Forage and seed yield, relationships among its characters in some grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) genotypes

Year 2020, , 152 - 158, 31.12.2020

Hazım Serkan Tenıkecıer

https://doi.org/10.13002/jafag4731

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to determine the forage and seed yield, relationships among its characters in some grass pea genotypes. This study was conducted between 2017-2020 at Field Crops Department, Agriculture Faculty, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Turkey in randomized block design with three replications. The characters which were determined in the study varied between; plant height 85.75-103.60 cm, number of branches/plant 5.40-6.42 pcs, number of pods/plant 19.12-27.66 pcs, pod width 9.57-11.60 mm, pod length 31.65-36.70 mm, number of seeds/pod 2.86-3.44 pcs, seed weight/pod 1.74-2.26 g, 1000-seed weight 218.88-260.26 g, seed yield 160.22-270.83 kg da-1, herbage yield 1462.22-2226.67 kg da-1 and hay yield 564.18-373.74 kg da-1. The highest plant height, number of branches/plant, number of pods/plant and seed yield were determined in genotype 'Karadağ'; however, the highest number of seeds/pod, herbage and hay yield were found in grass pea population 'Tekirdağ'.

Keywords

Correlation, forage yield, grass pea, hay yield, seed yield

References

• Allkin R, Macfarlane TD, White RJ, Bisby TA and Adey ME (1983). Names and Synonyms of Species and Subspecies in The Vicieae Issue 2. Vicieae Database Project, Publication No. 2, Southampton.
• Ates E (2011). Some chemical and morphological properties of five clover species Trifolium sp. at different aspect of pasture in Belovets village Razgrad Bulgaria. International Journal of Plant Production, 5: 255-262.
• Açıkgöz N, Akbaş ME, Moghaddam A and Özcan K (1994). Database-based Turkish statistics program for PCs: TARIST. Turkey 1st Field Crops Congress, 25-29 April, p: 264–267, İzmir.
• Altuntas E and Karadağ Y (2006). Some physical and mechanical properties of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa Lam.), grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) and bitter vetch (Vicia ervilia L.) seeds. Journal of Applied Sciences, 6(6): 1373-1379.
• Başaran U, Acar Z, Karacan M and Onar AN (2013). Variation and correlation of morpho-agronomic traits and biochemical contents (protein and B-Odap) in Turkish grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) landraces. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 18(2): 166-173.
• Bayram G, Türk M, Budaklı E and Çelik N (2004). A research on yield and adaptability of common chickling (Lathyrus sativus L.) lines in Bursa conditions. Uludag University Agricultural Faculty Journal, 18(2): 73-84.
• Campbell CG, Mehra RB, Agrawal SK, Chen YZ, Abd El Moneim AM, Khawaja HIT, Yadow CR, Tay JU and Araya WA (1994). Current status and future strategy in breeding grass pea. (Lathyrus sativus L.). Euphytica, 73: 167-175.
• Campbell CG (1997). Grass pea. Lathyrus sativus L.: Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. 18.Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy.
• Chowdhury SD (1988). Lathyrism in poultry. World’s Poultry Science, 44: 7-16.
• Davis PH (1970). Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands. Vol. 3, 328-369, Edinburgh.
• Düzgüneş O, Kesici T, Kavuncu O and Gürbüz F (1987). Research and Trial Methods (Statistical Methods II). Ankara Universtiy Agricultural Faculty Press No.1021, Ankara.
• Ergül M (1988). Feed Knowledge and Technology. Ege University Agricultural Faculty Press No: 487, Bornova, İzmir.
• Gençkan MS (1983). Forage Crops. Ege University Agricultural Faculty Press No: 467, Bornova, İzmir.
• Gül İ, Sümerli M and Yılmaz Y (2006). Determination of yield and yield components of some grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) lines under Diyarbakır Conditions. Journal of Agricultural Sicences, 10(4): 416-421.
• Hanbury CD, Sarker A, Siddique KHM and Perry MW (1995). Evaluation of Lathyrus germplasm in a Mediterranean type environment in South-western Australia. CLIMA Occasional Publication No. 8, Perth.
• Karadağ Y, Iptaş S and Yavuz M (2004). Agronomic potential of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) under rainfed condition in semi-arid regions of Turkey. Asian Journal of Plant Science, 3: 151-155.
• Karadağ Y and Yavuz M (2010). Seed yields and biochemical compounds of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) lines grown in semi-arid regions of Turkey. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9(49): 8343-8348.
