Research Article

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTION METHODS FOR ANTHOCYANIN RECOVERY FROM RED ONION PEEL: ENZYME-ASSISTED, ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED, AND ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED ENZYMATIC METHODS

Volume: 50 Number: 3 June 10, 2025
TR EN

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTION METHODS FOR ANTHOCYANIN RECOVERY FROM RED ONION PEEL: ENZYME-ASSISTED, ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED, AND ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED ENZYMATIC METHODS

Abstract

In this study, enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE), bath and probe type ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE-B, UAE-P), and ultrasound-assisted enzymatic extraction using bath and probe-type ultrasound (UAEE-B, UAEE-P) were compared to conventional extraction (CE) for recovering anthocyanins from red onion peel. Extracts were analyzed for total phenolic (TPC), total flavonoid (TFC), total monomeric anthocyanin (TMA), antioxidant activities (AA-ABTS, AA-DPPH), individual anthocyanins, and colour parameters. UAEE-B achieved 33.12% higher extraction yield than CE. UAEE-B showed more TPC compared to other methods, while UAEE-B and UAEE-P exhibited statistically significant TFC and TMA content. The extraction methods influenced the concentration of individual anthocyanins in distinct ways. EAE resulted in the highest AA-ABTS, while combined ultrasound- and enzyme-assisted methods showed the greatest efficacy in the AA-DPPH. The colour variation observed was 2.17±0.91 for UAEE-B and 3.48±0.24 for UAEE-P. In conclusion, combining ultrasound- and enzyme-assisted extraction techniques detected to be beneficial for recovering anthocyanins from red onion peel.

Keywords

References

  1. Bains, A., Sridhar, K., Singh, B. N., Kuhad, R. C., Chawla, P., Sharma, M. (2023). Valorization of onion peel waste: From trash to treasure. Chemosphere, 343: 140178, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140178.
  2. Benito-Román, Ó., Blanco, B., Sanz, M. T., Beltrán, S. (2021). Freeze-dried extract from onion (Allium cepa cv. Horcal) skin wastes: Extraction intensification and flavonoids identification. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 130: 92-105, doi: 10.1016/j.fbp.2021.09.005.
  3. Buyuktuncel, E. (2013). Toplam fenolik içerik ve antioksidan kapasite tayininde kullanılan başlıca spektrofotometrik yöntemler. Marmara Pharmaceutical Journal, 17(2): 93-103, doi: 10.12991/201317377.
  4. Celano, R., Docimo, T., Piccinelli, A. L., Gazzerro, P., Tucci, M., Di Sanzo, R., Rastrelli, L. (2021). Onion peel: Turning a food waste into a resource. Antioxidants, 10(2): 304, doi: 10.3390/antiox10020304.
  5. Chadorshabi, S., Hallaj-Nezhadi, S., Ghasempour, Z. (2022). Red onion skin active ingredients, extraction and biological properties for functional food applications. Food Chemistry, 386: 132737, doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132737.
  6. Chemat, F., Khan, M. K. (2011). Applications of ultrasound in food technology: Processing, preservation and extraction. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 18(4): 813-835, doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.11.023.
  7. Davidson, M., Louvet, F., Meudec, E., Landolt, C., Grenier, K., Périno, S., ..., Saad, N. (2023). Optimized single-step recovery of lipophilic and hydrophilic compounds from raspberry, strawberry and blackberry pomaces using a simultaneous ultrasound-enzyme-assisted extraction (UEAE). Antioxidants, 12(10): 1793, doi: 10.3390/antiox12101793.
  8. Ersoy, Ş. K., Tütem, E., Başkan, K. S., Apak, R. (2020). Valorization of red onion peels for quercetin recovery using quercetin-imprinted polymer. Journal of Chromatographic Science, 58(2): 163-170, doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/bmz079.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Food Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 10, 2025

Submission Date

March 11, 2025

Acceptance Date

May 7, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 50 Number: 3

APA
Damar, İ. (2025). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTION METHODS FOR ANTHOCYANIN RECOVERY FROM RED ONION PEEL: ENZYME-ASSISTED, ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED, AND ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED ENZYMATIC METHODS. Gıda, 50(3), 389-405. https://doi.org/10.15237/gida.GD25040
AMA
1.Damar İ. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTION METHODS FOR ANTHOCYANIN RECOVERY FROM RED ONION PEEL: ENZYME-ASSISTED, ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED, AND ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED ENZYMATIC METHODS. The Journal of Food. 2025;50(3):389-405. doi:10.15237/gida.GD25040
Chicago
Damar, İrem. 2025. “COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTION METHODS FOR ANTHOCYANIN RECOVERY FROM RED ONION PEEL: ENZYME-ASSISTED, ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED, AND ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED ENZYMATIC METHODS”. Gıda 50 (3): 389-405. https://doi.org/10.15237/gida.GD25040.
EndNote
Damar İ (June 1, 2025) COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTION METHODS FOR ANTHOCYANIN RECOVERY FROM RED ONION PEEL: ENZYME-ASSISTED, ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED, AND ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED ENZYMATIC METHODS. Gıda 50 3 389–405.
IEEE
[1]İ. Damar, “COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTION METHODS FOR ANTHOCYANIN RECOVERY FROM RED ONION PEEL: ENZYME-ASSISTED, ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED, AND ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED ENZYMATIC METHODS”, The Journal of Food, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 389–405, June 2025, doi: 10.15237/gida.GD25040.
ISNAD
Damar, İrem. “COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTION METHODS FOR ANTHOCYANIN RECOVERY FROM RED ONION PEEL: ENZYME-ASSISTED, ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED, AND ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED ENZYMATIC METHODS”. Gıda 50/3 (June 1, 2025): 389-405. https://doi.org/10.15237/gida.GD25040.
JAMA
1.Damar İ. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTION METHODS FOR ANTHOCYANIN RECOVERY FROM RED ONION PEEL: ENZYME-ASSISTED, ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED, AND ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED ENZYMATIC METHODS. The Journal of Food. 2025;50:389–405.
MLA
Damar, İrem. “COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTION METHODS FOR ANTHOCYANIN RECOVERY FROM RED ONION PEEL: ENZYME-ASSISTED, ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED, AND ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED ENZYMATIC METHODS”. Gıda, vol. 50, no. 3, June 2025, pp. 389-05, doi:10.15237/gida.GD25040.
Vancouver
1.İrem Damar. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTION METHODS FOR ANTHOCYANIN RECOVERY FROM RED ONION PEEL: ENZYME-ASSISTED, ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED, AND ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED ENZYMATIC METHODS. The Journal of Food. 2025 Jun. 1;50(3):389-405. doi:10.15237/gida.GD25040

35997    GIDA / The Journal of FOOD is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).