The New Steps Taken for Improvement of Vocational Education and Training in Turkey

Year 2021, , 1 - 16, 27.04.2021

Mahmut Özer

https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.907302

Cited By: 9

Abstract

Vocational education and training (VET) is a type of education that faces great expectations from stakeholders. VET systems are structured with different approaches in diverse education systems to meet these expectations in short term. Additionally, the revision of VET systems has always been continuing in order to strengthen its compliance with the labor market. VET has always been one of the main subjects in educational policies and discussions in Turkey. Numerous projects have been implemented for years to improve the VET system in diverse aspects. However, VET has been greatly affected by the negative outcomes of the coefficient regulation which restricts the access of VET graduates to higher education from the 1990s to the first decades of the 2000s. In this traumatic period, the perception of society and the labor market towards VET was affected negatively. Due to its negative outcomes, the coefficient regulation has been abolished and then many steps have been taken to mitigate the damage of coefficient regulation. Especially after the Education Vision 2023, which was announced at the end of 2018, comprehensive and systematic steps have been implemented to solve the major problems in VET. Remarkable transformations have been achieved in diverse aspects of the VET system, and perceptions of both the labor market and society have been affected positively in a short period of time. In this study, the purpose and scope of the new projects of the Ministry of National Education which increase the sustainability of the improvements in VET are evaluated. In addition, steps to be taken to improve the vocational education centers are discussed within the scope of the economic reform package announced as of March 2021.

Keywords

Vocational Education and Training, Labor Market, Research and Development, Intellectual Property, Quality

Türkiye’de Mesleki Eğitimi Güçlendirmek için Atılan Yeni Adımlar

Abstract

Eğitim sistemlerinde mesleki eğitim farklı yaklaşımlarla kurgulanmakta olup kısa vadede en fazla beklentinin olduğu bir eğitim türünü oluşturmaktadır. Bu nedenle özellikle işgücü piyasası ile uyumunu güçlendirmek için üzerinde sürekli revizyonlar yapılmaktadır. Türkiye’de de mesleki eğitim, eğitim gündeminin sürekli ana maddelerinden birisi olmuştur. Mesleki eğitimin güçlendirilmesi için yıllardan beri çok farklı projeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Özellikle, 1990’lardan itibaren 2000’li yılların ilk onlu yılları boyunca mesleki eğitim mezunlarının yükseköğretime erişimlerini kısıtlayan katsayı uygulaması mesleki eğitimi travmalı bir döneme sokmuş, işgücü piyasası ve toplum nezdindeki algısını olumsuz etkilemiştir. Bu hasarın ortadan kaldırılması için katsayı uygulaması sonlandırılmış ve ayrıca çok sayıda adım atılmıştır. Özellikle 2018 yılı sonunda açıklanan 2023 Eğitim Vizyonu sonrasında mesleki eğitimde sorunların çözülmesi için oldukça kapsamlı ve sistematik adımlar atılmıştır. Üç yıl gibi kısa bir sürede önemli dönüşümler sağlanabilmiş ve hem işgücü piyasası hem de toplum nezdindeki algısı pozitif yönde değişmiştir. Bu çalışmada, bu dönemde yaşanan iyileştirmeler kısaca ele alındıktan sonra mesleki eğitimde yaşanan iyileştirmelerin yaygınlığını artırmak ve sürdürülebilirliğini sağlamak için Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı tarafından uygulamaya konan yeni projelerin hedefleri ve alınan mesafeler değerlendirilmektedir. Ayrıca, 2021 Mart itibarıyla açıklanan ekonomik reform paketinde mesleki eğitim merkezlerini güçlendirmek için atılacak adımlar ele alınmaktadır.

