Akıllı Şehir Uygulamalarının Yeniden Tanımlanması; Akıllı Şehirlerin Sürdürülebilirliği İçin Yeni Bir Model Önerisi

Öz

Bu çalışma, akıllı yönetişim, akıllı teknolojiler ve akıllı, aktif vatandaş katılımını birleştiren yenilikçi bir üçlü sarmal modeli önererek akıllı şehir uygulama modellerindeki kritik boşluğu ele almaktadır. Akıllı şehir girişimleri yaygındır, ancak bunları etkili bir şekilde uygulamak zordur. Bu akıllı şehir ortamını eleştirel bir şekilde inceleyerek ve aktif eylem planları ile akıllı şehir uygulamalarının gerçek etkisi arasında önemli bir kopukluk ortaya koymaktadır. Sunulan yeni üçlü sarmal modeli, akıllı şehirlerde akıllı yönetişim ve vatandaşlığı yeniden tanımlayarak, gerçek akıllı kentsel gelişim için teknik benimsemenin ötesine geçen yapılandırılmış bir uygulama çerçevesine olan ihtiyacı göstermektedir. Yeni model, Türkiye'de seçilen dört metropol şehrinde uygulanmış ve kapsamlı masaüstü araştırması, McMillan etkileşim modeline uygun olarak 115 belediye web sitesinin analizi ve 1.754 bireyle yapılan anket temelinde test edilmiştir. Bu çalışma, vatandaş anketinin detaylı incelenmesine dayalı derinlemesine bir analiz sunmakta ve 19 akıllı mobilite uygulamasından elde edilen verileri kullanarak 13 ilişkiyi analiz etmek için Bağımsızlık Ki-Kare Testi ve İkili Lojistik Regresyon yöntemlerini kullanarak farkındalığı ve kullanımı etkileyebilecek potansiyel faktörleri tartışmaktadır. Sonuçlar, akıllı şehir girişimlerinin yeterli teknolojiye sahip olsalar bile, katılımcı vatandaşlar ve etkileşimli yönetim olmadan tam potansiyellerine ulaşamadığını göstermiştir. Araştırma, akıllı şehir tartışmasına eleştirel bir bakış açısı kazandırarak, gelecekteki akıllı şehir uygulamalarının başarısını ve sürdürülebilirliğini sağlamak için temel bir model sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sürdürülebilir Akıllı Şehir
• Akıllı İnsanlar
• Akıllı Yönetişim
• Akıllı Hareketlilik

Redefining Smart City Implementation: A New Model for Sustainability of Smart Cities

Abstract

This study addresses a critical gap in smart city implementation by proposing a novel triple helix model that integrates smart governance, smart technologies, and active citizen engagement. While smart city initiatives are widespread, effective execution remains a major challenge. This research examines the smart city environment through the lens of smart government, smart people, and smart technology, revealing a disconnect between ambitious plans and the actual impact of applications. The new model was applied to four metropolitan cities in Turkey and tested using desktop research, analysis of 115 municipal websites based on the McMillan interaction model, and a citizen survey of 1,754 participants. The study presents an in-depth analysis based on detailed examination of the citizen survey and discusses the potential factors affecting awareness and usage by using The Chi Square of Independence Test and Binary Logistic Regression methods to analyze 13 relationships using data from 19 smart mobility applications. The results have shown that smart city initiatives fail to reach their full potential without aware citizens and responsive governance, even with sufficient technology. This research contributes a critical perspective to the smart city discourse, offering a foundational model for future smart city implementations to ensure their success and sustainability.

Keywords

• Sustainable Smart City
• Smart People
• Smart Governance
• Smart Mobility

References

1. Ahvenniemi, H.; Huovila, A.; Pinto-Seppä, I.; Airaksinen, M. What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities, 2017, 60(A), pp. 234-245.
2. Angelidou, Margarita. Smart City Policies: a Spatial Approach. Cities 41 (2014): S3-S11.
3. Arnkil, R.; Järvensivu, A.; Koski, P.; Piirainen, T. Exploring quadruple helix: outlining us-er-oriented innovation models. Working Papers, Yhteiskuntatutkimuksen Instituutti, European Regional Development Fund , 2010.
4. Benamrou, B.; Mohamed, B.; Bernoussi, A.S.; Mustapha, O. Ranking models of smart cities. 4th IEEE International Colloquium on Information Science and Technology (CiSt), Tangier, Morocco, 2016, pp. 872-879.
5. Benevolo, C.; Dameri, P.R.; D’ Auria, B. Smart mobility in smart city. In Empowering Organizations, Enabling Platforms and Artefacts, Torre, T.; Braccini, A.M.; Spinelli, R. Springer, 2016, 11, pp. 13-29.
6. Benn, R.; The genesis of active citizenship in the learning society. Studies in The Education of Adults, 2000, 32(2), pp. 241-256.
7. Berntzen, L.; Johannessen, M.R. The role of citizens in smart cities. Management - International Conference, Faculty of Management, University of Presov Slovakia,October, 2016.
8. Bertot, John C., Paul T. Jaeger, And Justin M. Grimes. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: e-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 2010, (27), pp. 264-271.

