzim
• proteaz
• amilaz
• hemiselülaz
• ksilinaz

Supporting Institution

Elvan Gıda San. ve Tic. A.Ş.

INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECT OF ENZYME APPLICATION ON THE STRUCTURE OF WAFERS IN THE FOOD INDUSTRY

Abstract

The study aimed to assess the impact of 13 different enzymes, including protease, amylase, hemicellulase, and xylanase, on wafer dough and sheets, aiming to identify the most effective enzyme combination. Commercial protease, amylase, hemicellulase, and xylanase enzymes were applied to wafer dough following manufacturer instructions, and their flow behaviors were analyzed. Subsequently, the doughs were baked into wafer sheets, and various parameters such as water activity (aw), moisture content (%), weight loss (%), color parameters (L*, a*, b*), hardness (g), and sensory attributes were evaluated. Protease 4, Hemicellulase 2, and Xylanase 2 enzymes were selected for combination testing based on the analysis of flow behavior and characterization parameters of the wafer doughs. Among the tested combinations, the wafer dough containing 80 ppm Xylanase 2 + 300 ppm Protease 4 enzyme group exhibited promising potential for industrial applications due to its favorable flow behavior, while the resulting wafer sheets demonstrated desirable crispness and a brown-caramel color, suggesting suitability for commercial use.

Keywords

• Wafer sheet
• enzyme
• protease
• amylase
• hemicellulase
• xylanase

References

1. Ahmad, M. A., Isah, U., Raubilu, I. A., Muhammad, S. I., Ibrahim, D., (2019) “An overview of the enzyme: Amylase and its industrial potentials”, Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 12(1), 352-358.
2. Altinok, E., Kurultay, S., Boluk, E., Atik, D. S., Kopuk, B., Gunes, R., Toker, O. S., (2022) “Investigation of using possibility of grape pomace in wafer sheet for wheat flour substitution”, International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 57(6), 3634-3642.
3. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, (2000), Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 17th Edition, Maryland.
4. Barrera, G. N., Tadini, C. C., León, A. E., Ribotta, P. D., (2016) “Use of alpha-amylase and amyloglucosidase combinations to minimize the bread quality problems caused by high levels of damaged starch”, Journal of food science and technology, 53, 3675-3684.
5. Berk, E., Şumnu, S. G., Şahin, S., (2017) “Effects of hydrocolloids and carob bean flour on rheological properties of batter and cake quality”, Gıda, 42(6), 754-762.
6. Cardoso, R.V.C., Fernandes, A., Heleno, S.A., Rodrigues, P., Gonzalez-Paramas, A.M., Barros, L., Ferreira, I., (2019) “Physicochemical characterization and microbiology of wheat and rye flours”, Food Chemistry, 280, 123–129.
7. Carson, G.R., Edwards, N.M., (2009) “Criteria of Wheat and Flour Quality”, In Wheat: Chemistry and Technology; American Association of Cereal Chemists: St Paul, MN, USA, pp. 97–118
8. Cubadda, R., Carcea, M., Pasqui, L.A., (1992) “Suitability of the gluten index method for assessing gluten strength in durum wheat and semolina”, Cereal Foods World, 37(12), 866–869.

