Optimizing Evacuation in Densely Populated Buildings: A Bottleneck Analysis

Abstract

Safe and efficient evacuation from densely populated buildings during emergencies is crucial for ensuring human safety. This study analyzes potential evacuation bottlenecks in densely populated buildings using the newly constructed Ordu Annex Courthouse in Turkey as a case study. Employing Pathfinder simulations, pedestrian flow dynamics were modeled, and critical areas of congestion hindering evacuation efficiency were identified. The simulation results revealed that while 95% of occupants could evacuate within 316 seconds, the remaining 5% experienced significant delays, particularly due to bottlenecks at stairwells leading to exits. This finding highlights the importance of evacuation optimization in the design of densely populated buildings. The study proposes actionable design recommendations, such as adjustments to corridor widths, modifications to exit configurations, and strategic placement of flow-control elements, as strategies with the potential to improve evacuation times and enhance overall safety.

Keywords

• Densely populated buildings
• Evacuation
• Bottleneck analysis
• Simulation
• Emergency planning

References

1. [1] Zheng, X., Zhong, T., & Liu, M., “Modeling crowd evacuation of a building based on seven methodological approaches”, Building and Environment, 44(3): 437–445, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.04.002.
2. [2] Satır, M. S., & Topraklı, A. Y., “Simulation-Based Analysis of Evacuation Performance of Assembly Buildings According to Turkish Fire Regulations”, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering & Architecture of Gazi University, 39(4): 2343–2352, (2024). https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1281882.
3. [3] Toprakli, A. Y., & Satir, M. S., “Assessing evacuation risks in prominent historical mosques: An integrated quantitative and qualitative approach via the HM-ERI framework”, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 113(104866): (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104866.
4. [4] Satır, M. S., & Topraklı, A. Y., “Analyzing elevator use for evacuation efficiency of high-rise buildings in normal conditions: Case of İş Tower”, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering & Architecture of Gazi University, 38(3): 1493–1504, (2023). https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1055882.
5. [5] Shiwakoti, N., Tay, R., Stasinopoulos, P., & Woolley, P. J., “Likely behaviours of passengers under emergency evacuation in train station”, Safety Science, 91: 40–48, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.07.017
6. [6] Topraklı, A. Y., & Satır, M. S., “Analysis of evacuation time of historical mosques of 15th and 16th centuries in Turkey”, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 39(3): 1953–1962, (2024). https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1171323
7. [7] Bode, N. W. F., Holl, S., Mehner, W., & Seyfried, A., “Disentangling the Impact of Social Groups on Response Times and Movement Dynamics in Evacuations”, PLOS ONE, 10(3): e0121227. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121227
8. [8] Helbing, D., Farkas, I., & Vicsek, T., “Simulating dynamical features of escape panic”. Nature, 407(6803): 487–490, (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35035023