9. Bibri, S.E.; Krogstie, J. Smart sustainable cities of the future: an extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustainable Cities And Society, 2017, 31, pp. 183–212.
10. Bonsón, E.; Torres, L.; Royo, S.; Flores, F. Local E-government 2.0: social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 2012, (29), pp. 123-132.
11. Capdevila, I.; Zarlenga, M.I. Smart city or smart citizens? the Barcelona case. Journal of Strategy and Management, 2015, 8(3), pp. 266-282
12. Cardullo, P.; Kitchin, R. Being a ‘citizen’ in the smart city: up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in dublin, Ireland . Geojournal, 2019, 84, pp. 1-13.
13. Castells, M. An Introduction to the Information Age. City, Analysis of Urban Change, theory, Action, 1997, 2(7), pp. 6-16.
14. Cocchia, A. Smart and digital city: a systematic literature review. In Smart City; How to Create Public and Economic Value with High Technology in Urban Space, Dameri, R.P.; Sabroux, C.R. Springer: Paris, France, 2014; pp. 13-43.
15. Conroy, M.M.; Cowley, J.E. E-participation in planning: an analysis of cities adopting on-line citizen participation tools. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 2006, 24(3), pp. 371-384.
16. Cowley, J.E.; Conroy, M.M.; The growth of e-government in municipal planning. Journal of Urban Technology, 2010, 13(1), pp. 81-107.
17. Dameri, R.P. Searching for smart city definition: a comprehensive proposal. International Journal of Computers & Technology, 2013, 11(5), pp. 2544-2551.
18. Dameri, R.P. Comparing smart and digital city: initiatives and strategies in Amsterdam and genoa. are they digital and/or smart? In Smart City; How to Create Public and Economic Value with High Technology in Urban Space, Dameri, R.P.; Sabroux, C.R, Springer: 2014, pp. 45-88.
19. Evans, D.; Yen, C.D.; E-government: an analysis for implementation: framework for under-standing cultural and social impact. Government Information Quarterly, 2005, 22, pp. 354-373.
20. Etzkowitz, H.; Leydesdorff, L. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and ‘‘mode 2’’ to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 2000, 29, pp. 09-123.
21. Gascó-Hernandez, M. Building a smart city: lessons from Barcelona. Communications of the ACM, 2018, 4, pp. 50-57.
22. Giffinger, R. Smart cities, ranking of european medium-sized cities. Centre of Regional Science, Vienna University of Technology, 2007.
23. Gupta, S.; Mustafa, S. Z.; Kumar, H. Smart people for smart cities: a behavioral framework for personality and roles . In Advances In Smart Cities: Smarter People, Governance, and Solutions, Arpan Kumar Kar, Manmohan Prasad Gupta, P. Vigneswara Ilavarsan And Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Taylor & Francis, 2017, pp. 23-29.
24. Herrschel, T. Competitiveness and sustainability: can ‘smart city regionalism’ square the circle? Urban Studies, 2013, 50(11), pp. 2332-2348.
25. Hielkema, H.; Hongisto, P. Developing the Helsinki smart city: the role of competitions for open data applications. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2012, pp. 190–204.
26. Himanshu, A.; Dixit, G. M-commerce in smart cities: changing mindsets of individuals, organ-izations, and society. In Advances in Smart Cities: Smarter People, Governance, and Solutions, Kar, A.K.; Gupta, M.P.; Ilavarsan, P.V.; Dwivedi, Y. K. Taylor & Francis, 2017, pp. 167-177.
27. Hollands, R.G. Will the real smart city please stand up? City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 2008, 12(3), pp. 303-320.
28. Kalogirou, K.; Dimokas, N.; Tsami, M.; Kehagias, D. Smart mobility combining public transport with carpooling: an iOS applicaiton paradigm. IEEE 20th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE 16th International Conference On Smart City; IEEE 4th International Conference On Data Science and Systems (HPCC/Smart City/DSS), June, 2018