9. Çarşanba, E., Duerrschmid, K., Schleining, G., (2018) “Assessment of acoustic-mechanical measurements for crispness of wafer prod-ucts” Journal of Food Engineering, 229, 93–101.
10. Manley, D., (2011) “Wafer biscuits, in Manley’s technology of biscuits, crackers and cookies”, Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, pp.353–371.
11. de Souza, T. S., Kawaguti, H. Y., (2021) “Cellulases, hemicellulases, and pectinases: Applications in the food and beverage industry”, Food and Bioprocess Technology, 14(8), 1446-1477.
12. Delcour, J. A., Joye, I. J., Pareyt, B., Wilderjans, E., Brijs, K., and Lagrain, B., (2012) “Wheat gluten functionality as a quality determinant in cereal-based food products”, Annual Review of Food Science and Technology, 3, 469-492.
13. Dogan, I.S., (2006), “Factors affecting wafer sheet quality”, International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 41, 569–576.
14. Doǧan, İ. S., (2002), “Dynamic rheological properties of dough as affected by amylases from various sources”, Food/Nahrung, 46(6), 399-403.
15. Hung, P. V., Maeda, T., Fujita, M., Morita, N., (2007), “Dough properties and breadmaking qualities of whole waxy wheat flour and effects of additional enzymes”, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 87(13), 2538-2543.
16. Jabalia, N., Mishra, P. C., Chaudhary, N., (2014), “Applications, challenges and future prospects of proteases: An overview”, Journal of Agroecology and Natural Resource Management, 1(3), 179-183.
17. Lindahl L, Eliasson A.C., (1992), “Influence of added enzymes on rheological properties of a wheat flour dough”, Cereal Chemistry, 69, 542-6.
18. Meleshkina, E.P., (2016), “On new approaches to the quality of wheat flour”, Production Quality Control, 11, 13-18.
19. Meleshkina, E.P., Kolomiets, S.N., Bundina, O.I., Cheskidova, A.S., (2021), “Application of the alveograph device for the development of requirements for the quality of flour for the production of a wafer sheet”, In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Volume 845, No. 1, p. 012135.
20. Naderi, B., Nasabi, M., Akbari, M., Zargaraan, A., Amini, M., (2023), “Effect of enzymatic treatment on rheological properties of wafer batter and textural properties of wafer sheet”, Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 17(3), 2213-2223.
21. Oikonomou, N.A., Bakalis, S., Rahman, M.S., Krokida, M.K., (2015), “Gluten index for wheat products: Main variables in affecting the value and nonlinear regression model”, International journal of food properties, 18(1), 1-11.
22. Pandit, B., (2023), “Application of microbial enzymes in food industry: a review”, Science and culture. Park, S.H., Na, Y., Kim, J., Kang, S.D., Park, K.H., (2018), “Properties and applications of starch modifying enzymes for use in the baking industry”, Food science and biotechnology, 27, 299-312.
23. Philipps-Wiemann, P., (2018), “Proteases”, Enzymes in Human and Animal Nutrition, Principles and Perspectives, 267-277.
24. Piironen, V., Salmenkallio-Marttila, M., (2009), “Micronutrients and Phytochemicals in Wheat Grain”, In Wheat: Chemistry and Technology; American Association of Cereal Chemists: St Paul, MN, USA, 179–222.
25. Resurreccion, A.V.A., Brody, Aaron L., Lord, John B., (2008), “Consumer sensory testing for food product development”, In: Developing New Food Products for a Changing Marketplace, CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group, FL, USA, pp. 5–25.
26. Ahmad, S., Naz, A., Usman, M., Amjad, A., Pasha, I., Farooq, U., (2022), “Impediment efect of chemical agents (additives) on gluten development in cookie dough”, Journal of Food Science and Technology, 59, 1396–1406.
27. Sahin, S., Sumnu, G., (2006), “Physical properties of foods”, New York: Springer.
28. Stauffer, C.E, Kruger, JE, Lineback, D, (1987), “Proteases, peptidases and inhibitors”, Enzymes and their role in cereal technology, MN: AACC, p. 166-9.
29. Stemler, C.D., Scherf, K.A., (2023), “Lipases as cake batter improvers compared to a traditional emulsifier”, LWT, Volume 174, 114464.
30. Türk Gıda Kodeksi, Buğday Unu Tebliği, Tebliğ No: 2013/9, Tertip: 5, Sayısı: 28606
31. Xue, J., Ngadi, M., (2006), “Rheological properties of batter systemsformulated using different flour combinations”, Journal of Food Engineering, 77, 334–341.
32. Zhou, W., Therdthai, N., Hui, Y.H., (2014), “Introduction to baking and bakery products” Bakery products science and technology, 1-16.