9. [9] Seyfried, A., Passon, O., Steffen, B., Boltes, M., Rupprecht, T., & Klingsch, W., “New Insights into Pedestrian Flow Through Bottlenecks”, Transportation Science, 43(3): 395–406, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1090.0263
10. [10] Ma, J., Xu, S. M., Li, T., Mu, H. L., Wen, C., Song, W. G., & Lo, S. M., “Method of Bottleneck Identification and Evaluation During Crowd Evacuation Process”, Procedia Engineering, 71: 454–461, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.04.065
11. [11] Liddle, J., Seyfried, A., Klingsch, W., Rupprecht, T., Schadschneider, A., & Winkens, A., “An Experimental Study of Pedestrian Congestions: Influence of Bottleneck Width and Length”, Conference proceedings for Traffic and Granular Flow, (2009).
12. [12] Wang, J., Li, J., Li, J., Feng, J., Xu, S., Liu, J., & Wang, Y., “Performance optimization of the obstacle to corner bottleneck under emergency evacuation”, Journal of Building Engineering, 45, 103658, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103658
13. [13] Wang, J., Ma, J., & Lin, P. “Effect of architectural adjustments on pedestrian flow at bottleneck. Collective Dynamics”, 5: 167–172, (2020). https://doi.org/10.17815/CD.2020.47
14. [14] Thunderhead engineering, Pathfinder. https://www.thunderheadeng.com/pathfinder Access date: 21.01.2025.
15. [15] Helbing, D., & Molnár, P., “Social force model for pedestrian dynamics”, Physical Review E, 51(5): 4282–4286, (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.51.4282
16. [16] Daamen, W., & Hoogendoorn, S. P., “Controlled Experiments to Derive Walking Behaviour”, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 3(1): 39-59, (2019). https://doi.org/10.18757/EJTIR.2003.3.1.4235
17. [17] Tavana, H., & Aghabayk, K., “Insights toward efficient angle design of pedestrian crowd egress point bottlenecks. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 15(2): 1569–1586. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2019.1619200
18. [18] Li, H., Zhang, J., & Song, W., “A comparative experimental study on the influence of bottleneck width on evacuation characteristics of pedestrian flow in funnel shape bottleneck and normal bottleneck”, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 624, 128929, (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.128929
19. [19] Pan, H., Zhang, J., & Song, W., “Experimental study of pedestrian flow mixed with wheelchair users through funnel-shaped bottlenecks”, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2020(3): 033401, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/ab6b1c
20. [20] Zhao, Y., Lu, T., Fu, L., Wu, P., & Li, M., “Experimental verification of escape efficiency enhancement by the presence of obstacles”, Safety Science, 122, 104517, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104517
21. [21] Jiang, H., “The Development Of A Scenario Independent Method For Evaluating The Evacuation Complexity Of A Building”, University of Greenwich, Greenwich, (2012).
22. [22] Varas, A., Cornejo, M. D., Mainemer, D., Toledo, B., Rogan, J., Muñoz, V., & Valdivia, J. A., “Cellular automaton model for evacuation process with obstacles”, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 382(2): 631–642. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2007.04.006
23. [23] Weidmann, U. “Transporttechnik der Fussgänger Transporttechnische Eigenschaften des Fussgängerverkehrs”, Literaturauswertung, (1992).
24. [24] Zhang, J., Wang, S., & Wang, X. “Comparison analysis on vulnerability of metro networks based on complex network”, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 496: 72–78, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.12.094
25. [25] Tang, M., Jia, H., Ran, B., & Li, J., “Analysis of the pedestrian arching at bottleneck based on a bypassing behavior model”, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 453: 242–258, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.02.044
26. [26] Ye, R., Li, J., Lu, H., Wang, J., Pan, Y., & Wang, Y., “A study on the arch mechanism of pedestrian evacuation and congestion alleviation strategies at building exits”, Journal of Building Engineering, 88, 109159, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109159
27. [27] Parisi, D. R., & Dorso, C. O., “Microscopic dynamics of pedestrian evacuation”, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 354: 606–618, (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2005.02.040
28. [28] Dias, C., Sarvi, M., Ejtemai, O., & Burd, M., “Elevated Desired Speed and Change in Desired Direction”, Transportation Research Record, 2490(1): 65–75, (2015). https://doi.org/10.3141/2490-08
29. [29] Shahhoseini, Z., Sarvi, M., Saberi, M., & Haghani, M., “Pedestrian Crowd Dynamics Observed at Merging Sections: Impact of Designs on Movement Efficiency”, Transportation Research Record, 2622(1): 48–57, (2017). https://doi.org/10.3141/2622-05
30. [30] NFPA 101, (2018). https://www.nfpa.org/product/nfpa-101-code/p0101code. Access date: 01.01.2025.
31. [31] Turkey’s Regulation On Fire Protection, (2007). Access date: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/ mevzuat?MevzuatNo=200712937&MevzuatTur=21&MevzuatTertip=5
32. [32] Gwynne, S., Galea, E. R., Owen, M., Lawrence, P. J., & Filippidis, L., “A review of the methodologies used in the computer simulation of evacuation from the built environment”, Building and Environment, 34(6): 741–749, (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(98)00057-2
33. [33] Ronchi, E., Colonna, P., Berloco, N., Capote, J., Alvear, D., & Cuesta, A., Human Behaviour in road tunnel fires: comparison between egress models (FDS+Evac, STEPS, Pathfinder), (2010).
34. [34] Daamen, W., & Hoogendoorn, S. P. “Experimental Research of Pedestrian Walking Behavior”, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1828(1): 20–30. (2003). https://doi.org/10.3141/1828-03
35. [35] Gidley, A. D., & Lankford, D. E., “Cost of transport at preferred walking speeds are minimized while walking on moderately steep incline surfaces”, Human Movement Science, 79, 102849. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2021.102849
36. [36] Thomas, S. A., Vega, D., & Arellano, C. J., “Do humans exploit the metabolic and mechanical benefits of arm swing across slow to fast walking speeds?”, Journal of Biomechanics, 115, 110181, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110181
37. [37] Purser, D., “Dependence of Modelled Evacuation Times on Key Parameters and Interactions”, Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics, 667–675, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, (2010).
38. [38] Kuligowski, E. D. Modeling Human Behavior during Building Fires. (2008).
39. [39] Gwynne, S. “The Introduction of Adaptive Social Decision-Making in the Mathematical Modelling of Egress Behavior” University of Greenwich, Greenwich, Doctoral Dissertation, (2000).