Investigation of Hydrogen Production from Bio-Oil Substances Using Aspen Plus

Abstract

In this study, a base-case process diagram was established and simulated in Aspen Plus to explore effect of temperature on hydrogen production. The evaluated compounds were acetic acid, ethylene glycol, acetone, ethyl acetate and m-xylene, which are representative of the main bio-oil derived components. UNIQUAC was used as property model to simulate the process in Aspen Plus. Bio-oil components conversions, mass and molar fractions, and the molar flow rates of hydrogen were studied over a range of temperature starting from 30 °C to 1100 °C. The results obtained from the simulation suggest that all of the five components reach approximately 100% conversion with acetic acid to be the first to reach 100% conversion. The reactor temperature for 100% conversion of the components increases in the following orders: acetic acid > ethylene glycol > ethyl acetate > acetone > m-xylene. It was found that at high temperatures m-xylene was able to produce highest mass fraction of hydrogen and the order was the following: m-xylene> ethyl acetate > acetone > ethylene glycol > acetic acid. Such simulation approaches can be exploited for robust design and optimization of hydrogen production reducing operating cost and taking this process one step closer to industrialization.

Keywords

• Aspen Plus,Bio-Oil Compounds,Hydrogen Energy,Steam Reforming,Reactor Temperature

References

1. [1] L. Brennan and P. Owende., "Biofuels from microalgae—a review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products," Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, vol. 14, pp. 557-577, (2010).
2. [2] S. E. Hosseini and M. A. Wahid., "Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: promising green energy carrier for clean development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 57, pp. 850-866, (2016).
3. [3] Bekiroğullari, M., Kaya, M. and Saka, C., “Highly efficient Co-B catalysts with Chlorella Vulgaris microalgal strain modified using hydrochloric acid as a new support material for hydrogen production from methanolysis of sodium borohydride.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(14), pp.7262-7275, (2019).
4. [4] J. Armor, "Catalysis and the hydrogen economy.” Catalysis letters, vol. 101, pp. 131-135, (2005).
5. [5] M. Rivarolo, O. Improta, L. Magistri, M. Panizza, and A. Barbucci., "Thermo-economic analysis of a hydrogen production system by sodium borohydride (NaBH 4)," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 43, pp. 1606-1614, (2018).
6. [6] P. Brack, S. E. Dann, and K. U. Wijayantha., "Heterogeneous and homogenous catalysts for hydrogen generation by hydrolysis of aqueous sodium borohydride (NaBH4) solutions," Energy Science & Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 174-188, (2015).
7. [7] S. Dutta., "A review on production, storage of hydrogen and its utilization as an energy resource," Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 20, pp. 1148-1156, (2014).
8. [8] P. Nikolaidis and A. Poullikkas., "A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes," Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, vol. 67, pp. 597-611, (2017).

9. [9] X. Hu and G. Lu., "Investigation of the steam reforming of a series of model compounds derived from bio-oil for hydrogen production," Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 88, pp. 376-385, (2009).
10. [10] M. R. Usman and D. L. Cresswell., "Options for on-board use of hydrogen based on the methylcyclohexane–toluene–hydrogen system," International journal of green energy, vol. 10, pp. 177-189, (2013).
11. [11] A. G. a. O. Giwa., "Application of Aspen Plus to Hydrogen Production from Alcohols by Steam Reforming: Effects of Reactor Temperature," International Journal of Engineering, vol. 2, (2013).