Nutrigenomic Technologies (Turkish with English Abstract)

Year 2008, Volume: 33 Issue: 4, 183 - 191, 01.08.2008

Arzu Kart Gündoğdu Aynur Gül Karahan

Abstract

Nutrigenomics is the study of the interactions between nutrition and human genome. In addition, nutrigenomic technologies (genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, and bioinformatics) seek to understand the mechanisms underlying these interactions. By means of these technologies, it can lead to future individualized dietary recommendations to promote a healthier lifestyle and reduce the risks of chronic disease. In this review, it was aimed to give information about nutrigenomic technologies and the relationship between these technologies and human nutrition.

Keywords

Nutrigenomics, genomic, proteomic, metabolomic, bioinformatic 

Nutrigenomik Teknolojileri

Abstract

Nutrigenomik (Genetik beslenme) bilimi beslenme ve insan genomu arasındaki ilişkileri ele almaktadır. Ayrıca, nutrigenomik teknolojileri (genomik, proteomik, transkriptomik ve biyoinformatik) ile bu ilişkilerin temelinde yatan mekanizmaların anlaşılması yönünde çalışmalar yapmaktadır. Bu teknolojiler sayesinde, kişisel diyet reçeteleri hazırlanarak, ileride daha sağlıklı bir yaşam tarzı geliştirmek ve kronik hastalık risklerini azaltmak mümkün olabilecektir. Bu derlemede nutigenomik teknolojileri ve bu teknolojiler ile insan beslenmesi arasındaki ilişki hakkında bilgi verilmesi amaçlanmıştır.