Keywords

Mesleki Eğitim, İşgücü Piyasası, Araştırma-Geliştirme, Fikri Mülkiyet, Kalite

References

• Acemoğlu, D. ve Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence, automation and work. NBER Working Paper 24196. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge
• Allmendinger, J. (1998). Educational systems and labour market outcomes. European Sociological Review, 5(3), 231-250.
• Badescu, M., Villalba, E. ve D’Hombres, B. (2011). Returns to education in European countries: Evidence from the European Community Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EUSILC). Italy. doi:10278831157.
• Barber, M. ve Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best performing schools systems come out on top. McKinsey & Company.
• Barrett, P. S., Treves, A., Shmis, T., Ambasz, D. ve Ustinova, M. (2018). The impact of school infrastructure on learning: A synthesis of the evidence. International Development in Focus Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group.
• Bozgeyikli, H. (2019). Mesleki ve teknik eğitimin geleceği. Analiz Raporu:2019/02, İstanbul: İLKE İlim Kültür Eğitim Vakfı.
• Bölükbaş, S. ve Gür, B. S. (2020). Tracking and inequality: The results from Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development, 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102262
• Breen, R. (2005). Explaining cross-national variation in youth unemployment: Market and institutional factors. European Sociological Review, 21(2), 125-134.
• Callan, V. ve Ashworth, P. (2004). Working together industry and VET provider training partnerships. Australia: Australian National Training Authority.
• Canbal, M. S., Kerkez, B., Suna, H. E., Numanoğlu, K. V. ve Özer, M. (2020). Mesleki ve teknik ortaöğretimde paradigma değişimi için yeni bir adım: Eğitim programlarının güncellenmesi. Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama, 11(21), 1-26.
• CEDEFOP. (2013). Benefits of vocational education and training in Europe for people, organisations and countries. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED560841.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
• Cingöz, Z. K. ve Gür, B. S. (2020). Ekonomik, sosyal ve kültürel statünün akademik başarıya etkisi: PISA 2015 ve TEOG 2017 sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması. İnsan ve Toplum, 10(4), 247-288.
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1-44.
• Dickson, M. ve Smith, S. (2011). What determines the return to education: An extra year or a hurdle cleared? Economics of Education Review, 30(6), 1167-1176.
• DiPrete, T. A., Eller, C. C., Bol, T. ve Van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2017). School-to-work linkages in the United States, Germany, and France. American Journal of Sociology, 122(6), 1869-1938.
• Engelshoven, P. V., Despotovic, M., Maksimovic, I. ve Pejatovic, A. (2009). Methodology of curriculum development in vocational education and training and adult education. http://www.vetserbia.edu.rs/METHODOLOGY%20OF%20CURRICULUM%20DEVELOPMENT%20IN%20VOCATIONAL%20EDUCATION%20AND%20TRAINING%20AND%20ADULT%20EDUCATION.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
• Gençoğlu, C. (2019). Milli bir destekleme ve yetiştirme sistemi modeli: İlkokullarda Yetiştirme Programı (İYEP), Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 48(1), 853-881.
• Iannelli, C. ve Raffe, D. (2007). Vocational upper-secondary education and the transition from school. European Sociological Review, 23(1), 49-63.
• ILO. (2019). From school to work: An analysis of youth labour market transitions. ILOSTAT Spotlight on work statistics. https://ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---stat/documents/publication/wcms_732422.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
• Lee, J. (2009). Partnerships with industry for efficient and effective implementation of TVET. International Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 17(2), 39-56.
• Lochner, L. (2011). Non-production benefits of education: Crime, health, and good citizenship E.A. Hanushek, S. Machin ve L. Woessmann (Eds). Handbook of the economics of education (Volume 4) içinde (s. 183-282). Amsterdam: North Holland.
• Lopez-Mayan, C. ve Nicodemo, C. (2013). The transition from vocational education to work: Evidence from Spain. IZA Research Report. http://conference.iza.org/conference_files/Transatlantic_2013/lopez-mayan_c6109.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
• Maurice, M., Sellier, F. ve Silvestre, J. J. (1986). The social foundations of industrial power: A comparison of France and Germany. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
• McDonald, R., Hayton, G., Gonczi, A. ve Hager, P. (1993). Research and development issues for vocational education and training. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00002943.htm adresinden alınmıştır.
• MEB. (2018). 2018 Liselere Geçiş Sistemi (LGS): Merkezi sınavla yerleşen öğrencilerin performansı. Eğitim Analiz ve Değerlendirme Raporları Serisi No:3, Ankara: MEB.
• MEB. (2019). PISA 2018 Türkiye ön raporu. Eğitim Analiz ve Değerlendirme Raporları Serisi No: 10, Ankara: MEB. Milanowski, A. (2004). The relationship between teacher performance evaluation scores and student achievement: Evidence From Cincinnati. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 33-53.
• Müller, W. ve Gangl, M. (Eds.) (2003). Transitions from education to work in Europe: The integration of youth into EU labour markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Naravatnam, K. K. ve O’Connor, R. (1993). Quality assurance in vocational education: Meeting the needs of the nineties. The Vocational Aspect of Education, 45(2), 113-122.
