THE EFFECT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT PERCEPTION ON ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH EMPLOYEES

Abstract

Introduction and Research Questions & Purpose:
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of health workers' perceptions on psychological contract on organizational commitment because the success of health institutions healthcare professionals work is extremely important. There are different factors that affect the task performance of healthcare professionals. Being committed to the organization and making efforts in this direction are among the first of these factors (Millward ve Hopkins, 1998: 1530). Today's increasing competition conditions, ever-changing environment, changes in working conditions, require organizations to use human resources, which are the most important element of their core competencies, effectively and efficiently in order to be successful in the globalized business world. In this context, the issues of psychological contract and organizational commitment should be of special importance for the organizations of today to use human resources effectively, effectively and efficiently (Bal, Kooij ve De Jong, 2013: 545).

Literature Review:
Conceptually, the most general definition of the contract is beliefs that include obligations between two or more parties. Psychological contract is the expression of an individual's thoughts in terms of the terms and conditions of mutual exchange with another party. Psychological contracts are individual opinions that are shaped by the organization and include the conditions for the exchange agreement between the individual and the organization (Rousseau ve Parks, 1993: 3). Organizational commitment is a psychological link between the individual and the organization in the context of participation in work, loyalty and belief in the values of the organization (Meyer ve Allen, 1991: 67).

An important part of the researches in the literature, as cited in the article (Maia ve Bastos 2015:17; Hassan, Abdul-Rahman ve Abdul Basit ,2017: 37), reveals the existence of a positive and meaningful relationship between psychological contracts and organizational commitment. In addition, in the section where the concepts are analysed theoretically, the claim that meaningful relationships can be expected between these two variables is included. Taking this information into consideration, it was hypothesized the perceptions of healthcare professionals about the psychological contract affect their organizational commitment and its subdimension positively.

Methodology:
Before performing the research, necessary permissions were taken from The University Social Sciences Ethics Committee and the Hospital Administration. Millward and Hopkins's (1998) the psychological contract scale and the Organizational Commitment Scale by Allen and Meyer (1990) were used as data collection tools. The study conducted in a state hospital in Kahramanmaraş. 145 healthcare professionals voluntarily contributed to the research. The data were analysed using a statistical program. The scales used in the study were found to be quite reliable and highly reliable.

Considering the gender and marital status of the participants; 64.8% (N = 94) are women, 35.2% (N = 51) are men, 64.8% (N = 94) are married, 35.2% (N = 51) is single. It is seen that 28.3% (N = 41) of the participants are between the ages of 18-29, 49% (N = 71) are between 30-41 and 22.8% (N = 33) are over the age of 42. The average score of the psychological contract scale of the healthcare professionals contributing to the study was at a medium level. It was found that the average score of the organizational commitment scale of the healthcare professionals participating in the research was high.

Regression analysis was applied to determine the effect of perception of psychological contract on organizational commitment and subdimensions in line with the determined hypotheses. In terms of the results of the regression analysis, the level of disclosure of organizational commitment was statistically significant and it was found that perceptions of the participants about the psychological contract positively affect the organizational commitment.

Regarding the results of the regression analysis conducted to determine the effects of the perceptions of the healthcare professionals on the psychological contract on the affective, continuance and normative commitment, which are the sub-dimensions of organizational commitment; It has been determined that perceptions of healthcare professionals about psychological contract affect all sub-dimensions of organizational commitment in a statistically significant and positive way.

The findings of this study showed that meeting the expectations of the employees regarding the psychological contract will increase their organizational commitment both at the general level and at the level of sub-dimensions, thus increasing their contribution to their organizations. It is thought that this research will contribute to both practitioners and researchers in the health sector, where using human resources effectively and efficiently will be considered as a core competence.

PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞME ALGISININ ÖRGÜTSEL BAĞLILIK ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: SAĞLIK ÇALIŞANLARI ÜZERİNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Abstract

Bu çalışma sağlık çalışanlarının psikolojik sözleşme konusundaki algılarının örgütsel bağlılık üzerindeki etkisini değerlendirmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda sağlık çalışanı katılımcıların demografik özellikleri, psikolojik sözleşme ve örgütsel bağlılık algıları ile ilgili verilerin elde edilmesine dönük bir anket oluşturulmuştur. Kahramanmaraş ilinde bulunan Kahramanmaraş Necip Fazıl Şehir Hastanesi Yörük Selim Ek Hizmet Binasında görev yapan 145 sağlık çalışanı araştırmaya katkıda bulunmuşlardır. Elde edilen veriler bir istatistik programı ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmanın temel bulgusu sağlık çalışanlarının psikolojik sözleşme konusundaki algılarının örgütsel bağlılıklarını pozitif yönlü etkilediğidir. Sonuçlar literatürle karşılaştırılarak değerlendirilmiş, araştırma bulguları çerçevesinde öneriler yapılarak çalışma son bulmuştur.

Keywords

• Sağlık Çalışanları,Psikolojik Sözleşme,Örgütsel Bağlılık

References

1. Akgül, A.; Çevik, O. (2003), İstatistiksel Analiz Teknikleri SPSS'te İşletme Yönetimi Uygulamaları, Emek Ofset, Ankara.
2. Akmaz, A.; Erbaşı, A. (2017), “Psikolojik Kontrat ile Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Örgütsel Güven İlişkisi: Mersin İlindeki 4 ve 5 Yıldızlı Otel İşletmelerinde Bir Uygulama”, AİBÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17:4, 125-154.
3. Allen, N. J.; Meyer, J. P. (1990), “The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
4. Antonaki, X.; Trivellas, P. (2014), “Psychological Contract Breach and Organizational Commitment in the Greek Banking Sector: The Mediation Effect of Job Satisfaction”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148, 354-361.
5. Aslan, Ş.; Uyar, S. (2018), “Psikolojik Sözleşme İhlali ile Hissettirdiklerinin Örgütsel Özdeşleşme, İş Tatmini ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Üzerine Etkileri”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 33:1, 1-38.
6. Bal P. M., Kooij, D. T. A. M.; Jong, S. (2013), “How Do Developmental and Accommodative HRM Enhance Employee Engagement and Commitment? The Role of Psychological Contract and SOC Strategies.”, Journal of Management Studies, 50:4, 545-572, June 2013 doi: 10.1111/joms.12028.
7. Blau, P.M. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
8. Ceseroğlu, C.M. (2010), “Örgütlerde İşgören İlişkileri Açısından Psikolojik Kontrat ve Örgütsel Bağlılık Üzerine Etkisi: 4-5 Yıldızlı Otel İşletmeleri Örneği”, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çanakkale.

9. Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M.; Kessler, Ian. (2003), “The Employment Relationship in the U.K. Public Sector: A Psychological Contract Perspective”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13:2, 213–230.
10. Çankaya, S.; Gürdal, O.; Tunç, T.; Orhan, H. (2018), “Eğitim-Araştırma Hastanelerinde Çalışanların İş Doyumu, Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Tükenmişlik Düzeyleri Arasındaki İlişkilerin Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli İle İncelenmesi: Ordu İli Örneği”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 25:4, 436-449.
11. Çetin, E., (2010), “Örgütsel Bağlılığın Sağlanmasında Psikolojik Sözleşmenin Rolüne İlişkin Bir Araştırma”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kütahya.
12. Demiral, Ö., (2008), “Örgütsel Bağlılığın Sağlanmasında Personel Güçlendirme ve Psikolojik Sözleşmenin Etkisine İlişkin Bir Araştırma.”, Niğde Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Niğde.
13. Dönmez, N., (2015), “Ortaokullarda Görev Yapan Öğretmenlerin Psikolojik Sözleşme Düzeyleri İle Örgütsel Bağlılıkları Arasındaki İlişki”, Uşak Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Uşak.
14. Erdoğan, M., (2015) “ Psikolojik Sözleşme İhlali Algısının Örgütsel Sinizm ve Örgütsel Bağlılık Üzerine Etkisi: Konaklama İşletmelerinde Bir Uygulama”, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, Erzurum.
15. George, D.; Mallery, M. (2010), SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.), Boston: Pearson.
16. Goodine, Laura Ann (1999), “An Analysis of Personal Project Commitment.”, Carleton Üniversitesi, Ontario, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Kanada.
17. Guest, D. E. (1998), “Is the psychological contract worth taking seriously.”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 649–664.
18. Gupta, V.; Agarwal, U. A.; Khatri, N. (2016), “The relationships between perceived organizational support, affective commitment, psychological contract breach, organizational citizenship behaviour and work engagement.”, Journal of Advanced Nursing 72:11, 2806–2817. doi: 10.1111/jan.13043.
19. Hassan, Z.; Abdulrahman, A.; Abdul Basit. (2017), “The impact of psychological contract on organizational commitment: a study on public sector of Maldives”, Journal of Human Resource Management, 20: 2, 30-40.
20. Karcıoğlu, F.; Türker, E. (2010), “Psikolojik Sözleşme İle Örgütsel Bağlılık İlişkisi: Sağlık Çalışanları Üzerinde Bir Uygulama”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 24:2, 121-140.
21. Keman, G., (2012), “Psikolojik Sözleşmenin Örgütsel Bağlılığa Olan Etkisi: Tekstil Sektöründe Bir Uygulama”, Trakya Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Edirne. Knights, J. A.; Kennedy, B. J. (2005), “Psychological Contract Violation: Impacts on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment Among Australian Senior Public Servants”, Applied HRM Research, 10: 2, 57-72.
22. Lawler III, E. E. (1995), “Foundations of Job Satisfaction. Içinde Barry M. Staw Psychological Dimensions of Organizational Behaviour”, New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 79-96
23. Lub, X.; Bijvank, M. N.; Bal, P. M.; Blomme, R.; Schalk, R. (2012), “Different or alike? Exploring the psychological contract and commitment of different generations of hospitality workers.”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24: 4, 553-573.
24. Maia, L. G.; Bastos, A. V.B. (2015), “Organizational Commitment, Psychological Contract Fulfillment and Job Performance: A Longitudinal Quantqualitative Study”, Brazilian Administration Review, 12:3, 250-267.
25. Meyer, J. P.; Allen, N. J. (1991), “A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment”, Human Resource Management Review, 1: 1, 61-89.
26. Meyer, J.; Allen, N. (1997), Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, And Application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
27. Meyer, J. P.; Becker, T. E.; Van Dick, R. (2006), “Social Identities and Commitments at Work: Toward an Integrative Model”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27:5, 665-683. http://dX̅.doi.org/10.1002/job.383
28. Millward, L. J.; Hopkins, L. J. (1998), “Psychological Contracts, Organizational and Job Commitment”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28:16, 1530–1556.
29. Ng, T. W. H.; Feldman, D. C. (2008), “Can you get a better deal elsewhere? The effects of psychological contract replicability on organizational commitment over time”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 268–277.
30. O’Reilly, C. (1989), “Corporations, Culture, and Commitment: Motivation and Social Control in Organizations”, California Management Review, 31:4, 9–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166580.
31. Rousseau, D. M. (1989), “Psychological and implied contracts in organizations”, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2:2, 121-39.
32. Rousseau, D. M. (1995), Psychological Contracts Organizations Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements, Sage, California, ABD.
33. Rousseau, D. M.; Parks, J. M. (1993), “The Contracts of Individuals and Organizations”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 15, 1-43.
34. Sönmez, B. (2017), “Psikolojik Sözleşme ve Örgütsel Bağlılık Arasındaki İlişki: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığına Bağlı Eğitim Kurumlarında Bir Uygulama”, Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.
35. Tambay, A. (2018), “İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Uygulamalarının Örgütsel Bağlılığa Etkisinde Psikolojik Sözleşmenin Aracılık Rolü: Çimento Sektöründe Bir Araştırma”, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Konya.
36. Tokmak, M., (2018), “Örgütsel Adalet ve Örgütsel Bağlılık Arasındaki İlişkinin Kamu ve Özel Sektör Çalışanları Örneğinde Araştırılması”, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, Aydın.
37. Türk Dil Kurumu Sözlük Güncel Türkçe Sözlük, https://sozluk.gov.tr/ (Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2020).
38. Ünver, E., (2011), “Psikolojik Sözleşmenin İş Tatmini Üzerindeki Etkisini Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Uygulama”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kütahya.
39. Wasti, S. A. (2005), “Commitment profiles: Combinations of Organizational Commitment Forms And Job Outcomes”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 290–308.
40. World Health Organization (2014), A universal truth: no health without a workforce. World Health Organization.