Keywords

Nutrigenomik, genomik, proteomik, metabolomik, biyoinformatik

References

• Astley SB, Elliott RM. 2004. The European Nutrigenomics organisation- linking genomics, nutrition and health research. British Nutrition Foundation Nutrition Bulletin, 29: 254-261.
• Van Ommen B, Stierum R. 2002. Nutrigenomics: exploiting systems biology in the nutrition and health arena. Curr. Opin. Biotech., 13:517–521.
• Elliott R, Ong TJ. 2002. Nutritional genomics. BMJ, 324: 1438-1442.
• Ferguson LR. 2006. Nutrigenomics: integrating genomic approaches into nutrition research. Mol. Diagn. Ther., 10(2):101-108.
• Ordovas JM. 2006. Genetic interactions with diet influence the risk of cardiovascular disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 83(2): 443-446.
• Kaput J. 2005. Decoding the Pyramid: A Systems- Biological Approach to Nutrigenomics. Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 1055: 64–79.
• Johnson RL, Williams SM, Spruill IJ. 2006. Genomics, Nutrition, Obesity, and Diabetes. J. Nurs. Scholarship, 38( 1): 11- 18.
• Nair S, Pillai MR. 2005. Human papillomavirus and disease mechanisms: relevance to oral and cervical cancers. Oral Dis., 11: 350–359.
• De Almeida MDV, Pinhão S, Stewart-Knox B, Parr HJ, Gibney MJ. 2006. An overview of findings from a sixcountry European survey on consumer attitudes to the metabolic syndrome, genetics in nutrition, and potential agro-food Technologies. British Nutrition Foundation, Nutrition Bulletin, 31: 239–246.
• Garosi P, De Filippo C, van Erk M, Rocca-Serra P, Sansone S-A, Elliott R. 2005. Defining best practice for microarray analyses in nutrigenomic studies. Brit. J. Nutr., 93: 425–432.
• DeBusk RM. 2005. Nutrigenomics and the future of dietetics. Nutr. Diet., 62: 2-3.
• Van Ommen B. 2004. Nutrigenomics: Exploiting Systems Biology in the Nutrition and Health Arenas. Nutrition, 20: 4–8.
• Trujıllo E, Davıs C, Mılner J. 2006. Nutrigenomics, Proteomics, Metabolomics, and the Practice of Dietetics. J. Am. Diet. Assoc., 106: 403-413.
• Davis CD, Hord NG. 2005. Nutritional “Omics” Technologies for Elucidating the Role(s) of Bioactive Food Components in Colon Cancer Prevention. J. Nutr., 135: 2694–2697.
• Stover PJ. 2006. Influence of human genetic variation on nutritional requirements. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 83(2): 436-442.
• Go VLW, Nguyen CTH, Marris DM, Lee W-NP. 2005. Nutrient- Gene Interaction: Metabolic Genotype- Phenotype Relationship. J. Nutr., 135: 3016-3020.
• Corthésy- Theulaz I, Dunnen JT, Ferré P, Geurts JMW, Müler M, Belzen N, Ommen B. 2005. Nutrigenomics: The Impact of Biomics technology on Nutrition Research. Ann. Nutr. Metab., 49: 355-365.
• Stover PJ. 2004. Nutritional genomics. Physiol. Genomics, 16: 161–165.
• Kaput J, Rodriguez RL. 2004. Nutritional genomics: the next frontier in the postgenomic era. Physiol. Genomics, 16: 166-177.
• Buttriss JL. 2006. Diet–gene interactions and current EU research: something for everybody . British Nutrition Foundation, Nutrition Bulletin, 31: 65–68.
• Ordovas JM, Mooser V. 2004. Nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics. Genetics and molecular biology. Curr. Opin Lipidol., 15(2): 101-108.
• Gıllıes PJ. 2003. Nutrigenomics: The Rubicon of molecular nutrition. J. Am. Diet Assoc., 103: 50-55.
• Milner JA. 2003. Incorporating Basic Nutrition Science into Health Interventions for Cancer Prevention. J. Nutr., 133: 3820–3826.
• Labadarios D, Meguid MM. 2004. Nutrigenomics: Unraveling Man’s Constitution in Relation to Food. Nutrition, 20: 2–3.
• Roche HM. 2006. Nutrigenomics – new approaches for human nutrition research J. Sci. Food Agric., 86:1156–1163.
• Afman L, Müller M. 2006. Nutrigenomics: From Molecular Nutrition to Prevention of Disease. J. Am. Diet. Assoc., 106: 569-576.
• Muller M, Kersten S. 2003. Nutrigenomics: goals and strategies. Nat. Rev. Genet., 4(4): 315-22.
• Nugent AP. 2004a. Nutrigenomics: tailor-made foods for a genetic era?. British Nutrition Foundation, Nutrition Bulletin, 29: 82–83.
• Nugent A. 2004b. LIPGENE: a truly integratedapproach to tackling the metabolic syndrome. British Nutrition Foundation, Nutrition Bulletin, 29: 152–155.
• Simopoulos AP. 2002. Genetic variation and dietary response: Nutrigenetics/ nutrigenomics. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr., 11: 117.
• Tapsell LC. 2006. Conference Report: International Life Sciences Institute’s First International Conference on Nutrigenomics: Opportunities in Asia. Singapore 7–9 December 2005. Nutr. Diet., 63: 52–53.
• Debusk RM. 2006. Nutritional Genomics and The Future of Dietetics Practice. Nutr. Diet., 63: A1–A24.
• Verrips CT, Warmoeskerken MMCG, Post JA. 2001. General introduction to the importance of genomics in food biotechnology and nutrition. Curr. Opin. Biotech., 12: 483–487.
• Kuipers OP. 1999. Genomics for food biotechnology: prospects of the use of high- throughput technologies for the improvement of food microorganisms. Curr. Opin. Biotech., 10: 511-516.
• Arab L. 2004. Individualized nutritional recommendations: do we have the measurements needed to assess risk and make diyetary recommendations? P. Nutr. Soc., 63: 167–172.
• Saito K, Kato H, Arai S. 2005. A nutrigenomics database—integrated repository for publications and associated microarray data in nutrigenomics research. Brit. J. Nutr., 94 (4): 493-495.
• Mutch DM, Wahli W, Williamson G. 2005. Nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics: the emerging faces of Nutrition. FASEB J., 19: 1602–1616.
• Ordovas JM, Corella D. 2004. Nutritional Genomics. Annu. Rev. Genom Hum., 5: 71-118.
• Milner JA. 2004. Molecular Targets for Bioactive Food Components. J. Nutr., 134: 2492-2498.
• Rock CL, Lampe JW, Patterson RE. 2000. Nutrition, genetics, and risks of cancer. Ann. Rev. Public Health, 21: 47-64.
• Kan˘ková K, S˘ebeková K. 2005. Genetic variability in the RAGE gene: Possible implications for nutrigenetics, nutrigenomics, and understanding the susceptibility to diabetic complications. Mol. Nutr. Food Res., 49: 700 – 709.
• Peterson J, Dwyer J. 1998. Flavonoids: Dietary Occurrence and Biochemical Activity. Nutr. Res., 18(12): 1995-2018.
• Anderle P, Farmer P, Berger A, Roberts M-A. 2004. Nutrigenomic Approach to Understanding the Mechanisms by Which Dietary Long-Chain Fatty Acids Induce Gene Signals and Control Mechanisms Involved in Carcinogenesis. Nutrition, 20: 103–108.