• Karadağ Y, Özkurt M, Akbay S, Kır H 2012. The determination of the yield and yield characteristics of some grass pea lines under Tokat-Kazova ecological conditions. International Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 5(2): 11-13.
• Kökten K and Bakoğlu A (2011). Effect of different row spacing on the seed yield and yield components of chickling (Lathyrus sativus L.) in Elaziğ Conditions. Science Journal of Bingöl Univ. 1(1): 37-42.
• Milczak M, Pedzinski M, Mnichowska H, Szwed-Urbas K and Rybinski W (2001). Creative breeding of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) in Poland. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter 2: 85-89.
• Öten M, Kiremitci S and Erdurmuş C (2016). Determination of characters associated with seed yield and hay yield by path and correlation analysis in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Derim, 34(1): 72-78.
• Öten M, Kiremitçi S and Erdurmuş C (2017). The determination of yield characteristics of some grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) lines collected from Antalya Natural Flora. Ege University Agricultural Faculty Journal, 54(1): 17-26.
• Özyazıcı MA and Açıkbaş S (2019). Determination of some agricultural characteristics and yield performance of common grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) genotypes in semi-arid climate conditions. European Journal of Science and Technology, 17: 1058-1068.
• Polignano GB, Uggenti P, Alba V, Bisignano V and DellaGatta C (2005). Morpho-agronomic diversity in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Plant Genetic Resources, 3(1): 29–34.
• Polignano GB, Bisignano V, Tomaselli V, Uggenti P, Alba V and DellaGatta C (2009). Genotype × environment interaction in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) lines. International Journal of Agronomy, 2009: 7 pages.
• Rahman S, Molla MR, Nazim-ud-Dowla MAN, Rasul MG and Mian MAK (2010). Assessment of genetic diversity in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) genotypes using morphological markers. Academic Journal of Plant Sciences, 3(2): 85-91.
• Rybinski W, Szot B and Rusinek R (2008). Estimation of morphological traits and mechanical properties of grass pea seeds (Lathyrus sativus L.) originating from EU countries. International Agrophysics, 22: 261-275.
• Sayar MS, Han Y, Seydoşoğlu S and Başbağ M (2013). Determination of Forage Yield, Its Affecting Components and Relationships among Traits of Some Grass Pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) Lines in Diyarbakır Ecological Conditions. Turkish 10th Field Crops Congress, 10-13 September, p: 56-64, Konya, Turkey.
• Seydoşoğlu S, Saruhan V, Kökten K and Karadağ Y (2015). Determination of yield and yield components of some grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) genotypes in ecological conditions of Diyarbakır. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 32(3): 98-109.
• Tavoletti S, Iommarini L, Crino P and Granati E (2005). Collection and evaluation of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) germplasm of central Italy. Plant Breeding, 124: 388-391.
• Tekeli AS and Ates E (2011). Vetch Species. In: Forage Legumes (II. Edition), Sevil Grafik Tasarım ve Cilt Evi, Tekirdağ, Turkey (In Turkish).
• Tenikecier HS, Orak A, Gürbüz MA and Çubuk MG (2017). Determination of performance of some cultivars and populations of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) under conditions of Trakya Region. KSU Journal of Nature Science, 20: 102-108.
• TTSM (2001). Fiğ Türleri Tarımsal Değerleri Ölçme Teknik Talimatları, T. C. Tarım ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı Tohumluk Tescil ve Sertifikasyon Merkez Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
• Türk M, Albayrak S and Çelik N (2007) Estimates of broad-sense heritability for seed yield and yield components of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 31:155-158.
• Urga K, Fite A and Kebede B (1995). Nutritional and antinutritional factors of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus) germplasms. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Ethiopia 9: 9-16.
• Williams PC, Bhatty RS, Deshpande SS, Hussein LA and Savage GP (1994). Improving nutritional quality of cool season food legumes. In: Muehlbauer FJ and Kaiser WJ (eds) Expanding the Production and Use of Cool Season Food Legumes. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 113-129.