29. Leydesdorff, L.; Deakin, M. The triple-helix model of smart cities: a neo-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 2011, 18(2), pp. 53-63.
30. Lieshout, M.V. The digital city of Amsterdam: between public domain and private entreprise. In Social Learning Regarding Multimedia Developments at a Local Level: the Case of Digital Cities, Van Bastelaer, B.; Lobert-Maris, C., 1998, pp. 61-108
31. Lytras, M.D.; Visvizi, A. Who uses smart city services and what to make of it: toward interdisciplinary smart cities research. Sustainability, 2018, 10(6).
32. Martin, C. J.; Evans, J; Karvonen, A. Smart and sustainable? Five tensions in the visions and practices of the smart-sustainable city in Europe and North America. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2018, 13, pp. 269-278.
33. Merli, M.Z.; Bonollo, E. Performance measurement in the smart cities. In Smart City: How to Create Public and Economic Value with High Technology in Urban Space, Dameri, R.P.; Sabroux, C.R. Springer, 2014, pp. 139-155.
34. Mcmillan, S. J. A four-part model of cyber-interactivity: some cyber-places are more interactive than others. New Media & Society, 2002, 4(2), pp. 271-291.
35. Mora, L.; Deakin, M.; Reid, A. Strategic principles for smart city development: a multiple case study analysis of European best practices. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2019, 142, pp. 70-97.
36. Nam, T.; Pardo, T.A.; Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Re-search. College Park, MD, USA, 12-15 June 2011.
37. Neirotti, P.;De Marco, A.; Cagliano, A.C.; Mangano, G.; Scorrano, F. Current trends in smart city initiatives: some stylised facts. Cities, 2014, 38, pp. 25-36.
38. Negre, E.; Sabroux, C.R. Recommendations to improve the smartness of a city. In Smart City: How to Create Public and Economic Value with High Technology in Urban Space, Dameri, R.P.; Sa-broux, C.R. Springer, 2014, pp. 101-117.
39. Orlowski, A.; Romanowska, P. Smart cities concept: smart mobility indicator. Cybernetics and Systems, 2019, 50(2), pp. 118-131.
40. Paskaleva, K. A. The smart city: a nexus for open innovation? Intelligent Buildings International, 2011, 3(3), pp. 153-171.
41. Peng, G.C.A.; Nunes, M.B.; Zheng, L. Impacts of low citizen awareness and usage in smart city services: the case of london’s smart parking system. Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, 2017, 15, pp. 845-876.
42. Raj, A.; Dwivedi, G. Smart city: an integrated approach using system dynamics. In Advances in Smart Cities: Smarter People, Governance, and Solutions, Kar, A.K.; Gupta, M.P.; Ilavarsan, P.V.; Dwivedi, Y. K. Taylor & Francis, 2017, pp. 93-103.
43. Sanseverino, R.R. Competitive urban models. In Smart Rules for Smart Cities:Managing Efficient Cities in Euro-Mediterranean Countries, Sanseverino, E.R.; Sanseverino, R.R.; Vaccaro, V.; Zizzo, G. Springer: Palermo, Italy, 2014; pp. 1-14
44. Sanseverino, R.R.; Salvatore O. The integration and sharing of resources for a new quality of living . In Smart Rules for Smart Cities: Managing Efficient Cities in Euro-Mediterranean Countries, Sanseverino,E.R.; Sanseverino, R.R.; Vaccaro, V.; Zizzo, G. Springer, 2014, pp. 29-45.
45. Shin, Dong-Hee. Ubiquitous city: urban technologies, urban infrastructure and urban informatics. Journal Of Information Science, 2009, 35(5), pp. 515-526.
46. Wall, R.; Stavropoulos, S.; Edelenbos, J.; Pajević, F. Evaluating the performance of smart cities in the global economic network. In Transforming City Governments For Successful Smart Cities, Manuel Pedro Rodríguez-Bolívar, Springer, 2015, pp. 87-113.
47. Yiğitcanlar, T.; Han, H.; Kamruzzaman, Md.; Loppolo, G.; Sabatini-Marques, J. The making of smart cities: are songdo, masdar, amsterdam, san francisco and brisbane the best we could build? Land Use Policy, 2019, 88, pp. 1-11.