NOHUTTA TANE (TOHUM) KABUĞUNUN TÜM TANENİN FİZİKSEL, KİMYASAL VE BESLENME ÖZELLİKLERİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Abstract

Nohut, dünyada en fazla tüketilen baklagiller içerisinde ikinci sırada yer almaktadır. Bu çalışmada, nohut tanesinin kabuk kısmının tüm tanenin kimyasal içerik ve beslenme özellikleri üzerine etkisinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Bu kapsamda taneden ayrılan kabuk kısımları ve kabuksuz nohudun bazı fiziksel ve kimyasal özellikleri belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, örneklerin besleyicilik özellikleri açısından önemli olan fenolik madde içerikleri, antioksidan aktiviteleri ve safra asitlerini bağlama kapasiteleri de analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre nohut kabuğunun tüm nohut tanesinin yaklaşık %5’lik bir kısmını oluşturduğu ve diğer baklagil kabuklarına göre daha ince olduğu görülmüştür. Kabuk ve kabuksuz nohudun diyet lif içerikleri sırasıyla %73.89 ve %13.51 olarak bulunmuştur. Toplam sindirilebilirlilik değerleri ise sırasıyla %15.4 ve %74.5 olarak belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca nohudun kabuk kısmının mineral maddelerce kabuksuz kısma göre daha zengin olduğu sonucuna varılmış, ancak beslenme özellikleri açısından incelendiğinde nohut kabuğunun tüm nohut tanesi içerisindeki katkısının düşük olduğu belirlenmiştir. 

Keywords

• nohut,nohut kabuğu,sindirilebilirlik,fenolik madde,kimyasal içerik,safra asitleri bağlama

EFFECT OF SEED COAT ON THE PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL AND NUTRITIONAL PROPERTIES OF WHOLE CHICKPEA

Abstract

Chickpea is the second most consumed legume in the world. In this study, the effects of seed coat on chemical composition and also on the nutritional properties of whole chickpea seed were studied. In this context some physical and chemical analysis were conducted on both seed coat and coatless chickpea flour. Phenolic content, antioxidant activity and bile acid binding capacity of the samples were also determined, in order to specify the nutritional benefits of the samples. The results showed that seed coat constitute approximately 5% of the whole chickpea seed and the seed coat thickness was found to be thinner than most of the other legumes. Chickpea seed coat was found to be rich in dietary fiber and minerals. However, the contribution of the seed coat on nutritional benefits of the whole seed were determined to be limited. 

Keywords

• chickpea,chickpea seed coat,digestibility,phenolic substances,chemical composition,bile acid binding

References

1. FAOSTAT 2016. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QC/E (Accessed 3 October 2016).
2. Karakullukçu E, Adak MS. 2008. Bazı nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) çeşitlerinin tuza toleranslarının belirlenmesi. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 14 (4), 313-319.
3. Anon 2013. Baklagil raporu. Gıda Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı, GAP Uluslararası Tarımsal Araştırma ve Eğitim Merkezi, http://arastirma.tarim.gov.tr/gaputaem/Belgeler/ tar%C4%B1msal%20veriler/gaputaem%20gncel/Baklagil%20Raporu.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 02/10/2016).
4. Singh U, Subrahmanyam N, Kumar J. 1991. Cooking quality and nuritional attributes of some newly developed cultivars of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J Sci Food Agric, 55(1), 37-46.
5. Segev A, Badani H, Kapulnik Y, Shomer I, Oren‐Shamir M, Galili S. 2010. Determination of polyphenols, flavonoids, and antioxidant capacity in colored chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J Food Sci, 75(2), 115-119.
6. Williams PC, Singh KB. 1987. Nutritional quality and the evaluation of quality in breeding programmes. The Chickpea. Saxena MC, Singh KB (eds), CAB International Wallingford, Oxon, UK, pp. 329–356.
7. Meiners CR, Derise NL, Lau MG, Ritchey SJ, Murphy EW. 1976. Proximate composition and yield of raw and cooked mature dry legumes. J Agric Food Chem, 24(6), 1122-1125.
8. Singh U. 1985. Nutritional quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): current study and future research needs. Plant Foods Hum Nutr, 35(4), 339-351.

9. Chavan JK, Kadam SS, Salunkhe DK. 1986. Biochemistry and Technology of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seeds. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 25(2), 107-158.
10. Singh U, Kumar J, Jambunathan R, Smithson JB. 1980. Variability in the seed coat content of desi and kabuli chickpea cultivars. Int Chickpea News, 3, 18-21.
11. Klamczynska B, Czuchajowska Z, Baik, BK. 2001. Composition, soaking, cooking and thermal characteristics of starch of chickpeas, wrinkled peas and smooth peas. Int J Food Sci Technol, 36(5), 563-572.
12. Dueñas M, Estrella I, Hernández T. 2004. Occurrence of phenolic compounds in the seed coat and the cotyledon of peas (Pisum sativum L.). Eur Food Res Technol, 219(2), 116-123.
13. Saxena, MC (ed), Singh, KB (ed). 1987. The Chickpea. CAB International Wallingford, Oxon, UK, 368 p.
14. Hawtln L (ed). 1981. The Chickpea Cookbook. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas. Aleppo, Syria, 65 p.
15. Choung MG, Baek IY, Kang ST, Han WY, Shin DC, Moon HP, Kang KH. 2001. Isolation and determination of anthocyanins in seed coats of black soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). J Agric Food Chem, 49(12), 5848-5851.
16. Dalgherty DD, Byung-Kee B. 2003. Isolation and characterization of cotyledon fibers from peas, lentils, and chickpeas. Cereal Chem, 80(3),310-315.
17. Duenas M, Hernandez T, Estrella I. 2006. Assessment of in vitro antioxidant capacity of the seed coat and the cotyledon of legumes in relation to their phenolic contents. Food Chem, 98(1), 95-103.
18. Moise JA, Han S, Gudynaitę-Savitch L, Johnson DA, Miki BL. 2005. Seed coats: structure, development, composition, and biotechnology. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant, 41(5), 620-644.
19. Troszynska A, Ciska E. 2002. Phenolic compounds of seed coats of white and colored varieties of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and their total antioxidant activity. Czech J Food Sci, 20(1), 15-22.
20. Yoshida K, Sato Y, Okuno R, Kameda K, Isobe M, Kondo, T. 1996. Structural analysis and measurement of anthocyanins from colored seed coats of Vigna, Phaseolus, and Glycine legumes. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem, 60(4), 589-593.
21. Filipovic N, Djuric M, Gyura J. 2007. The effect of the type and quantity of sugar-beet fibers on bread characteristics. J Food Eng, 78(3), 1047-1053.
22. AACC 1995. Approved methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists. 9th Edition, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
23. AACC 2000. Approved methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists. 10th Edition. St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
24. Pérez-Jiménez J, Saura-Calixto F. 2005. Literature data may underestimate the actual antioxidant capacity of cereals. J Agric Food Chem, 53(12), 5036-5040.
25. Heimler D, Vignolini P, Dini MG, Romani A. 2005. Rapid tests to assess the antioxidant activity of Phaseolus vulgaris L. dry beans. J Agric Food Chem, 53(8), 3053-3056.
26. Moure A, Franco D, Sineir J, Domínguez H, Núñez MJ, Lema JM 2000. Evaluation of extracts from Gevuina avellana hulls as antioxidants. J Agric Food Chem, 48(9), 3890-3897.