• OECD. (1998). Employment outlook 1998. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2010). Learning for jobs: Synthesis report of the OECD reviews of vocational education and training. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2014). Skills beyond school: Synthesis report. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264214682-8-en.pdf?expires=1616883451&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=CFB83C5A6538C30287F6C16BA58EE78F adresinden alınmıştır.
• OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. Paris: OECD Publishing
• Özer, M., Çavuşoğlu, A. ve Gür, B. S. (2011). Restorasyon ve toparlanma dönemi: Mesleki ve teknik eğitimde 2000’li yıllar, B. S. Gür (Ed.), Türkiye’de eğitim: 2000’li yıllar içinde (s.163-192). İstanbul: Meydan Yayıncılık.
• Özer, M. (2018). The 2023 Education Vision and new goals in vocational and technical education. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 8(3), 425–435.
• Özer, M. (2019a). Reconsidering the fundamental problems of vocational education and training in Turkey and proposed solutions for restructuring. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 39(2), 1–19.
• Özer, M. (2019b). Background of problems in vocational education and training and its road map to solution in Turkey’s Education Vision 2023. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 9(1), 1–11.
• Özer, M. ve Perc, M. (2020). Dreams and realities of school tracking and vocational education. Palgrave Communications, 6, 34.
• Özer, M. ve Suna, H. E. (2019). Future of vocational and technical education in Turkey: Solid steps taken after Education Vision 2023. Journal of Education and Humanities, 10(20), 165–192.
• Özer, M. ve Suna, H. E. (2020). The linkage between vocational education and labor market in Turkey: Employability and skill mismatch. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(2), 558–569.
• Özer, M., Gençoğlu, C. ve Suna, H. E. (2020). Türkiye’de eğitimde eşitsizlikleri azaltmak için uygulanan politikalar. OMÜ Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(2), 294-312.
• Özer, M. (2020a). Vocational education and training as “A friend in need” during coronavirus pandemic in Turkey. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 9(2), 1-7.
• Özer, M. (2020b). The contribution of the strengthened capacity of vocational education and training system in Turkey to the fight against Covid-19. Journal of Higher Education, 10(2), 134–140.
• Özer, M. (2020c). Educational policy actions by the Ministry of National Education in the times of COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(3), 1124-1129.
• Özer, M. (2020d). Türkiye’de mesleki eğitimde paradigma değişimi. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(2), 357-384.
• Özer, M. (2020e). Mesleki eğitimde paradigma değişimi: Türkiye’nin mesleki eğitim ile imtihanı. İstanbul: Maltepe Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Özer, M. (2020f). What PISA tells us about performance of education systems?. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 9(2), 217-228.
• Özer, M. (2020g). Mesleki eğitimde okuldan işe geçişi etkileyen yeni parametreler: Küresel dönüşümde yeni eğilimler. İnsan ve Toplum, 10(3), 1-27.
• Özer, M. (2021). A new step towards narrowing the achievement gap in Turkey: “1,000 schools in vocational education and training” project. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 10(1), 97-108.
• Özer, M. ve Perc, M. (2021). Impact of social networks on the labor market inequalities and school-to-work transitions. Journal of Higher Education, doi: 10.2399/yod.21.868353.
• Perc, M., Özer, M. ve Hojnik, J. (2019). Social and juristic challenges of artificial intelligence. Palgrave Communication, 5, 61.
• Pulley, P. A. (2006). On-the-job-training: Easy to do if you have the right program. Online Journal for Workforce Education and Development, 2(29). https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1043&context=ojwed adresinden alınmıştır.
• Rusten, G. ve Hermelin, B. (2017). Cross-sector collaboration in upper secondary school vocational education: Experiences from two industrial towns in Sweden and Norway. Journal of Education and Work, 30(8), 813-826.
• Shavit, Y. ve Müller, W. (Eds.) (1998). From school to work: A comparative study of educational qualifications and occupational destinations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Suna, H. E., Tanberkan, H. ve Özer, M. (2020). Changes in literacy of students in Turkey by years and school types: performance of students in PISA applications. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 11(1), 76–97.
• Suna, H. E., Gür, B. S., Gelbal, S. ve Özer, M. (2020a). Fen lisesi öğrencilerinin sosyoekonomik arkaplanı ve yükseköğretime geçişteki tercihleri. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, doi:10.2399/yod.20.734921.
• Suna, H. E., Tanberkan, H., Gur, B. S., Perc, M. ve Özer, M. (2020b). Socioeconomic status and school type as predictors of academic achievement. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 61, 41–64.
• Suna, H. E., Tanberkan, H., Eroğlu, E., Özer, M. ve Gür, B. S. (2020c). Horizontal skills mismatch in vocational education in Turkey: The reasons for out-of-field employment. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 40(2), 931-955.
• Teixeira, J., Amoroso, J. ve Gresham, J. (2017). Why education infrastructure matters for learning?. World Bank Blogs. https://blogs.worldbank.org/education/why-education-infrastructure-matters-learning adresinden alınmıştır.
• UNICEF. (2019). Unpacking school-to-work transition data and evidence synthesis. Scoping Paper No. 02. Wuttke, E., Seifried, J. ve Niegemann, H. (Eds). (2020). Vocational eduation and training in the age of digitization. 4th Edition. Leverkusen, Germany: Barbara Budrich Publishers.