Research Article

Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System

Volume: 32 Number: 3 September 1, 2019
EN

Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System

Abstract

This paper accords an intelligent controller based 3-level SEPIC configuration for energy transformation in the solar PV system. An artificial intelligence based radial basis function network is engaged as a control algorithm for the maximum power extraction and the converter control can be done based on the duty cycle generated by the controller. In this system, a SEPIC topology is used for high voltage gain with reduced switching losses. In this paper, an RBFN controller based 3-level SEPIC topology is designed for 1.2kW solar PV system over the traditional P & O (Perturb & Observe) control method and the comparative result analysis is done though the simulation output for the corresponding input parameters.

Keywords

References

  1. [1]. Joshi KA, Pindoriya NM. Impact investigation of rooftop Solar PV system: A case study in India. In2012 3rd IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT Europe) 2012 Oct 14 (pp. 1-8). IEEE. [2]. Kumar K, Babu NR, Prabhu KR. Design and Analysis of RBFN-Based Single MPPT Controller for Hybrid Solar and Wind Energy System. IEEE Access. 2017;5:15308-17. [3]. Singh B, Jain C, Goel S, Gogia R, Subramaniam U. A Sustainable Solar Photovoltaic Energy System Interfaced with Grid-Tied Voltage Source Converter for Power Quality Improvement. Electric Power Components and Systems. 2016 Dec 9:1-3. [4]. Jain C, Singh B. A Three-Phase Grid Tied SPV System With Adaptive DC Link Voltage for CPI Voltage Variations. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy. 2016 Jan;7(1):337-44. [5]. Messalti S, Harrag A, Loukriz A. A new variable step size neural networks MPPT controller: Review, simulation and hardware implementation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017 Feb 28;68:221-33. [6]. Saravanan S, Babu NR. RBFN based MPPT algorithm for PV system with high step up converter. Energy Conversion and Management. 2016 Aug 15;122:239-51. [7]. Xiao W, Edwin FF, Spagnuolo G, Jatskevich J. Efficient approaches for modeling and simulating photovoltaic power systems. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics. 2013 Jan;3(1):500-8. [8]. El Khateb A, Rahim NA, Selvaraj J, Uddin MN. Fuzzy-logic-controller-based SEPIC converter for maximum power point tracking. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. 2014 Jul;50(4):2349-58. [9]. Damodhar Reddy, Sudha Ramasamy “A fuzzy logic MPPT controller based three phase grid-tied solar PV system with improved CPI voltage” International Conference on Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies [i-PACT], April 2017 IEEE (pp. 1-6). IEEE. [10]. Singh B, Shahani DT, Verma AK. Neural network controlled grid interfaced solar photovoltaic power generation. IET Power Electronics. 2014 Mar;7(3):614-26. [11]. Damodhar Reddy, Sudha Ramasamy, “Design of RBFN Controller Based Boost Type Vienna Rectifier for Grid-Tied Wind Energy Conversion System” DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2787567, IEEE Access. [12]. Lyden S, Haque ME. A simulated annealing global maximum power point tracking approach for PV modules under partial shading conditions. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. 2016 Jun;31(6):4171-81. [13]. Gil-Antonio L, Saldivar-Marquez MB, Portillo-Rodriguez O. Maximum power point tracking techniques in photovoltaic systems: A brief review. InPower Electronics (CIEP), 2016 13th International Conference on 2016 Jun 20 (pp. 317-322). IEEE. [14]. Lin WM, Hong CM, Ou TC, Chiu TM. Hybrid intelligent control of PMSG wind generation system using pitch angle control with RBFN. Energy conversion and management. 2011 Feb 28;52(2):1244-51. [15]. Ramasamy S. Single Stage Energy Conversion through an RBFN Controller based Boost Type Vienna Rectifier in the Wind Turbine System. Gazi University Journal of Science.;30(4):253-66. [16]. Gules R, Dos Santos WM, Dos Reis FA, Romaneli EF, Badin AA. A modified SEPIC converter with high static gain for renewable applications. IEEE transactions on power electronics. 2014 Nov;29(11):5860-71. [17]. Chen YM, Huang AQ, Yu X. A high step-up three-port dc–dc converter for stand-alone PV/battery power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. 2013 Nov;28(11):5049-62. [18]. Debnath D, Chatterjee K. Two-stage solar photovoltaic-based stand-alone scheme having battery as energy storage element for rural deployment. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 2015 Jul;62(7):4148-57. [19]. Choi WY, Lee SJ. Three-Level SEPIC with Improved Efficiency and Balanced Capacitor Voltages. Journal of Power Electronics. 2016 Mar 1;16(2):447-54. [20]. Yang MK, Lee SJ, Heo J, Choi WY. High-efficiency three-level SEPIC for grid-tied PV systems. InEnergy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2016 IEEE 2016 Sep 18 (pp. 1-5). IEEE. [21]. Choi WY. Three-level single-ended primary-inductor converter for photovoltaic power conditioning systems. Solar Energy. 2016 Feb 29;125:43-50. [22]. Mohanraj K, Bharathnarayanan S. Three Level SEPIC For Hybrid Wind-Solar Energy Systems. Energy Procedia. 2017 Jun 30;117:120-7.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 1, 2019

Submission Date

January 5, 2018

Acceptance Date

November 12, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 32 Number: 3

APA
Ramasamy, S., & Reddy, D. (2019). Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System. Gazi University Journal of Science, 32(3), 853-869. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.375313
AMA
1.Ramasamy S, Reddy D. Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2019;32(3):853-869. doi:10.35378/gujs.375313
Chicago
Ramasamy, Sudha, and Damodhar Reddy. 2019. “Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System”. Gazi University Journal of Science 32 (3): 853-69. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.375313.
EndNote
Ramasamy S, Reddy D (September 1, 2019) Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System. Gazi University Journal of Science 32 3 853–869.
IEEE
[1]S. Ramasamy and D. Reddy, “Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System”, Gazi University Journal of Science, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 853–869, Sept. 2019, doi: 10.35378/gujs.375313.
ISNAD
Ramasamy, Sudha - Reddy, Damodhar. “Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System”. Gazi University Journal of Science 32/3 (September 1, 2019): 853-869. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.375313.
JAMA
1.Ramasamy S, Reddy D. Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2019;32:853–869.
MLA
Ramasamy, Sudha, and Damodhar Reddy. “Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System”. Gazi University Journal of Science, vol. 32, no. 3, Sept. 2019, pp. 853-69, doi:10.35378/gujs.375313.
Vancouver
1.Sudha Ramasamy, Damodhar Reddy. Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2019 Sep. 1;32(3):853-69. doi:10.35378/gujs.375313

Cited By